Abstract
This study investigates whether second language (L2) speakers can pre-empt a first language (L1) property which involves uninterpretable features, such as resumption. The Interpretability Hypothesis predicts persistent L1 effects in L2 grammars because uninterpretable features resist resetting beyond some critical period (Tsimpli and Dimitrakopoulou 2007). Unlike English, Saudi Arabic allows grammatical resumption in complex wh-interrogatives, which is highly preferred with (D)iscourse-linked wh-forms (e. g. ʔayy-NP ‘which-NP’) but disallowed with non-D-linked ones (e. g. ʔeeʃ ‘what’). The study was conducted with fifteen native English speakers and 34 (very)-advanced Saudi Arabic L2 speakers of English with age of onset (AO 1–13 years). In a bimodal, timed acceptability judgment task, their accuracy judgments of 32 (un)grammatical wh-interrogatives were tested. As predicted, results show that L2 speakers of very advanced levels inaccurately accepted resumption especially with D-linked wh-interrogatives. The results also show non-significant differences between AO 1–6 and 7–13 years in their rejection accuracy of resumption.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank first and foremost two anonymous IRAL reviewers for their valuable and meticulous feedback that helped in improving the paper in many ways. I would also like to thank Roger Hawkins and Rex Sprouse for their advice and comments on an earlier draft of the paper. I am so grateful to Heather Marsden for advice on handling reviewers’ comments. I am so thankful as well to Andrew Radford for his valuable feedback on that-trace effects, and Lina Choueiri for her thought-provoking discussion and input on resumption. Finally, I thank Jang Dong Seo and Samah Al-Thubaiti for tips and advice on statistics.
References
Abrahamsson, Niclas & Kenneth Hyltenstam. 2009. Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59. 249–306.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.xSearch in Google Scholar
Al-Thubaiti, Kholoud. 2010. Age effects in a minimal input setting on the acquisition of English morpho-syntactic and semantic properties by L1 speakers of Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun & Lina Choueiri. 2010. The syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511691775Search in Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph & Lina Choueiri. 1999. Modes of interrogation. In Elabbas Benmamoun (ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XII, 7–26. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.190.04aouSearch in Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert W., Sascha W. Felix & Georgette L. Ioup. 1988. The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research 4. 1–32.10.1177/026765838800400101Search in Google Scholar
DeKeyser, Robert & Jenifer Larson-Hall. 2005. What does the critical period really mean? In Judith Kroll & Annette De Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 88–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195151770.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Granena, Gisela & Michael Long. 2013. Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29. 311–343.10.1177/0267658312461497Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, Roger & Hajime Hattori. 2006. Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research 22. 269–301.10.1191/0267658306sr269oaSearch in Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 1992. Non-native features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. Advances in psychology 83. 351–368.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61505-8Search in Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania. 2012. Formal theory-based methodologies. In Alison Mackey & Susan Gass (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide, 30–52. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444347340.ch3Search in Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Kenneth Wexler. 2002. Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research 18. 95–136.10.1191/0267658302sr195oaSearch in Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Ken Safir. 1989. The null subject parameter. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3Search in Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1989. The null subject parameter in modern Arabic dialects. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 263–275. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_9Search in Google Scholar
Lardiere, Donna. 1998. Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research 14. 1–26.10.1191/026765898674105303Search in Google Scholar
Leal-Méndez, Tania & Roumyana Slabakova. 2014. The interpretability hypothesis again: A partial replication of Tsimpli and Dimitrakopoulou (2007). International Journal of Bilingualism 18. 537–557.10.1177/1367006912448125Search in Google Scholar
Leal-Méndez, Tania, Roumyana Slabakova, Ivan Ivanov & Marta Tryzna. 2016. Uninterpretable features in L2A again: Interrogatives in the L2 English of Kuwaiti Arabic speakers. Paper presented to the 13th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, Indiana Bloomington University, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Long, Mike. 2005. Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43. 287–317.10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.287Search in Google Scholar
Mackey, Alison & Susan Gass. 2005. Second language research: Methodology and design. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move: Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8116.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. 2008. Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.39Search in Google Scholar
Muñoz, Carmen & David Singleton. 2011. A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching 44. 1–35.10.1017/S0261444810000327Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, Victoria. 1997. The effect of modality on a grammaticality judgement task. Second Language Research 13. 34–65.10.1191/026765897671676818Search in Google Scholar
Nation, Ian. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759Search in Google Scholar
Nishikawa, Tomomi. 2014. Nonnativeness in near-native child L2 starters of Japanese: Age and the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics 35. 504–529.10.1093/applin/amu018Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Complementizer-trace phenomena and the nominative island condition. The Linguistic Review 1. 297–344.10.1515/tlir.1982.1.3.297Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Eric Reuland & Alice Ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Plonsky, Luke & Frederick Oswald. 2014. How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64. 878–912.10.1111/lang.12079Search in Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2018. Colloquial English: Structure and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108552202Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativised minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2015. Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In UR Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond functional sequence: The cartography of syntactic structures, 314–338. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0017Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion=language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics., 115–160. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552.115Search in Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT unpublished doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2002. C, T, and the subject: That-t phenomena revisited. Lingua 112. 13–52.10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00056-5Search in Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 2011. Some issues in the theory of resumption: A perspective on early and recent research. In Alain Rouveret (ed.), Resumptive pronouns at the interface, 1–62. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.5Search in Google Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas. 2002. The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect and minimal CP. Journal of Linguistics 38. 527–560.10.1017/S0022226702001652Search in Google Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas. 2009. Prestige case forms and the Comp‐trace effect. Syntax 12. 32–59.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.01113.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella & Francesca Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22. 339–368.10.1191/0267658306sr271oaSearch in Google Scholar
Towell, Richard & Roger Hawkins. 1994. Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Search in Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria & Maria Dimitrakopoulou. 2007. The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23. 215–242.10.1177/0267658307076546Search in Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria & Anna Roussou. 1991. Parameter-resetting in L2. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 149–169.Search in Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 1985. The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 35. 47–62.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01014.xSearch in Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 2003. Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815065Search in Google Scholar
White, Lydia & Fred Genesee. 1996. How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12. 233–265.10.1177/026765839601200301Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Exploring the motivational antecedents of Nepalese learners of L2 English
- Explicit phonetic instruction vs. implicit attention to native exposure: phonological awareness of English schwa in CLIL
- Pre-emption of L1 properties in the L2 acquisition of English wh-interrogatives: Effects of L2 proficiency and age of onset
- The acquisition of Mandarin sentence final particles by Italian learners
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Exploring the motivational antecedents of Nepalese learners of L2 English
- Explicit phonetic instruction vs. implicit attention to native exposure: phonological awareness of English schwa in CLIL
- Pre-emption of L1 properties in the L2 acquisition of English wh-interrogatives: Effects of L2 proficiency and age of onset
- The acquisition of Mandarin sentence final particles by Italian learners