Abstract
This essay advocates a distinction between scribal craftsmen and scholar-scribes, the latter mostly coming from the elite circles of the kingdom and increasingly, as their career advanced, involved in scholarly endeavors rather than tablet production. It is these scholars who were probably also responsible for the so-called tablet inventories (“catalogs”).
Acknowledgments
I am most grateful to Seth Richardson for his very valuable remarks and suggestions and to Hannah Marcuson for correcting my English. I alone remain responsble for any mistakes and the views expressed here.
Bibliography
Bawanypeck, D. 2013. ‘luwian’ Religious Texts in the Archives of Ḫattuša. Pp. 159–76 in Luwian Identities. Culture, Language and Religion Between Anatolia and the Aegean, ed. A. Mouton et al. Leiden-Boston.10.1163/9789004253414_009Search in Google Scholar
Beckman, G. 1983. Mesopotamians and Mesopotamian Learning at Ḫattuša. JCS 35: 97–114.10.2307/3515944Search in Google Scholar
Beckman, G. 2001. Sargon and Naram-Sin in Ḫatti: Reflections of Mesopotamian Antiquity among the Hittites. Pp. 85–91 in Die Gegenwart des Altertums. Formen und Funktionen des Altertumsbezugs in den Hochkulturen der Alten Welt, eds. D. Kuhn and H. Stahl. Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Beckman, G. 2013a. Under the Spell of Babylon: Mesopotamian Influence on the Religion of the Hittites. Pp. 284–97 in Cultures in Contact. From Mesopotamia to the Mediterranean in the Second Millennium B.C, eds. J. Aruz et al. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Beckman, G. 2013b. Foreigners in the Ancient Near East. JAOS 133: 203–15.10.7817/jameroriesoci.133.2.0203Search in Google Scholar
Blair, A. M. 2010. Too Much to Know. Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. New Haven, London.Search in Google Scholar
Christiansen, B. 2008. Review of Dardano 2006. ZA 98: 302–308.10.1016/j.siny.2006.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Y. 2004. Kidin-Gula—the Foreign Teacher at the Emar Scribal School. Revue D’assyriologie 98: 81–100.10.3917/assy.098.0081Search in Google Scholar
Dardano, P. 2006. Die hethitischen Tontafelkataloge aus Ḫattuša. CTH 276–282. Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Delnero, P. 2010. Sumerian Literary Catalogues and the Scribal Curriculum. ZA 100: 32–55.10.1515/za.2010.003Search in Google Scholar
Everling, J., and Földi, Z. 2015. Talmi-Šarruma, an unknown scribe of the ḫišuwa-ritual (CTH 628). NABU 3: 110–13.Search in Google Scholar
Frahm, E. 2004. Royal Hermeneutics: Observations on the Commentaries from Ashurbanipal’s Libraries at Nineveh. Iraq 66: 45–50.10.1017/S0021088900001613Search in Google Scholar
Gordin, Sh. 2014. The Socio-Historical Setting of Hittite Schools of Writing as Reflected in Scribal Habits. Pp. 57–79 in Visualizing Knowledge and Creating Meaning in Ancient Writing Systems, ed. Sh. Gordin. Gladbeck.Search in Google Scholar
Götze, A. 1925. Ḫattušiliš. Der Bericht über seine Thronbesteigung nebst den Paralleltexten. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Hagenbuchner, A. 1989. Die Korrespondenz der Hethiter, 1. Teil. Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Herbordt, S. 2005. Die Prinzen- und Beamtensiegel der hethitischen Grossreichszeit auf Tonbullen aus dem Nişantepe-Archiv in Hattusa. Mainz am Rhein.Search in Google Scholar
Houston, G. W. 2009. Papyrological Evidence for Book Collections and Libraries in the Roman Empire. Pp. 233–67 in Ancient Literacies. The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, eds. W. A. Johnson and H. N. Parker Oxford, New York.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199793983.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Hunger, H. 1968. Babylonische und assyrische Kolophone. Neukirchen-Vluyn.Search in Google Scholar
Imparati, F. 1974. Una concessione di terre da parte di Tudhaliya IV. RHA 33: 1–211.10.3406/rhita.1974.1075Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, J. 2005. Die hethitische Rezeption mesopotamischer Literatur und die Überlieferung des Gilgameš-Epos in Ḫattuša. Pp. 103–27 in Motivation und Mechanismen des Kulturkontaktes in der späten Bronzezeit, ed. D. Prechel. Firenze.Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, J. 2010. Literarische sumerische Texte aus den hethitischen Archiven aus paläographischer Sicht – Teil II. AoF 37: 306–40.10.1524/aofo.2010.0025Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, J. 2012. Literarische sumerische Texte aus den hethitischen Archiven aus überlieferungsgeschichtlicher Sicht – Teil I. Pp. 79–93 in Palaeography and Scribal Practices in Syro-Palestine and Anatolia in the Late Bronze Age, ed. E. Devecchi. Leiden.Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. 1971. Catalogue des textes hittites. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Marizza, M. 2010. Le cariche di GAL DUB.SARMEŠ e GAL DUB.SAR.GIŠ nel regno ittita. Mesopotamia 45: 31–45.Search in Google Scholar
Maul, St. 2011. Die ‘Tontafelbibliothek’ einer assyrischen Gelehrtenfamilie des 7. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Pp. 9–50 in Bibliotheken Im Altertum, eds. E. Blumenthal and W. Schmitz. Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
McKitterick, R. 1989. The Carolingians and the Written Word. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511583599Search in Google Scholar
Muller, S., J. A. Feith, and R. Fruin. 2003. Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. 1964. Ancient Mesopotamia. Portrait of a Dead Civilization. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Otranto, R. 2000. Antiche liste di libri su papiro. Roma.Search in Google Scholar
Otten, H. 1988. Die Bronzetafel aus Boğazköy. Ein Staatsvertrag Tutḫalijas IV. Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Palaima, Th. G. 2011. Scribes, Scribal Hands and Palaeography. Pp. 33–136 in A Companion to Linear B. Mycenaean Greek Texts and Their World, Vol. 2, eds. Y. Duhoux and A. M. Davies. Louvain-la-Neuve-Walpole, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Papritz, J. 1959. Archive in Altmesopotamien. Theorie und Tatsachen. Archivalische Zeitschrift 55: 11–50.10.7788/az-1959-jg02Search in Google Scholar
Parpola, S. 1983. Assyrian Library Records. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 42: 1–29.10.1086/372983Search in Google Scholar
Pecchioli Daddi, F. 1982. Mestieri, professioni e dignità nell Anatolia ittita. Roma.Search in Google Scholar
Postgate, N. 2013. Bronze Age Bureaucracy. Writing and the Practice of Government in Assyria. New York.10.1017/CBO9781107338937Search in Google Scholar
Schwemer, D. 2012. Qualitätsmanagement für das Wohlergehen des Landes: Die hethitische Festritualtradition. Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, Neue Folge 36: 39–57.Search in Google Scholar
Schwemer, D. 2013. Gauging the Influence of Babylonian Magic: The Reception of Mesopotamian Traditions in Hittite Ritual Practice. Pp. 145–71 in Diversity and Standardization. Perspectives on Social and Political Norms in the Ancient Near East, eds. E. Cancik-Kirschbaum, J. Klinger, and G. Müller. Berlin.10.1524/9783050057576.145Search in Google Scholar
Taggar-Cohen, A. 2006. Hittite Priesthood. Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1992. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511620331Search in Google Scholar
Torri, G. 2010. Hittite Scribes at Play: The Case of the Cuneiform Sign AN. Pp. 317–27 in Investigationes Anatolicae. Gedenkschrift Für Erich Neu, eds. J. Klinger, E. Rieken, and Chr. Rüster. Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Torri, G. 2011. The Phrase ṬUPPU URUḪatti in Colophons from Ḫattuša and the Work of the Scribe Ḫanikkuili,. Altorientalische Forschungen 38: 135–44.10.1524/aofo.2011.0009Search in Google Scholar
Torri, G. 2015. Hereditary Transmission of Specialized Knowledge in Hittite Anatolia: The Case of Scribal Families of the Empire Period. Pp. 577–586 in Tradition and Innovation in the Ancient Near East, eds. A. Archi and A. Bramanti. Winona Lake.10.5325/j.ctv1bxgx2w.53Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th. 1995. Der Ulmitešub-Vertrag. Eine Prosopographische Untersuchung. Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th. 2003–2005. Omina (Omens). B. Bei den Hethitern. Pp. 88–90 in Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie, ed. M. P. Streck. Band 10.Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th. 2005. On the Nature of the Tablet Collections of Ḫattuša. Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici 47: 277–289.Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th. 2009a. Reflections on the Origins and Development of the Hittite Tablet Collections in Hattuša and Their Consequences for the Rise of Hittite Literacy. Pp. 71–96 in Central-North Anatolia in the Hittite Period, eds. F. Pecchioli Daddi, G. Torri, and C. Corti. New Perspectives in Light of Recent Research (Roma).Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th. 2009b. Schreiber. D. Bei den Hethitern. Pp. 273–80 in Reallexikon der Assyriologie und vorderasiatischen Archäologie, ed. M. P. Streck. Band 12. Berlin-New York.Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th. 2010. LÚDUB.SAR.GIŠ=‘Clerk’? Orientalia 79: 255–267.Search in Google Scholar
van den Hout, Th. 2012. The Ductus of the Alalaḫ VII Texts and the Origin of the Hittite Cuneiform. Pp. 147–70 in Palaeography and Scribal Practices in Syro-Palestine and Anatolia in the Late Bronze Age, ed. E. Devecchi. Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, Leiden.Search in Google Scholar
Veldhuis, N. 2014. History of the Cuneiform Lexical Tradition. Münster.Search in Google Scholar
Waal, W. 2010. The Source as Object. Studies in Hittite Diplomatics. Diss. Universiteit Leiden.Search in Google Scholar
Weeden, M. 2011. Hittite Logograms and Hittite Scholarship. Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter