Negative existence statements: Kripke, Strawson, and topic noun phrases

References

Abbott, Barbara. 2018. Presuppositions, negation, and existence. In K. Turner & L. Horn (eds.), Pragmatics, Truth, and Underspecification: Towards an Atlas of Meaning. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 34. 82–106. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004365445.Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. 1980. Reference, meaning, and translation. Philosophical Books 21(3). 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1980.tb01826.x.Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. 1988. What are negative existence statements about?. Linguistics and Philosophy 11(4). 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00668680.Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. 1989. Philosophy without Ambiguity: a Logico-Linguistic Essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. 1991. Topic/comment, presupposition, logical form, and focus stress implicatures: The case of focal particles Only and Also Journal of Semantics 8(1/2). 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/8.1-2.127.Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. 2004a. Descriptions, linguistic topic/comment, and negative existentials: A case study in the application of linguistic theory to problems in the philosophy of language. In M. Reimer & A. Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. 342–360. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780199270514.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. 2004b. Presupposition. In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. 29–52. Oxford: B.H. Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. 2018. Aboutness and quantifying into intensional contexts: a pragmatic topic/comment analysis of propositional attitude statements. In A. Capone, M. Carapezza & F. Lo Piparo (eds.), Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy. Part 1. From Theory to Practice. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy, and Psychology. vol. 18. 25–43. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Pub.10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_2Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay D. & Levinson, S. C. 1981. It-Clefts, informativeness, and logical form: An introduction to radically radical pragmatics. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. 1–61. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris Pub. Co.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Language and Nature. Mind 104. 1–61.10.1017/CBO9780511613876Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000a. Language from an internalist perspective. Chapter 6 of N. Chomsky (2000b). 134–163.10.1017/CBO9780511811937.008Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000b. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811937Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, Matthew. 2007. On sense and direct reference: readings in the philosophy of language. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Donnellan, Keith. 1974. Speaking of nothing. The Philosophical Review 83(1). 3–32, 1974. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183871.Search in Google Scholar

Donnellan, Keith. 1975. Speaking of nothing. In D. Hockney, W. Harper & B. Freed (eds.), Contemporary research in philosophical logic and linguistic semantics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel. 93–118.10.1007/978-94-010-1756-5_5Search in Google Scholar

Everett, Anthony & Thomas Hofweber. 2000. (eds.), Empty names, fiction and the puzzles of non-existence. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry D. 1979. In defense of the truth value gap. In C-K Oh & D. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and semantics 11: Presupposition. 199–224. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368880_008Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1892/1980. On sense and meaning. In P. Geach & M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell. 56–78.Search in Google Scholar

Geach, Peter. 1950. Subject and predicate. Mind 59. 461–482.10.1093/mind/LIX.236.461Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette. 1977. Role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Bloomington, Austin: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Orig. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Georgetown university roundtable on language and linguistics 1984: Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. 11–42. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 2013. Reference and existence: The John Locke Lectures. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Steven C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicatures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levenson, Thomas. 2015. The Hunt for Vulcan: And how Albert Einstein destroyed a planet, discovered relativity, and deciphered the universe. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Lumsden, Michael. 1988. Existential sentences: Their structure and meaning, London: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1872/ 1973. A system of logic. 8th edn. In J. M. Robson (ed.), Collected works of John Stuart Mill. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. Books 1 – III. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hillary. 1975a. The meaning of ‘Meaning’. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge. 131–193. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625251.014Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hillary. 1975b. The meaning of ‘Meaning Philosophical Papers. V.2: mind, language, and reality. 215–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625251.014Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard V. 1948. On what there is. The Review of Metaphysics 2(5). 21–38.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1956. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 53(5). 177–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2022451.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1976. The ways of paradox and other essays. Rev. and Enlarged Edn. Cambridge, Massaschusettts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1980. On what there is. In W. V. Quine, From a logical point of view. 1–19. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1c5cx5c.6Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1903. Principles of mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59. 320–344.10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. 1959. Individuals: an essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. 1964. Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria 30(2). 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1964.tb00404.x.Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. 1971. Logico-linguistic papers. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1998. Daniel Kolak (trans.). Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Pub.Search in Google Scholar