Home Philosophy Dynastic Periodization and its Limits: Historiography in Contemporary Arab Monarchies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dynastic Periodization and its Limits: Historiography in Contemporary Arab Monarchies

  • Jörg Matthias Determann EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 1, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract: Over the last decades, a number of scholars have studied how historiography served to legitimize different Arab regimes. These scholars have, however, given little attention to the role of periodization. By contrast, this study suggests that periodization has been a central element of historiography in the monarchies. Many textbooks and other major works in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Jordan, and Morocco follow two broad tendencies in terms of periodization. The first tendency is to merge dynastic and national periods and to start the history of the country essentially with the rise of the contemporary ruling family. The second tendency is to integrate the contemporary dynasty into the history of a longer, sometimes perennial, monarchy. Nevertheless, official dynastic periodization has not determined all historical writing in the monarchies. Local and tribal historians often developed periodizations centered on specific cities or tribes and also imagined a much longer history than that of the contemporary dynasty.

Published Online: 2014-5-1
Published in Print: 2014-5-1

© De Gruyter 2014

Downloaded on 11.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/islam-2014-0006/pdf
Scroll to top button