Unificative methodology for determining recent dynamic parameters of tectonic plates based on GNSS data
-
Ihor Savchyn
Abstract
This study presents a unificative methodology for determining the latest dynamic parameters of tectonic plates, including moment of inertia, angular momentum, and kinetic energy, using data from continuous GNSS stations combined with information on crustal thickness and density from the CRUST1.0 model. The methodology treats the tectonic plate as a system of discrete volume cells, each with a defined mass and distance to the axis of rotation, which allows for accurate calculation of dynamic parameters. The approach has been tested on 7 large, 7 medium, and 3 microplates using data from 3169 GNSS stations for the period 2002–2021. The methodology provides an uncertainty of parameter estimation of less than 5.5 %, offering a new tool for detailed assessment of lithospheric dynamics and understanding the distribution of rotational energy in the Earth’s plates.
Acknowledgments
This research was carried out within the framework of the Doctor of Science dissertation «Differentiation of the Kinematics of Tectonic Structures Based on GNSS Measurements». Open-access data and open-source software were employed, while licensed software was provided by Lviv Polytechnic National University. The author gratefully acknowledges the support and valuable discussions with colleagues from the Institute of Geodesy, Lviv Polytechnic National University, and expresses sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped improve the manuscript.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The author is willing to provide all intermediate data, calculation results, and analyses upon request for comparison and further research.
References
1. Jin, S, Zhu, W. A revision of the parameters of the NNR-NUVEL-1A plate velocity model. J Geodyn 2004;38:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2004.03.004.Search in Google Scholar
2. Schettino, A. Computational methods for calculating geometric parameters of tectonic plates. Comput Geosci 1999;25:897–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-3004(99)00054-0.Search in Google Scholar
3. Soler, T, Mueller, II. Global plate tectonics and the secular motion of the pole. Bull Géod 1978;52:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02521791.Search in Google Scholar
4. Bowin, C. Plate tectonics conserves angular momentum. eEarth 2010;5:1–20. https://doi.org/10.5194/ee-5-1-2010.Search in Google Scholar
5. Žalohar, J. The omega-theory: a new physics of earthquakes. In: Developments in structural geology and tectonics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018, vol II, 570 p. ISBN: 978-0-12-814580-7. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3411574.Search in Google Scholar
6. Zhang, Q, Zhu, WY, Xiong, YQ. Net rotation of the ITRF96. Chin J Geophys 2000;43:633–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.79.Search in Google Scholar
7. Olson, P, Bercovici, D. On the equipartition of kinetic energy in plate tectonics. Geophys Res Lett 1991;18:1751–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl01840.Search in Google Scholar
8. Swedan, NH. Energy of plate tectonics calculation and projection. Solid Earth Discuss 2013;5:135–61. https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-5-135-2013.Search in Google Scholar
9. Savchyn, I. Determination of the recent rotation poles of the main tectonic plates on the base of GNSS data. Geodynamics 2022;2:17–27. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2022.02.017.Search in Google Scholar
10. Euler, L. General formulas for the translation of arbitrary rigid bodies. Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 1776;20:189–207.Search in Google Scholar
11. Savchyn, I. Establishing the correlation between changes of absolute rotation poles of major tectonic plates based on continuous GNSS stations data. Acta Geodyn Geomater 2022;19:167–76. https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2022.0006.Search in Google Scholar
12. Savchyn, I, Tretyak, K. Tectonic plates moment of inertia and angular momentum determination: the case of the Antarctic plate. Ukr Antarct J 2023;21:13–23. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2023.704.Search in Google Scholar
13. Tretyak, K, Al-Alusi, FKF, Babiy, L. Investigation of the interrelationship between changes and redistribution of angular momentum of the earth, the Antarctic tectonic plate, the atmosphere, and the ocean. Geodynamics 2018;1:5–26. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2018.01.005.Search in Google Scholar
14. Blewitt, G, Hammond, WC, Kreemer, C. Harnessing the GPS data explosion for interdisciplinary science. Eos 2018;99. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EO104623.Search in Google Scholar
15. Laske, G, Masters, G, Ma, Z, Pasyanos, M. Update on CRUST1.0 – a 1-degree global model of Earth’s crust. In: Geophys Res Abstr. Vienna: EGU General Assembly; 2013, vol 15:2658 p.Search in Google Scholar
16. Bird, P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. G-cubed 2003;4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gc000252.Search in Google Scholar
17. Argus, DF, Gordon, RG, DeMets, C. Geologically current motion of 56 plates relative to the no-net-rotation reference frame. G-cubed 2011;12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gc003751.Search in Google Scholar
18. Altamimi, Z, Métivier, L, Rebischung, P, Rouby, H, Collilieux, X. ITRF2014 plate motion model. Geophys J Int 2017;209:1906–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx136.Search in Google Scholar
19. Altamimi, Z, Rebischung, P, Métivier, L, Collilieux, X. ITRF2014: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2016;121:6109–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013098.Search in Google Scholar
20. Argus, DF, Gordon, RG. Tests of the rigid-plate hypothesis and bounds on intraplate deformation using geodetic data from very long baseline interferometry. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 1996;101:13555–72. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB03775.Search in Google Scholar
21. Kreemer, C, Blewitt, G, Klein, EC. A geodetic plate motion and Global Strain Rate Model. G-cubed 2014;15:3849–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gc005407.Search in Google Scholar
22. Simmons, NA, Myers, SC, Johannesson, G, Matzel, E. LLNL-G3Dv3: global P wave tomography model for improved regional and teleseismic travel time prediction. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2012;117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009525.Search in Google Scholar
23. Savchyn, I, Brusak, I, Tretyak, K. Analysis of recent Antarctic plate kinematics based on GNSS data. Geod Geodyn 2023;14:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2022.08.004.Search in Google Scholar
24. Argus, DF, Heflin, MB. Plate motion and crustal deformation estimated with geodetic data from the Global Positioning System. Geophys Res Lett 1995;22:1973–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL02006.Search in Google Scholar
25. Sella, GF, Dixon, TH, Mao, A. REVEL: a model for recent plate velocities from space geodesy. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2002;107:ETG 11-1–30. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB000033.Search in Google Scholar
26. Altamimi, Z, Sillard, P, Boucher, C. ITRF2000: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for Earth science applications. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2002;107:ETG 2-1–19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000561.Search in Google Scholar
27. Kreemer, C, Lavallée, DA, Blewitt, G, Holt, WE. On the stability of a geodetic no-net-rotation frame and its implication for the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Geophys Res Lett 2006;33. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027058.Search in Google Scholar
28. Altamimi, Z, Collilieux, X, Legrand, J, Garayt, B, Boucher, C. ITRF2005: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on time series of station positions and Earth orientation parameters. J Geophys Res 2007;112. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB004949.Search in Google Scholar
29. Altamimi, Z, Métivier, L, Collilieux, X. ITRF2008 plate motion model. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2012;117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008930.Search in Google Scholar
30. Goudarzi, MA, Cocard, M, Santerre, R. Estimating Euler pole parameters for eastern Canada using GPS velocities. Geodesy Cartogr 2015;41:162–73. https://doi.org/10.3846/20296991.2015.1123445.Search in Google Scholar
31. Haas, R, Gueguen, E, Scherneck, HG, Nothnagel, A, Campbell, J. Crustal motion results derived from observations in the European geodetic VLBI network. Earth Planets Space 2000;52:759–64. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352278.Search in Google Scholar
32. Haas, R, Nothnagel, A, Campbell, J, Gueguen, E. Recent crustal movements observed with the European VLBI network: geodetic analysis and results. J Geodyn 2003;35:391–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(03)00003-6.Search in Google Scholar
33. Krásná, H, Tierno, RC, Pavetich, P, Böhm, J, Nilsson, T, Schuh, H. Investigation of crustal motion in Europe by analysing the European VLBI sessions. Acta Geod Geophys 2013;48:389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-013-0034-4.Search in Google Scholar
34. Kurt, O. Monitoring movements of tectonic plates by analyzing VLBI data via QGIS. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Congress of the Turkish National Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (TNUGG-SC). Izmir, Turkey; 2018. p. 198–201.Search in Google Scholar
35. Jagoda, M, Rutkowska, M. Use of VLBI measurement technique for determination of motion parameters of the tectonic plates. Metrol Meas Syst 2020;27:151–65. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2020.131722.Search in Google Scholar
36. Kraszewska, K, Jagoda, M, Rutkowska, M. Tectonic plate parameters estimated in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame ITRF2008 based on SLR stations. Acta Geophys 2016;64:1495–512. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0072.Search in Google Scholar
37. Crétaux, JF, Soudarin, L, Cazenave, A, Bouillé, F. Present-day tectonic plate motions and crustal deformations from the DORIS space system. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 1998;103:30167–81. https://doi.org/10.1029/98jb02239.Search in Google Scholar
38. Soudarin, L, Crétaux, JF. A model of present-day tectonic plate motions from 12 years of DORIS measurements. J Geod 2006;80:609–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0090-4.Search in Google Scholar
39. Kraszewska, K, Jagoda, M, Rutkowska, M. Tectonic plates parameters estimated in International Terrestrial Reference Frame ITRF2008 based on DORIS stations. Acta Geophys 2018;66:509–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0169-3.Search in Google Scholar
40. Banerjee, P, Soudarin, L, Crétaux, JF. Present-day kinematics of India and interseismic strain in the Nepal Himalaya from GPS and DORIS measurements. J Geod 2006;80:567–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0030-3.Search in Google Scholar
41. Jagoda, M, Rutkowska, M, Suchocki, C, Katzer, J. Determination of the tectonic plates motion parameters based on SLR, DORIS and VLBI stations positions. J Appl Geodesy 2019;14:121–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2019-0053.Search in Google Scholar
42. Altamimi, Z, Métivier, L, Rebischung, P, Collilieux, X, Chanard, K, Barnéoud, J. ITRF2020 plate motion model. Geophys Res Lett 2023;50:e2023GL106373. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106373.Search in Google Scholar
43. Mooney, WD, Laske, G, Masters, G. CRUST 5.1: а global crustal model at 5°×5°. J Geophys Res 1998;103:727–47. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB02122.Search in Google Scholar
44. Bassin, C, Laske, G, Masters, G. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America. Eos Trans AGU 2000;81:F897.Search in Google Scholar
45. Ritsema, J, Deuss, A, van Heijst, HJ, Woodhouse, JH. S40RTS: a degree-40 shear-velocity model for the mantle from new Rayleigh wave dispersion, teleseismic traveltime and normal-mode splitting function measurements. Geophys J Int 2011;184:1223–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04884.x.Search in Google Scholar
46. Molinari, I, Morelli, A. EPcrust: a reference crustal model for the European plate. Geophys J Int 2011;185:352–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.04940.x.Search in Google Scholar
47. Argus, DF, Gordon, RG. No-net-rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL-1. Geophys Res Lett 1991;18:2039–42. https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL01532.Search in Google Scholar
48. Drewes, H. The actual plate kinematic and crustal deformation model APKIM2005 as basis for a non-rotating ITRF. In: IAG symposium on geodetic reference frames, GRF 2006, Munich, Germany, 9–14 Oct 2006. International Association of Geodesy Symposia; 2009, 95–9 pp.10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_15Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
