A Spatial Analysis of GEOID03 and GEOID09 in Connecticut

References

[1] Cressie N. Statistics for Spatial Data. Revised ed., New York, USA, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993.10.1002/9781119115151Search in Google Scholar

[2] Daho SAB, Fairhead JD. Accuracy assessment of the available geoid models in Algeria. Computers & Geosciences 2007, 33, 76–82.10.1016/j.cageo.2006.05.009Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ghilani CD, Wolf PR. Adjustment Computations Spatial Data Analysis. New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.10.1002/9780470121498Search in Google Scholar

[4] Heiskanen WA, Moritz H. Physical Geodesy. New York, USA, W. H. Freeman & Co., 1967.10.1007/BF02525647Search in Google Scholar

[5] Introduction to SAS. UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (Accessed September 01, 2015, at http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/notes2/)Search in Google Scholar

[6] Isaaks HE, Srivastava MR. An introduction to Applied Geostatistics. New York, USA, Oxford University Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kutner HM, Nachtsheim JC, Neter J, Li W. Applied linear statistical models. 5^th ed., Boston, USA, McGraw-Hill, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Leick A. GPS satellite surveying. 3^rd ed., New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Littell CR, Milliken AG, Stroup WW, Wolfinger DR, Schabenberger O. SAS for mixed models 2^nd ed., NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Meyer TH, Arifuzzaman K, Massalski D. Assessing the Accuracy of GEOID03 and GEOID09 in Connecticut. Surveying and Land Information Science 2010, 70(2), 89–101.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Nahavandchi H, Soltanpour A. Improved determination of heights using a conversion surface by combining gravimetric quasi-geoid / geoid and GPS-levelling height differences. Studia Geophysica & Geodaetica 2006, 50(2), 165–180.10.1007/s11200-006-0010-3Search in Google Scholar

[12] National Geodetic Survey (NGS). National Height Modernization Study: Report to Congress, Rockville, MD. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[13] National Geodetic Survey (NGS). The National Geodetic Survey Ten-Year Strategic Plan 2013–2023: Positioning America for the Future. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[14] National Research Council (NRC). Forum on NOAA’s National Spatial Reference System. Report of the Committee on Geodesy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Roman DR, Wang YM, Henning W, Hamilton J. Assessment of the New National Geoid Height Model, GEOID03. Surveying and Land Information Science 2004, 64(3), 153–162.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Roman DR, Wang YM, Saleh J, Li X. National Geoid Height Models for the United States: USGG2009 and GEOID09. ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference, 20–23 FEB, Salt Lake City, UT, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[17] SAS Institute Inc. SAS / STAT^® 9.2 User’s Guide, Second Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Smith D. Overview of New Datums. National Geodetic Survey, March 12, 2015. (Accessed September 1, 2015, at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/corbin/class_description/Overview_New_Datums.shtml)Search in Google Scholar

[19] Snay RA, Soler T. Part 2 – The evolution of NAD 83. Professional Surveyor 2000, 20(2), 16–18.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Snay RA, Soler T. Part 3 – WGS 84 and ITRS. Professional Surveyor 2000, 20(3), 24–28.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Soler T, Snay RA. Transforming positions and velocities between the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2000 and North American Datum of 1983. Journal of Surveying Engineering 2004, 130(2), 49–55.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2004)130:2(49)Search in Google Scholar

[22] Soycan M, Soycan A. Surface Modeling for GPS-leveling geoid determination. Newton’s Bulletin 2003, 1, 41–52.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C. The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment: Mission Overview and Early Results. Geophysical Research Letters 2004, 31(9), L09607.10.1029/2004GL019920Search in Google Scholar

[24] Tobler W. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 1970, 46(2), 234–240.10.2307/143141Search in Google Scholar

[25] Tranes MD, Meyer TH, Massalski D. Comparisons of GPS-Derived Orthometric Heights Using Local Geometric Geoid Models. Journal of Surveying Engineering 2007, 133(1), 6–13.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2007)133:1(6)Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zilkoski DB, Carlson EE, and Smith CL. A guide for establishing GPS-derived orthometric heights (Standards: 2 cm and 5 cm) DRAFT v1.1., NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NGS-59, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD 20910, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Zilkoski DB, D’Onofrio JD, Frakes SJ. Guidelines for Establishing GPS-Derived Ellipsoidal Heights (Standards: 2 cm and 5 cm) – Version 4.3., NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NGS-58, National Geodetic Survey Information Center, Silver Spring, MD 20910, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Zilkoski DB, Richards JH, Young GM. Results of the General Adjustment of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. Surveying and Land Information Systems 1992, 52(3), 133–149.Search in Google Scholar