Influence of the simplified stochastic model of TLS measurements on geometry-based deformation analysis

References

[1] Alkhatib, H., Kargoll, B., Paffenholz, J., and Bureick, J. Terrestrial laser scanning for deformation monitoring. In Proceedings of the XXVI FIG congress (Istanbul, Turkey, 6–11 May, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[2] Alkhatib, H., Neumann, I., and Kutterer, H. Uncertainty modeling of random and systematic errors by means of Monte-Carlo and fuzzy techniques. J. Appl. Geod. 3, 2 (2009), 67–79.10.1515/JAG.2009.008Search in Google Scholar

[3] Baselga, S., García-Asenjo, L., and Garrigues, P. Deformation monitoring and the maximum number of stable points method. Measurement 70 (2015), 27–35.10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.034Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bureick, J., Alkhatib, H., and Neumann, I. Robust spatial approximation of laser scanner point clouds by means of free-form curve approaches in deformation analysis. J. Appl. Geod. 10, 1 (2016), 27–35.10.1515/jag-2015-0020Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bureick, J., Neuner, H., Harmening, C., and Neumann, I. Curve and surface approximation of 3D point clouds. avn. 123, 11–12 (2016), 315–327.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Denli, H. H., and Deniz, R. Global congruency test methods for GPS networks. J. Surv. Eng. 129, 3 (2003), 95–98.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2003)129:3(95)Search in Google Scholar

[7] Farin, G. From conics to NURBS: A tutorial and survey. IEEE Comput. Graph. 12, 5 (1992), 78–86.10.1109/38.156017Search in Google Scholar

[8] Girardeau-Montaut, D., Roux, M., Marc, R., and Thibault, G. Change detection on points cloud data acquired with a ground laser scanner. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 36, part 3 (2005), 30–35.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gotthardt, E. Die Auswirkung unrichtiger Annahmen über Gewichte und Korrelationen auf die Genauigkeit von Ausgleichungen. Z. Vermess. 87 (1962), 65–68.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Harmening, C., and Neuner, H. A constraint-based parameterization technique for B-spline surfaces. J. Appl. Geod. 9, 3 (2015), 143–161.10.1515/jag-2015-0003Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hoffmann, M., Li, Y., and Wang, G. Paths of C-Bézier and CB-spline curves. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 23, 5 (2006), 463–475.10.1016/j.cagd.2006.03.001Search in Google Scholar

[12] Holst, C., and Kuhlmann, H. Challenges and present fields of action at laser scanner based deformation analyses. J. Appl. Geod. 10, 1 (2016), 17–25.10.1515/jag-2015-0025Search in Google Scholar

[13] Holst, C., Nothnagel, A., Blome, M., Becker, P., Eichborn, M., and Kuhlmann, H. Improved area-based deformation analysis of a radio telescopes main reflector based on terrestrial laser scanning. J. Appl. Geod. 9, 1 (2015), 1–14.10.1515/jag-2014-0018Search in Google Scholar

[14] JCGM. Uncertainty of measurement–Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995 with minor corrections). 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jurek, T., Kuhlmann, H., and Holst, C. Impact of spatial correlations on the surface estimation based on terrestrial laser scanning. J. Appl. Geod. 11, 3 (2017), 143–155.10.1515/jag-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kargoll, B.On the theory and application of model misspecification tests in geodesy. PhD thesis, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kauker, S., and Schwieger, V. A synthetic covariance matrix for monitoring by terrestrial laser scanning. J. Appl. Geod. 11, 2 (2017), 77–87.10.1515/jag-2016-0026Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kermarrec, G., and Schön, S. Taking correlations in GPS least squares adjustments into account with a diagonal covariance matrix. J. Geod. 90, 9 (2016), 793–805.10.1007/s00190-016-0911-zSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Kermarrec, G., and Schön, S. A priori fully populated covariance matrices in least-squares adjustment-case study: GPS relative positioning. J. Geod. 91, 5 (2017), 465–484.10.1007/s00190-016-0976-8Search in Google Scholar

[20] Koch, K.-R.Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Koch, K.-R. Determining uncertainties of correlated measurements by Monte-Carlo simulations applied to laserscanning. J. Appl. Geod. 2, 3 (2008), 139–147.10.1515/JAG.2008.016Search in Google Scholar

[22] Koch, K.-R. Evaluation of uncertainties in measurements by Monte-Carlo simulations with an application for laserscanning. J. Appl. Geod. 2, 2 (2008), 67–77.10.1515/JAG.2008.008Search in Google Scholar

[23] Koch, K.-R. NURBS surface with changing shape. avn. 117 (2010), 83–89.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Koch, K.-R.Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lague, D., Brodu, N., and Leroux, J. Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z). ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 82 (2013), 10–26.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[26] Lehmann, R., and Lösler, M. Congruence analysis of geodetic networks-hypothesis tests versus model selection by information criteria. J. Appl. Geod. 11, 4 (2017), 271–283.10.1515/jag-2016-0049Search in Google Scholar

[27] Lindenbergh, R., and Pfeifer, N. A statistical deformation analysis of two epochs of terrestrial laser data of a lock. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Optical 3D Measurement Techniques (Vienna, Austria, 3–5 October 2005).Search in Google Scholar

[28] Linkwitz, K. Über den Einfluß verschiedener Gewichtsannahmen auf das Ausgleichungsergebnis bei bedingten Beobachtungen. Z. Vermess. 86 (1961), 179–186.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Meagher, D. J.Octree encoding: A new technique for the representation, manipulation and display of arbitrary 3D objects by computer. Tech. Rep. IPL-TR-80-111, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Image Processing Laboratory, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Neumann, I., and Kutterer, H. Congruence tests and outlier detection in deformation analysis with respect to observation imprecision. J. Appl. Geod. 1, 1 (2007), 1–7.10.1515/jag.2007.001Search in Google Scholar

[31] Neumann, I., and Kutterer, H. The probability of type I and type II errors in imprecise hypothesis testing with an application to geodetic deformation analysis. Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 3, 1–3 (2009), 286–306.10.1504/IJRS.2009.026847Search in Google Scholar

[32] Neuner, H., Schmitt, C., and Neumann, I. Zur Bestimmung der verkehrsseitig verursachten Dehnung an einem Brückentragwerk mittels terrestrischem Laserscanning. In A. Wieser (ed.): Ingenieurvermessung’ 14. Beiträge zum 17. Internationalen Ingenieurvermessungskurs (Zürich, Switzerland, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

[33] Niemeier, W. Statistical tests for detecting movements in repeatedly measured geodetic networks. Tectonophysics 71, 1–4 (1981), 335–351.10.1016/0040-1951(81)90076-7Search in Google Scholar

[34] Niemeier, W.Ausgleichungsrechnung: Statistische Auswertemethoden. Walter de Gruyter, 2008.10.1515/9783110206784Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ohlmann-Lauber, J., and Schäfer, T. Ansätze zur Ableitung von Deformationen aus TLS-Daten. In DVW Seminal Terrestrisches Laserscanning-TLS 2011 mit TLS-Challenge (Fulda, Germany, 2011).Search in Google Scholar

[36] Pelzer, H.Zur Analyse geodatischer Deformations-messungen. Reihe c, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Piegl, L., and Tiller, W.The NURBS Book. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Schneider, D. Terrestrial laser scanning for area based deformation analysis of towers and water damns. In Proceedings of 3rd IAG/12th FIG Symposium (Baden, Austria, 22–24 May, 2006).Search in Google Scholar

[39] Setan, H., and Singh, R. Deformation analysis of a geodetic monitoring network. Geomatica 55, 3 (2001), 333–346.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Taşccedil, L. Analysis of dam deformation measurements with the robust and non-robust methods. Sci. Res. Essays 5, 14 (2010), 1770–1779.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Teza, G., Galgaro, A., Zaltron, N., and Genevois, R. Terrestrial laser scanner to detect landslide displacement fields: a new approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 28, 16 (2007), 3425–3446.10.1080/01431160601024234Search in Google Scholar

[42] Tsakiri, M., Lichti, D., and Pfeifer, N. Terrestrial laser scanning for deformation monitoring. In Proceedings of 3rd IAG/12th FIG Symposium (Baden, Austria, 22–24 May, 2006).Search in Google Scholar

[43] Velsink, H. On the deformation analysis of point fields. J. Geod. 89, 11 (2015), 1071–1087.10.1007/s00190-015-0835-zSearch in Google Scholar

[44] Vezočnik, R., Ambrožič, T., Sterle, O., Bilban, G., Pfeifer, N., Stopar, B., et al. Use of terrestrial laser scanning technology for long term high precision deformation monitoring. Sensors 9, 12 (2009), 9873–9895.10.3390/s91209873Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[45] Wang, J. Block-to-point fine registration in terrestrial laser scanning. Remote Sens. 5, 12 (2013), 6921–6937.10.3390/rs5126921Search in Google Scholar

[46] Wolf, H. Der Einfluss von Gewichtsänderungen auf die Ausgleichungsergebnisse. Z. Vermess. 86 (1961), 361–362.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Wujanz, D., Burger, M., Mettenleiter, M., and Neitzel, F. An intensity-based stochastic model for terrestrial laser scanners. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 125 (2017), 146–155.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[48] Xu, P. The effect of incorrect weights on estimating the variance of unit weight. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 57, 3 (2013), 339–352.10.1007/s11200-012-0665-xSearch in Google Scholar

[49] Xu, X., Kargoll, B., Bureick, J., Yang, H., Alkhatib, H., and Neumann, I. TLS-based profile model analysis of major composite structures with robust B-spline method. Compos. Struct. 184 (2018), 814–820.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.057Search in Google Scholar

[50] Zhao, X., Alkhatib, H., Kargoll, B., and Neumann, I. Statistical evaluation of the influence of the uncertainty budget on B-spline curve approximation. J. Appl. Geod. 11, 4 (2017), 215–230.10.1515/jag-2017-0018Search in Google Scholar

[51] Zhao, X., Kargoll, B., Omidalizarandi, M., Xu, X., and Alkhatib, H. Model selection for parametric surfaces approximating 3D point clouds for deformation analysis. Remote Sens. 10, 4 (2018), 634.10.3390/rs10040634Search in Google Scholar