Home Word of Mouth, Viral Marketing and Open Data: A Large-Scale Simulation for Predicting Opinion Diffusion on Ethical Food Consumption
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Word of Mouth, Viral Marketing and Open Data: A Large-Scale Simulation for Predicting Opinion Diffusion on Ethical Food Consumption

  • Agostino G. Bruzzone , Matteo Agresta EMAIL logo and Jen Hsien Hsu
Published/Copyright: May 17, 2019

Abstract

This paper presents the first results of a large-scale-Agent-Based Simulation devoted to simulate individual behaviour inside a medium sized city (600,000 inhabitants). Humans are simulated as Intelligent Individual entities characterized by several attributes created from the Open Data available by means of a multi-layer approach. The work presented is divided into two main parts: the first part aims to describe the multi-layer approach adopted with the inclusion of the social network layer devoted to capture how social networks can be correlated with human activities and how an “Individual Opinion” can changes based on social interactions. The second part is devoted to present a preliminary case study for simulating the propagation dynamics of the individual opinion in the form of an ethical value function. The basic idea is to capture the changes in the individual opinion based on the social interactions predicted by the simulation. Finally, a food choice model for predicting individual choices based on the individual opinion function is presented; the model is based on three parameters: accessibility of ethical shops, price difference with standard products, and ethical value propagation.

References

[1] Manyika J, Lund S, Bughin J, Woetzel JR, Stamenov K, Dhingra D. Digital globalization: the new era of global flows. San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[2] GSMA. The Mobile Economy 2018. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Perrin A. Social media usage: 2005–2015. 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Meeker M. Internet trends 2015-code conference. Glokalde. 2015;1:3.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bruzzone AG, Agresta M, Agresta M, Hsu JH. Human behavior and social influence: an application for green product consumption diffusion. Proc.of WAMS, Florence, September 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bruzzone A, Massei M, Longo F, Poggi S, Agresta M, Bartolucci C, et al. Human behavior simulation for complex scenarios based on intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Annual simulation symposium. Society for computer simulation international, 2014:10.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Teng PS. A comparison of simulation approaches to epidemic modeling. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1985;23:351–79.10.1146/annurev.py.23.090185.002031Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mossel E, Roch S. On the submodularity of influence in social networks. In: Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. ACM. 2007:128–34.10.1145/1250790.1250811Search in Google Scholar

[9] Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF. Personal influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Coleman JS. Medical innovation: a diffusion study. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Barreto AM. The word-of-mouth phenomenon in the social media era. Int J Market Res. 2014;56:631–54.10.2501/IJMR-2014-043Search in Google Scholar

[12] Liu CY, Hu XF, Si GY, Luo P. Public opinion propagation model based on small world networks. J Syst Simul. 2006;12:3608–10.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dellarocas C. The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manage Sci. 2003;49:1407–24.10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308Search in Google Scholar

[14] Watts DJ, Dodds PS. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J Consum Res. 2007;34:441–58.10.1086/518527Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bruzzone AG, Massei M. Intelligent agents for modelling country reconstruction operation. Pro Third IASTED African Conf. 2010;685:34.10.2316/P.2010.685-052Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bruzzone AG, Tremori A, Massei M. Adding smart to the mix. Modeling simulation & training. Int Defense Train J. 2011a;3:25–7.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Bruzzone AG, Massei M, Agresta M, Murino G. A decision support system for disaster prevention in Urban Areas. In: Proc. of. 4th International workshop on simulation for energy, sustainable development and environment, SESDE, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bruzzone AG, Massei M, Longo F, Nicoletti L, Di Matteo R, Maglione G, et al. Intelligent agents & interoperable simulation for strategic decision making on multicoalition joint operations. In: Proc. of the 5th International Defense and Homeland Security Simulation Workshop, DHSS, Bergeggi, Italy, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Bruzzone AG, Novak V, Madeo F. Obesity epidemics modelling by using intelligent agents. SCS M&S Mag. 2012a;9:18–24.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Bruzzone AG, Novak V, Madeo F. Agent based simulation model for obesity epidemic analysis. In: Proceedings of I3M2012. Austria: Wien, 2012b.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Woods DD. Coping with complexity: the psychology of human behaviour in complex systems. Tasks, errors, and mental models. Bristol, PA, USA: Taylor & Francis, Inc, 1988:128–48.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Christian F. Internet and society. Social theory in the information age. New York: Routledge, 2008. Routledge Research in Information Technology and Society Series Number 8. ISBN 0415961327. 408 Pages.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Davidsson P. Agent based social simulation: A computer science view. JASSS. 2002;5:1.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Bauer F, Kaltenböck M. Linked open data: the essentials. Vienna: Edition mono/monochrom, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Huijboom N, Van Den Broek T. Open data: an international comparison of strategies. Eur J ePract. 2011;12:4–16.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Manyika J, Chui M, Groves P, Farrell D, Van Kuiken S, Doshi EA. Open data: unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. Washington, DC: McKinsey Global Institute, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Richiardi M, Leombruni R, Saam N, Sonnessa M. A common protocol for agent-based social simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation ed. 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Davidsson P. Multi agent based simulation: beyond social simulation. In: International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000:97–107.10.1007/3-540-44561-7_7Search in Google Scholar

[29] Bruzzone AG, Tremori A, Tarone F, Madeo F. Intelligent agents driving computer generated forces for simulating human behaviour in urban riots. Int J Simul Process Model. 2011b;6:308–16.10.1504/IJSPM.2011.048011Search in Google Scholar

[30] Can F, Özyer T, Polat F, editors. State of the art applications of social network analysis, Lecture Notes in Social Network ed. Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-05912-9Search in Google Scholar

[31] Bruzzone AG. Intelligent agent-based simulation for supporting operational planning in country reconstruction. Int J Simul Process Model. 2013;8:145–59.10.1504/IJSPM.2013.057545Search in Google Scholar

[32] Crane A. Unpacking the ethical product. J Bus Ethics. 2001;30:361–73.10.1023/A:1010793013027Search in Google Scholar

[33] Moisander J. Motivational complexity of green consumerism. Int J Consum Stud. 2007;31:404–9.10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00586.xSearch in Google Scholar

[34] Strong C. Features contributing to the growth of ethical consumerism-a preliminary investigation. Mark Intell Plann. 1996;14:5–13.10.1108/02634509610127518Search in Google Scholar

[35] Peloza J, White K, Shang J. Good and guilt-free: the role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. J Mark. 2013;77:104–19.10.1509/jm.11.0454Search in Google Scholar

[36] Jensen KD, Denver S, Zanoli R. Actual and potential development of consumer demand on the organic food market in Europe. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci. 2011;58:79–84.10.1016/j.njas.2011.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[37] Schröder MJ, McEachern MG. Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare. Int J Consum Stud. 2004;28:168–77.10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00357.xSearch in Google Scholar

[38] Bruzzone A, Massei M, Bocca E. Fresh-food supply chain. In: Merkuryev Y, Merkuryeva G, Piera MA, Guasch Petit A. editor. Simulation-based case studies in logistics. London: Springer, 2009:127–46.10.1007/978-1-84882-187-3_8Search in Google Scholar

[39] Siro I, Kápolna E, Kápolna B, Lugasi A. Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—A review. Appetite. 2008;51:456–67.10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Bruzzone AG, Tremori A, Massei M, Tarone F. Modeling green logistics. In: Proceedings of AMS, Third IEEE Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation, May 2009b:543–8.10.1109/AMS.2009.97Search in Google Scholar

[41] Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2006;19:169–94.10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bredahl L, Grunert KG, Frewer LJ. Consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to genetically engineered food products–a review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research. J Consum Policy. 1998;21:251–77.10.1023/A:1006940724167Search in Google Scholar

[43] Rialti R, Zollo L, Pellegrini MM, Ciappei C. Exploring the antecedents of brand loyalty and electronic word of mouth in social-media-based brand communities: do gender differences matter? J Global Mark. 2017;30:147–60.10.1080/08911762.2017.1306899Search in Google Scholar

[44] Brown J, Broderick AJ, Lee N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. J Interact Mark. 2007;21:2–20.10.1002/dir.20082Search in Google Scholar

[45] Michaelidou N, Hassan LM. The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. Int J Consum Stud. 2008;32:163–70.10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.xSearch in Google Scholar

[46] Zollo L, Yoon S, Rialti R, Ciappei C. Ethical consumption and consumers’ decision making: the role of moral intuition. Manage Decis. 2018;56:692–710.10.1108/MD-10-2016-0745Search in Google Scholar

[47] Shaw D, Newholm T. Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychol Mark. 2002;19:167–85.10.1002/mar.10008Search in Google Scholar

[48] Futerra SCL. The rules of the game: the principals of climate change communication. London, UK: Depart- ment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Devinney TM, Auger P, Eckhardt GM. The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van Den Bergh B. Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98:392–404.10.1037/a0017346Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consum Res. 2008;35:472–82.10.1086/586910Search in Google Scholar

[52] White K, Simpson B. When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors? J Mark. 2013;77:78–95. DOI: 10.1509/jm.11.0278.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Freeman III, AM. Benefits of environmental improvement: theory and practice. Baltimore: John Hopking Uniiversity Press, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Kratzer J, Lettl C. Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. J Consum Res. 2009;36:646–59.10.1086/599324Search in Google Scholar

[55] Goffman E. Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J. 1990;100:464–77.10.2307/2234133Search in Google Scholar

[57] Kahneman D, Knetsch JL. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J Environ Econ Manage. 1992;22:57–70.10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-SSearch in Google Scholar

[58] Semmann D, Krambeck HJ, Milinski M. Reputation is valuable within and outside one’s own social group. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2005;57:611–16.10.1007/s00265-004-0885-3Search in Google Scholar

[59] Catlin JR, Wang Y. Recycling gone bad: when the option to recycle increases resource consumption. J Consum Psychol. 2013;23:122–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Wedekind C, Braithwaite VA. The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1012–5.10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00890-4Search in Google Scholar

[61] Mazar N, Zhong C-B. Do green products make us better people? Psychol Sci. 2010;21:494–8.10.1177/0956797610363538Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] Crane A, Matten D. Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. OUP Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. ISBN : 9780199564330.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E. Using complex systems analysis to advance marketing theory development: modeling heterogeneity effects on new product growth through stochastic cellular automata. Acad Mark Sci Rev. 2001;2001:1.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Delre SA, Broekhuizen TL, Bijmolt TH. The effects of shared consumption on product life cycles and advertising effectiveness: the case of the motion picture market. J Mark Res. 2016;53:608–27. DOI: 10.1509/jmr.14.0097.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Haenlein M, Libai B. Targeting revenue leaders for a new product. J Mark. 2013;77:65–80.10.1509/jm.11.0428Search in Google Scholar

[66] Block HD, Marschak J. Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses. Contrib Probab Stat. 1960;2:97–132.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Hall K, Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, vol. 9. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1985:7–38.Search in Google Scholar

[68] Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M. Discrete choice models with applications to departure time and route choice the handbook of transportation science, 2nd ed. Massachusetts, 2003. (eds.) R.W.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Swait J, Adamowicz W. Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: a theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001;86:141–67.10.1006/obhd.2000.2941Search in Google Scholar

[70] Matejka F, McKay A. Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. Am Econ Rev. 2014;105:272–98.10.1257/aer.20130047Search in Google Scholar

[71] Lichtenstein DR, Ridgway NM, Netemeyer RG. Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: a field study. J Mark Res. 1993;30:234–245.10.1177/002224379303000208Search in Google Scholar

[72] Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. John wiley & sons, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-05-02
Revised: 2018-12-20
Accepted: 2019-03-27
Published Online: 2019-05-17

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2018-0139/html
Scroll to top button