Home Modelling of convective drying of potatoes polyhedrons
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Modelling of convective drying of potatoes polyhedrons

  • Marco A. V. Silva Júnior , Mariani A. Leite and Gustavo C. Dacanal ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 1, 2023

Abstract

This work aimed to develop numerical models to predict the moisture content and deformation of potato slices during convective drying (40–80 °C, 0.5 m·s−1). Three-dimensional slices were considered in cylindrical, cubic, parallelepiped, and prism geometries. The first classic model coupled the linear constant drying rate period with the analytical solution of Fick’s law in spherical coordinates, evaluating the mass diffusion coefficients (4.2–15.5·10−10 m2·s−1), critical drying time (1640–5085 s), and critical moisture content (1.8–2.4 kg·kg−1). The Finite Element Method (FEM) was a more robust model, that combined momentum and mass transfer to three-dimensional solid deformation of polyhedrons by ALE method, evaluating the mass diffusivity (1.4–6.5·10−10 m2·s−1). The FEM model could predict the shrinkage due to water molar flux removal on moving solid boundaries and explain the pseudo-constant drying rate detected in experimental data. The developed models accurately described the drying of food materials with a high shrinkage ratio.


Corresponding author: Gustavo C. Dacanal, Department of Food Engineering, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, 13635-900, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 001

Nomenclature

A

Coefficient of the constant drying rate period (dimensionless)

c

Water concentration (mol⋅m−3)

D air

Diffusivity of water in air domain (m2⋅s−1)

D eff

Effective diffusivity of water in solid domain (m2⋅s−1)

e

Edge or diameter of polyhedron (m)

h

Height of polyhedron (m)

J n

Total normal molar flux (mol⋅m−2⋅s−1)

K p

Partition coefficient (dimensionless)

M w

Water molar mass (kg⋅mol−1)

m

Mass (kg)

N c

Coefficient of the constant drying rate period (s−1)

P

Pressure (Pa)

R s

Equivalent spherical radius (m)

R

Universal gas constant (J⋅mol−1⋅K−1)

RH

Relative humidity (dimensionless)

RMSE

Root-mean-square error (dimensionless)

R 2

Coefficient of determination (dimensionless)

S

Specific area (m2⋅kg−1)

T

Air temperature (°C or K)

t

Time (s)

V

Volume (m³)

V/V 0

Shrinkage (dimensionless)

v

Air velocity (m⋅s−1)

v n

Normal velocity of moving boundary (m⋅s−1)

X

Moisture content in dry basis (kg⋅kg−1)

XR

Moisture ratio (dimensionless)

ρ

Density (kg⋅m−3)

μ

Dynamic viscosity (Pa⋅s)

CL

Sample label for cylinder polyhedron

CB

Sample label for cube polyhedron

PL

Sample label for parallelepiped polyhedron

PM

Sample label for prism polyhedron

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, experimental drying trials, data collection and analysis were performed by MAVSJ and MAL. Mathematical modeling was performed by MAVSJ and GCD. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MAVSJ and GCD, and GCD commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Mujumdar, AS, Law, CL. Drying technology: trends and applications in postharvest processing. Food Bioprocess Technol 2010;3:843–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0353-1.Search in Google Scholar

2. Castro, AM, Mayorga, EY, Moreno, FL. Mathematical modelling of convective drying of fruits: a review. J Food Eng 2018;223:152–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.12.012.Search in Google Scholar

3. Malekjani, N, Jafari, SM. Simulation of food drying processes by computational fluid dynamics (CFD); recent advances and approaches. Trends Food Sci Technol 2018;78:206–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

4. Silva Júnior, MAV, Rabi, JA, Ribeiro, R, Dacanal, GC. Modeling of convective drying of cornstarch-alginate gel slabs. J Food Eng 2019;250:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.01.015.Search in Google Scholar

5. Sabarez, HT. Computational modelling of the transport phenomena occurring during convective drying of prunes. J Food Eng 2012;111:279–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.02.021.Search in Google Scholar

6. Perussello, CA, Kumar, C, De Castilhos, F, Karim, MA. Heat and mass transfer modeling of the osmo-convective drying of yacon roots (Smallanthus sonchifolius). Appl Therm Eng 2014;63:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.10.020.Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhu, Y, Wang, P, Sun, D, Qu, Z, Yu, B. Multiphase porous media model with thermo-hydro and mechanical bidirectional coupling for food convective drying. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2021;175:121356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121356.Search in Google Scholar

8. Albosharib, D, Noshad, M, Jooyandeh, H, Zaki Dizaji, H. Effect of freezing and radiofrequency pretreatments on quality and kinetics of convective air-drying of potatoes. J Food Process Preserv 2021;45:e16062. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16062.Search in Google Scholar

9. Boutelba, I, Zid, S, Glouannec, P, Magueresse, A, Youcef-ali, S. Experimental data on convective drying of potato samples with different thickness. Data Brief 2018;18:1567–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.065.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Defraeye, T. Impact of size and shape of fresh-cut fruit on the drying time and fruit quality. J Food Eng 2017;210:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ajani, C, Kumar, A, Curcio, S, Tekasakul, P. Parametric study and shrinkage modelling of natural rubber sheet drying using COMSOL multiphysics. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2017;243:12012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/243/1/012012.Search in Google Scholar

12. Aversa, M, Curcio, S, Calabrò, V, Iorio, G. Experimental evaluation of quality parameters during drying of carrot samples. Food Bioprocess Technol 2012;5:118–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-009-0280-1.Search in Google Scholar

13. Senadeera, W, Bhandari, BR, Young, G, Wijesinghe, B. Influence of shapes of selected vegetable materials on drying kinetics during fluidized bed drying. J Food Eng 2003;58:277–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-8774(02)00386-2.Search in Google Scholar

14. Mulet, A, Garcia-Reverter, J, Bon, J, Berna, A. Effect of shape on potato and cauliflower shrinkage during drying. Dry Technol 2000;18:1201–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930008917772.Search in Google Scholar

15. Yamsaengsung, R, Moreira, RG. Modeling the transport phenomena and structural changes during deep fat frying. J Food Eng 2002;53:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-8774(01)00134-0.Search in Google Scholar

16. Sanga, ECM, Mujumdar, AS, Raghavan, GSV. Simulation of convection-microwave drying for a shrinking material. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 2002;41:487–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0255-2701(01)00170-2.Search in Google Scholar

17. Aversa, M, Curcio, S, Calabrò, V, Iorio, G. An analysis of the transport phenomena occurring during food drying process. J Food Eng 2007;78:922–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.12.005.Search in Google Scholar

18. Yang, H, Sakai, N, Watanabe, M. Drying model with non-isotropic shrinkage deformation undergoing simultaneous heat and mass transfer. Dry Technol 2001;19:1441–60. https://doi.org/10.1081/drt-100105299.Search in Google Scholar

19. Curcio, S, Aversa, M. Influence of shrinkage on convective drying of fresh vegetables: a theoretical model. J Food Eng 2014;123:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.09.014.Search in Google Scholar

20. Aprajeeta, J, Gopirajah, R, Anandharamakrishnan, C. Shrinkage and porosity effects on heat and mass transfer during potato drying. J Food Eng 2015;144:119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

21. Khan, MIH, Kumar, C, Joardder, MUH, Karim, MA. Determination of appropriate effective diffusivity for different food materials. Dry Technol 2017;35:335–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2016.1170700.Search in Google Scholar

22. Rakesh, V, Datta, A. Microwave puffing: mathematical modeling and optimization. Procedia Food Sci 2011;1:762–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.115.Search in Google Scholar

23. Gulati, T, Ukidwe, M, Datta, A. Engineering puffed rice. Phys Today 2018;71:66–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.3979.Search in Google Scholar

24. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

25. Ruiz-López, II, Ruiz-Espinosa, H, Arellanes-Lozada, P, Bárcenas-Pozos, ME, García-Alvarado, MA. Analytical model for variable moisture diffusivity estimation and drying simulation of shrinkable food products. J Food Eng 2012;108:427–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.08.025.Search in Google Scholar

26. Crank, J. The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1975:414 p.Search in Google Scholar

27. Cussler ELEL. Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems, 3rd ed. Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press; 2009:655 p.10.1017/CBO9780511805134Search in Google Scholar

28. Sun, ML, Wu, D, Wang, MQ, Jin, SF, Wang, KZ. Simulation analysis of fluid-structure interactions with moving mesh. Adv Mater Res 2011;305:235–8. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.305.235.Search in Google Scholar

29. Borgnakke, C, Sonntag, RE. Fundamentos da Termodinâmica, 8th ed. São Paulo, SP: Blucher; 2013:730 p.Search in Google Scholar

30. Hassini, L, Azzouz, S, Peczalski, R, Belghith, A. Estimation of potato moisture diffusivity from convective drying kinetics with correction for shrinkage. J Food Eng 2007;79:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.025.Search in Google Scholar

31. Joardder, MUH, Kumar, C, Karim, MA. Prediction of porosity of food materials during drying: current challenges and directions. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2018;58:2896–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1345852.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-01-19
Accepted: 2023-11-19
Published Online: 2023-12-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2023-0016/html
Scroll to top button