Foreign language ideology and American Sign Language in US public education

References

Antia, Shirin D., Michael S. Stinson & Martha G. Gaustad. 2002. Developing membership in the education of deaf in inclusive settings. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7. 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/7.3.214.Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, David F. 1988. Some notes on ASL as a ‘foreign language’. Sign Language Studies 59. 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0015.Search in Google Scholar

Battison, Robbin & S. Melvin CarterJr. 1981. The academic status of sign language. In Frank Caccamise, Mervin Garretson & Ursula Bellugi (eds.), Teaching American Sign Language as a second/foreign language, v–ix. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Search in Google Scholar

Baynton, Douglas. 1996. Forbidden signs: American culture and the campaign against sign language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226039688.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Belka, Robert W. 2000. Is American Sign Language a ‘Foreign language’? NECTFL Review 48. 45–52.Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 1999. The debate is open. In Jan Blommaert (ed.), Language ideological debates, 1–38. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: DeGruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110808049.1Search in Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E. & David Collier (eds.). 2010. Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Center for Applied Linguistics. 1997. A national survey of foreign language instruction in elementary and secondary schools: A changing picture: 1987–1997. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Chopin, Paul G. 1988. American Sign Language and the liberal education. Sign Language Studies 59. 109–115.10.1353/sls.1988.0019Search in Google Scholar

Chrisp, Steven. 2005. Maori intergenerational language transmission. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 172. 149–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2005.2005.172.149.Search in Google Scholar

Conoma, John Bosco. 2020. 35 years and counting! An ethnographic analysis of sign language ideologies within the Irish Sign Language recognition campaign. In Annelies Kusters, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty & Kristin Snoddon (eds.), Sign language ideologies in practice, 265–286. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: DeGruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501510090-014Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Audrey C. 2020. Bj and being: Spoken language dominant disability-oriented development and Vietnamese DHHself-determination. In Annelies Kusters, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty & Kristin Snoddon (eds.), Sign language ideologies in practice, 245–264. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: DeGruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501510090-013Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robert L. 1989. Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Sheryl B. 1997. The academic status of sign language programs in institutions of higher education in the United States. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Corwin, Kim & Sherman Wilcox. 1985. The search for the empty cup continues. Sign Language Studies 48. 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1985.0002.Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, James. 1992. Hold your tongue: Bilingualism and the politics of ‘English only’. Reading, MA: Addison-Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Lennard. 1998. The linguistic turf battles over American Sign Language. The Chronicle of Higher Education 44. 60–64.Search in Google Scholar

De Meulder, Maartje, Annelies Kusters, Erin Moriarty & Joseph J. Murray. 2019. Describe, don’t prescribe. The practice and politics of translanguaging in the context of deaf signers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40(10). 892–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1592181.Search in Google Scholar

Dunne, Brid, Judith Pettigrew & Katie Robinson. 2016. Using historical documentary methods to explore the history of occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 79(6). 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022615608639.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Susan & Patricia Siple. 1990. Theoretical issues in sign language research. Chicago: University of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Frishberg, Nancy. 1988. Signers of tales: The case for literary status of an unwritten language. Sign Language Studies 59. 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0023.Search in Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria A. 1988. Sign language: Evidence for language universals and the linguistic capacity of the human brain. Sign Language Studies 59. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0027.Search in Google Scholar

Gannon, Jack. 1981. The Deaf heritage: A narrative history of Deaf America. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Search in Google Scholar

Gaustad, Martha G. & Thomas N. Kluwer. 1992. Patterns of communication among DHH and hearing adolescents. In Thomas N. Kluwin, Donald F. Moores & Martha G. Gaustad (eds.), Toward effective school programs for DHH students, 107–128. New York: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, Larry J. 1993. Narrative, event-structure analysis, and causal interpretation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology 98(5). 1094–1133. https://doi.org/10.1086/230140.Search in Google Scholar

Herman, Deborah M. 2002. “Our patriotic duty”: Insights from professional history, 1890-1920. In Terry A. Osborn (ed.), Future of foreign language education in the United States, 1–29. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.10.5040/9798400655272.0007Search in Google Scholar

Hornberger, Nancy H. 2006. Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In Thomas Recent (ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method, 10–23. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Trevor. 2006. W(h)ither the Deaf community? Population, genetics, and the future of Australian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 6(2). 137–173. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2006.0006.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Robert B. & Richard B. BaldaufJr. 2005. Language-in-education policy and planning. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 1013–1034. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Kemp, Mike. 1988. Why is learning American Sign language a challenge? American Annals of the Deaf 143. 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0157.Search in Google Scholar

Klima, Edward S. & Ursala Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kreeft-Peyton, Joy. 1998. ASL as a foreign language. K-12 Foreign Language Education 6(1). 1–3.Search in Google Scholar

Kusters, Annelies. 2014. Language ideologies in the shared signing community of Adamorobe. Language in Society 43(2). 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404514000013.Search in Google Scholar

Kusters, Annelies, Massimiliano Spotti, Ruth Swanwick & Elina Tapio. 2017. Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism 14(3). 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651.Search in Google Scholar

Kusters, Annelies, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty & Kristin Snoddon (eds.). 2020a. Sign language ideologies in practice. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: DeGruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501510090Search in Google Scholar

Kusters, Annelies, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty & Kristin Snoddon. 2020b. Sign language ideologies: Practices and politics. In Annelies Kusters, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty & Kristin Snoddon (eds.), Sign language ideologies in practice, 3–22. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: DeGruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501510090-001Search in Google Scholar

Lane, Harlan. 1984. When the mind hears: A history of the deaf. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Lane, Harlan. 1992. The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf community. New York: Alfred Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Lane, Harlan, Robert Hoffmeister & Benjamin Bahan. 1996. A journey into the Deaf-World. San Diego, CA: DawnSignPress.Search in Google Scholar

Lane, Harlan, Richard C. Pillard & Ulf Hedberg. 2010. The people of the eye: Deaf ethnicity and ancestry. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759293.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.10.1515/9783112418260Search in Google Scholar

Loux, Donny. 1996. Report of the Legislative Task Force on American Sign Language to the Members of the 69th Session of the Nevada Legislature, Nevada (booklet), cited in Deborah A. Pfeiffer. 2003. The implementation and administration of American Sign Language programs for foreign language credit in public secondary schools. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2004. Comparative-historical methodology. Annual Review of Sociology 30. 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110507.Search in Google Scholar

Mas i Miralles, Antoni Mas. 2012. Language teaching and family linguistic transmission: Two correlative factors in the Valencian Region (Catalan vs. Spanish)? SOLS 6(1). 45–63.10.1558/sols.v6i1.45Search in Google Scholar

Moores, Donald M. 2001. Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles and practices, 5th edn. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Moriarty, Erin. 2020. Exploring sign language histories and documentation projects in post conflict areas. In Annelies Kusters, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty & Kristin Snoddon (eds.), Sign language ideologies in practice, 309–331. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: DeGruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501510090-016Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Joseph. 2020. Ideology, authority, and power. In Annelies Kusters, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty & Kristin Snoddon (eds.), Sign language ideologies in practice, 333–352. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: DeGruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501510090-017Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Joseph J. 2019. American Sign Language legislation in the USA. In Maartje de Meulder, Joseph J. Murray & Rachel L. McKee (eds.), The legal recognition of sign languages: Advocacy and outcomes around the world, 119–128. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788924016-009Search in Google Scholar

Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Padden, Carol A. & Tom L. Humphries. 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1097/00003446-198904000-00022Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, Richard W. 1999. The perceptions of deafness and language learning of incoming ASL students. PhD thesis. Riverside, CA: The University of California at Riverside.Search in Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, Deborah A. 2003. The implementation and administration of American Sign Language programs for foreign language credit in public secondary schools. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben. 1999. Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Reagan, Timothy. 2000. But does it count?: Reflections on “Signing” as a foreign language. NECTFL Review 48. 16–26.Search in Google Scholar

Reagan, Timothy G. 2010. Language policy and planning for sign languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reagan, Timothy G. 2020. The politics of L2/Ln pedagogy. In Russell S. Rosen (ed.), The Routledge handbook of sign language pedagogy, 262–275. Abington, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315406824-19Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, Russell. 2008. American Sign Language as a foreign language in US high schools: State of the art. The Modern Language Journal 92(1). 10–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00684.x.Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, Russell. 2015. Learning American Sign Language in high school: Motivation, strategies, and achievement. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.10.2307/j.ctv2rh29hgSearch in Google Scholar

Rueschemeyer, Dietrich & John D. Stephens. 1997. Comparing historical sequences—a powerful tool for causal analysis. Comparative Social Research 16. 55–72.Search in Google Scholar

Rutherford, Susan A. 1988. The culture of American Deaf people. Sign Language Studies 59. 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0022.Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163910Search in Google Scholar

Selover, Peggy J. 1988. American Sign Language in the high school system. Sign Language Studies 59(1). 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0026.Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, Joseph. 1993. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Three Rivers Press.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1992. The use and utility of ideology: Some reflections. Pragmatics 2(3). 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.11sil.Search in Google Scholar

Sinett, David R. 1995. An investigation of how foreign language departments at colleges and universities view American Sign Language. Miami: Florida International University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Sterniak, Nancy Vierira. 2008. The American attitude toward foreign language education from 1700’s to 2006. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Stinson, Michael & Yufang Liu. 1999. Participation of deaf students in classes with hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 4(3). 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/4.3.191.Search in Google Scholar

Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stokoe, William C., Dorothy Casterline & Carl Croneberg. 1965. A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Terstriep, Amy L. 1993. Ethnicity, social theory, and Deaf culture. In Proceedings on Deaf Deaf Studies III: Bridging cultures in the 21st century, 231–243. Washington, DC: College for Continuing Education, Gallaudet University.Search in Google Scholar

The New York State Education Department. 1994. American Sign Language for Communication New York State Teacher’s Guide, Field Test edn. Albany, NY: The State Education Department.Search in Google Scholar

Tollefson, James W. 1991. Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

US Department of Education. 1999. Analysis of final regulations for Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 64, 12527–12656. Washington, DC: Federal Register.Search in Google Scholar

Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas. 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Cleve, John & Barry A. Crouch. 1989. A place of their own: Creating the deaf community. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.10.1097/00003446-198908000-00024Search in Google Scholar

Wallinger, Linda. 2000. American Sign Language instruction: Moving from protest to practice. NECTFL Review 48. 27–36.Search in Google Scholar

Watzke, John L. 2003. Lasting change in foreign language education: A historical case for change in national policy. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Wilbers, Stephen. 1987. The case for recognizing American Sign Language. College Board Review 145. 4–9–30.Search in Google Scholar

Wilbers, Stephen. 1988. Why America needs Deaf culture: Cultural pluralism and the liberal arts tradition. Sign Language Studies 59. 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0006.Search in Google Scholar

Wilbur, Ronnie. 1979. American Sign Language and sign systems. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 1992. Academic acceptance of American Sign Language. Burtonsville, MD: Linstock Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 2019. Universities that accept ASL in fulfillment of foreign language requirements. http://www.unm.edu/∼wilcox/UNM/univlist.html (accessed 8 December 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Joy Kreeft-Peyton. 1999. American Sign Language as a foreign language (ERIC Digest). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Stephen Wilbers. 1987. The case for academic acceptance of American Sign Language. The Chronicle of Higher Education 30.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis P. Wilcox. 1997. Learning to see: Teaching American Sign Language as a second language, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Winefield, Richard. 1987. Never the twain shall meet: Bell, Gallaudet, and the communication debate. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woolard, Kathryn A. 1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 3–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0001Search in Google Scholar