Home Developing interlanguage: Driving forces in children learning Dutch and German
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Developing interlanguage: Driving forces in children learning Dutch and German

  • Peter Jordens EMAIL logo and Dagmar Bittner
Published/Copyright: October 28, 2017

Abstract

Spontaneous language learning both in children learning their mother tongue and in adults learning a second language shows that language development proceeds in a stage-wise manner. Given that a developmental stage is defined as a coherent linguistic system, utterances of language learners can be accounted for in terms of what (Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10. 209–231) referred to with the term Interlanguage. This paper is a study on the early interlanguage systems of children learning Dutch and German as their mother tongue. The present child learner systems, so it is claimed, are coherent lexical systems based on types of verb-argument structure that are either agentive (as in Dutch: kannie bal pakke ‘cannot ball get’, or German: mag nich nase putzen ‘like not nose clean’) or non-agentive (as in Dutch: popje valt bijna ‘doll falls nearly’, or in German: ente fällt ‘duck falls’). At this lexical stage, functional morphology (e. g. morphological finiteness, tense), function words (e. g. auxiliary verbs, determiners) and word order variation are absent. For these typically developing children, both in Dutch and in German, it is claimed that developmental progress is driven by the acquisition of the formal properties of topicalization. It is, furthermore, argued that this feature seems to serve as the driving force in the instantiation of the functional, i. e. informational linguistic properties of the target-language system.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the German Bundesministerium fÜr Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (Grant Nr. 01UG1411).

References

Bittner, Dagmar. 2003. The emergence of verb inflection in two German speaking children. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition, 53–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110899832Search in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics 24. 79–121.10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.79Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 2003. First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Corder, S. Pit. 1978. ‘Simple codes’ and the source of the second language learner’s initial heuristic hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1. 1–10.10.1017/S027226310000067XSearch in Google Scholar

De Haan, Ger. 1987. A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch. In Ger De Haan & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Formal parameters of generative grammar. Yearbook 1987, 15–30. Dordrecht: ICG.Search in Google Scholar

Gillis, Steven. 2003. A case study of the early acquisition of verbs in Dutch. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition, 171–203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Teun & Peter Jordens. 1994. From adjunct to head. In Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 119–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.8.08hoeSearch in Google Scholar

Ingram, David & William Thompson. 1996. Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the Modal Hypothesis. Language 72. 97–120.10.2307/416795Search in Google Scholar

Jolink, Anke. 2009. Finiteness in children with SLI. A functional approach. In Christine Dimroth & Peter Jordens (eds.), Functional categories in learner language, 235–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216172.235Search in Google Scholar

Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics 28. 1407–1448.10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1407Search in Google Scholar

Jordens, Peter. 2012. Language acquisition and the functional category system. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216219Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 1997. Learner varieties are the normal case. The Clarion. Magazine of the European Second Language Association 3. 4–6.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 1998. Assertion and finiteness. In Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition, 225–245. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 2008. The topic situation. In Bernt Ahrenholz, Ursula Bredel, Wolfgang Klein, Martina Rost-Roth & Romuald Skiba (eds.), Empirische Forschung und Theoriebildung. Beiträge aus Soziolinguistik, Gesprochene Sprache- und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung. Festschrift für Norbert Dittmar zum 65. Geburtstag, 287–305. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang & Clive Perdue. 1997. The basic variety (Or: Couldn’t languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13. 301–347.10.1191/026765897666879396Search in Google Scholar

Perdue, Clive. 2006. “Creating language anew”: Some remarks on an idea of Bernard Comrie’s. Linguistics 44. 853–871.10.1515/LING.2006.027Search in Google Scholar

Poeppel, David & Kenneth Wexler. 1993. The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69. 1–33.10.2307/416414Search in Google Scholar

Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10. 209–231.10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209Search in Google Scholar

Verrips, Maaike. 1996. Potatoes must peel. The acquisition of the Dutch passive. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-28
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2017-0147/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button