Effect of target color and scanning geometry on terrestrial LiDAR point-cloud noise and plane fitting

References

[1] Chow JC, Lichti DD, Glennie C, Hartzell P. Improvements to and comparison of static terrestrial LiDAR self-calibration methods. Sensors, 13, 2013, 7224–7249. DOI: 10.3390/s130607224.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Abbas MA, Lichti DD, Chong AK, Setan H, Majid Z. An on-site approach for the self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanner. Measurement, 52, 2014, 111–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.009.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chan TO, Lichti DD, Belton D. A rigorous cylinder-based self-calibration approach for terrestrial laser scanners. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 99, 2015, 84–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.11.003.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mukupa, W, Roberts GW, Hancock CM, Al-Manasir K. A review of the use of terrestrial laser scanning application for change detection and deformation monitoring of structures. Survey Review, 49, 2017, 99–116. DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2015.1133039.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gordon SJ, Lichti DD. Modeling terrestrial laser scanner data for precise structural deformation measurement. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 133, 2007, 72–80. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2007)133:2(72).Search in Google Scholar

[6] Park H, Lee H, Adeli H, Lee I. A new approach for health monitoring of structures: Terrestrial laser scanning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22, 2007, 19–30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2006.00466.x.Search in Google Scholar

[7] González-Aguilera D, Gómez-Lahoz J, Sánchez J. A new approach for structural monitoring of large dams with a three-dimensional laser scanner. Sensors, 8, 2008, 5866–5883. DOI: 10.3390/s8095866.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Chow JC, Ebeling A, Teskey WF. Point-based and plane-based deformation monitoring of indoor environments using terrestrial laser scanners. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 6, 2012, 193–202. DOI: 10.1515/jag-2012-0017.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Delaloye D, Diederichs MS, Walton G, Hutchinson J. Sensitivity testing of the newly developed elliptical fitting method for the measurement of convergence in tunnels and shafts. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 48, 2015, 651–667. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-014-0566-0.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jaafar HA, Meng X, Sowter A, Bryan P. New approach for monitoring historic and heritage buildings: Using terrestrial laser scanning and generalised procrustes analysis. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2017. DOI: 10.1002/stc.1987.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lichti DD, Harvey B. The effects of reflecting surface material properties on time-of-flight laser scanner measurements. In Proceedings of ISPRS Commission IV Symposium 2002 on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications, Ottawa, Canada, 9–12 July 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lichti DD, Gordon SJ, Tipdecho T. Error models and propagation in directly georeferenced terrestrial laser scanner networks. Journal of surveying engineering, 131 (4), 2005, 135–142. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2005)131:4(135).Search in Google Scholar

[13] Soudarissanane S, Lindenbergh R, Menenti M, Teunissen P. Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66, 2011, 389–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Boehler W, Vicent MB, Marbs A. Investigating laser scanner accuracy. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34, 2003, 696–701.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Pfeifer N, Dorninger P, Haring A, Fan H. Investigating terrestrial laser scanning intensity data: Quality and functional relations. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques, Zurich, Switzerland, 9–12 July 2007, 328–337.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jaafar HA, Meng X, Sowter A. Terrestrial laser scanner error quantification for the purpose of monitoring. Survey Review, 2017, 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2016.1259721.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wunderlich T, Wasmeier P, Ohlmann-Lauber J, Schäfer T, Reidl F. Objective specifications of terrestrial laser scanners – a contribution of the geodetic laboratory at the Technishche Universität München. Blue Series Books at the Chair of Geodesy. Volume 21, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Asbeck W, Loo MV. Critical pigment volume relationships. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 41, 1949, 1470–1475. DOI: 10.1021/ie50475a042.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hansen EF, Walston S, Bishop MH. Matte paint: Its history and technology, analysis, properties, and conservation treatment, with special emphasis on ethnographic objects, 1st ed. Getty Conservation Institute: Marina del Rey, California, USA, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Nassau K. Color for science, art and technology, 1st ed. Elsevier: New York, USA, 1997.10.1016/S1387-6783(98)80004-4Search in Google Scholar

[21] Vosselman G, Maas H-G. Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning, 1st ed. CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kashani AG, Olsen MJ, Parrish CE, Wilson N. A review of LiDAR radiometric processing: From ad hoc intensity correction to rigorous radiometric calibration. Sensors, 15, 2015, 28099–28128. DOI: 10.3390/s151128099.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Kaasalainen S, Jaakkola A, Kaasalainen M, Krooks A, Kukko A. Analysis of incidence angle and distance effects on terrestrial laser scanner intensity: Search for correction methods. Remote Sensing, 3, 2011, 2207–2221. DOI: 10.3390/rs3102207.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Wagner W, Ullrich A, Ducic V, Melzer T, Studnicka N. Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60, 2006, 100–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Höfle B, Pfeifer N. Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62, 2007, 415–433. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.008.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Schanda E. Physical fundamentals of remote sensing. 1st ed. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, 1986, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48733-0.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Jutzi B, Gross H. Investigations on surface reflection models for intensity normalization in airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 76, 2010, 1051–1060. DOI: 10.14358/PERS.76.9.1051.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Tatoglu A, Pochiraju K. Point cloud segmentation with LIDAR reflection intensity behavior. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, USA, 14–18 May 2012; pp. 786–790. DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225224.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Poullain E, Garestier F, Levoy F, Bretel P. Analysis of ALS intensity behavior as a function of the incidence angle in coastal environments. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9, 2016, 313–325. DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2510337.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Leica Geosystems. Leica ScanStation P40/P30, 2016. (Accessed on 28 August 2017 at http://leica-geosystems.com/en-us/products/laser-scanners/scanners/leica-scanstation-p40–p30).Search in Google Scholar

[31] Topcon Corporation. 3D Laser Scanner GLS-1500, 2010. (Accessed on 28 August 2017 at http://www.topcon.co.jp/en/positioning/products/product/3dscanner/GLS-1500_E.html).Search in Google Scholar

[32] Maar H, Zogg H-M. WFD – Wave Form Digitizer Technology: White Paper. Heerbrugg, Switzerland: Leica Geosystems AG, 2014. (Accessed on 28 August 2017 at http://w3.leica-geosystems.com/downloads123/zz/tps/nova_ms50/white-tech-paper/Leica_Nova_MS50_WFD-Wave_Form_Digitizer_Technology_TPA_en.pdf).Search in Google Scholar

[33] Demantké J, Mallet C, David N, Vallet B. Dimensionality based scale selection in 3D lidar point clouds. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38, 2011, W12.10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W12-97-2011Search in Google Scholar

[34] Khoshelham K, Altundag D, Ngan-Tillard D, Menenti M. Influence of range measurement noise on roughness characterization of rock surfaces using terrestrial laser scanning. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48, 2011, 1215–1223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kersten TP, Mechelke K, Lindstaedt M, Sternberg H. Methods for geometric accuracy investigations of terrestrial laser scanning systems. Photogrammetrie-Fernerkundung-Geoinformation, 4, 2009, 301–315.10.1127/1432-8364/2009/0023Search in Google Scholar

[36] Hartzell PJ, Gadomski PJ, Glennie CL, Finnegan DC, Deems JS. Rigorous error propagation for terrestrial laser scanning with application to snow volume uncertainty. Journal of Glaciology, 61 (230), 2015, 1147–1158.10.3189/2015JoG15J031Search in Google Scholar

[37] Olsen MJ, Johnstone E, Kuester F, Driscoll N, Ashford SA. New automated point-cloud alignment for ground-based light detection and ranging data of long coastal sections. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 137 (1), 2010, 14–25. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000030.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Lichti DD, Jamtsho S. Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners. The Photogrammetric Record, 21 (114), 2006, 141–160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00367.x.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Laefer DF, Truong-Hong L, Carr H, Singhf M. Crack detection limits in unit based masonry with terrestrial laser scanning. NDT & E International, 62, 2014, 66–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Tang P, Huber D, Akinci B. Characterization of laser scanners and algorithms for detecting flatness defects on concrete surfaces. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 25 (1), 2010, 31–42. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000073.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Laefer DF, Fitzgerald M, Maloney EM, Coyne D, Lennon D, Morrish SW. Lateral image degradation in terrestrial laser scanning. Structural engineering international, 19 (2), 2009, 184–189.10.2749/101686609788220196Search in Google Scholar

[42] Voegtle T, Schwab I, Landes T. Influences of different materials on the measurements of a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS). In Proceedings of the XXI Congress, The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 37, 1061–1066, Beijing, China, 3–11 July 2008.Search in Google Scholar