Home Accounting for the asymmetrical interpretation of thematic and non-thematic verbs in L2 English
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Accounting for the asymmetrical interpretation of thematic and non-thematic verbs in L2 English

  • Stano Kong EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 18, 2017

Abstract

This study presents data from an experiment on the interpretation of thematic and non-thematic verbs in second language (L2) English by three groups of adult native Chinese speakers and a group of native English speakers. English allows non-thematic verbs to raise but requires thematic verbs to remain in-situ. In contrast, neither thematic nor non-thematic verbs are allowed to raise in Chinese. The results indicate that there is a discrepancy between native and non-native mental representations of the grammars concerned; whereas native grammars require English thematic verbs to remain in-situ but allow non-thematic verbs to raise, neither thematic nor non-thematic verbs are allowed to raise in learners L2 English grammars. Results of the study argue against the Valueless Features Hypothesis (Eubank 1993/94. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition 3. 183–208, 1994. Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (eds), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in Honour of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW Workshop, 369–388. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996. Negation in early German-English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research 12. 73–106.), which posits that the L1 syntactic features of INFL are initially inert and are not transferred. Instead, the results support the Interpretability Hypothesis (Tsimpli and Dimitrakopoulou 2007. The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23. 215–242.), which argues for the inaccessibility of uninterpretable syntactic features beyond a critical period. In particular, it is argued that uninterpretable syntactic features not selected during early stages of primary language acquisition become inaccessible in subsequent language acquisition. The results suggest that there may be cases where apparent target-like performance conceals non-target-like underlying competence.

Funding statement: Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China, (Grant/Award Number: ‘MOST 104-2410-H-029-030’).

References

Allan, Dave. 1992. The Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ayoun, Dalila. 2005. Verb movement in the L2 acquisition of English by adult native speakers of French. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Del Pilar Garcia-Mayo & J. Cenoz (eds.), EUROSLA yearbook 5, 35–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/eurosla.5.05ayoSearch in Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, Robert. 1990. The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20. 3–49.10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005Search in Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, Robert. 2009. The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31. 175–198.10.1017/S0272263109090275Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 417–454. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvian Bromberger, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chu, Wei & Bonnie D. Schwartz 2005. Another look at ‚Verb raising’ in the L2 English of Chinese speakers. In Laurent Dekydtspotter et. al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th generative approaches to second language acquisition (GASLA 2004), 68–85. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 1994. Functional categories and the Chinese Infl. Linguistics 32. 191–212.10.1515/ling.1994.32.2.191Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 1995. Chinese adjuncts and phrase structure theory. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 22. 41–71.Search in Google Scholar

Eubank, Lynn. 1993/94. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition 3. 183–208.10.1207/s15327817la0303_1Search in Google Scholar

Eubank, Lynn. 1994. Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in Honour of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW Workshop, 369–388. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.8.15eubSearch in Google Scholar

Eubank, Lynn. 1996. Negation in early German-English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research 12. 73–106.10.1177/026765839601200104Search in Google Scholar

Eubank, Lynn., Janine. Bischof, April. Huffstutler, Patricia Leek. & Clint West. 1997. ‘Tom eats slowly cooked eggs’: Thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6. 171–199.10.1207/s15327817la0603_1Search in Google Scholar

Eubank, Lynn. & Sabine Grace. 1996. Where’s the mature language? Where’s native language? In A. Stringfellow, S. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes & A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 189–200. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, Roger., Gabriela. Casillas, Hajime. Hattori, James. Hawthorne, Ritta. Husted, Cristobal. Lozano, Aya. Okamoto, Emma. Thomas & Kazumi Yamadas. 2008. The semantic effects of verb raising and its consequences in second language grammars. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds.), The role of features in second language acquisition, 328–351. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781315085340-11Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, Roger. & Hajime. Hattori 2006. Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research 22. 269–301.10.1191/0267658306sr269oaSearch in Google Scholar

Hawkins, Roger., Richard. Towell & Nives. Bazergui 1993. Universal grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English. Second Language Research 9. 189–233.10.1177/026765839300900301Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, Rogers & Cecelia Yuet-hung. Chan 1997. The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research 13. 187–226.10.1191/026765897671476153Search in Google Scholar

Kamimoto, Tadamitsu, Shimura, Aki & Kellerman, Eric. 1992. A second language classic reconsidered- the case of Schachter’s avoidance. Second Language Research 8. 251–277.10.1177/026765839200800305Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stano. 2005. The partial access of universal grammar in second language acquisition: An investigation of English subjects by L1 Chinese speakers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14. 227–265.10.1007/s10831-005-1602-6Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stano. 2007. English speakers and the asymmetrical matrix-embedded null subjects in L2 Chinese. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 33. 23–52.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stano. 2011a. Monomorphemic and polymorphemic anaphors in L2 Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 39. 451–477.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stano. 2011b. The non-droppability of uninterpretable features in second language acquisition: On the interpretation of resumptive pronouns in L2 Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 9. 159–194.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stano. 2012. Adult English speakers’ acquisition of Chinese count-mass classifiers. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 40. 442–477.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stano. 2014. Long and short passives in English speakers’ L2 Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 42. 400–430.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stano. 2015. L3 initial state: Typological primacy driven, L2 factor determined, or L1 feature oriented? Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 13. 79–117.Search in Google Scholar

Liszka, Sarah. 2015. The acquisition of the English present simple-present progressive distinction: Verb-raising revisited. In Ayoun Dalila (ed.), The acquisition of the present, 57–86. Amsterdam: John Benjimins.10.1075/z.196.03lisSearch in Google Scholar

Ouhalla, Jamal. 1991. Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntax: A minimalist introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166898Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 2004. English syntax: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841675Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, Daniel & Antonella. Sorace 1999. Losing the L2 constraint. In Elaine C. Klein & Gita Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach, 317–362. New York: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.18.16robSearch in Google Scholar

Smith, Neil & Ianthi-Maria. Tsimpli 1995. The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Soh, Hooi. 1998. Object scrambling in Chinese: A closer look at post-duration/frequency phrase positions. NELS 28(4). 197–211.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Jane. 1990. Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X’-Theory. Doctoral Dissertation. Cornell University.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Margaret. 1995. Acquisition of Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in logical form. Second Language Research 11. 206–234.10.1177/026765839501100302Search in Google Scholar

Trahey, Martha. 1996. Positive evidence in second language acquisition: Some long-term effects. Second Language Research 12. 111–139.10.1177/026765839601200201Search in Google Scholar

Trahey, Martha. & Lydia. White 1993. Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15. 181–204.10.1017/S0272263100011955Search in Google Scholar

Tsimpli, Ianthi-maria & Maria. Dimitrakopoulou 2007. The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23. 215–242.10.1177/0267658307076546Search in Google Scholar

Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria & Anna. Roussou 1991. Parameter-resetting in L2? UCLWorking Papers in Linguistics 3. 149–170.Search in Google Scholar

Vainikka, Anne, Martha. Young-Scholten. 2009. Successful features: Verb raising and adverbs in L2 acquisition under an Organic Grammar approach. In Neal Snape, Yan-Kit Ingrid Leung & Michael Sharwood Smith (eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins, 229–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.47.06vaiSearch in Google Scholar

White, Lydia. 1990/1991. The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 1. 337–360.10.1207/s15327817la0104_2Search in Google Scholar

White, Lydia. 1991a. Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7. 133–161.10.1177/026765839100700205Search in Google Scholar

White, Lydia. 1992a. long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of linguistics 37. 273–286.10.1017/S0008413100021988Search in Google Scholar

White, Lydia., Bruhn-Garavito, Joyce., Kawasaki, T., Pater., Joe, & Prevost, Prevost. 1997. The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: Problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning 47. 145–175.10.1111/0023-8333.41997004Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 2001. The status of the thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese: Against inevitability of thematic-verb raising in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17. 248–272.10.1177/026765830101700302Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-05-18
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2016-0079/pdf
Scroll to top button