Rational belief and Dialetheism

References

Austin, David. 1990. What’s the meaning of “This”? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Black, Max. 1970. The identity of indiscernibles. In Michael J. Loux (ed.), Universals and particulars, 204–216. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.10.1093/mind/LXI.242.153Search in Google Scholar

Bohr, Niels. 1913. On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Philosophical Magazine 26. 1–25, 476–502 and 857–875.10.1080/14786441308635031Search in Google Scholar

Bonardi, Paolo. 2012. Believing without modes of presentation. PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Bonardi, Paolo. 2017. Salmon, Schiffer and Frege’s Constraint. Unpublished Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Bonardi, Paolo. 2019. Manifest validity and beyond: An inquiry into the nature of coordination and the identity of guises and propositional-attitude states. Linguistics and Philosophy 42(5). 475–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-018-9245-z.Search in Google Scholar

Bonardi, Paolo. 2020. Frege’s puzzle and cognitive relationism: An essay on mental files and coordination. Disputatio 12(56). 1–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, David. 1998. Understanding belief reports. Philosophical Review 107(4). 555–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998375.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, David & Jennifer Saul. 2002. Simple sentences, substitutions, and mistaken evaluations. Philosophical Studies 111. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021287328280.10.1023/A:1021287328280Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Bryson & Graham Priest. 2015. Chunk and permeate II: Bohr’s hydrogen atom. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5(3). 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-014-0104-7.Search in Google Scholar

Casati, Filippo & Naoya Fujikawa. 2019. Nothingness, Meinongianism and inconsistent mereology. Synthese 196(9). 3739–3772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1619-1.Search in Google Scholar

Castañeda, Héctor-Neri. 1989. Direct reference, the semantics of thinking, and guise. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 105–144. Oxford: Oxford University.Search in Google Scholar

Crane, Tim. 2013. The objects of thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682744.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Crimmins, Mark & John Perry. 1989. The prince and the phone booth: Reporting puzzling beliefs. The Journal of Philosophy 86(12). 685–711. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027014.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 2004. Problems of rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198237545.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75(3). 281–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183143.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, Kit. 2007. Semantic relationism. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470690826Search in Google Scholar

Fine, Kit. 2010. Comments on Scott Soames’ “Coordination problems”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81(2). 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00405.x.Search in Google Scholar

Forbes, Graeme. 1990. The indispensability of sinn. Philosophical Review 99. 535–563. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185616.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift. Halle a/S: Verlag von Louis Nebert. Translated. In Peter Geach & Max Black (eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, 1952, 1–20. London: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100/101: 25–50. Translated as “On sense and reference”. In Peter Geach & Max Black (eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, 1952, 56–78. London: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio & Alvin Goldman. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mindreading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(12). 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin. 2006. Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195138929.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1968. Quantifying in. Synthese 19(1/2). 178–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00568057.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 2011. An idea of Donnellan. In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), Having in mind: The philosophy of Keith Donnellan, 122–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199844845.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1979. A puzzle about belief. In Avishai Margalit (ed.), Meaning and use, 239–283. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-1-4020-4104-4_20Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A system of logic. London: John W. Parker.Search in Google Scholar

Murzi, Julien & Lorenzo Rossi. Forthcoming. Truth and paradox in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 1993. The problem of the essential indexical and other essays. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195049992.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Priest, Graham. 2006. Doubt truth to be a liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199263280.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Priest, Graham. 2006a. In contradiction: A study of the transconsistent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Priest, Graham. 2008. An introduction to non-classical logic. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801174Search in Google Scholar

Priest, Graham. 2014. One: Being an investigation into the unity of reality and of its parts, including the singular object which is nothingness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688258.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Priest, Graham, Koji Tanaka & Zachary Weber. 2018. Paraconsistent logic. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.Search in Google Scholar

Quiroga, Rodrigo Quian. 2012. Concept cells: The building blocks of declarative memory functions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13(8). 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3251.Search in Google Scholar

Quiroga, Rodrigo Quian, Leila Reddy, Gabriel Kreiman, Christof Koch & Itzhak Fried. 2005. Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature 435(7045). 1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03687.Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2007. Perspectival thought: A plea for (moderate) relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230532.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2012. Mental files. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659982.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2021. Mental files. In Piotr, Stalmaszczyk (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108698283.030Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14(56). 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xiv.4.479.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1910. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11(5). 108–128.10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108Search in Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Mark & Michael Tye. 2012. Seven puzzles of thought and how to solve them: An originalist theory of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695317.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Mark, Michael Tye & Ruth Garrett Millikan. 2011. Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 85. 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00198.x.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 1986. Frege’s puzzle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 1989. Illogical belief. Philosophical Perspectives 3. 243–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214270.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 1998. Nonexistence. Noûs 32(3). 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00101.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 2002. Mythical objects. In Joseph Campbell, Michael O’Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and truth, proceedings of the Eastern Washington University and the University of Idaho Inland Northwest Philosophy Conference on meaning, 105–123. Seven Bridges Press.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 2004. The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and beyond, 230–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199270514.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 2006. The resilience of illogical belief. Noûs 40(2). 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00615.x.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 2011. A note on Kripke’s puzzle about belief. In Alan Berger (ed.), Saul Kripke, 235–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511780622.011Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 2012. Generality. Philosophical Studies 161(3). 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9772-8.Search in Google Scholar

Saul, Jennifer. 1997. Substitution and simple sentences. Analysis 57(2). 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/57.2.102.Search in Google Scholar

Saul, Jennifer. 2007. Simple sentences, substitution, and intuitions. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219155.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen. 1987. The “Fido”-Fido theory of belief. Philosophical Perspectives 1. 455–480. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214153.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen. 1990. The mode-of-presentation problem. In C. Anthony Anderson & Joseph Owens (eds.), Propositional attitudes: The role of content in logic, language, and mind, 249–268. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen. 2003. The things we mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199257760.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen. 2006. A problem for a direct-reference theory of belief reports. Noûs 40(2). 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00614.x.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen. 2016. De re belief reports: Response to Gary Ostertag. In Gary Ostertag (ed.), Meanings and other things: Themes from the work of Stephen Schiffer, 426–440. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684939.003.0017Search in Google Scholar

Soames, Scott. 1987. Direct reference, propositional attitudes, and semantic content. Philosophical Topics 15(1). 47–87. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics198715112.Search in Google Scholar

Soames, Scott. 2002. Beyond rigidity: The unfinished semantic agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195145283.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Soames, Scott. 2015. Rethinking language, mind, and meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400866335Search in Google Scholar

Vickers, Peter. 2008. Bohr’s theory of the atom: Content, closure and consistency. Unpublished Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Vickers, Peter. 2013. Understanding inconsistent science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692026.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wettstein, Howard. 1988. Cognitive significance without cognitive content. Mind 97(385). 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xcvii.385.1.Search in Google Scholar

Wettstein, Howard. 1989. Turning the tables on Frege or how is it that “Hesperus is Hesperus” is trivial? Philosophical Perspectives 3. 317–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214272.Search in Google Scholar