Teaching stylistic inversion to advanced learners of English: Interaction of input manipulation and individual difference variables

References

Alanen, Riika. 1995. Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In Ricrard Schmidt (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, 259–302. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benati, Alessandro. 2016. Input manipulation, enhancement and processing: Theoretical views and empirical research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6(1). 65–88.10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.4Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert M. 2005. What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55 (Supplement 1). 1–25.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.xSearch in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert M. 2010. Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (ed.), The handbook of language teaching, 119–138. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444315783.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine J. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 206–257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.010Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine J. & Elisabeth Varela. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In Catherine J. Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 114–138. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine J. & Jessica Williams. 1998. Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In Catherine J. Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 197–261. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2008. Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18. 4–22.10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00184.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2009. Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In Rod Ellis, Shawn Loewen, Catherine Elder, Rosemary Erlam, Jenefer Philp & Hayo Reinders (eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching, 3–25. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691767-003Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Helen Basturkmen & Shawn Loewen. 2001. Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning 51. 281–318.10.1111/1467-9922.00156Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen & Rosemary Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28. 339–368.10.1017/S0272263106060141Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen & Rosemary Erlam. 2009. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In Rod Ellis, Shawn Loewen, Catherine Elder, Rosemary Erlam, Jenefer Philp & Hayo Reinders (eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching, 303–332. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691767-015Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod & Younghee Sheen. 2006. Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28. 575–600.10.1017/S027226310606027XSearch in Google Scholar

Foley, Mark & Diane Hall. 2003. Advanced learners’ grammar. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Zhaohong. 2002. A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly 36. 543–572.10.2307/3588240Search in Google Scholar

Han, Zhaohong, Eun Sung Park & Charles Combs. 2008. Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics 29. 597–618.10.1093/applin/amn010Search in Google Scholar

Hawkes, Laura & Hossein Nassaji. 2016. The role of extensive recasts in error detection and correction by adult ESL students. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6. 19–42.10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.2Search in Google Scholar

Jourdenais, Renée, M. Mitsuhiko Ota, Stephanie Stauffer, Beverly Boyson & Catherine J. Doughty. 1995. Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think aloud protocol analysis. In Richard Schmidt (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, 183–216. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Search in Google Scholar

LaBrozzi, Ryan. 2016. The effects of textual enhancement type on L2 form recognition and reading comprehension in Spanish. Language Teaching Research 20. 75–91.10.1177/1362168814561903Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2015. Research into practice. Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching 48. 263–280.10.1017/S0261444814000408Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sang-Ki. 2007. Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive. Language Learning 57. 87–118.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lee, Sang-Ki & Hung-Tzu Huang. 2008. Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30. 307–331.10.1017/S0272263108080479Search in Google Scholar

Leow, Ronald P. 1997. The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers’ comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning 8. 151–182.Search in Google Scholar

Leow, Ronald P. 2001. Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania 84. 496–509.10.2307/3657810Search in Google Scholar

Leow, Ronald P., Takako Egi, Ana Maria Nuevo & Ya-Chin Tsai. 2003. The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners’ comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning 13. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng. 2010. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta analysis. Language Learning 60. 309–365.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.xSearch in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng. 2017. Cognitive differences in ISLA. In Shawn Loewen & Masatoshi Sato (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, 396–417. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315676968-22Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn. 2005. Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 361–386.10.1017/S0272263105050163Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn. 2015. Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203117811Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn & Jenefer Philp. 2006. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal 90. 536–556.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.xSearch in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. (ed.). 2006. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition, 413–468. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 1998. Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning 48. 183–218.10.1111/1467-9922.00039Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26. 399–432.10.1017/S0272263104263021Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20. 37–66.10.1017/S0272263197001034Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Kazuya Saito. 2010. Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32. 265–302.10.1017/S0272263109990520Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy, Kazuya Saito & Masatoshi Sato. 2012. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46. 1–40.10.1017/S0261444812000365Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison & Jenefer Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?. Modern Language Journal 82. 338–356.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein. 2006. Explicitness of interactional feedback and its role in the learning of the targeted form in student-teacher interaction. Paper presented at the Pacific Second Language Research Forum (PacSLRF), Brisbane, Australia.Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein. 2015. The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein 2017. Grammar acquisition. In Shawn Loewen & Masatoshi Sato (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, 205–223. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315676968-12Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein & Sandra Fotos. 2011. Teaching grammar in second language classrooms. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203850961Search in Google Scholar

Nicholas, Howard, Patsy M. Lightbown & Nina Spada. 2001. Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51. 719–758.10.1111/0023-8333.00172Search in Google Scholar

Overstreet, Mark. 1998. Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics 2. 229–258.Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2006. The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Poznań – Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2009. Paper presented during the annual EUROSLA conference, Cork, 2-5 September.Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2011. Cultural differences in perceptions of form/focused instruction: The case of advanced Polish and Italian learners. In Adam Wojtaszek & Janusz Arabski (eds.), Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning, 77–94. Heidelberg – New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-20201-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2012. Variability in the use of implicit knowledge: The effect of task, level and linguistic form. In Ewa Piechurska-Kuciel & Liliana Piasecka (eds.), Variability an stability in foreign and second language learning contexts, 279–298. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2013a. Comparing learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about form-focused instruction. In Danuta Gabryś-Barker, Ewa Piechurska-Kuciel & Jerzy Zybert (eds.), Investigations in teaching and learning languages: Studies in honor of Hanna Komorowska, 109–131. Heidelberg – New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-00044-2_9Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2013b. Researching grammar learning strategies: Combining the macro- and micro-perspective. In Łukasz Salski, Weronika Szubko-Sitarek & Jan Majer (eds.), Perspectives on foreign language learning, 191–210. Łódź: University of Łódź Press.10.18778/7969-032-9.15Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2017a. Individual difference variables as mediating influences on success or failure in form-focused instruction. In Ewa Piechurska-Kuciel, Elżbieta Szymańska-Czaplak & Magdalena Szyszka (eds.), At the crossroads: Challenges of foreign language learning, 75–92. Heidelberg: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-319-55155-5_5Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław. 2017b. Overview of learner individual differences and their mediating effects on the process and outcome of interaction. In Laura Gurzynski-Weiss (ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach. Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors, 19–40. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/aals.16.02pawSearch in Google Scholar

Pienemann, Manfred. 1998. Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.15Search in Google Scholar

Reinders, Hayo & Rod Ellis. 2009. The effects of two types of input on intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In Rod Ellis, Shawn Loewen, Catherine Elder, Rosemary Erlam, Jenefer Philp & Hayo Reinders (eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching, 282–302. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691767Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11. 129–158.10.1093/applin/11.2.129Search in Google Scholar

Sharwood Smith, Michael. 1991. Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research 7. 118–132.10.1177/026765839100700204Search in Google Scholar

Sharwood Smith, Michael. 1993. Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15. 165–179.10.1017/S0272263100011943Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee. 2011. Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-0548-7Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee & Rod Ellis. 2011. Corrective feedback in language teaching. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Volume II, 593–610. New York and London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Shook, David J. 1994. What foreign language reading recalls reveal about the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning 10. 39–76.Search in Google Scholar

Simard, Daphnée. 2009. Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System 37. 124–135.10.1016/j.system.2008.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Susan Gass & Carolyn G. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition, 235–253. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Catherine J. Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 64–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill & Alessandro Benati. 2015. Key terms in SLA. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

White, Joanna. 1998. Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In Catherine J. Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 85–113. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Winke, Paula M. 2013. The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension. A modified replication of Lee (2007) with eye-movement data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35. 323–352.10.1017/S0272263112000903Search in Google Scholar

Wong, Weichung. 2003. Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning 13. 17–45.Search in Google Scholar