Startseite Private Labels Strategy, Retail Profitability and Bargaining Power in the Fluid Milk Market
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Private Labels Strategy, Retail Profitability and Bargaining Power in the Fluid Milk Market

  • Xuan Chen und Yizao Liu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Juni 2022

Abstract

This paper studies the competition between private labels and the role of private labels in determining the bargaining outcomes between retailers and manufacturers as well as retailer profitability in the fluid milk market. We differentiate private labels from different retailers and develop a structural model of demand and a Nash-in-Nash vertical bargaining model of supply. Using 2004–2011 Nielsen Homescan data at monthly-county level, we estimated the average bargaining power of retailers and how various factors influence their bargaining power with a random-coefficient discrete choice model of demand. With the full bargaining model specification, this paper then conducts simulations to isolate the role of private label in bargaining and retailer profitability, comparing the effectiveness of alternative private label strategies. Results indicate private label milk from different retailers are close competitors and retailers have more bargaining power than manufacturers. Further, factors such as the manufacturer size, private label share, and their private label position can significantly affect retailers’ bargaining power. Moreover, the counterfactual analysis shows that lowering private label prices and other private label strategies such as private label program expansion and retailer advertising could not only increase their profitability but also allow retailers to benefit from the bargaining with manufacturers.

JEL Classification: D12; Q13

Corresponding author: Yizao Liu, The Pennsylvania State University, 208A Armsby Building, 16802 University Park, PA, USA, E-mail:
Researcher(s)’ own analyses calculated (or derived) based in part on data from Nielsen Consumer LLC and marketing databases provided through the NielsenIQ Datasets at the Kilts Center for Marketing Data Center at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. The conclusions drawn from the NielsenIQ data are those of the researcher(s) and do not reflect the views of NielsenIQ. NielsenIQ is not responsible for, had no role in, and was not involved in analyzing and preparing the results reported herein.

References

Ailawadi, K. L., K. Pauwels, and J. B. E. Steenkamp. 2008. “Private-Label Use and Store Loyalty.” Journal of Marketing 72 (6): 19–30, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.6.19.Suche in Google Scholar

Bauner, C., E. Jaenicke, E. Wang, and P. C. Wu. 2019. “Couponing Strategies in Competition Between a National Brand and a Private Label Product.” Journal of Retailing 95 (1): 57–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2018.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Bergès-Sennou, F., P. Bontems, and V. Réquillart. 2004. “Economics of Private Labels: A Survey of Literature.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2 (1): 1037, https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1037.Suche in Google Scholar

Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes. 1995. “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 63: 841–90, https://doi.org/10.2307/2171802.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonanno, A., and R. A. Lopez. 2005. “Private Label Expansion and Supermarket Milk Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 3 (1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1085.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonnet, C., and P. Dubois. 2010. “Inference on Vertical Contracts Between Manufacturers and Retailers Allowing for Nonlinear Pricing and Resale Price Maintenance.” The RAND Journal of Economics 41 (1): 139–64, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00093.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonnet, C., and Z. Bouamra-Mechemache. 2016. “Organic Label, Bargaining Power, and Profit-Sharing in the French Fluid Milk Market.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98 (1): 113–33, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav047.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, X., Y. Liu, E. C. Jaenicke, and A. N. Rabinowitz. 2019. “New Concerns on Caffeine Consumption and the Impact of Potential Regulations: The Case of Energy Drinks.” Food Policy 87: 101746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101746.Suche in Google Scholar

Chidmi, B., and R. A. Lopez. 2007. “Brand-Supermarket Demand for Breakfast Cereals and Retail Competition.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (2): 324–37, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00994.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Corstjens, M., and R. Lal. 2000. “Building Store Loyalty Through Store Brands.” Journal of Marketing Research 37 (3): 281–91, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.3.281.18781.Suche in Google Scholar

Cotterill, R. W., W. P. PutsisJr, and R. Dhar. 2000. “Assessing the Competitive Interaction Between Private Labels and National Brands.” The Journal of Business 73 (1): 109–37, https://doi.org/10.1086/209634.Suche in Google Scholar

Dawes, J., and M. Nenycz-Thiel. 2013. “Analyzing the Intensity of Private Label Competition Across Retailers.” Journal of Business Research 66 (1): 60–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.023.Suche in Google Scholar

Dobson, P., M. Waterson, K. Konrad, and C. Matutes. 1999. “Retailer Power: Recent Developments and Policy Implications.” Economic Policy 14: 135–64, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00046.Suche in Google Scholar

Geyskens, I., K. Gielens, and E. Gijsbrechts. 2010. “Proliferating Private-Label Portfolios: How Introducing Economy and Premium Private Labels Influences Brand Choice.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (5): 791–807, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.5.791.Suche in Google Scholar

Hausman, J. A. 1996. “Valuation of New Goods Under Perfect and Imperfect Competition.” In The Economics of New Goods, 207–48. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Y., and R. A. Lopez. 2014. “The Impact of Social Media Conversations on Consumer Brand Choices.” Marketing Letters 27: 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9321-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Y., X. Chen, and A. N. Rabinowitz. 2019. “The Role of Retail Market Power and State Regulations in the Heterogeneity of Farm–Retail Price Transmission of Private Label and Branded Products.” Agricultural Economics 50 (1): 91–9, https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12468.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Y., X. Chen, A. N. Rabinowitz, and B. Campbell. 2020. “Demand, Challenges, and Marketing Strategies in the Retail Promotion of Local Brand Milk.” Agricultural Economics 51 (5): 655–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12584.Suche in Google Scholar

Lopez, E., and R. A. Lopez. 2009. “Demand for Differentiated Milk Products: Implications for Price Competition.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 25 (4): 453–65, https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20219.Suche in Google Scholar

Nevo, A. 2001. “Measuring Market Power in the Ready–to–Eat Cereal Industry.” Econometrica 69 (2): 307–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00194.Suche in Google Scholar

Richards, T. J., S. F. Hamilton, and P. M. Patterson. 2010. “Spatial Competition and Private Labels.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35: 183–208.Suche in Google Scholar

Villas-Boas, S. B. 2007. “Vertical Relationships Between Manufacturers and Retailers: Inference with Limited Data.” The Review of Economic Studies 74 (2): 625–52, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00433.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Yonezawa, K., M. I. Gómez, and T. J. Richards. 2020. “The Robinson–Patman Act and Vertical Relationships.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 102 (1): 329–52, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaz049.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-19
Accepted: 2022-03-23
Published Online: 2022-06-20

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jafio-2022-0002/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen