Home Performance tests of geodetic receivers with tilt sensors in obstructed environments using the NRTK GNSS technique
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performance tests of geodetic receivers with tilt sensors in obstructed environments using the NRTK GNSS technique

  • Puttipol Dumrongchai , Jittranud Patsadutarn and Chalermchon Satirapod EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 7, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Department of Lands (DOL), Thailand, has adopted the Network-based Real-Time Kinematic (NRTK) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) surveying technique using a Virtual Reference Station (VRS) to support cadastral surveys since 2011. Determining accurate coordinates of parcel boundary markers at building corners or near fences and walls is difficult because a GNSS range pole cannot be leveled with a circular bubble. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the receivers equipped with tilt sensors for horizontal and vertical positioning. Two types of tilt sensors used for evaluation were a magnetometer and micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) and an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Conducting the NRTK GNSS surveying tests was based on the pole tilt angles of 0°, 15°, 25°, 35°, and 45° from a plumb line in controlled and obstructed environments. The IMU-based tilt sensor had more advantage of accurately positioning over the MEMS sensor. The results showed that using the IMU, better than 4 cm horizontal positioning accuracy was achievable when the pole was tilted by 15° or less under non-multipath and open-sky conditions. The vertical accuracy was of a few centimeter levels and least sensitive to tilt angles using either type of sensor. However, none of the sensors precisely compensated for pole tilt in strong-multipath and complex environments, causing increased horizontal errors in decimeter levels.


Corresponding author: Chalermchon Satirapod, Department of Survey Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Lands for providing all relevant data. We also appreciate the help of DOL surveyors in collecting GNSS field data.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Charoenkalunyuta, T, Satirapod, C, Keitniyomrung, V, Yomwan, P. Performance of network-based RTK GNSS for the cadastral survey in Thailand. Int J Geoinf 2019;15:13–9.Search in Google Scholar

2. Department of Lands. The department of lands regulation of the practical RTK GNSS network for the cadastral survey B.E. 2562. Thailand: Ministry of Interior; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

3. Dumrongchai, P, Buatong, T, Satirapod, C, Yun, S. Improved height determination using a correction surface by combining GNSS/leveling co-points and Thailand Geoid Model 2017. J Kor Soc Surv, Geodes, Photogram Cartogr 2022;40:305–13. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2022.40.4.305.Search in Google Scholar

4. Dumrongchai, P, Srimanee, C, Duangdee, N, Bairaksa, J. The determination of Thailand Geoid Model 2017 (TGM2017) from airborne and terrestrial gravimetry. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 2021;32:857–72. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2021.08.23.01.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kriengkraiwasin, S, Charoenphon, C, Butwong, K, Kovitpongkajorn, V, Yomwan, P, Thongtan, T, et al.. Unification of GNSS CORS coordinates in Thailand. Surv Rev 2021;53:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2021.1987002.Search in Google Scholar

6. Satirapod, C, Simons, WJF, Panumastrakul, E, Trisirisatayawong, I. Updating Thai reference frame to ITRF2005 using GPS: diversion between ITRF2000 and 2005 in Southeast Asia. Surv Rev 2013;43:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1179/003962610x12747001420906.Search in Google Scholar

7. Thongtan, T, Sawatdiaree, S, Satirapod, C. GNSS time and frequency transfers through national positioning, navigation and timing infrastructure. J Appl Geodes 2022;16:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2021-0061.Search in Google Scholar

8. Trakolkul, C, Satirapod, C. Variations of precipitable water vapor using GNSS CORS in Thailand. Surv Rev 2021;53:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2020.1713611.Search in Google Scholar

9. Jongrujinan, T, Satirapod, C. Stochastic modeling for VRS network-based GNSS RTK with residual interpolation uncertainty. J Appl Geodes 2020;14:317–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2020-0007.Search in Google Scholar

10. Rizos, C, Satirapod, C. Contribution of GNSS CORS infrastructure to the mission of modern geodesy and status of GNSS CORS in Thailand. Eng J 2011;15:25–42. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2011.15.1.25.Search in Google Scholar

11. Mekik, C, Can, O. Multipath effects in RTK GPS and a case Study. J Aeronaut, Astronaut Aviat 2010;42:231–40.Search in Google Scholar

12. Chen, D, Ye, S, Xia, F, Cheng, X, Zhang, H, Jiang, W. A multipath mitigation method in long-range RTK for deformation monitoring. GPS Solut 2022;26:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-022-01281-9.Search in Google Scholar

13. Dammalage, TL, Satirapod, C, Kibe, S, Ogaja, C. C/A code multipath mitigation at GPS base stations for improved DGPS corrections using wavelets. Surv Rev 2013;42:240–55. https://doi.org/10.1179/003962610x12572516251925.Search in Google Scholar

14. Nie, B, Chen, G, Liu, B. Research on RTK tilt position measurement method based on UKF. IET Radar Sonar Navig 2019;13:2102–6. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0128.Search in Google Scholar

15. Šugar, D, Zalović, L, Bači, Ž. Analysis of positioning results obtained by a single base RTK with autonomous base start and tilt option. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Theory and Practice in Construction XIII; 2018, vol. 13:231–46 pp. https://doi.org/10.7251/stp1813231z.Search in Google Scholar

16. Luo, X, Schaufler, S, Carrera, M, Celebi, I. High-precision RTK positioning with calibration-free tilt compensation. In: Proceedings of FIG Congress 2018. Istanbul, Turkey; 2018. Available from: https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2018/papers/ts04e/TS04E_luo_schaufler_et_al_9407.pdf [Accessed 1 Apr 2022].Search in Google Scholar

17. Hazry, D, Sofian, M, Azfar, AZ. Study of inertial measurement unit sensor. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Machine Systems (ICoMMS) 2009. Batu Ferringhi, Penang, Malaysia; 2009. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/21293245/Study_of_inertial_measurement_unit_sensor [Accessed 1 Apr 2022].Search in Google Scholar

18. Jekeli, C. Inertial Navigation Systems with Geodetic Applications. New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kaniewski, P. Aircraft positioning with INS/GNSS integrated system. Mol Quant Acoust 2006;27:149–68.Search in Google Scholar

20. Jeong, J. Use of network RTK using VRS for a cadastral survey on islands. In: Proceedings of Facing the Challenges – Building the Capacity. Sydney, Australia: FIG Congress; 2010. Available from: https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2010/techprog.htm [Accessed 1 Apr 2022].Search in Google Scholar

21. Bernstein, T, Janssen, V. Positional uncertainty of network RTK observations in a modern datum. J Geodetic Sci 2021;11:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2020-0116.Search in Google Scholar

22. CHC Shanghai HuaCe Navigation Technology Ltd. CHCNAV i80 GNSS USER GUIDE; 2015. Available from: https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1133721/Chc-I80.html [Accessed 1 Apr 2022].Search in Google Scholar

23. CHC Shanghai HuaCe Navigation Technology Ltd. CHCNAV i90 GNSS USER GUIDE; 2019. Available from: https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1832733/Chcnav-I90-Gnss.html [Accessed 1 Apr 2022].Search in Google Scholar

24. CHC Shanghai HuaCe Navigation Technology Ltd. CHC® Geomatics Office 2.0 User Guide; 2018. Available from: https://iggps.com/out/CGO2/olderversions/2.0.0.286/CGO%202.0_User%20Guide_EN_20180719.pdf [Accessed 1 Apr 2022].Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-03
Revised: 2022-10-19
Accepted: 2022-10-20
Published Online: 2022-11-07
Published in Print: 2023-01-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jag-2022-0047/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button