Home Physical Sciences Development of an Innovative Raw Milk Dispenser Based on Nanofluid Technology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Development of an Innovative Raw Milk Dispenser Based on Nanofluid Technology

  • Giovanni A. Longo EMAIL logo , Giulia Righetti and Claudio Zilio
Published/Copyright: September 8, 2015

Abstract

This paper presents the comparative analysis of a traditional raw milk dispenser and an innovative prototype based on nanofluid technology. The traditional raw milk dispenser consists of an off-the-shelf upright air-cooled refrigerator sold on the market, whereas the innovative prototype presents a tank equipped with a serpentine tube jacket operated with Al2O3–ethylene glycol aqueous solution nanofluid. The systems are experimentally analysed in the ambient temperature range of 19–35°C to evaluate the energy performance and the temperature control of the milk tank. The innovative prototype is demonstrated to be superior from the point of view of both energy saving and food safety. In fact, the innovative prototype exhibits a 63–70% energy saving with respect to the traditional one. Furthermore, the prototype distributor is able to reach the “safe” temperature of 4°C in about half of the time required by traditional system and it keeps the milk always in the “safe” temperature range 2–3°C, while the traditional distributor displays locally milk temperature higher than 4°C.

Funding statement: Funding: The present work was funded by CariVerona Foundation, Verona, Italy, Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica in the framework of the “Sviluppo di tecnologie a ridotto consumo energetico, impiego di materiali a basso impatto ambientale e implementazione di sistemi per la sicurezza alimentare e la qualità del prodotto. Analisi della convenienza commerciale e sostenibilità economica dei prodotti di ricerca”, 2011–2012 project.

Nomenclature

CEC

cumulated energy consumption (Wh)

D

defrost

F

fan

k

coverage factor

M

motor

P

electric power (W)

S

stirrer

SCEC

specific cumulated energy consumption (Wh/L)

t

temperature (°C)

V

total milk volume (L)

τ

time (s)

References

1. Das SK, Choi SU, Yu W, Pradeep T. Nanofluids: science and technology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2007:346.10.1002/9780470180693Search in Google Scholar

2. Cleland DJ, Keedwell RW, Adams SR. Use of hydrocarbons as drop-in replacements for HCFC-22 in on-farm milk cooling equipment. Int J Refrig 2009;32:1403–11.10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.02.004Search in Google Scholar

3. Rekstad H, Hafner A, Jessen S. Energy efficient dairy shed milk cooler and water heater using carbon dioxide as refrigerant. In Proceedings of 10th IIR Gustav Lorentzen conference on natural refrigerants, Delft, the Netherlands, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

4. Liu Y, Groll EA, Kurtulus O, Yazawa K. Study on energy-saving performance of a novel CO2 heat pump with applications in dairy processes. In Proceedings of the 15th international refrigeration and air conditioning conference at Purdue. West Lafayette, USA, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

5. Muir D. The shelf-life of dairy products: 1. Factors influencing raw milk and fresh products. J Soc Dairy Technol 1996;49:24–32.10.1111/j.1471-0307.1996.tb02616.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Lafarge V, Ogier JC, Girard V, Maladen V, Leveau JY, Gruss A, et al. Raw cow milk bacterial population shifts attributable to refrigeration. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:5644–50.10.1128/AEM.70.9.5644-5650.2004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Longo GA, Experimental ZC. Measurement of thermophysical properties of Al2O3 and TiO2-ethylene glycol nanofluids. Int J Thermophys 2013;34:1288–307.10.1007/s10765-013-1478-zSearch in Google Scholar

8. Sandrucci A, Bava L, Brasca M, Laurenti M, Lodi R, Piccinini R, et al. Piano per la ricerca e lo sviluppo 2007–2009. Progetto n. 1242 Igiene e sicurezza del latte bovino alla stalla: sistema integrato di diagnosi – LATTESAN 2010 119, ottobre 2010.Search in Google Scholar

9. Muir D, Phillips JD. Prediction of the shelf life of raw milk during refrigerated storage. Milchweissenschaft 1984;39:7–11.Search in Google Scholar

10. De Jonghe V, Coorevits A, Van Hoorde K, Messens W, Van Landschoot A, De Vos P, et al. Influence of storage conditions on the growth of Pseudomonas species in refrigerated raw milk. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:460–70.10.1128/AEM.00521-10Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Giacometti F, Serraino A, Finazzi G, Daminelli P, Losio MN, Arrigoni N, et al. Sale of raw milk in northern Italy: food safety implications and comparison of different analytical methodologies for detection of foodborne pathogens. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2012;9:293–7.10.1089/fpd.2011.1052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Giacometti F, Serraino A, Finazzi G, Daminelli P, Losio MN, Tamba M, et al. Field handling conditions of raw milk sold in vending machines: experimental evaluation of the behavior of Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium and Campylobacter jejuni. Ital J Anim Sci 2012;11:132–6.10.4081/ijas.2012.e24Search in Google Scholar

13. Giacometti F, Bonilauri P, Amatiste S, Arrigoni N, Bianchi M, Losio MN, et al. Human campylobacteriosis related to the consumption of raw milk sold by vending machines in Italy: quantitative risk assessment based on official controls over four years. Prev Veter Med 2015;121:151–8.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.06.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Brush A, Masanet E, Worrell E. Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for the dairy processing industry. An energy star guide for energy and plant managers, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, 2011.10.2172/1171534Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-9-8
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 16.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2015-0127/html
Scroll to top button