Home Navigating liminality: young people’s political socialization in a conflict-affected context
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Navigating liminality: young people’s political socialization in a conflict-affected context

  • Constadina Charalambous ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 11, 2023

Abstract

This paper focuses on political socialization in a conflict-affected context and looks at how young Greek-Cypriot learners of Turkish debated political positionings and engaged with political and conflict ideologies usually seen as part of the adult world. It draws on data from two linguistic ethnographic projects (2006–2009; 2012–2015) that analysed classroom observations and recordings of controversial Turkish-as-Foreign-Language (MFL) lessons in a Greek-Cypriot Secondary School. The paper employs the concept of liminality, which has been traditionally linked with transition, describing an in-between space, where normal rules, conventions and relations are suspended or transgressed, carrying the potential for the creation of new structures and creative performance. Moving away from romantised approaches to liminality as liberating from structures, the analysis looks “inside liminality” for alternative or enduring patterns and conventions and reveals the affordances and limitations of liminal-like experiences in education settings, and their potential role in young people’s political socialization. Approaching children/teenagers as youthful political agents, the paper analyses first the multiple liminal social and political spaces that young learners of Turkish occupied; then, it focuses particularly on an interactional event, when the usual lesson structures and procedures of the language lesson were suspended, looking at how students, in this liminal-like moment, mobilized knowledge and recourses to form and debate political subjectivities and dominant political ideologies. The analysis points to the resilience of conflict discourses and discourses of othering but it also reveals youngsters’ attempts to articulate a political discourse that introduces new discursive frames for the discussion of social and political relations in a post-conflict manner. This has important implications for young people’s political socialization in conflict-affected contexts, revealing the role that language plays in this process.


Corresponding author: Constadina Charalambous, Language Education & Literacy, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus, E-mail:

Funding source: Leverhulme Trust

Award Identifier / Grant number: RPG-2012-447

Appendix 1: Transcription conventions

[
[ text overlaps
(.) pause less than a second
(…) Text omitted
(number) number indicates seconds of pause
the vowel of the last syllable is elongated and extended until the next word (used in the English translation)
((italics)) Comments
{ text } words that are necessary for the translated text to make sense
- interrupted speech
= no pause between turns
underlined emphasised words
CAPITALS Words pronounced louder and with emphasis
‘text’ Text pronounced as quoting someone else (usually marked as such by a change in the pitch of the voice)
( ) inaudible word
(student) Unidentified student

References

Benwell, Matthew. 2021. Going back to school: Engaging veterans’ memories of the Malvinas war in secondary schools in Santa Fe, Argentina. Political Geography 86. 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102351.Search in Google Scholar

Benwell, Matthew & Peter Hopkins (eds.). 2016. Children, young people and critical geopolitics. Farnham: Ashgate.10.4324/9781315562827Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, Rebecca. 2004. Imagining the modern: The cultures of nationalism in Cyprus. London: IB Tauris.10.5040/9780755620753Search in Google Scholar

Charalambous, Constadina. 2009. Learning the language of ‘The Other’: A linguistic ethnography of Turkish language classes in a Greek Cypriot school. Unpublished PhD thesis. King’s College London.Search in Google Scholar

Charalambous, Constadina. 2012. ‘Republica de Kubros’: Transgression and collusion in Greek-Cypriot adolescents’ classroom silly-talk. Linguistics and Education 23(3). 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.05.005.Search in Google Scholar

Charalambous, Constadina. 2013. The burden of emotions in language teaching: Renegotiating a troubled past in the language classroom. Language and Intercultural communication Journal 13(3). 310–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.804535.Search in Google Scholar

Charalambous, Constadina. 2019. Language education and ‘Conflicted heritage’: Implications for teaching and learning. The Modern Language Journal 103(4). 874–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12593.Search in Google Scholar

Charalambous, Constadina, Panayiota Charalambous & Ben Rampton. 2021. International relations, sociolinguistics and the ‘everyday’: A linguistic ethnography of peace-building through language education. Peacebuilding 9(4). 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1895604.Search in Google Scholar

Charalambous, Constadina, Panayiota Charalambous & Michalinos Zembylas. 2013. Doing ‘Leftist propaganda’or working towards peace? Moving Greek-Cypriot peace education struggles beyond local political complexities. Journal of Peace Education 10(1). 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2012.741522.Search in Google Scholar

Charalambous, Panayiota, Constadina Charalambous & Ben Rampton. 2017. De-securitizing Turkish: Teaching the language of a former enemy, and intercultural language education. Applied Linguistics 38(6). 800–823.10.1093/applin/amv063Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Ervin. 1974. Frame Analysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Ervin. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, Jennifer, Karen Golden-Biddle, Jennifer Irwin & Jina Mao. 2011. Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organization Science 22(2). 522–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0554.Search in Google Scholar

Kallio, Kirsi Pauliina & Jouni Häkli. 2013. Children and young people’s politics in everyday life. Space and Polity 17(1). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.780710.Search in Google Scholar

Karoulla–Vrikki, Dimitra. 2004. Language and ethnicity in Cyprus under the British: A linkage of heightened salience. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 168. 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2004.030.Search in Google Scholar

Kaukko, Mervi & Ulrika Wernesjö. 2017. Belonging and participation in liminality: Unaccompanied children in Finland and Sweden. Childhood 24(1). 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216649104.Search in Google Scholar

Mavratsas, Ceasar. 1999. National Identity and consciousness in everyday Life: Towards a sociology of knowledge of Greek-Cypriot nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 5(1). 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.1999.00091.x.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, Katharyne & Sarah Elwood. 2013. Intergenerational mapping and the cultural politics of memory. Space and Polity 17(1). 33–52.10.1080/13562576.2013.780712Search in Google Scholar

Ozerk, Kamil. 2001. Reciprocal bilingualism as a challenge and opportunity: The case of Cyprus. International Review of Education 47. 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017945624774.10.1023/A:1017945624774Search in Google Scholar

Papadakis, Yiannis. 2005. Echoes from the dead zone: Across the Cyprus divide. London: I.B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755619726Search in Google Scholar

Philippou, Stavroula. 2005. Constructing national and European identities: The case of Greek-Cypriot pupils. Educational Studies 31(3). 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500236761.Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben. 1995/2018. Crossing: language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman (3rd edition London: Routledge).10.4324/9781315205915Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben. 1999. Sociolinguistics and cultural studies: New ethnicities, liminality and interaction. Social Semiotics 9(3). 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339909360443.Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben, Constadina Charalambous & Panayiota Charalambous. 2019. Crossing of a different kind. Language in Society 48(5). 629–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404519000460.Search in Google Scholar

Szakolczai, Arpad. 2009. Liminality and experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. International Political Anthropology 2(1). 141–172.10.2307/j.ctt9qcxbg.5Search in Google Scholar

Szakolczai, Arpad. 2014. Living permanent liminality: The recent transition experience in Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology 22(1). 28–50. https://doi.org/10.7227/ijs.22.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Thomassen, Bjørn. 2009. The uses and meaning of liminality. International Political Anthropology 2(1). 5–28.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Victor. 1969. The ritual process: Structure & anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Victor. 1982. From ritual to theatre. New York: PAJ Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Vuchinich, Samuel. 1990. The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations 118. 138.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, Karen. 2017. Making young subjects: Liminality and violence. In Nancy Worth, Claire Dwyer & Tracey Skelton (eds.), Identities and subjectivities. Geographies of Children and Young People 4, 215–230. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-287-023-0_18Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-02-24
Accepted: 2022-09-30
Published Online: 2023-01-11
Published in Print: 2023-01-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2022-0036/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button