Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers

References

Ackerman, Brian P. 1981. Young children’s understanding of a speaker’s intentional use of a false utterance. Developmental Psychology 17. 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.472.Search in Google Scholar

Altay, Sacha & Hugo Mercier. 2020. Relevance is socially rewarded, but not at the price of accuracy. Evolutionary Psychology 18(1). 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704920912640.Search in Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie & Utah Frith. 1985. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”. Cognition 21(1). 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.Search in Google Scholar

Bühler, Daniela, Alexandra Perovic & Nausicaa Pouscoulous. 2018. Comprehension of novel metaphor in young children with Developmental Language Disorder. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 3. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518817229.Search in Google Scholar

Caillies, Stéphanie, Vincine Bertot, Jacques Motte, Christine Raynaud & Michel Abely. 2014. Social cognition in ADHD: Irony understanding and recursive theory of mind. Research in Developmental Disabilities 35(11). 3191–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

Carrell, Patricia L. 1981. Children’s understanding of indirect requests: Comparing child and adult comprehension. Journal of Child Language 8(2). 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900003226.Search in Google Scholar

Chevallier, Coralie, Deirdre Wilson, Francesca Happé & Ira Andrew Noveck. 2010. Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40(9). 1104–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0960-8.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1). 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121.Search in Google Scholar

Deamer, Felicity. 2013. An investigation into the processes and mechanisms underlying the comprehension of metaphor and hyperbole. London: UCL (University College London) Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Deliens, Gaétane, Kyriakos Antoniou, Elise Clin, Ekaterian Ostashchenko & Mikhail Kissine. 2018a. Context, facial expression and prosody in irony processing. Journal of Memory and Language 99. 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

Deliens, Gaétane, Fanny Papastamou, Nicolas Ruytenbeek, Philippine Geelhand & Mikhail Kissine. 2018b. Selective pragmatic impairment in autism spectrum disorder: Indirect requests versus irony. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 48(9). 2938–2952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3561-6.Search in Google Scholar

Demorest, Amy, Lisa Silberstein, Howard Gardner & Ellen Winner. 1983. Telling it as it isn’t: Children’s understanding of figurative language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1. 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1983.tb00550.x.Search in Google Scholar

Demorest, Amy, Christine Meyer, Erin Phelps, Howard Gardner & Ellen Winner. 1984. Words speak louder than actions: Understanding deliberately false remarks. Child Development 55. 1527–1534. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130022.Search in Google Scholar

Falkum, Ingrid Lossius & Franziska Köder. 2020. The acquisition of figurative meanings. Journal of Pragmatics 164. 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

Falkum, Ingrid Lossius, Mart Recasens & Eve Vivienne Clark. 2017. “The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language 44(1). 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000915000720.Search in Google Scholar

Filippova, Eva & Janet Wilde Astington. 2008. Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development 79(1). 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01115.x.Search in Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry G. 2005. On bullshit. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Garmendia, Joana. 2018. Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Sarah R. Pripas-Kapit. 2012. Who’s missing the point? A commentary on claims that autistic persons have a specific deficit in figurative language comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol 27(1). 93–105.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1986. On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115(1). 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34(4). 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00046-7.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1978/89. Further notes on logic and conversation. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics, 113–127. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice. 1989. 41–57.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grosse, Gerlind, Henrike Moll & Michael Tomasello. 2010. 21-month-olds understand the cooperative logic of requests. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12). 3377–3383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.005.Search in Google Scholar

Happé, Francesca. 1993. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition 48(2). 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-r.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Paul L., Melissa A. Koenig, Kathleen H. Corriveau & Vikram K. Jaswal. 2018. Cognitive foundations of learning from testimony. Annual Review of Psychology 69. 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011710.Search in Google Scholar

He, Sui. 2021. Cognitive metaphor theories in translation studies: Toward a dual-model parametric approach. Intercultural Pragmatics 18(1). 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Jared, Debra & Alyssa Pandolfo. 2021. The effect of speaker age on the perception of ironic insults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 75(2). 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000222.Search in Google Scholar

Jorgensen, Julia, George A. Miller & Dan Sperber. 1984. Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1). 112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.112.Search in Google Scholar

Kalandadze, Tamar, Courtenay Norbury, Terje Nærland & Kari-Anne B. Næss. 2016. Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review. Autism 22(2). 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316668652.Search in Google Scholar

Katsos, Napoleon, Clara Andrés Roqueta, Rosa Ana Clemente Estevan & Chris Cummins. 2011. Are children with specific language impairment competent with the pragmatics and logic of quantification? Cognition 119(1). 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Albert N. & Penny M. Pexman. 1997. Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol 12(1). 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1201_3.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Albert N., Dawn G. Blasko & Victoria A. Kazmerski. 2004. Saying what you don’t mean: Social influences on sarcastic language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13(5). 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00304.x.Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Thomas Richard & Kathleen Quigley. 1999. Do young children use echoic information in their comprehension of sarcastic speech? A test of echoic mention theory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 17(1). 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165168.Search in Google Scholar

Kreuz, Roger J. & Sam. Glucksberg. 1989. How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(4). 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374.Search in Google Scholar

Langdon, Robyn, Martin Davies & Max Coltheart. 2002. Understanding minds and understanding communicated meanings in schizophrenia. Mind & Language 17(1–2). 68–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00189.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Xiaoming, Die Hu, Wenrui Deng, Tao Qian, Ying Hu, Xiaoxue Yang, Zheng Wang, Rui Tao, Lizhuang Yang & Xiaochu Zhang. 2017. Pragmatic ability deficit in schizophrenia and associated theory of mind and executive function. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 2164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02164.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Ingerigh & Skye McDonald. 2004. An exploration of causes of non-literal language problems in individuals with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34(3). 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000029553.52889.15.Search in Google Scholar

Mascaro, Olivier & Olivier Morin. 2014. Gullible’s travel: How honest and trustful children become vigilant communicators. In Elizabeth J. Robinson & Shiri Einav (eds.), Trust and skepticism: Children’s selective learning from testimony, 69–83. Hove, East Sussex and New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mascaro, Olivier, Olivier Morin & Dan Sperber. 2017. Optimistic expectations about communication explain children’s difficulties in hiding, lying, and mistrusting liars. Journal of Child Language 44(5). 1041–1064. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000916000350.Search in Google Scholar

Matsui, Tomoko. 2019. Component processes of irony comprehension in children: Epistemic vigilance, mind-reading and the search for relevance. In Kate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston (eds.), Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation, 231–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Danielle, Hannah Biney & Kirsten Abbot-Smith. 2018. Individual differences in children’s pragmatic ability: A review of associations with formal language, social cognition, and executive functions. Language Learning and Development 14(3). 186–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2018.1455584.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzarella, Diana. 2015. Politeness, relevance and scalar inferences. Journal of Pragmatics 79. 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.016.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzarella, Diana & Nausicaa Pouscoulous. 2020. Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: A developmental perspective. Mind & Language 36(3). 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12287.Search in Google Scholar

Mercier, Hugo. 2012. The social functions of explicit coherence evaluation. Mind & Society 11(1). 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-011-0095-4.Search in Google Scholar

Mercier, Hugo & Dan Sperber. 2017. The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Nicholson, Andrew, Juanita M. Whalen & Penny M. Pexman. 2013. Children’s processing of emotion in ironic language. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00691.Search in Google Scholar

Panzeri, Francesca, Beatrice Giustolisi & Laura Zampini. 2020. The comprehension of ironic criticisms and ironic compliments in individuals with Down syndrome: Adding another piece to the puzzle. Journal of Pragmatics 156. 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.08.009.Search in Google Scholar

Perner, Josef & Heinz Wimmer. 1985. John thinks that Mary thinks that attribution of second-order beliefs by 5-to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39(3). 437–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(85)90051-7.Search in Google Scholar

Pexman, Penny M. 2005. Social factors in the interpretation of verbal irony: The roles of speaker and listener characteristics. In Herbert L. Colston & Albert N. Katz (eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences, 209–232. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pexman, Penny M. & Kara M. Olineck. 2002. Understanding irony: How do stereotypes cue speaker intent? Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(3). 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x02021003003.Search in Google Scholar

Pexman, Penny M., Melanie Glenwright, Suzanne Hala, Stacey L. Kowbel & Sara Jungen. 2006. Children’s use of trait information in understanding verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol 21(1). 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_3.Search in Google Scholar

Pijnacker, Judith, Peter Hagoort, Jan Buitelaar, Jan-Pieter Teunisse & Bart Geurts. 2009. Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 39(4). 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0661-8.Search in Google Scholar

Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Michael Tomasello. 2020. Early birds: Metaphor understanding in 3-year-olds. Journal of Pragmatics 156. 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021.Search in Google Scholar

Rapp, Alexander M., Dorothee Mutschler, Barbara Wild, Michael Erb, Ines Lengsfeld, Ralf Saur & Wolfgang Grodd. 2010. Neural correlates of irony comprehension: The role of schizotypal personality traits. Brain and Language 113(1). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Reeder, Kenneth. 1980. The emergence of illocutionary skills. Journal of Child Language 7(1). 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900007005.Search in Google Scholar

Regel, Stefanie, Seana Coulson & Thomas C. Gunter. 2010. The communicative style of the speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony. Brain Research 1311. 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.077.Search in Google Scholar

Rivière, Elora, Madelyne Klein & Maud Champagne-Lavau. 2018. Using context and prosody in understanding irony: Variability amongst individuals. Journal of Pragmatics 138. 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

Rowley, Dane A., Miles Rogish, Timothy Alexander & Kevin J. Riggs. 2017. Cognitive correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in adult traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Brain Injury 31. 1564–1574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1341645.Search in Google Scholar

Shatz, Marilyn. 1978. On the development of communicative understandings: An early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. Cognitive Psychology 10(3). 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(78)90001-4.Search in Google Scholar

Shibata, Midori, Akira Toyomura, Hiroaki Itoh & Jun-ichi Abe. 2010. Neural substrates of irony comprehension: A functional MRI study. Brain Research 1308. 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.030.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. 1984. Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1). 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.130.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. Philosophy 3. 143–184.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance. Cognition and communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi & Deirdre Wilson. 2010. Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language 25(4). 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x.Search in Google Scholar

Spotorno, Nicola & Ira Andrew Noveck. 2014. When is irony effortful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(4). 1649–1665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036630.Search in Google Scholar

Spotorno, Nicola, Eric Koun, Jérôme Prado, Jean-Baptiste Van Der Henst & Ira Andrew Noveck. 2012. Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: The case of irony. NeuroImage 63(1). 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.046.Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Kate, Ellen Winner & Natalie Hopfield. 1995. How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 13(2). 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1995.tb00673.x.Search in Google Scholar

Țurcan, Alexandra & Ruth Filik. 2017. Investigating sarcasm comprehension using eye-tracking during reading. What are the roles of literality, familiarity, and echoic mention? In Angeliki Athanasiadou & Herbert L. Colston (eds.), Irony in language use and communication, 255–276. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Uchiyama, Hitoshi, Ayumi Seki, Hiroko Kageyama, Daisuke N. Saito, Tatsuya Koeda, Kousaku Ohno & Norihiro Sadato. 2006. Neural substrates of sarcasm: A functional magnetic-resonance imaging study. Brain Research 1124(1). 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.088.Search in Google Scholar

Uchiyama, Hitoshi, Daisuke N. Saito, Hiroki C. Tanabe, Tokiko Harada, Ayumi Seki, Kousaku Ohno, Tatsuya Koeda & Norihiro Sadato. 2012. Distinction between the literal and intended meanings of sentences: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of metaphor and sarcasm. Cortex 48(5). 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

Wakusawa, Keisuke, Motoaki Sugiura, Yuko Sassa, Hyeonjeong Jeong, Kaoru Horie, Shigeru Sato, Hiroyuki Yokoyama, Shigeru Tsuchiya, Kazuie Inuma & Ryuta Kawashima. 2007. Comprehension of implicit meanings in social situations involving irony: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage 37(4). 1417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.013.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre. 2009. Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 183–226.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–260. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Winner, Ellen & Sue Leekam. 1991. Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker’s second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9(2). 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1991.tb00875.x.Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2016. Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics and Cognition 23(1). 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus.Search in Google Scholar