Startseite Impacts of task complexity on the development of L2 oral performance over time
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Impacts of task complexity on the development of L2 oral performance over time

  • YouJin Kim EMAIL logo und Caroline Payant
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Juni 2017

Abstract

Robinson’s (2001, Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. doi: 10.1093/applin/22.1.27) Cognition Hypothesis states that requiring second language (L2) learners to engage in tasks of increasing complexity may promote greater quality of language production. However, few studies have explored the impact of increasing task complexity on learners’ development of L2 oral performance over time. The present study employed a pre-test/post-test design to investigate how engaging in tasks with different degrees of complexity impact L2 oral performance development with sixty Korean learners of English. Task complexity was manipulated based on the [+/-reasoning demands] variable following Robinson’s Triadic Componential Framework (2001). To measure the effects of task complexity on L2 oral performance, learners were assigned to one of four conditions: a) simple task, b) +complex task, c) ++complex task, and d) no task. The pre- and post-test results were analysed for complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Results indicated that L2 oral performance under complex task conditions led to greater syntactic complexity and fluency over time.

References

Andrea, Révész, Marije Michel & Roger Gilabert. 2016. Measuring cognitive task demands using dual task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgments: A validation study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38. 703–737. doi:10.1017/S0272263115000339Suche in Google Scholar

Baralt, Melissa. 2013. The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35. 689–725.10.1017/S0272263113000429Suche in Google Scholar

Bygate, Martin. 1996. Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In Jane Willis & Dave Willis (eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching, 136–146. London: Heinemann.Suche in Google Scholar

Bygate, Martin. 2001. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In Martin Bygate, Peter Skehan & Merrill Swain (eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning, and assessment, 23–48. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline, Alan Tonkyn & Gillian Wigglesworth. 2000. Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21(3). 354–375. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.3.354Suche in Google Scholar

Ishikawa, Tomohito. 2007. The effect of manipulating task complexity along [+/-here-and-now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In María del Pilar García Mayo (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 136–156. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.10.21832/9781853599286-010Suche in Google Scholar

Jackson, Daniel & Sakol Suethanapornkul. 2013. The cognition hypotehsis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning 63. 330–367.10.1111/lang.12008Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin. 2009. The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System 37(2). 254–268.10.1016/j.system.2009.02.003Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin. 2012. Task complexity, learning opportunities and Korean EFL learners´ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34. 627–658. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000368Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin. 2015. The role of tasks as vehicles for learning in classroom interaction. In Numa Markee (ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction, 163–181. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118531242.ch10Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin & Naoko Taguchi. 2015. Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal 99(4). 656–677. doi: 10.1111/modl.12273.10.1111/modl.12273Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin & Nicole Tracy-Ventura. 2013. Task complexity, language anxiety and the development of the simple past. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, 287–306. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.10.1075/tblt.2.18ch11Suche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, Folkert, Maria Mos & Ineke Vedder. 2005. Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. EUROSLA Yearbook 5. 195–222.10.1075/eurosla.5.10kuiSuche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2002. The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research 37. 343–358.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00009-0Suche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2007. Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45(3). 261–284.10.1515/iral.2007.012Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, Tony & Joan Maclean. 2000. Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research 4(3). 221–250.10.1177/136216880000400303Suche in Google Scholar

Michel, Marijie. 2011. Effects of Task Complexity and Interaction on L2-Performance. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, 141–174. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6Suche in Google Scholar

Michel, Marije. 2013. The use of conjunctions in cognitively simple versus complex oral L2 tasks. The Modern Language Journal 97(1). 178–195.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01431.xSuche in Google Scholar

Michel, Marije, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder. 2007. The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45(3). 241–259.10.1515/iral.2007.011Suche in Google Scholar

Niwa, Yukiko. 2000. Reasoning demands of L2 tasks and L2 narrative production: Effects of individual differences in working memory, intelligence, and aptitude. Tokyo: Aoyama Gakuin University M.A. MA dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 555–578.10.1093/applin/amp044Suche in Google Scholar

Nuevo, Ana-Maria. 2006. Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and development. Washington, DC: Georgetown University doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2009. Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31(3). 437–470. doi:10.1017/S0272263109090366Suche in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2011. Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal 95(1). 162–181. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01241.xSuche in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2014. Towards a fuller assessment of cognitive models of task-based learning: Investigating task-generated cognitive demands and processes, Applied Linguistics 35(1). 87–92. doi:10.1093/applin/amt039Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 1995. Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning 45(1). 99–140.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00964.xSuche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2001. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22(1). 27–57. doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.27Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2003. The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies 21(2). 45–105.Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2005. Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43(1). 1–32.10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2007a. Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In María del Pilar García Mayo (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 7–26. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853599286-004Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2007b. Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45(3). 193–213.10.1515/iral.2007.009Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2009. Syllabus design. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (eds.), Handbook of language teaching, 294–310. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444315783.ch17Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2011. Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning 61. 1–36.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.xSuche in Google Scholar

Rossiter, Marian J., Tracey M. Derwing, Linda G. Manimtim & Ron I. Thomson. 2010. Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review 66(4). 583–606.10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583Suche in Google Scholar

Sasayama, Shoko. 2016. Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity. Modern Language Journal 100. 231–254.10.1111/modl.12313Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Robert. 1983. Input, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In Nessa Wolfson & Elliot Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition, 137–174. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Suche in Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Irene E. 2006. Focus on grammar: An integrated skills approach. White Plains, NY: Pearson ESL.Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1177/003368829802900209Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter & Pauline Foster. 2001. Cognition and tasks. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 183–205. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.009Suche in Google Scholar

Swan, Michael. 2005. Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 26(3). 376–401.10.1093/applin/ami013Suche in Google Scholar

Yuan, Fangyuan & Rod Ellis. 2003. The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 24. 1–27.10.1093/applin/24.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-1
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 9.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2017-0066/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen