Text mining of syntactic complexity in L2 writing: an LDA topic modeling approach

References

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Jongbong Lee & Yizhou Wang. 2024. Capturing linguistic features of writing in two genres over time. Reading and Writing 37(3). 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10437-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Ai, Haiyang & Xiaofei Lu. 2013. A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’ writing. Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data 59. 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.59.15ai.Suche in Google Scholar

Ajabshir, Zahra Fakher & Saman Ebadi. 2023. The effects of automatic writing evaluation and teacher-focused feedback on CALF measures and overall quality of L2 writing across different genres. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 8(1). 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00201-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Aletras, Nikolaos & Mark Stevenson. 2013. Evaluating topic coherence using distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013)–Long Papers.Suche in Google Scholar

Aydin, Zeynep & Sema Yildiz. 2014. Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology 18(1). 160–180.Suche in Google Scholar

Barrot, Jessie & Mari Karen Gabinete. 2021. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59(2). 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0012.Suche in Google Scholar

Barrot, Jessie S. & Joan Y. Agdeppa. 2021. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as indices of college-level L2 writers’ proficiency. Assessing Writing 47. 100510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100510.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Daniel R. & Christopher Judd. 2018. The effects of online collaborative writing and TOEIC writing test-preparation on L2 writing performance. Journal of Asia TEFL 15(2). 383. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.8.383.Suche in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2007. Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes 43(2). 79–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336894.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Kornwipa Poonpon. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1). 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Shelley Staples. 2016. Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics 37(5). 639–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu059.Suche in Google Scholar

Bikowski, Dawn & Ramyadarshanie Vithanage. 2016. Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology 20(1). 79–99.Suche in Google Scholar

Blei, David, Andrew Ng & Michael Jordan. 2001. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. 601–608.10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0082Suche in Google Scholar

Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng & Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3(Jan). 993–1022.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonilla López, Marisela, Elke Van Steendam & Kris Buyse. 2017. Comprehensive corrective feedback on low and high proficiency writers: Examining attitudes and preferences. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168(1). 91–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.04bon.Suche in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2012. Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.32.02bulSuche in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2014. Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2018. Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28(1). 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12196.Suche in Google Scholar

Bueno-Alastuey, María Camino, Raychel Vasseur & Idoia Elola. 2022. Effects of collaborative writing and peer feedback on Spanish as a foreign language writing performance. Foreign Language Annals 55(2). 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12611.Suche in Google Scholar

Casal, J. Elliott & Joseph J. Lee. 2019. Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 44. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Casal, J. Elliott, Xiaofei Lu, Xixin Qiu, Yuanheng Wang & Genggeng Zhang. 2021. Syntactic complexity across academic research article part-genres: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 52. 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100996.Suche in Google Scholar

Cho, Hyejin. 2015. Effects of task complexity on English argumentative writing. English Teaching 70(2). 107–131. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.70.2.201506.107.Suche in Google Scholar

Chuang, Jason, Christopher D. Manning & Jeffrey Heer. 2012. Termite: Visualization techniques for assessing textual topic models. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 74–77.Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara. 2014. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A. 2020. Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview. Journal of Writing Research 11(3). 415–443. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01.Suche in Google Scholar

De Clercq, Bastien & Alex Housen. 2017. A cross-linguistic perspective on syntactic complexity in L2 development: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. The Modern Language Journal 101(2). 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12396.Suche in Google Scholar

Dirgeyasa, I. Wy. 2016. Genre-based approach: What and how to teach and to learn writing. English Language Teaching 9(9). 45–51. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n9p45.Suche in Google Scholar

Elgort, Irina. 2017. Blog posts and traditional assignments by first- and second-language writers. Language Learning & Technology 21(2). 52–72.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod & Fangyuan Yuan. 2004. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(1). 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263104261034.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2005. Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11Suche in Google Scholar

Ehret, Katharina & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2019. Compressing learner language: An information-theoretic measure of complexity in SLA production data. Second Language Research 35(1). 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316669559.Suche in Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, Ana. 2012. Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(1). 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Tatsushi. 2023. L2 writing development through two types of writing task repetition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61(3). 1109–1138. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0144.Suche in Google Scholar

Ghavamnia, Maedeh, Mansoor Tavakoli & Masoos Esteki. 2013. The effect of pre-task and online planning conditions on complexity, accuracy, and fluency in EFL learners’ written production. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras 20. 31–43.10.30827/Digibug.29559Suche in Google Scholar

Graesser, Arthur C., Danielle S. McNamara, Max M. Louwerse & Zhiqiang Cai. 2004. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 36(2). 193–202. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195564.Suche in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Thomas & Mark Steyvers. 2004. Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(Supplement 1). 5228–5235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Zellig S. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10(2–3). 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520.Suche in Google Scholar

Gyllstad, Henrik, Jonas Granfeldt, Petra Bernardini & Marie Källkvist. 2014. Linguistic correlates to communicative proficiency levels of the CEFR: The case of syntactic complexity in written L2 English, L3 French and L4 Italian. In Eurosla yearbook, 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/eurosla.14.01gylSuche in Google Scholar

Hamano-Bunce, Douglas. 2022. The effects of direct written corrective feedback and comparator texts on the complexity and accuracy of revisions and new pieces of writing. Language Teaching Research. 13621688221127643. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221127643.Suche in Google Scholar

Hidayatullah, Ahmad Fathan & Muhammad Rifqi Ma’arif. 2017. Road traffic topic modeling on Twitter using latent Dirichlet allocation. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET), 47–52. Indonesia: IEEE.10.1109/SIET.2017.8304107Suche in Google Scholar

Homburg, Taco Justus. 1984. Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? Tesol Quarterly 18(1). 87–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586337.Suche in Google Scholar

Hwang, Haerim, Hyeyoung Jung & Hyunwoo Kim. 2020. Effects of written versus spoken production modalities on syntactic complexity measures in beginning-level child EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal 104(1). 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12626.Suche in Google Scholar

Jagaiah, Thilagha, Natalie G. Olinghouse & Devin M. Kearns. 2020. Syntactic complexity measures: Variation by genre, grade-level, students’ writing abilities, and writing quality. Reading and Writing 33. 2577–2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lin & Tu Mengwei. 2016. Effects of the continuation task on L2 vocabulary learning. Modern Foreign Language 6. 819–829.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Jingyang, Peng Bi & Haitao Liu. 2019. Syntactic complexity development in the writings of EFL learners: Insights from a dependency syntactically-annotated corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing 46. 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666.Suche in Google Scholar

Karim, Khaled & Hossein Nassaji. 2020. The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing. Language Teaching Research 24(4). 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818802469.Suche in Google Scholar

Khan, Ashraf, M. Kabir Hassan, Andrea Paltrinieri, Alberto Dreassi & Salman Bahoo. 2020. A bibliometric review of takaful literature. International Review of Economics & Finance 69. 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.05.013.Suche in Google Scholar

Khan, Ashraf, John W. Goodell, M. Kabir Hassan & Andrea Paltrinieri. 2022. A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters 47. 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520.Suche in Google Scholar

Kisselev, Olesya, Rossina Soyan, Dmitrii Pastushenkov & Jason Merrill. 2022. Measuring writing development and proficiency gains using indices of lexical and syntactic complexity: Evidence from longitudinal Russian learner corpus data. The Modern Language Journal 106(4). 798–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12808.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Minkyung & Scott A. Crossley. 2018. Modeling second language writing quality: A structural equation investigation of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features in source-based and independent writing. Assessing Writing 37. 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin, Sanghee Kang, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Bumyong Choi. 2020. The role of task repetition in a Korean as a foreign language classroom: Writing quality, attention to form, and learning of Korean grammar. Foreign Language Annals 53(4). 827–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12501.Suche in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher. 2016. Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine-grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.Suche in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher & Scott A. Crossley. 2018. Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal 102(2). 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468.Suche in Google Scholar

Lan, Ge, Qiandi Liu & Shelley Staples. 2019. Grammatical complexity: ‘What Does It Mean’ and ‘So What’ for L2 writing classrooms? Journal of Second Language Writing 46. 100673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100673.Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2009. Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp043.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Cynthia, Haoyan Ge & Edsoulla Chung. 2021. What linguistic features distinguish and predict L2 writing quality? A study of examination scripts written by adolescent Chinese learners of English in Hong Kong. System 97. 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102461.Suche in Google Scholar

Lei, Lei, Ju Wen & Xiaohu Yang. 2023. A large-scale longitudinal study of syntactic complexity development in EFL writing: A mixed-effects model approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 59. 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Mimi & Wei Zhu. 2017. Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing 35. 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Yang, Larisa Nikitina & Patricia Nora Riget. 2022. Development of syntactic complexity in Chinese university students’ L2 argumentative writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 56. 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101099.Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, Liuxuan & Yalan Chen. 2023. Evolution of Chinese original-innovation talent policies: A topic modelling approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2242513.Suche in Google Scholar

Lorenzo, Francisco & Leticia Rodríguez. 2014. Onset and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings: CALP in CLIL. System 47. 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei. 2010. Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4). 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei. 2011. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. Tesol Quarterly 45(1). 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859.Suche in Google Scholar

Martínez, Ana Cristina Lahuerta. 2018. Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing 35. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Mao, Zhicheng & Lin Jiang. 2017. Exploring the effects of the continuation task on syntactic complexity in second language writing. English Language Teaching 10(8). 100–106. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n8p100.Suche in Google Scholar

Maier, Daniel, Annie Waldherr, Peter Miltner, Gregor Wiedemann, Andreas Niekler, Alexa Keinert, Barbara Pfetsch, Gerhard Heyer, Ueli Reber, Thomas Häussler, Hannah Schmid-Petri & Silke Adam. 2021. Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. In Computational Methods for Communication Science, 13–38. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Mazgutova, Diana & Judit Kormos. 2015. Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing 29. 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30. 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044.Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2012. Interlanguage complexity. In Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, 13. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229226.127Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2015. Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing 29. 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Ouyang, Jinghui, Jingyang Jiang & Haitao Liu. 2022. Dependency distance measures in assessing L2 writing proficiency. Assessing Writing 51. 100603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100603.Suche in Google Scholar

Pallotti, Gabriele. 2015. A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research 31(1). 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536435.Suche in Google Scholar

Peng, Jinfang, Chuming Wang & Xiaofei Lu. 2020. Effect of the linguistic complexity of the input text on alignment, writing fluency, and writing accuracy in the continuation task. Language Teaching Research 24(3). 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818783341.Suche in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2). 169–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000056.Suche in Google Scholar

Porter, Kyle. 2018. Analyzing the DarkNetMarkets subreddit for evolutions of tools and trends using LDA topic modeling. Digital Investigation 26. S87–S97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2018.04.023.Suche in Google Scholar

Qin, Wenjuan & Paola Uccelli. 2016. Same language, different functions: A cross-genre analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 33. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Rostamian, Morteza, Ali Mohammad Fazilatfar & Ali Akbar Jabbari. 2018. The effect of planning time on cognitive processes, monitoring behavior, and quality of L2 writing. Language Teaching Research 22(4). 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817699239.Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2003. The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies 21(2). 45–105.Suche in Google Scholar

Sievert, Carson & Kenneth Shirley. 2014. LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, 63–70.10.3115/v1/W14-3110Suche in Google Scholar

Shi, Bibing, Liyan Huang & Xiaofei Lu. 2020. Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing performance and writing strategy use in the continuation task. Language Testing 37(3). 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220911626.Suche in Google Scholar

Shao, Zimeng, Hanbo Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Yuexin Zhong & Xiaoyan Xu. 2022. Phrasal complexity in English argumentative writing: Variations across Chinese STEM versus English majors’ production and EFL textbook essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 55. 101070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101070.Suche in Google Scholar

Syed, Shaheen & Marco Spruit. 2017. Full-text or abstract? Examining topic coherence scores using latent Dirichlet allocation. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 165–174. Tokyo: IEEE.10.1109/DSAA.2017.61Suche in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko, William Crawford & Danielle Zawodny Wetzel. 2013. What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. TESOL Quarterly 47(2). 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.91.Suche in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 2007. The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16. 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Chuming. 2012. Continuation task: An effective way to improve the efficiency of foreign language learning. Foreign Language World 5. 2–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Min & Chuming Wang. 2014. The effects of alignment in continuation tasks. Modern Foreign Languages 4. 501–512.Suche in Google Scholar

Westgate, Martin J., Philip S. Barton, Jennifer C. Pierson & David B. Lindenmayer. 2015. Text analysis tools for identification of emerging topics and research gaps in conservation science. Conservation Biology 29(6). 1606–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12605.Suche in Google Scholar

Wigglesworth, Gillian & Neomy Storch. 2009. Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. Language Testing 26(3). 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670.Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Ting Sophia, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Janet S. Gaffney. 2023. A multidimensional approach to assessing the effects of task complexity on L2 students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing 55. 100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100690.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Weiwei, Xiaofei Lu & Sara Cushing Weigle. 2015. Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 28. 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Yin, Shuhui, Yuan Gao & Xiaofei Lu. 2021. Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System 97. 102427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102427.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhai, Ke, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Nima Asadi & Mohamad L. Alkhouja. 2012. Mr. LDA: A flexible large scale topic modeling package using variational inference in mapreduce. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, 879–888.10.1145/2187836.2187955Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Xiaopeng. 2016. Multi-dimensional analysis of the effects of the continuation task on the ESL writing process. Foreign Language World 6. 86–94.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lawrence Jun & Xiaolong Cheng. 2021. Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 54. 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Xiaopeng & Xiaofei Lu. 2022. Revisiting the predictive power of traditional vs. fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for L2 writing quality: The case of two genres. Assessing Writing 51. 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100597.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Huan. 2022. Effect of interaction and alignment of continuation task in Chinese as a second language writing. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2072312.Suche in Google Scholar