Abstract
Food safety plays an essential role in our daily lives, and it becomes serious with the development of worldwide trade. To tackle the food safety issues, many advanced technologies have been developed to monitor the process of the food industry (FI) to ensure food safety, including the process of food production, processing, transporting, storage, and retailing. These technologies are often referred to as artificial intelligence (AI), big data, and blockchain, which have been widely applied in many research areas. In this review, we introduce these technologies and their applications in the food safety domain. Firstly, basic concepts of these technologies are presented. Then, applications for food safety from a data perspective based on these technologies are analyzed. Finally, future challenges of the applications of AI, big data, and blockchain are discussed.
1 Introduction
As defined by the World Food Submit, the goal of food safety is to enable all people to have safe, nutritious, and enough food for their dietary needs and preferences for a healthy and active life [1]. Food safety holds an important role in the economy and trade in modern society for food industry (FI). Moreover, it is very essential to human health in both developing and developed countries. As estimated in ref. [2], there are over 600 million cases of food-borne diseases, which cause 420,000 deaths every year. It is reported that the illnesses from food-borne pathogens will cost over 10 billion annually in the United States. Moreover, the demand of food from all over the world increases the risks of food safety during the process of food production, food processing, food transportation, and food retail. Thus, it is urgent but hard to make sure the food safety.
Food safety problems may occur during any process in FI for it is a complicated procedure. Food production is the first step in the FI, and it is also an essential process for food safety. Food production mainly refers to the cultivation of crops and animal husbandry in agriculture. Thus, it is particularly important and difficult to ensure food safety at this stage food processing it the processing of crops or animals into products for human consumption. Corresponding food additives are usually added during food processing, and food safety should ensure that there are no errors in this process. Food transportation includes the transportation and preservation of food, which usually deteriorates due to changes in the external environment. Food retail is mainly to prevent expired food from being sold by mistake. These four processes describe the whole “life” of a kind of food, and they all can influence food safety.
With the development of economics and world trading, food safety becomes more and more important, and it can be achieved with the advances of technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and big data. In the past, it was difficult for people to believe where the food they bought came from. Nowadays, food traceability can easily realize information query for the whole process of the food. In the food production process, sensors and other devices are used for the monitoring of food safety and collecting data for traceability. Then records during the food processing, food transportation, and food retail are kept for the data processing. Large amount of data are collected during these stages, and the technologies of AI and big data are useful for the data processing.
AI aims at enabling computers to “understand” the meanings from data. Recent years have witnessed the successful applications in computer vision [3], [4], [5], [6], natural language processing etc. One of the most obvious advantages of AI is that it can learn knowledge from a large amount of data automatically. Thus, big data plays an important role for AI. Big data techniques are mainly used for the collection, storage, query, and basic processing of the huge amount of data. There are a lot of redundancies in the collected data. Thus, the use of AI and big data can obtain useful information from the redundant collected data.
Since food safety plays an critical role in the FI, it has received an abundance of attention by the research community from the food science, and even the information science. As shown in Figure 1, the search traffic for the terms blockchain, big data, and AI on Google has grown dramatically over the past decade, and it is evident that food safety gets an increasing attention over years. Many recent works have put their attention on related content about blockchain, big data, and AI and their applications on food safety as shown in Table 1. The authors in ref. [7] analyzed the situation of big data on food safety, and several examples are provided to support future issues and opportunities. Friedlander and Zoellner [8] presented the applications of AI for food retailing, which are classified as different solutions, such as vision, text, or functional-based solutions. The work by Tse et al. [9] introduced blockchain technology, and its applications in the security of the food supply chain compared to the traditional supply chain system. These works have analyzed the applications of corresponding topics in a broad view. However, food safety systems are usually complex systems which integrate the technologies of AI, big data, and blockchain. Thus, a systemic review that introduces multiple technologies applied for food safety is needed for the research field.

Relative worldwide search traffic for the terms food safety, blockchain, big data, and artificial intelligence (AI) on Google over the last decade. The data are accessed from Google Trends on April 25, 2021.
Existing surveys and reviews relating to the terms of food industry (FI).
Publication | Summary | Related context |
---|---|---|
Big data in food safety: An overview [7] | An overview analyzed the situations of big data in food safety, and several examples are provided for future developments and opportunities. | Big data |
Big Data in food safety-A review [93] | A review presents recent progress of the applications of big data in food safety. It showed that big data for food safety still in its infancy but it is powering the whole food supply chain. | Big data |
IoT, big data and artificial intelligence in agriculture and food industry [94] | A survey discussed the role of IoT and big data in agriculture supply chain modernization, social media in food industry, food quality assessment, and food safety. | IoT, big data and AI |
A critical review on computer vision and artificial intelligence in food industry [65] | A review provided an insight into advanced AI and computer vision technologies that can help farmers in agriculture and food processing. | AI and computer vision |
Artificial intelligence opportunities to improve food safety at retail [8] | A review presented the applications of AI for food retailing, which are categorized as vision, text, interactive, analytical, or functional-based solutions. | AI |
Current progress in the utilization of smartphone-based imaging for quality assessment of food products: a review [95] | A review highlighted the recent researches of smartphone-based imaging systems in different food systems, such as fruit, vegetables, and meat. | Computer vision |
A supply chain traceability system for food safety based on HACCP, blockchain & Internet of things [96] | A review introduced the benefits of blockchain technology to the food supply chain in improving food traceability, strengthening collaboration, operational efficiency, and simplifying food transaction processes. | Blockchain |
Blockchain application in food supply information security [9] | An article introduced blockchain technology, and its applications in the security of the food supply chain compared to the traditional supply chain system. | Blockchain |
In this paper, we review the works relating to AI, big data, and blockchain on food safety. Different from the previous works, we present these works about food safety in a systemic view instead of introducing these hot topics independently. As shown in Figure 2, a food supply chain, also known as “from farm to fork”, consists of four step, namely, agriculture, manufacturing, supply chain (storage and transportation), and retail. Similar to the process of food processing, we conclude the process of these technologies into five stages from the data view, which contains data collection, storage and transferring, analysis, visualization, and security. Specifically, data collection pays attention to online data, genomics data, social media, and data from sensors. We introduce several databases such as SQL, NoSQL, MongoDB for data storage, and then data analysis methods such as support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), and tools including PyTorch, Hadoop are also presented. For data visualization, programming tools HTML, R are introduced, and business tools such as IBM system are also recommended. Finally, similar to food safety for the food process, data security also plays an important role for the data processing. The wellknown technology, blockchain is utilized for ensuring the security during the data processing period. We offer a broad view of advanced technologies that are applied for food safety in the data processing view. We hope that this review with various topics will motivate further research for food safety.

Overview of the architecture of the review.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents basic technologies of big data, AI, and blockchain. Section 3 presents the applications of these technologies in food processing from a data processing view including data collection, storage and transferring, analysis, visualization, and security. Future trends and challenges are given in Section 4 and Section 5 concludes the paper.
2 Basic technologies
2.1 Big data
The definition of big data is rapidly collected and complex data in huge quantities as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) [10]. The storage of big data can reach terabytes (1012 bytes), etabytes (1015 bytes), or even zettabytes (1021 bytes). As described in ref. [11], it has three important characteristics, namely, high volume, high velocity, and high variety information. Similarly, The European Commission (EC) [12] defined big data as large amounts of data generated from various types of sources. New tools and technologies such as powerful algorithms are needed to deal with these highly variable data.
In all the above definitions, volume represents the amount of data, velocity refers to the information generation and processing speed, and variety represents the variation in data formats (e.g., structured data that are organized by rows and columns, such as tables and databases, and unstructured data represents the information that cannot be represented in a structural manner, such as BBC News pages, and other social media postings [13]).
2.2 Artificial intelligence
AI, defined as “the simulation of human intelligence in machines that is programmed to think and act like humans”, is a hot research field in computer science. It contains a broad range of concepts such as machine learning (ML), deep learning, etc. AI has undergone several stages of development, namely, (i) knowledge-based rules, (ii) patterns using ML, (iii) automation using deep learning. In the first stage of AI, knowledge-based rules are first defined by human experts and then are used identify rules or make decisions. Specific patterns are designed by using techniques such as feature engineering and then ML are utilized to classify or recognize these defined patterns in the second stage. Then, deep learning techniques are utilized to identify and make decisions automatically in an end-to-end manner.
2.2.1 Rule-based AI
Rule-based AI is also known as “expert system (ES)”, where the rules are collected based on physical rules or experience-based knowledge designed by human experts. By this approach, the system is constantly monitored using machines, and the data are analyzed using the principles. Intuitively, the system utilizes the rule of “if-then” coding statements, resulting in deterministic outputs. Thus, it is hard to model knowledge into clearly defined rules that can be applied in ESs [14]. Moreover, rule-based AI cannot be utilized in a real-time system, which needs both accurate and fast decision and control.
2.2.2 Machine learning
To overcome the shortages of rule-based AI, ML has been developed from a data perspective. Recently, it has been a hot research area [15]. ML based AI can distill and learn knowledge from large amounts of unorganized data, where the learned knowledge can be used for making predictions on data. It explores the ways of learning or studying and the structure of algorithms. The ML based algorithms overcome the drawbacks of static programmed of rule-based AI by making decisions and predictions in a data-driven manner. It can be classified into the five main categories, namely, (i) Supervised learning: learning from labeled training data and making predictions on unknown testing data. (ii) Unsupervised learning: learning from the training data without labels and making decisions on unseen testing data. (iii) Weakly/semi-supervised learning: learning from labeled and unlabeled data (training set) and making decisions on unknown testing data. (iv) Reinforcement learning: learning by continuously interacting with the environment and getting rewards for each action. Its objective is to maximize the rewards over a series of actions and interact with the environment. (v) Representation learning: learning representations for classification or detection automatically from raw data, which is also known as feature learning.
2.2.3 Deep learning
ML based AI has achieved great progress for the manner of learning from data. However, ML based methods are concentrated on the way of learning and ignore the processing of feature acquisition. Thus, deep learning (DL) based AI is investigated to extract high levels of information from large amounts of data. Different from traditional ML based methods, DL based algorithms are organized hierarchically with the increase of complexity. Multiple processing layers are stacked to learn data representations with multi-level of abstractions.
DL based algorithms have obtained unprecedented achievements on a wide range of applications, such as image classification, object detection [3], image segmentation [4, 5] in computer vision. There are mainly four models in DL based algorithms, namely, convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), generative adversarial network (GAN), and deep reinforcement learning (DRL). CNN is a kind of ANNs that are constructed by multiple layers, including convolutional layers, pooling operation, and fully connected (FC) layers, and are used to learn spatial hierarchical features through back-propagation automatically and adaptively [16]. RNN is a neural network with feedback (closed loop) connections and can be used for learning sequential or time varying patterns [17]. GAN is a new framework with a generative model G and a discriminative model D, where G learns the data distribution, and D estimates the probability that a sample came from the training data rather than G [18]. DRL is a deep neural network version of reinforcement learning in the traditional ML based AI, which is implemented by using deep layers and reward mechanism [19] (see Figure 3).

Machine learning (ML) and deep learning.
2.3 Blockchain
As defined in ref. [20], a blockchain is a digital, decentralized, and distributed ledger, which records and adds the transactions in a chronological order in order to create permanent and tamper-proof records. It is combined by different methods, techniques, and tools to solve a specific problem. Due to its ability to increasing transparency, increasing the immutability of transactions, and enhance trust among stakeholders in the food supply chain, blockchain has obtained wide attention. A blockchain is a growing record list linked through cryptography, namely, blocks. A block consists of a cryptographic hash of the previous block, a time stamp, and transaction data (a Merkle tree). Modification of the data is not resistant in a blockchain because the data cannot be changed retroactively without alteration of all following blocks once recorded [21].
In conclusion, blockchain has four main characteristics as follows. (i) Decentralization: Validation through the central trusted agency is needed in the traditional centralized transaction systems, which inevitably results in the additional cost for the system. Differently, in a blockchain network, any two peers (P2P) can realize the transactions without the authentication by the center server. The server costs and performance bottlenecks can be reduced and mitigated by this way with the use of blockchain. (ii) Persistency: Tamper is nearly impossible because each transaction in the network needs to be recorded and confirmed by every block distributed in the whole network. Moreover, each broad-casted block is validated by other nodes, and transactions is checked. Thus, it is easily to detect falsification. (iii) Anonymity: Generated addresses can be used by a user during the interaction with the network to avoid identity exposure. Private information of users are no longer kept in any nodes, which ensures certain privacy on the transactions. However, the perfect privacy cannot be guaranteed due to intrinsic constraint. (iv) Auditability: The previous records can be easily verified and traced by accessing the time stamp of the interactions in any nodes in the distributed networks. For example, in the bitcoin blockchain, every transaction can be accessed to previous records iteratively. This mechanism ensures the traceability and transparency of the data in the blockchain.
The blockchain is a chain structure constructed by the blocks using a hash algorithm, as shown in Figure 4. The first block, also called the block header, is the genesis block. The creation block mainly consists of Hash value, Mine difficulty, Nonce, Time stamp, and Merkle tree root data [22]. The middle block includes all transactions within a certain period including the hash value of the previous block, Nonce, and Times tamp. The blockchain generation process can be briefly summarized as follows: by adding a time stamp, all parties can keep the account and verify it at the same time, and confirm it every 10 min to form the entire network record [23].

The generation process of the blockchain.
3 Applications
3.1 Data collection
Various types of data sources with useful information can be utilized for food safety, such as online databases, sensor data, genomics data, and social media data. However, the diversity of the data also brings challenges that it is difficult to identify relevant information within a data source and the relation with other data sources.
3.1.1 Online database
The extensive move from worldwide food supply chains to food supply networks brings both convenient lives and considerable challenges for food safety. The online databases, which are constructed by international or national organizations, offer the monitoring data of hazard (including monitoring data, alteration, chemical data), consumption databases, and surveillance reports on animal and plant diseases. Table 2 presents several examples of the online databases for monitoring data of hazards in food products, such as GEMS/Food, RASFF, etc.
Examples of food safety databases.
Database | Type | Description | Organization & country | Link/source |
---|---|---|---|---|
GEMS/food | Monitoring data | Biological/chemical monitoring | WHO, Global | https://extranet.who.int/gemsfood/ |
JECFA | Chemical/biological specifications | The most recent specifications for flavorings evaluated by JECFA | JECFA, Global | http://www.fao.org/food/food-safety-quality/scientific-advice/jecfa/jecfa-flav/en/ |
RASFF | Alerts/notifications | Notifications from the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed | European Commission, European Union | https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/portal/?event=SearchForm&cleanSearch=1 |
FDA Alerts | Alerts/notifications | Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts | USFDA, USA | http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/default.htm |
FOSCOLLAB | Collaborating database | Multiple sources of reliable data | WHO, Global | http://www.who.int/collaboratingcentres/database/en/ |
The Global Environment Monitoring System (GEMS/food) database has millions of global monitoring data, which are structured in a logical manner for easily retrieval [24]. Food safety incidences are both stored in databases in a structural way, such as RASFF and presented on webs and media reports of the food safety authorities, such as MedISys. For the unstructured data sources, they are distributed over the Internet, which therefore are hard to retrieve, such as the news about food-borne outbreaks that be found on social media. FOSCOLLAB [25] integrates a large amount of reliable data from different sources. It can help access these key sources in a short time. Moreover, it can assist the professionals and authorities do better risk assessment and make better decisions.
Apart from the official databases, there is also a large source of information from the Internet that can be applied to help risk managers in maintaining food safety. Considering there is a huge volume of data on the Internet which has not been stored in a structural way, the researchers have developed web crawling systems to search publications related to food safety. For example, MedISys, a typical case of web crawling systems, is a part of the European Media Monitor (EMM) exploited by the Joint Research Center (JRC) of the EC [26]. MedISys is collecting reports about human and animal infectious diseases from the Internet [27] in a fully automatic manner. It also has been used to collect publications related to food safety [28]. The system has been analyzed that it can be utilized for detecting food and feed-borne hazards as an early warning system [29].
3.1.2 Genomics data
Genomics data can provide the most reliable way to trace to the food and hazard source in a bioinformatics way. Large-scale genomic databases are the main methods for processing toxicogenomics-based predictive analysis, especially for the hazard identification [30]. These databases are obtained from exposure of cells or animals to known toxicants. The aim of toxicogenomics is to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the toxic expression. Moreover, by using “animal-based” and cellular models, toxicogenomics can be applied to derive the molecular expression models in vitro and vivo toxicity [31]. This approach is also called read-across, which is constructed on the hypothesis that similar gene expressions indicate similar physiological responses. These responses can be utilized to identify the toxicological characteristics of a biological or chemical entity. A large volume of data is required to realize the simple concept of “toxicogenomics” for obtaining actual toxicologically significant effects. The amount of generated data is enormous, complicated, and challenging to describe in a statistical and biological manner [32]. Large volumes of transcriptomics data on toxicogenomics can be saved in extremely massive databases and can be freely accessible. There are several instances of these databases, such as Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [33] and ArrayExpress [34].
Moreover, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) program (http://aopkb.org/) has developed a comprehensive knowledge base that will serve as a central repository for exploratory analyses and predicting human health risks [35].
3.1.3 Social media data
Social media plays an important position in modern society and daily lives. News are often delivered to the general public through social media, such as Facebook, Twitter [36, 37], YouTube, and crowd-sourced consumer review sites such as Yelp [38, 39] and Amazon [40], and participatory systems such as IWasPoisoned.com [41]. Food-associated organizations now are adopting social media to interact with the public on relevant issues [42]. Food agencies can better understand the requirements of the public by monitoring users’ conversations on social media tools. Data mining and analysis approaches have been utilized to exploit a large number of social media information as an early notification mechanism for identifying potential health and food safety matters that have high risks to develop into a crisis [43].
3.1.4 Sensor data
Sensors are deployed during the whole process of food production, therefore it plays an essential role in the safety monitoring. Sensors such as temperature, humidity, gas sensor are applied in the monitoring and control of greenhouse cultivation, and they record the environmental information of the food products which may influence the food safety. With the help of these sensors, food safety issues can be avoided before delivering to the customers.
3.2 Data storage and transferring
Large-scale of data collected from Internet, genomics data, social media, and sensor data are managed in a structure manner using databases such as structured query language (SQL), and NoSQL (see Table 3). General data management methods, such as MySQL, Oracle, and PostgreSQL are utilized to realize data storage. However, these systems are not adequate to handle big data for the flexibility and reliability of these systems are limit due to the SQL. Thus, NoSQL systems are developed for next-generation databases that are open-source and horizontally scalable. For example, MongoDB, Cassandra, and HBase are representative databases using NoSQL.
Examples of data storage, processing, transferring, and visualization.
Apart from data storage, it is more difficult for dealing with big data from different sources in a NoSQL cluster. Therefore, data transferring software is needed to transfer data, such as Aspera, Talend, and Elasticsearch.
3.3 Data analysis
Data analysis are operated after the data storage and moving the data into the processing unit. As shown in Table 3, a list of the most used analysis tools for ML and deep learning are presented. Python [44] is the basic programming language for data science and AI. Scikit-learn [45] is a ML module written in Python. It integrates a broad scope of advanced ML algorithms for supervised and unsupervised problems. Similarly, PyTorch [46] is a deep learning framework which supports lots of deep learning algorithms and computes in a parallel manner by using graphics processing units (GPUs), as well as other frameworks such as TensorFlow [47], Keras [48], MXNet [49].
For rule-based AI applications, the authors in ref. [50] developed an ES to investigate seed potato production. The ES constructed 127 rules diagnose 11 pathogenic diseases and six nonpathogenic diseases by two knowledge engineers and five domain experts in potato disease diagnosis. The proposed ES has shown great potential in managing the disease component of seed potato production. Similarly, Sarma et al. [51] designed an ES based on a logic programming approach for the diagnosis of common diseases in the rice plant. The system is composed of a knowledge base, inference engine, and user-interface. To identify the halal safety rating for food additives, Zakaria et al. [52] used an ES to offer the consumers a safety rating key according to their past food consumption record experience. Similarly, to monitor and predict the product quality in the production process, an intelligent ES was developed. Recommendations for the products and the defects for the final product can be identified by this system [53].
Compared to human ESs based on logic programming, ML methods can make the process of protecting food safety become more “intelligent”. When rule-based AI systems cannot work in complex scenarios, ML algorithms are deployed to make decisions by learning from data [54]. ML models, such as Naive Bayes, SVM, MLP, and ANN are widely applied for the applications of food safety. To automatically grade mangoes based on the features of fruit, Pise and Upadhye [55] proposed a ML system based on the features of size, shape, color, and surface pixel of mangoes using Naive Byes and SVM. Experimental results have shown that the proposed system can achieve better performance than rule-based AI systems. Similarly, to analyze the quality of wine, Shaw et al. [56] focused on the comparative study over different classification algorithms for wine quality analysis. In their study, SVM, random forest, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were compared. ANN has also been utilized for dried vegetables quality detection in ref. [57].
The features used for food quality assessment are often defined by human experts, which may not proper for the classification results. Instead of using features of food independently, deep learning can learn features from the food images automatically, which can be more suitable for the process of protecting food safety. The authors in ref. [58] used the deep denoising auto-encoder to illustrate the influence of food contamination on gastrointestinal infections and provided a valuable tool for morbidity forecast. To detect the quality of food for safety, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), stacked auto-encoders (SAEs) are applications for the qualitative detection of vegetables, fruits, and meat. Liu et al. [59] developed a novel classification algorithm by using deep feature representation learned by the stacked sparse auto-encoder (SSAE). The proposed SSAE was then combined with CNN for the defect recognition of pickling cucumbers by learning from hyper-spectral images. Similarly, the authors in ref. [60] recognized the plum varieties by applying image analysis and deep CNNs. Computer vision and deep learning based methods were also applied in the quality assessment of meat products in refs. [61, 62]. The food supply chain is a complicated system consisting of various economic processes from primary farmers to customers (including production, transportation, restoration, retail). The multiple processes result in unreliable information from the supply chain, which can give rise to food fraud and food safety dilemmas. Thus, it is hard for official organizations or governments to achieve reliable information about food safety. Mao et al. [63] proposed a credit evaluation system using blockchain for the food supply chain with long term short memory network (LSTM). For more examples about deep learning for food, we recommend the readers for reviews such as refs. [64, 65]. Chen et al. [66] adopted deep learning for food quality assessment, where AI-based methods, image processing (IP) system, and sensor technology can be utilized for quality assessment in the FI. The IP systems and AI can be used for various purposes, such as classifying products based on size and shape, detecting product defects, the presence of microbes, and grading food quality (see Table 4).
Examples of data analysis methods.
Method | Type | Applications |
---|---|---|
Rule-based AI | Human expert system | Plant diseases detection [50, 51], food additives detection [52], food products monitoring [53] |
Fuzzy model | Food safety risk assessment [97] | |
Machine learning | Naive Bayes, SVM | Mangoes quality detection [55], wine quality detection [56] |
MLP | Dried carrots quality detection [57] | |
ANN | Weed identification [98, 99] | |
Deep learning | Auto-encoder | Food contamination detection [58] |
CNN | Quality detection of vegetables [59], fruits [60], meat [62], biscuits [100] | |
SAE | Quality detection of meat [62] | |
LSTM | Food supply chain [63] |
3.4 Data visualization
Table 2 presents several visualization tools which are available to analyze and give summaries of a large volume of data. R [67] and Circos [68] are two most commonly used tools. R, an open-source programming language widely adopted in data science, is often applied to visualize and analyze data. Circos enables the visualization of data using a circular layout and can illustrate the relationship between objects or locations, which has become the main choice of genome chromosomes visualization. The above two tools require programming skills, several commercial visualization softwares such as IBM Many Eyes and Tableau are good choices for researchers without any programming experiences.
3.5 Data security
The complex food supply chain results in the unreliable information, which will influence data security. Similar to food safety, data security is also essential to the whole process of data processing. Thus, blockchain is utilized to guarantee data security during the collection, storage, and processing stages. As shown in Table 5, a blockchain is constructed based on its unique infrastructure, which contains six layers, namely, data layer, network layer, consensus layer, incentive layer, contract layer, and application layer [69, 70]. Each layer performs a core function, and all the layers realize a decentralized trust mechanism by cooperating with each other [71].
The technology architecture of blockchain.
Layer | Function |
---|---|
Application layer | Programmable finance, currency, and society |
Contract layer | Script codes, algorithmic mechanism, smart contracts |
Incentive layer | Issuance mechanism, distribution mechanism |
Consensus layer | PoW/PoS/DPoS |
Network layer | P2P network, propagation mechanism, verification mechanism |
Data layer | Block data, chain structure, time stamp, hash function, Merkle tree, asymmetric encryption |
From the bottom to the top layer, the data layer briefly illustrates the physical form of blockchain technology. The main function of the network layer is to realize the information communication chain among nodes in the network [23]. The network layer mainly contains point-to-point transmission technology (also known as peer-to-peer [P2P] system), propagation mechanisms, and verification mechanisms. It has the functions of consensus algorithms, encrypted signatures, data storage, etc. The consensus layer enables highly decentralized nodes in a decentralized system to effectively reach a consensus on the validity of block data [72, 73]. Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) are three commonly used consensus mechanisms. The main purpose of the incentive layer is to provide certain incentives to encourage every block to participate in the security verification and to attract participants to contribute to the computing power [74]. Various script codes, algorithmic mechanisms, and smart contracts are the main elements of the contract layer, which establish regulated and auditable contract specifications. The last layer is the application layer, which mainly focuses on programmable finance, currency, and society, such as bitcoin.
Blockchain, a tool that builds trust among stakeholders with divergent benefits, has been applied in many different sectors since it was first used in the year 2008 [75, 76]. Blockchain technology can provide an unprecedented applications for innovation in different domains due to its decentralized, transparent, and tamper-proof features. Originally, it was intended to record financial transactions between individuals, and it has been widely applied with technological advances and increased interest from international companies [77]. At present, blockchain technology has been extended to many other fields, such as mutual insurance [78], citizenship identification [79, 80], as well as food safety [81]. In the research field of food safety, blockchain technology is mainly applied to guarantee the data generated in the food production process will not be falsified to ensure food safety, strengthen food traceability and increase consumers’ trust in food safety [82, 83].
As shown in Table 6, for plant food, each link transaction (such as purchase and use of seeds, pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers) related to the plant culture can be verified by nodes in the network by using a “consensus mechanism” [84, 85]. Meanwhile, for animal food, the food for animal feeding will influence the quality of the animal food, such as pesticide or herbicide residues, heavy metal residues, and various other contaminants [86, 87]. Animals are inevitably interfered with by diseases and the use of veterinary drugs or antibiotics, resulting in veterinary drugs or antibiotic residues [88]. Moreover, the temperature is also a very important factor affecting the safety of animal food. The microbial contamination of meat products mainly occurs after the slaughter of livestock. When the conditions are abnormal, microorganisms are born, which affect meat quality and cause food safety problems [89]. Based on HACCP, blockchain, and Internet of Things, a distributed information system has been proposed for monitoring food production [90, 91]. In this system, blockchain technology can be used to control all aspects of food production, such as sorting, cleaning, processing, storage, transportation, and retail. In developing countries, producers usually seek to gain greater profits by mixing low-cost ingredients that are harmful to human health; deliberate deception is quite common at the expense of the food quality for sale [92].
4 Challenges and futures
4.1 Challenges
As shown in Figure 5, we illustrate the challenges of the applications for food safety of different technologies. Big data is mainly responsible for data acquisition and pre-processing. A large amount of data are generated during the food production process, which brings challenges for the process of data pre-processing. Moreover, these data are emerged from different sources as mentioned above, which will make the system hard to identify the source of the data and update data promptly. Most importantly, the data acquisition or collection process in charge of the data quality, which is important for data analysis. AI is utilized for data process or analysis for assessment of food safety. However, a large amount of data with labels are needed for the process of AI models, which means that human experts are required to mark the data with labels. Due to the data capacity and AI models, computing resources are required for training AI-based models, especially deep learning based models. Moreover, generalization problems often occur in AI models, where the trained models are not appropriate for different scenarios. For blockchain, which is used for data security, is the recent advanced technology. It may meet basic infrastructure problems, technical problems, and data authenticity problems.

Challenges of big data, artificial intelligence (AI), and blockchain for food safety.
4.2 Futures
Basic infrastructures: At present, with the development of information and computer science, people are familiar with new technologies in their daily lives. However, there are still unknown information for people without any background knowledge. Thus, it will take time for people to accept these technologies, such as blockchain. Moreover, for these new technologies, infrastructures which can meet all the requirements of these technologies are still lacking. Therefore, it will take a long time to build the basic infrastructure system.
Technical challenges: As the food safety system is a complex system which contains both of hardware and software infrastructures, therefore it is hard to implement such system. Moreover, applications of big data, AI, and blockchain in the food safety system increase the difficulty of its deployment. With the development and application of 5G technology, the speed of data transmission will be greatly improved, and the shortcomings of these technologies in terms of speed could be overcome. However, it still needs hard effort for the applications of these techniques. Another important challenge is the current high development cost of the food safety system. Food safety systems using big data, AI, and blockchain may achieve significant cost savings by circumventing mediations, but in some situations, they may not have a competing advantage over current solutions in mature markets.
Compatibility and standardization: The compatibility and standardization of these systems across industries matter a lot in the real applications of systems. These architectures need to be constructed to support interpretability protection among industrial solutions for collaborative trust and information. Thus, compatibility and standardization of the different systems is another challenge.
5 Conclusions
Food safety is an essential topic in the research field of FI, as well as computer science and electronics since many advanced technologies have been applied for the insurance of food safety. In this review, AI, big data, and blockchain have been investigated for the applications about food safety. To present an overview of these technologies, we utilized a systemic view from the data perspective inspired by the food supply chain. Data collection, storage and transferring, analysis, visualization, and security were analyzed based on the basic technologies of AI, big data, and blockchain. This systemic review can provide a broad view for researchers in the field of FI and information.
Funding source: Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province
Award Identifier / Grant number: SJCX20_0461
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: This work was supported by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province under Grant SJCX20_0461.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Shaw, DJ. World food security: a history since 1945. In: World food summit, 1996. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2007:347–60 pp.10.1057/9780230589780_35Search in Google Scholar
2. Yu, Z, Jung, D, Park, S, Hu, Y, Huang, K, Rasco, BA, et al.. Smart traceability for food safety. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2020:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1830262.Search in Google Scholar
3. Zhang, H, Hong, X. Recent progresses on object detection: a brief review. Multimed Tool Appl 2019;78:27809–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07898-2.Search in Google Scholar
4. Zhang, H, Hong, X, Zhou, S, Wang, Q. Infrared image segmentation for photovoltaic panels based on Res-UNet. In: Chinese conference on pattern recognition and computer vision (PRCV). Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019:611–22 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-31654-9_52Search in Google Scholar
5. Xu, JJ, Zhang, H, Tang, CS, Cheng, Q, Liu, B, Shi, B. Automatic soil desiccation crack recognition using deep learning. Geotechnique 2020:1–13.10.1680/jgeot.20.P.091Search in Google Scholar
6. Wang, Q, Zhang, H, Hong, X, Zhou, Q. Small object detection based on modified FSSD and model compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10503 2021;1–5.10.1109/ICSIP52628.2021.9688896Search in Google Scholar
7. Marvin, HJ, Janssen, EM, Bouzembrak, Y, Hendriksen, PJ, Staats, M. Big data in food safety: an overview. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2017;57:2286–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1257481.Search in Google Scholar
8. Friedlander, A, Zoellner, C. Artificial intelligence opportunities to improve food safety at retail. Food Protect Trends 2020;40:272–8.Search in Google Scholar
9. Tse, D, Zhang, B, Yang, Y, Cheng, C, Mu, H. Blockchain application in food supply information security. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM). New York City, USA: IEEE; 2017:1357–61 pp.10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290114Search in Google Scholar
10. Ward, JS, Barker, A. Undefined by data: a survey of big data definitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.5821 2013;1–2.Search in Google Scholar
11. Katal, A, Wazid, M, Goudar, RH. Big data: issues, challenges, tools and good practices. In: 2013 sixth international conference on contemporary computing (IC3). New York City, USA: IEEE; 2013:404–9 pp.10.1109/IC3.2013.6612229Search in Google Scholar
12. European Commission. Towards a thriving data-driven economy. In: Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2014.Search in Google Scholar
13. Arthur, L. Big data marketing: engage your customers more effectively and drive value. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.Search in Google Scholar
14. Goyache, F, Bahamonde, A, Alonso, J, López, S, Del Coz, J, Quevedo, J, et al.. The usefulness of artificial intelligence techniques to assess subjective quality of products in the food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 2001;12:370–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-2244(02)00010-9.Search in Google Scholar
15. Rajan, K, Saffiotti, A. Towards a science of integrated AI and Robotics. Amsterdam, USA: Elsevier; 2017.10.1016/j.artint.2017.03.003Search in Google Scholar
16. Yamashita, R, Nishio, M, Do, RKG, Togashi, K. Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imag 2018;9:611–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Medsker, LR, Jain, L. Recurrent neural networks. Des Appl 2001;5.Search in Google Scholar
18. Goodfellow, IJ, Pouget-Abadie, J, Mirza, M, Xu, B, Warde-Farley, D, Ozair, S, et al.. Generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2661 2014;1–9.10.1145/3422622Search in Google Scholar
19. François-Lavet, V, Henderson, P, Islam, R, Bellemare, MG, Pineau, J. An introduction to deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12560 2018;1–140.10.1561/9781680835397Search in Google Scholar
20. Treiblmaier, H. The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: a theory-based research framework and a call for action. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 2018;23:545–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-01-2018-0029.Search in Google Scholar
21. Zheng, Z, Xie, S, Dai, HN, Chen, X, Wang, H. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Int J Web Grid Serv 2018;14:352–75. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwgs.2018.095647.Search in Google Scholar
22. Nofer, M, Gomber, P, Hinz, O, Schiereck, D. Blockchain. Business & Information Systems Engineering 2017;59:183–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0467-3.Search in Google Scholar
23. Eyal, I. Blockchain technology: transforming libertarian cryptocurrency dreams to finance and banking realities. Computer 2017;50:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2017.3571042.Search in Google Scholar
24. WHO. Global environment monitoring system: food contamination monitoring and assessment programme (GEMS). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1995.Search in Google Scholar
25. WHO. Guidance document for the integration of data in FOSCOLLAB. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015.Search in Google Scholar
26. Steinberger, R, Pouliquen, B, Van der Goot, E. An introduction to the europe media monitor family of applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.5290 2013;1–12.Search in Google Scholar
27. Linge, JP, Steinberger, R, Weber, T, Yangarber, R, van der Goot, E, Al Khudhairy, D, et al.. Internet surveillance systems for early alerting of health threats. Euro Surveill 2009;14:19162. https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.14.13.19162-en.Search in Google Scholar
28. Rortais, A, Belyaeva, J, Gemo, M, Van der Goot, E, Linge, JP. MedISys: an early-warning system for the detection of (re-) emerging food-and feed-borne hazards. Food Res Int 2010;43:1553–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.04.009.Search in Google Scholar
29. Velasco, E, Agheneza, T, Denecke, K, Kirchner, G, Eckmanns, T. Social media and internet-based data in global systems for public health surveillance: a systematic review. Milbank Q 2014;92:7–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12038.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. Cools, HJ, Hammond-Kosack, KE. Exploitation of genomics in fungicide research: current status and future perspectives. Mol Plant Pathol 2013;14:197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
31. Embry, MR, Bachman, AN, Bell, DR, Boobis, AR, Cohen, SM, Dellarco, M, et al.. Risk assessment in the 21st century: roadmap and matrix. Crit Rev Toxicol 2014;44(3 Sup):6–16. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2014.931924.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Suter-Dick, L, Prétôt, RF, Chen, GJ. Molecular and in vitro toxicology at the FHNW. CHIMIA Int J Chem 2014;68:329–30. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2014.329.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Clough, E, Barrett, T. The gene expression omnibus database. In: Statistical genomics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016:93–110 pp.10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
34. Kolesnikov, N, Hastings, E, Keays, M, Melnichuk, O, Tang, YA, Williams, E, et al.. ArrayExpress update–simplifying data submissions. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D1113–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1057.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
35. Oki, NO, Nelms, MD, Bell, SM, Mortensen, HM, Edwards, SW. Accelerating adverse outcome pathway development using publicly available data sources. Curr Environ Health Rep 2016;3:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-016-0079-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
36. Devinney, K, Bekbay, A, Effland, T, Gravano, L, Howell, D, Hsu, D, et al.. Evaluating twitter for foodborne illness outbreak detection in New York city. Online J Public Health Inf 2018;10:e120. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v10i1.8894.Search in Google Scholar
37. Harris, JK, Hawkins, JB, Nguyen, L, Nsoesie, EO, Tuli, G, Mansour, R, et al.. Research brief report: using twitter to identify and respond to food poisoning: the food safety stl project. J Publ Health Manag Pract 2017;23:577. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000516.Search in Google Scholar
38. Effland, T, Lawson, A, Balter, S, Devinney, K, Reddy, V, Waechter, H, et al.. Discovering foodborne illness in online restaurant reviews. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2018;25:1586–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx093.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
39. Nsoesie, EO, Kluberg, SA, Brownstein, JS. Online reports of foodborne illness capture foods implicated in official foodborne outbreak reports. Prev Med 2014;67:264–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
40. Maharana, A, Cai, K, Hellerstein, J, Hswen, Y, Munsell, M, Staneva, V, et al.. Detecting reports of unsafe foods in consumer product reviews. JAMIA Open 2019;2:330–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz030.Search in Google Scholar
41. Quade, P, Nsoesie, EO. A platform for crowdsourced foodborne illness surveillance: description of users and reports. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2017;3:e42. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.7076.Search in Google Scholar
42. Shan, LC, Panagiotopoulos, P, Regan, Á, De Brún, A, Barnett, J, Wall, P, et al.. Interactive communication with the public: qualitative exploration of the use of social media by food and health organizations. J Nutr Educ Behav 2015;47:104–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.09.004.Search in Google Scholar
43. Huang, T, Lan, L, Fang, X, An, P, Min, J, Wang, F. Promises and challenges of big data computing in health sciences. Big Data Res 2015;2:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.02.002.Search in Google Scholar
44. Oliphant, TE. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 2007;9:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2007.58.Search in Google Scholar
45. Pedregosa, F, Varoquaux, G, Gramfort, A, Michel, V, Thirion, B, Grisel, O, et al.. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 2011;12:2825–30.Search in Google Scholar
46. Paszke, A, Gross, S, Massa, F, Lerer, A, Bradbury, J, Chanan, G, et al.. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01703 2019;1–12.Search in Google Scholar
47. Abadi, M, Barham, P, Chen, J, Chen, Z, Davis, A, Dean, J, et al.. Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning. In: 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI’16). Berkeley, USA: USENIX; 2016:265–83 pp.Search in Google Scholar
48. Gulli, A, Pal, S. Deep learning with Keras. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd; 2017.Search in Google Scholar
49. Chen, T, Li, M, Li, Y, Lin, M, Wang, N, Wang, M, et al.. Mxnet: a flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.01274 2015;1–6.Search in Google Scholar
50. Boyd, D, Sun, M. Prototyping an expert system for diagnosis of potato diseases. Comput Electron Agric 1994;10:259–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1699(94)90045-0.Search in Google Scholar
51. Sarma, SK, Singh, KR, Singh, A. An Expert System for diagnosis of diseases in Rice Plant. Int J Artif Intell 2010;1:26–31.Search in Google Scholar
52. Zakaria, MZ, Nordin, N, Malik, A, Elias, SJ, Shahuddin, AZ. Fuzzy expert systems (fes) for halal food additive. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 2019;13:1073–8. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i3.pp1073-1078.Search in Google Scholar
53. Blagoveshchenskiy, I, Blagoveshchenskiy, V, Besfamilnaya, E, Sumerin, V. Development of databases of intelligent expert systems for automatic control of product quality indicators. In: Journal of physics: conference series. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing; 2020, 1705:012019 p.10.1088/1742-6596/1705/1/012019Search in Google Scholar
54. Kim, S, Yu, Z, Kil, RM, Lee, M. Deep learning of support vector machines with class probability output networks. Neural Network 2015;64:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
55. Pise, D, Upadhye, G. Grading of harvested mangoes quality and maturity based on machine learning techniques. In: 2018 international conference on smart city and emerging technology (ICSCET). New York City, USA: IEEE; 2018:1–6 pp.10.1109/ICSCET.2018.8537342Search in Google Scholar
56. Shaw, B, Suman, AK, Chakraborty, B. Wine quality analysis using machine learning. In: Emerging technology in modelling and graphics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020:239–47 pp.10.1007/978-981-13-7403-6_23Search in Google Scholar
57. Koszela, K, Łukomski, M, Mueller, W, Górna, K, Okoń, P, Boniecki, P, et al.. Classification of dried vegetables using computer image analysis and artificial neural networks. In: ninth international conference on digital image processing (ICDIP 2017). Bellingham, USA: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2017, 10420:1042031 p.10.1117/12.2281718Search in Google Scholar
58. Song, Q, Zheng, YJ, Xue, Y, Sheng, WG, Zhao, MR. An evolutionary deep neural network for predicting morbidity of gastrointestinal infections by food contamination. Neurocomputing 2017;226:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.018.Search in Google Scholar
59. Liu, Z, He, Y, Cen, H, Lu, R. Deep feature representation with stacked sparse auto-encoder and convolutional neural network for hyperspectral imaging-based detection of cucumber defects. Trans ASABE 2018;61:425–36. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12214.Search in Google Scholar
60. Rodríguez, FJ, García, A, Pardo, PJ, Chávez, F, Luque-Baena, RM. Study and classification of plum varieties using image analysis and deep learning techniques. Prog Artif Intell 2018;7:119–27.10.1007/s13748-017-0137-1Search in Google Scholar
61. Al-Sarayreh, M, Reis, MM, Qi Yan, W, Klette, R. Detection of red-meat adulteration by deep spectral–spatial features in hyperspectral images. J Imag 2018;4:63. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4050063.Search in Google Scholar
62. Yu, X, Tang, L, Wu, X, Lu, H. Nondestructive freshness discriminating of shrimp using visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging technique and deep learning algorithm. Food Anal Methods 2018;11:768–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-1050-8.Search in Google Scholar
63. Mao, D, Wang, F, Hao, Z, Li, H. Credit evaluation system based on blockchain for multiple stakeholders in the food supply chain. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2018;15:1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081627.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
64. Zhou, L, Zhang, C, Liu, F, Qiu, Z, He, Y. Application of deep learning in food: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2019;18:1793–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12492.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
65. Kakani, V, Nguyen, VH, Kumar, BP, Kim, H, Pasupuleti, VR. A critical review on computer vision and artificial intelligence in food industry. J Agric Food Res 2020;2:100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100033.Search in Google Scholar
66. Chen, TC, Yu, SY. The review of food safety inspection system based on artificial intelligence, image processing, and robotic. Food Sci and Technol; 2021:1–7 pp. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.35421.Search in Google Scholar
67. Schumacker, R, Tomek, S. Understanding statistics using R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.10.1007/978-1-4614-6227-9Search in Google Scholar
68. Xiao, M, Prabakaran, P, Chen, W, Kessing, B, Dimitrov, DS. Deep sequencing and Circos analyses of antibody libraries reveal antigen-driven selection of Ig VH genes during HIV-1 infection. Exp Mol Pathol 2013;95:357–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.10.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
69. Wu, J, Tran, NK. Application of blockchain technology in sustainable energy systems: an overview. Sustainability 2018;10:3067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093067.Search in Google Scholar
70. Zhao, W. Blockchain technology: development and prospects. Natl Sci Rev 2019;6:369–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
71. Andoni, M, Robu, V, Flynn, D, Abram, S, Geach, D, Jenkins, D, et al.. Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019;100:143–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014.Search in Google Scholar
72. Casado-Vara, R, Prieto, J, De la Prieta, F, Corchado, JM. How blockchain improves the supply chain: case study alimentary supply chain. Procedia Comput Sci 2018;134:393–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.193.Search in Google Scholar
73. Corchado, JM, Borrajo, ML, Pellicer, MA, Yáñez, JC. Neuro-symbolic system for business internal control. In: Industrial conference on data mining. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2004:1–10 pp.10.1007/978-3-540-30185-1_1Search in Google Scholar
74. Swan, M. Blockchain thinking: the brain as a decentralized autonomous corporation [commentary]. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 2015;34:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2015.2494358.Search in Google Scholar
75. Almeida, S, Albuquerque, A, Silva, A. An approach to develop software that uses blockchain. In: Computer science on-line conference. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018:346–55 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-91186-1_36Search in Google Scholar
76. Li, X, Jiang, P, Chen, T, Luo, X, Wen, Q. A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Future Generat Comput Syst 2020;107:841–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.08.020.Search in Google Scholar
77. Zhang, P, White, J, Schmidt, DC, Lenz, G, Rosenbloom, ST. FHIRChain: applying blockchain to securely and scalably share clinical data. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2018;16:267–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2018.07.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
78. Gatteschi, V, Lamberti, F, Demartini, C, Pranteda, C, Santamaría, V. Blockchain and smart contracts for insurance: is the technology mature enough? Future Internet 2018;10:20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10020020.Search in Google Scholar
79. Kshetri, N. Blockchain’s roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy. Telecommun Pol 2017;41:1027–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
80. Ølnes, S, Ubacht, J, Janssen, M. Blockchain in government: benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Amsterdam, USA: Elsevier; 2017.10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007Search in Google Scholar
81. Figorilli, S, Antonucci, F, Costa, C, Pallottino, F, Raso, L, Castiglione, M, et al.. A blockchain implementation prototype for the electronic open source traceability of wood along the whole supply chain. Sensors 2018;18:3133. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
82. Galvez, JF, Mejuto, JC, Simal-Gandara, J. Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. Trac Trends Anal Chem 2018;107:222–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.011.Search in Google Scholar
83. Sander, F, Semeijn, J, Mahr, D. The acceptance of blockchain technology in meat traceability and transparency. Br Food J 2018;120:2066–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-07-2017-0365.Search in Google Scholar
84. Verdouw, C, Sundmaeker, H, Meyer, F, Wolfert, J, Verhoosel, J. Smart agri-food logistics: requirements for the future internet. In: Dynamics in logistics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2013:247–57 pp.10.1007/978-3-642-35966-8_20Search in Google Scholar
85. Leng, K, Bi, Y, Jing, L, Fu, HC, Van Nieuwenhuyse, I. Research on agricultural supply chain system with double chain architecture based on blockchain technology. Future Generat Comput Syst 2018;86:641–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.04.061.Search in Google Scholar
86. Fernández-Cisnal, R, García-Sevillano, MA, García-Barrera, T, Gómez-Ariza, JL, Abril, N. Metabolomic alterations and oxidative stress are associated with environmental pollution in Procambarus clarkii. Aquat Toxicol 2018;205:76–88.10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.10.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
87. Fritsch, C, Coeurdassier, M, Faivre, B, Baurand, PE, Giraudoux, P, van den Brink, NW, et al.. Influence of landscape composition and diversity on contaminant flux in terrestrial food webs: a case study of trace metal transfer to European blackbirds Turdus merula. Sci Total Environ 2012;432:275–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
88. Garnero, PL, Monferran, MV, González, GA, Griboff, J, de Los Ángeles, BM. Assessment of exposure to metals, As and Se in water and sediment of a freshwater reservoir and their bioaccumulation in fish species of different feeding and habitat preferences. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2018;163:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
89. Wang, N, Zhang, N, Wang, M. Wireless sensors in agriculture and food industry–recent development and future perspective. Comput Electron Agric 2006;50:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
90. Coward, J. Meet the visionary who brought blockchain to the industrial IoT. London, UK: IOT World News; 2016, 14.Search in Google Scholar
91. Tian, F. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. In: 2016 13th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM). New York City, USA: IEEE; 2016:1–6 pp.Search in Google Scholar
92. Akhtar, S. Food safety challenges–a Pakistan’s perspective. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2015;55:219–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.650801.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
93. Jin, C, Bouzembrak, Y, Zhou, J, Liang, Q, van den Bulk, LM, Gavai, A, et al.. Big Data in food safety-A review. Curr Opin Food Sci 2020;36:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.11.006.Search in Google Scholar
94. Misra, N, Dixit, Y, Al-Mallahi, A, Bhullar, MS, Upadhyay, R, Martynenko, A. IoT, big data and artificial intelligence in agriculture and food industry. IEEE Internet Things J 2020;1–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.2998584.Search in Google Scholar
95. Amani, H, Badak-Kerti, K, Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Current progress in the utilization of smartphone-based imaging for quality assessment of food products: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2020:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1867820.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
96. Rejeb, A, Keogh, JG, Zailani, S, Treiblmaier, H, Rejeb, K. Blockchain technology in the food industry: a review of potentials, challenges and future research directions. Logistics 2020;4:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4040027.Search in Google Scholar
97. Wang, X, Li, D, Shi, X. A fuzzy model for aggregative food safety risk assessment in food supply chains. Prod Plann Control 2012;23:377–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.561812.Search in Google Scholar
98. Tobal, A, Mokhtar, SA. Weeds identification using evolutionary artificial intelligence algorithm. J Comput Sci 2014;10:1355–61. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2014.1355.1361.Search in Google Scholar
99. Barrero, O, Rojas, D, Gonzalez, C, Perdomo, S. Weed detection in rice fields using aerial images and neural networks. In: 2016 XXI symposium on signal processing, images and artificial vision (STSIVA). New York City, USA: IEEE; 2016:1–4 pp.10.1109/STSIVA.2016.7743317Search in Google Scholar
100. de Sousa Silva, M, Cruz, LF, Bugatti, PH, Saito, PTM. Automatic visual quality assessment of biscuits using machine learning. In: International conference on artificial intelligence and soft computing. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020:59–70 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-61534-5_6Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Critical Review
- Artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain in food safety
- Articles
- Immobilization of cellulase on magnetic nanoparticles for rice bran oil extraction in a magnetic fluidized bed
- Utilization of shallot bio-waste (Allium cepa L. var. aggregatum) fractions for the production of functional cookies
- Effect of bacterial cellulose nanofibers incorporation on acid-induced casein gels: microstructures and rheological properties
- Effect of microencapsulated chavil (Ferulago angulata) extract on physicochemical, microbiological, textural and sensorial properties of UF-feta-type cheese during storage time
- Evaluation of thickened liquid viscoelasticity for a swallowing process using an inclined flow channel instrument
- Comparative flavor analysis of four kinds of sweet fermented grains by sensory analysis combined with GC-MS
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Critical Review
- Artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain in food safety
- Articles
- Immobilization of cellulase on magnetic nanoparticles for rice bran oil extraction in a magnetic fluidized bed
- Utilization of shallot bio-waste (Allium cepa L. var. aggregatum) fractions for the production of functional cookies
- Effect of bacterial cellulose nanofibers incorporation on acid-induced casein gels: microstructures and rheological properties
- Effect of microencapsulated chavil (Ferulago angulata) extract on physicochemical, microbiological, textural and sensorial properties of UF-feta-type cheese during storage time
- Evaluation of thickened liquid viscoelasticity for a swallowing process using an inclined flow channel instrument
- Comparative flavor analysis of four kinds of sweet fermented grains by sensory analysis combined with GC-MS