Startseite Oligopolistic Market Structure in the Japanese Pistachio Import Market
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Oligopolistic Market Structure in the Japanese Pistachio Import Market

  • Mahdi Asgari und Sayed H. Saghaian EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. September 2013

Abstract

Iran is the major producer of pistachio nuts in the world. Iran dominated the international pistachio export markets until 1982, when a new competitor, the United States, emerged in the international markets. Currently, both Iran and the United States are major pistachio exporters to Japan. In this study, we address the following empirical question: Is the Japanese pistachio import market best characterized by Cournot or Bertrand duopoly competition or some other form of game? We use two historical data sets on pistachio prices and quantities imported by Japan from Iran and the United States and estimate the demand functions for these two main exporters. Considering two different strategic variables, quantity and price, full information maximum likelihood (FIML) resulted in different estimates. We used normalized likelihood ratio statistics for the model comparison. Having proper game-specific nonlinear-equation restrictions enabled us to form six alternative models. The model that best fit the data was the Stackelberg model with US quantity leadership.

JEL Codes: Q17; F12; C72

Appendix A: functional forms of the estimated models

Bertrand model (M1)

Stackelberg model with Iran price leadership (M2)

Stackelberg model with the US price leadership (M3)

Cournot model (M4)

Stackelberg model with Iran quantity leadership (M5)

Stackelberg model with the US quantity leadership (M6)

Appendix B: data sets

The annual data set.

TimeQirPirQusPusEirjEusjGDP
19886,439.209619.062640.719632.766186.515128.1523,078.998
19895,235.315677.2171,209.93721.505191.507137.9643,228.661
19904,477.943684.638884.957737.874212.551144.7933,385.023
19917,709.417554.8431,751.296638.568199.475134.7073,486.715
19926,158.143581.3451,456.309647.740193.136126.6513,506.557
19935,433.721486.3751,217.391553.5948.768111.1983,503.896
19946,465.345405.2851,135.936419.4145.842102.2083,522.135
19957,489.277376.2711,038.279414.9415.37994.0603,574.736
19965,942.027462.288999.077526.3406.211108.7793,659.618
19974,229.100549.502824.591655.9026.900120.9913,707.111
19983,471.966615.297814.959601.6927.470130.9053,621.993
19991,412.841455.5491,862.359529.4236.496113.9073,610.032
2000961.509535.3181,910.257546.3496.105107.7653,706.845
2001933.982456.7752,458.161506.6506.928121.5293,705.531
2002527.575592.4182,085.675526.8521.815125.3883,706.62
2003174.518614.8361,976.805516.0471.415115.9333,750.98
2004244.032639.1742,019.246552.2561.256108.1933,852.619
2005186.685876.2842,008.522624.4081.230110.2183,926.764
2006228.236931.8781,848.394825.3191.268116.2994,007.382
2007222.2401,137.2081,795.331732.6931.269117.7544,101.597
2008322.7401,059.1992,060.986616.3541.096103.3594,055.919
2009138.4401,373.1441,673.813732.1920.94993.5703,805.253
2010238.3561,340.6081,946.256770.7600.85687.7803,960.784

The quarterly data set.

TimeQirPirQusPusEirjEusjGDP
Q2-19921,750.01632.32284.62665.14196.23130.383,934.33
Q3-1992861.57582.32225.82633.64196.36124.903,934.52
Q4-1992863.69542.34336.25594.28187.13123.033,915.76
Q1-19931,909.61529.31262.50587.91130.88120.923,962.73
Q2-19931,534.00475.98327.55543.876.80110.063,920.48
Q3-1993965.11453.62215.92536.486.65105.683,910.30
Q4-19931,025.00452.79411.41548.436.47108.273,937.82
Q1-19942,103.54428.98177.65494.086.15107.613,959.56
Q2-19942,109.16401.49347.11433.315.90103.253,938.24
Q3-19941,180.60388.21279.40395.455.6699.054,000.15
Q4-19941,072.05385.06331.78385.075.6598.863,961.50
Q1-19951,916.39365.23368.54399.955.5096.173,943.51
Q2-19952,077.86345.48288.68377.654.8384.483,991.65
Q3-19952,425.21380.56109.81452.725.3994.234,019.96
Q4-19951,069.82446.12271.25459.705.81101.544,023.25
Q1-19961,470.67451.89383.08474.686.05105.834,025.34
Q2-19961,783.28455.49206.25514.866.14107.504,066.37
Q3-19961,363.70471.65125.22522.346.22109.004,066.24
Q4-19961,324.39473.33284.53605.976.44112.904,117.53
Q1-19971,219.30518.42257.76647.216.91121.224,138.41
Q2-19971,394.04528.54190.09664.226.83119.714,149.14
Q3-1997887.51546.66110.07641.876.73118.074,153.11
Q4-1997728.25645.12266.67664.167.15125.394,157.64
Q1-19981,371.86625.04153.15621.477.31128.164,063.97
Q2-19981,290.17628.53206.32654.117.74135.664,036.72
Q3-1998529.50613.91172.31646.567.99139.984,035.89
Q4-1998280.44509.35283.18525.506.82119.474,061.32
Q1-1999335.20450.48452.42510.956.64116.484,000.50
Q2-1999162.80478.81597.49525.576.89120.834,000.01
Q3-1999412.52448.39367.40531.036.46113.143,974.49
Q4-1999502.33457.27445.04552.045.95104.403,980.96
Q1-2000402.15541.77432.14578.106.10107.004,030.67
Q2-2000112.91550.85563.67579.546.09106.694,020.54
Q3-2000298.90526.55314.13573.256.15107.714,003.61
Q4-2000147.55523.60600.31478.256.11109.894,022.96
Q1-2001270.59415.73593.74511.046.73118.144,040.54
Q2-2001178.96500.65613.08517.556.99122.633,996.37
Q3-2001220.76423.65605.44500.656.93121.493,936.28
Q4-2001263.68496.85645.90497.897.06123.823,919.95
Q1-2002296.80539.30591.69532.135.61132.463,916.28
Q2-2002150.77630.25435.83533.231.60126.813,911.52
Q3-200278.21672.69347.65522.011.50119.323,921.03
Q4-20021.802,694.44710.51520.921.54122.473,923.98
Q1-20033.292,706.20593.50535.201.48118.953,871.90
Q2-200368.18649.18458.50515.471.45118.533,921.68
Q3-200325.50483.69518.77512.501.42117.393,920.30
Q4-200377.55539.09406.04493.241.31108.803,929.80
Q1-200478.25564.92547.05525.271.28107.163,960.12
Q2-200467.53604.86437.63571.651.28109.763,943.61
Q3-200452.22658.66350.73578.441.26109.943,943.55
Q4-200446.03793.65683.84548.001.20105.763,936.40
Q1-200554.47719.81567.11568.111.18104.513,921.44
Q2-200583.45855.86484.98570.711.20107.513,954.75
Q3-200519.641,161.34484.41622.201.24111.273,951.59
Q4-200529.131,035.22472.03749.491.29117.263,951.52
Q1-200669.79977.55236.23852.311.28116.873,955.64
Q2-200668.52752.44348.19809.281.25114.483,957.06
Q3-200680.19789.96544.48801.441.27116.303,947.25
Q4-20069.743,035.32719.49842.291.28117.754,003.77
Q1-2007124.64959.59487.32797.291.29119.404,022.67
Q2-200726.721,974.25488.43747.221.30120.804,027.13
Q3-200742.361,073.32432.14739.751.27117.733,993.29
Q4-200728.521,224.12387.45625.251.21113.134,014.92
Q1-200894.721,155.87498.62603.291.14105.204,021.40
Q2-2008103.32960.96628.51572.041.14104.653,959.37
Q3-200839.631,191.46475.57620.581.14107.603,888.24
Q4-200885.081,009.29458.29686.950.9796.073,827.14
Q1-200960.121,222.92423.66758.560.9693.633,671.05
Q2-200923.691,979.91487.97757.650.9997.393,706.23
Q3-200928.351,062.47434.30726.930.9493.513,679.06
Q4-200926.281,504.98327.88667.190.9189.863,720.87
Q1-201042.881,176.92655.70703.850.9190.653,686.68
Q2-201077.681,244.74520.54787.760.9092.083,718.74
Q3-201069.801,548.66319.82837.720.8285.743,724.17
Q4-201048.001,339.42450.19800.980.7982.533,702.42
Q1-201179.501,390.94534.77766.230.8082.273,603.35
Q2-201146.521,467.69458.55750.240.7681.583,556.97
Q3-201162.401,123.84401.98696.850.7377.673,612.67
Q4-201148.691,327.73493.88694.580.7177.333,602.82

Acknowledgments

Journal Paper Number 13-04-067 of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous referees for their insightful comments.

References

Besanko, D., D.Dranove, M.Shanley, and S.Schaefer. 2010. Economics of Strategy, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Carter, C. A., and D.MacLaren. 1997. “Price or Quantity Competition? Oligopolistic Structures in International Commodity Markets.” Review of International Economics3(5):37385.10.1111/1467-9396.00063Suche in Google Scholar

Dastidar, K. G.. 2004. “On Stackelberg Games in a Homogeneous Product Market.” European Economic Review48:54962.10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00035-7Suche in Google Scholar

Economides, N.. 1993. “Quantity Leadership and Social Inefficiency.” International Journal of Industrial Organization11:21937.10.1016/0167-7187(93)90005-WSuche in Google Scholar

Gasmi, F., J. J.Laffont, and Q.Vuong. 1992. “Econometric Analysis of Collusive Behavior in a Soft-Drink Market.” Journal of Economics& Management Strategy1(2):277311.10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00277.xSuche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, P., and M. M.Knetter. 1999. “Measuring the Intensity of Competition in Export Markets.” Journal of International Economics47(1):2760.10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00015-4Suche in Google Scholar

Saghaian, S. H., and M. R.Reed. 2004. “Measuring the Intensity of Competition in the Japanese Beef Market.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics36(1):11322.10.1017/S1074070800021891Suche in Google Scholar

Tirole, J. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization, 12th ed. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

van Damme, E., and S.Hurkens. 1999. “Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership.” Games and Economic Behavior28:10529.10.1006/game.1998.0687Suche in Google Scholar

Vuong, Q. H. 1989. “Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses.” Econometrica57(2):30733.10.2307/1912557Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Z. 2011. “World Production and Trade of Pistachios: The Role of the U.S. and Factors Affecting the Export Demand of the U.S. Pistachios.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Z., S.Saghaian, and M.Reed. 2012. “Factors Affecting the Export Demand for U.S. Pistachios.” The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review15(3):13954.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-09-17

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Heruntergeladen am 18.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jafio-2013-0005/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen