Home Scaffolding in genre-based L2 writing classes: Vietnamese EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Scaffolding in genre-based L2 writing classes: Vietnamese EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices

  • Loc Tan Nguyen ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Hung Phu Bui ORCID logo and Xuan Van Ha ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: January 30, 2024

Abstract

The facilitative role of scaffolding has been highlighted by research with empirical evidence on learners’ engagement in classroom interaction and their uptake of teacher instruction but the body of empirical research focusing on genre-based pedagogical approaches for Vietnamese learners as second language (L2) writers remains relatively limited. The present study extends this line of enquiry by investigating how five experienced EFL teachers at two Vietnamese colleges apply scaffolding strategies in genre-based L2 writing classes and how teacher professional development workshops shifted the teachers’ beliefs about such an approach to teaching EFL writing. Data were collected from 30 classroom observations (10 before and 20 after the workshops) and five individual semi-structured interviews with the teachers. A content-based approach was adopted for qualitative data analysis. Findings show that the teachers used a much wider range of scaffolding strategies, with questioning and giving feedback being the most frequently-used strategies, in their EFL writing classes compared to those observed before the workshops. The study further shows that there were remarkable changes in the teachers’ beliefs about genre-based L2 writing pedagogy and that they highly valued the potential impact of this approach on learners’ uptake in writing skills. Implications for second language writing pedagogy and teacher professional development will be discussed.


Corresponding author: Loc Tan Nguyen, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: This work was funded by University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Vietnam.

  2. Informed consent: The authors all consent to the publication of this article.

  3. Competing interests: The authors hereby declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Appendix: Guiding interview questions

  1. What procedures/steps do you often follow in teaching writing to your students? What is the focus of each step? Why?

  2. How do you often prepare your students for the main writing task? Why?

  3. How do you assess your students’ submissions? How do you treat your students’ language and writing problems? Why?

  4. What is the teacher’s role in a writing class? What role do you think about interactive scaffolding plays in teaching writing? Why?

  5. Let’s talk about the modeling stage in writing classes? What do you think the teacher and students usually do at this stage? Why?

  6. Let’s talk about the joint construction stage in the writing class. What do you think the teacher and students usually do? Why?

  7. What do you think about peer assessment in a writing class? Is it effective? Why or why not?

  8. In your opinion, is genre-based pedagogy an effective approach to teaching writing? Why or why not?

References

Basturkmen, Helen. 2012. Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System 40(2). 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles. 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric, 67–85. London: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Belland, Brian R. 2014. Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In Michael J. Spector, David M. Merrill, Jan Elen & M. J. Bishop (eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 505–518. New Your: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Simon. 2011. The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System 39(3). 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.009.Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Simon. 2015. Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Simon. 2017. Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. In Peter Garrett & Josep M. Cots (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness, 75–91. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315676494-5Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Simon & Saleh Al-Busaidi. 2012. Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal 66(3). 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr065.Search in Google Scholar

Bui, Trang Le Diem & Johnathan Newton. 2022. Developing task-based lessons from PPP lessons: A case of primary English textbooks in Vietnam. RELC Journal 53(1). 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688220912040.10.1177/0033688220912040Search in Google Scholar

Burns, Anne. 2001. Genre-based approaches to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. In Christopher Candlin & Neil Mercer (eds.), English language teaching in its social context, 200–2007. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Capps, Daniel. K., Barbara Crawford & Mark Constas. 2012. A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education 23(3). 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2.Search in Google Scholar

Chaisiri, Tawatchai. 2010. An investigation of the teaching of writing with a specific focus on the concept of genre. International Journal of Learning 17(2). 195–205. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v17i02/46879.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Yuan-Shan & Shao-Wen Su. 2012. A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal 66(2). 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr061.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Fei-Wen. 2008. Scaffolding language, scaffolding writing: A genre approach to teaching narrative writing. The Asian EFL Journal 10(2). 167–191.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, David & Hilary Hollingsworth. 2002. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education 18(8). 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00053-7.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, John W. & Cheryl N. Poth. 2017. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.Search in Google Scholar

Derewianka, Beverly. 2003. Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal 34(2). 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202.Search in Google Scholar

Diefes-Dux, Heidi A. 2014. In-service teacher professional development in engineering education: Early years. In Senay Purzer Johannes Strobel & Monica Cardella (eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Synthesizing research, policy, practices, 233–257. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.15Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2008. Learner beliefs and language learning. Asian EFL Journal 10(4). 7–25.Search in Google Scholar

Feez, Susan. 2002. Heritage and innovation in second language education. In Ann M. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives, 43–69. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, Jiayan & Jianbin Huang. 2010. On communicative competence in curriculum design: A comparison of the college English curriculum requirements and the English curriculum standards. Polyglossia 18. 73–86.Search in Google Scholar

Ha, Xuan Van. 2022. Effects of a professional development program on teachers’ actual practices concerning oral corrective feedback. System 96. 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102917.Search in Google Scholar

Ha, Xuan Van. 2023. High school EFL teachers’ oral corrective feedback beliefs and practices, and the effects of lesson focus. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61(4). 1799–1826. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0213.Search in Google Scholar

Ha, Xuan Van & Jill C. Murray. 2023. Corrective feedback: Beliefs and practices of Vietnamese primary EFL teachers. Language Teaching Research 27(1). 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168820931897.10.1177/1362168820931897Search in Google Scholar

Ha, Xuan Van & Jill C. Murray. 2021. The impact of a professional development program on EFL teachers’ beliefs about corrective feedback. System 96. 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102405.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2003. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(1). 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2007. Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 16(3). 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005.Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, Dona M. 1992. Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist 27(1). 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6.Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, James P. & Matthew E. Poehner. 2014. Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203813850Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Icy, Pauline Mak & Anne Burns. 2016. EFL teachers’ attempts at feedback innovation in the writing classroom. Language Teaching Research 20(2). 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815581007.Search in Google Scholar

Macalister, John & Paul I. S. Nation. 2020. Language curriculum design, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429203763Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Thomas C. & Jeffrey Zoul. 2015. Leading professional learning: Tools to connect and empower teachers. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.10.4135/9781483393346Search in Google Scholar

Myskow, Gordon & Kana Gordon. 2010. A focus on purpose: Using a genre approach in an EFL writing class. ELT Journal 64(3). 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp057.Search in Google Scholar

Nagao, Akiko. 2019. The SFL genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 4(1). 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0069-3.Search in Google Scholar

Neuendorf, Kimberly. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Thi Nguyet Minh. 2016. The cultural appropriateness of communicative language teaching: A case study of the EFL program implementation at a Vietnamese tertiary institution. NSW, Australia: Western Sydney University.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Loc Tan & Johnathan Newton. 2020. Pronunciation teaching in tertiary EFL classes: Vietnamese teachers’ beliefs and practices. TESL-EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 24(1). 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Loc Tan & Johnathan Newton. 2021. Enhancing EFL teachers’ pronunciation pedagogy through professional learning: A Vietnamese case study. RELC Journal 52(1). 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220952476.Search in Google Scholar

Opfer, Darleen V. & Davia Pedder. 2011. Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research 81(3). 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609.Search in Google Scholar

Phipps, Simon & Simon Borg. 2007. Exploring the relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their classroom practice. Teacher Trainer 21(3). 17–19.Search in Google Scholar

Phipps, Simon & Simon Borg. 2009. Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System 37(3). 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

Rozimela, Yenni. 2005. Genre Based pedagogy for teaching English academic writing in an Indonesian tertiary context: A case study. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.Search in Google Scholar

Sahin, Iclal & Ali Yildirim. 2016. Transforming professional learning into practice. ELT Journal 70(3). 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv070.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, Leimin, Amanda Baker & Honglin Chen. 2017. Chinese EFL teachers’ cognition about the effectiveness of genre pedagogy: A case study. RELC Journal 50(2). 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217716506.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, Leimin, Jamine Delahunty & Xuesong Gao. 2019. Constraints preventing Chinese EFL teachers from putting their stated beliefs into teaching practice. Professional Development in Education 45(5). 774–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1511455.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tardy, Christine. 2019. Genre-based writing: What every ESL teacher needs to know. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Timperley, Helen. 2011. A background paper to inform the development of a national professional development framework for teachers and school leaders. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL).Search in Google Scholar

van de Pol, Janeke, Monique Volman & Jos Beishuizen. 2010. Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review 22(3). 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev. 1978. Interaction between learning and development. In Mary Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner & Ellen Souberman (eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, 79–91. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Chunmei. 2013. A study of genre approach in EFL writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3(11). 2128–2135. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.2128-2135.Search in Google Scholar

You, Xiaoye. 2004. New directions in EFL writing: A report from China. Journal of Second Language Writing 13(4). 253–256.10.1016/j.jslw.2004.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Shulin, Hao Xu, Lianjiang Jiang & Iris Ka Ian Chan. 2020. Understanding Macau novice secondary teachers’ beliefs and practices of EFL writing instruction: A complexity theory perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing 48. 100728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100728.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Xiaodong. 2019. EFL writers’ reconstruction of writing beliefs in a Functional Linguistics-Based curriculum: What does the trajectory look like? SAGE Open 9(2). 2158244019853915. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853915.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-08
Accepted: 2023-12-29
Published Online: 2024-01-30
Published in Print: 2025-06-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Unpacking the positioning of being “disengaged” and “disrespectful” in class through nexus analysis: an international student’s navigation of institutional and interactional university norms
  4. Assessing English language learners’ collocation knowledge: a systematic review of receptive and productive measurements
  5. The role of awareness in implicit and explicit knowledge
  6. Intensity of CLIL exposure and L2 motivation in primary school: evidence from Spanish EFL learners in non-CLIL, low-CLIL and high-CLIL programmes
  7. Promoting young EFL learners’ oral production through storytelling: coursebook adaptation in the Vietnamese classroom
  8. Applying embodied meaning of spatial prepositions and the Principled Polysemy model to teaching English as a second language: the case of to and on
  9. The impact of guessing and retrieval strategies for learning phrasal verbs
  10. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality
  11. Examining L2 studentsʼ development of global cohesion and its relationship with their argumentative essay quality
  12. The construct of integrated group discussion (IGD) among undergraduate students: to what extent does group discussion performance reflect performance on IGD tasks?
  13. Discipline-specific attitudinal differences of EMI students towards translanguaging
  14. Relationship between second language vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary learning strategy use: a meta-analysis of correlational studies
  15. Evaluative language in undergraduate academic writing: expressions of attitude as sources of text effectiveness in English as a Foreign Language
  16. Investigating optimal spacing schedules for incidental acquisition of L2 collocations
  17. The association between socioeconomic status and Chinese secondary students’ English achievement: mediation of self-efficacy and moderation of gender
  18. Integrated instruction of Appraisal Theory and rhetorical moves in literature reviews: an exploratory study
  19. Scaffolding in genre-based L2 writing classes: Vietnamese EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices
  20. Exploring the professional role identities of English for academic purposes practitioners: a qualitative study
  21. The combined effects of task repetition and post-task teacher-corrected transcribing on complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 oral performance
  22. Teacher behaviour and student engagement with L2 writing feedback: a case study
  23. The effect of an intervention focused on academic language on CAF measures in the multilingual writing of secondary students
  24. Which approach best promoted low-proficiency learners’ listening performance: metacognitive, bottom-up or a combination of both?
  25. Enhancing young EFL learners’ written skills: the role of repeated pre-task planning
  26. The mediating roles of resilience and motivation in the relationship between students’ English learning burnout and engagement: a conservation-of-resources perspective
  27. Student and teacher beliefs about oral corrective feedback in junior secondary English classrooms
  28. The effects of context, story-type, and language proficiency on EFL word learning and retention from reading
Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2023-0125/html?recommended=sidebar
Scroll to top button