Home Water multipath effect in Terrestrial Radar Interferometry (TRI) in open-pit mine monitoring
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Water multipath effect in Terrestrial Radar Interferometry (TRI) in open-pit mine monitoring

  • Alberto Michelini EMAIL logo , Nicola Dal Santo , Giovanni Alli and Claudio Testa
Published/Copyright: April 30, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Terrestrial Radar Interferometry (TRI) has established as the reference technology for slope monitoring in the open-pit mining sector. Along with the many benefits this technique provides, there remain some limitations that have not yet been fully resolved by current technology. One of the most curious disturbance factors, is signal interference caused by the reflection of the electromagnetic waves on a water surface. This phenomenon is well known in radio communications and is called multipath propagation. The presence of multipath effects in open-pit mining is not uncommon due to the presence of ponds at the bottom of the pit. In this context, a simulation algorithm has been developed for the evaluation of TRI water multipath, to be able to predict its presence and help monitoring campaign planning. In this work the general characteristics of TRI water multipath are described together with standard mitigation techniques. Furthermore, the simulation algorithm is presented and its application to some real case study is discussed.


Corresponding author: Alberto Michelini, IDS GeoRadar, Pisa, Italy, E-mail: 

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Caduff, R, Schlunegger, F, Kos, A, Wiesmann, A. A review of terrestrial radar interferometry for measuring surface change in the geosciences. Earth Surf Process Landf 2015;40:208–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3656.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bar, N, Cobián, JC, Diaz, C, Bautista, MM, Mojica, B, Coli, N, et al.. Brittle and ductile slope failure management. In: Proceedings of international slope stabiliy symposium; 2022:17–21 pp.Search in Google Scholar

3. Lucas, C, Leinss, S, Bühler, Y, Marino, A, Hajnsek, I. Multipath interferences in ground-based radar data: a case study. Remote Sens 2017;9:1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9121260.Search in Google Scholar

4. Souza, MF, Costa, TAV, Sales, OPG, Campos, MO, Reis, IS, Vecchia, BP, et al.. The influence of multipath interference in ground-based radar data – a case study at an open-pit mine. In: Proceedings of the international slope stabiliy symposium. Belo Horizonte; 2024.Search in Google Scholar

5. Skolnik, MI. Radar handbook. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

6. Luzi, G, Dematteis, N. Ku band terrestrial radar observations by means of circular polarized antennas. Remote Sens 2019;11:270. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030270.Search in Google Scholar

7. Pieraccini, M, Miccinesi, L. A polarimetric approach for multipath suppression/mitigation in ground-based interferometric radar imaging. In: IGARSS 2020-2020 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium; 2020:794–7 pp.10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9324721Search in Google Scholar

8. Michelini, A, Viviani, F, Mayer, L. Introduction to IBIS-ArcSAR: a circular scanning GB-SAR system for deformation monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 4th joint international symposium on deformation monitoring (JISDM); 2019, vol 15:17 p.Search in Google Scholar

9. Rebmeister, M, Auer, S, Schenk, A, Hinz, S. Geocoding of ground-based SAR data for infrastructure objects using the Maximum A Posteriori estimation and ray-tracing. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 2022;189:110–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.04.030.Search in Google Scholar

10. Schmid, L, Medic, T, Collins, BD, Meier, L, Wieser, A. Georeferencing of terrestrial radar images in geomonitoring using kernel correlation. Int J Rem Sens 2023;44:6736–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2274321.Search in Google Scholar

11. Jackson, JD. Classical electrodynamics. New York: Wiley; 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-02-21
Accepted: 2025-03-15
Published Online: 2025-04-30
Published in Print: 2025-07-28

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Special Issue: Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring 2025
  3. Impact of mathematical correlations
  4. Employing variance component estimation for point cloud based geometric surface representation by B-splines
  5. Deterministic uncertainty for terrestrial laser scanning observations based on intervals
  6. Investigating the potential of stochastic relationships to model deformations
  7. Laser scanning based deformation analysis of a wooden dome under load
  8. Classifying surface displacements in mining regions using differential terrain models and InSAR coherence
  9. Water multipath effect in Terrestrial Radar Interferometry (TRI) in open-pit mine monitoring
  10. Multi-temporal GNSS, RTS, and InSAR for very slow-moving landslide displacement analysis
  11. Reviews
  12. Evaluation of the regional ionosphere using final, ultra-rapid, and rapid ionosphere products
  13. Experiences with techniques and sensors for smartphone positioning
  14. Original Research Articles
  15. Crustal deformation estimation using InSAR, West of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt
  16. Factors affecting the fitting of a global geopotential model to local geodetic datasets over local areas in Egypt using multiple linear regression approach
  17. Utilization of low-cost GNSS RTK receiver for accurate GIS mapping in urban environment
  18. Seasonal variations of permanent stations in close vicinity to tectonic plate boundaries
  19. Time-frequency and power-law noise analyzes of three GBAS solutions of a single GNSS station
  20. A 2D velocity field computation using multi-dimensional InSAR: a case study of the Abu-Dabbab area in Egypt
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jag-2025-0030/html
Scroll to top button