Home Data-driven wind power prediction model based on improved generative adversarial network
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Data-driven wind power prediction model based on improved generative adversarial network

  • Zhang Peng , Fan Huibo , Chen Ge , Chi Lin , Gong Zhimin , Ma Zhiyuan and Cao Mengnan ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 22, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Accurate and timely wind power forecast is difficult because of the volatility and intermittency of wind energy, which are strongly influenced by meteorological conditions. In order to solve this problem, this research suggests a data-driven wind power prediction technique based on Elman neural networks and an enhanced generative adversarial network (GAN). First, outliers in the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) power and wind speed data are found by combining the methods of density clustering and regression threshold truncation. To guarantee the temporal continuity of wind power data with the original characteristics, minority class samples are then generated using an enhanced GAN and added to the dataset. In order to obtain an accurate wind power prediction, the balanced data is then fed into a prediction model that combines the ABC algorithm and Elman neural networks. The fitness value is the mean squared error (MSE) of the training data, and the optimization objective is the connection weights of the Elman neural network. Results from experiments show that the suggested model outperforms earlier state-of-the-art techniques and significantly increases wind power prediction accuracy. It also has the advantages of high stability and quick convergence speed, and it can capture the long-term dependencies of wind power data.


Corresponding author: Cao Mengnan, Shanghai Power Equipment Reserch Institute CO., LTD., Shanghai 200233, China, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors contribute to the design and methodology of this study, the assessment of the outcomes and the writing of the manuscript.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  6. Conflict of interest: Authors do not have any conflicts.

  7. Research funding: The authors did not receive any funding.

  8. Data availability: No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

  9. Code availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Peng, X, Liu, Z, Jiang, D. A review of multiphase energy conversion in wind power generation[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 147: 111172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111172.Search in Google Scholar

2. Lehtola, T, Zahedi, A. Solar energy and wind power supply supported by storage technology: a review[J]. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments, 2019, 35: 25-31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.05.013.Search in Google Scholar

3. Messner, JW, Pinson, P, Browell, J, Bjerregård, MB, Schicker, I. Evaluation of wind power forecasts—An up‐to‐date view[J]. Wind Energy, 2020, 23: 1461-81, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2497.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ozkan, MB, Karagoz, P. Data mining-based upscaling approach for regional wind power forecasting: regional statistical hybrid wind power forecast technique (RegionalSHWIP)[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 171790-800, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2956203.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mahoney, WP, Parks, K, Wiener, G, Liu, Y, Myers, WL, Sun, J, et al.., A wind power forecasting system to optimize grid integration[J]. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2012, 3: 670-82, https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2012.2201758.Search in Google Scholar

6. Aggarwal, SK, Gupta, M. Wind power forecasting: a review of statistical models-wind power forecasting[J]. Int J Energy Sci, 2013, 3: 1-10.Search in Google Scholar

7. Jørgensen, KL, Shaker, HR. Wind power forecasting using machine learning: state of the art, trends and challenges[C]. In: 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE). Oshawa, ON, Canada: IEEE; 2020:44-50 pp.10.1109/SEGE49949.2020.9181870Search in Google Scholar

8. Ferrero Bermejo, J, Gómez Fernández, JF, Olivencia Polo, F, Crespo Márquez, A. A review of the use of artificial neural network models for energy and reliability prediction. A study of the solar PV, hydraulic and wind energy sources[J]. Appl Sci, 2019, 9: 1844, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091844.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lydia, M, Kumar, GEP. Deep learning algorithms for wind forecasting: an overview[J]. Artif Intell Renew Energy Syst, 2022: 129-45, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119761686.ch6.Search in Google Scholar

10. Foley, AM, Leahy, PG, Marvuglia, A, McKeogh, EJ. Current methods and advances in the forecasting of wind power generation[J]. Renew Energy, 2012, 37: 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.033.Search in Google Scholar

11. Meng, A, Chen, S, Ou, Z, Ding, W, Zhou, H, Fan, J, et al.., A hybrid deep learning architecture for wind power prediction based on bi-attention mechanism and crisscross optimization[J]. Energy, 2022, 238: 121795, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121795.Search in Google Scholar

12. Zhu, X, Liu, R, Chen, Y, Gao, X, Wang, Y, Xu, Z. Wind speed behaviours feather analysis and its utilization on wind speed prediction using 3D-CNN[J]. Energy, 2021, 236: 121523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121523.Search in Google Scholar

13. Chen, Y, Zhang, S, Zhang, W, Peng, J, Cai, Y. MultifactorMultifactor spatio-temporal correlation model based on a convolutional neural network and long short-term memory neural network for wind speed forecasting[J]. Energy Convers Manag, 2019, 185: 783-99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.018.Search in Google Scholar

14. Farah, S, Humaira, N, Aneela, Z, Steffen, E. Short-term multi-hour ahead country-wide wind power prediction for Germany using gated recurrent unit deep learning[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 167: 112700, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112700.Search in Google Scholar

15. Yang, L, Shami, A. On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: theory and practice[J]. Neurocomputing, 2020, 415: 295-316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061.Search in Google Scholar

16. Berner, J, Grohs, P, Jentzen, A. Analysis of the generalization error: empirical risk minimization over deep artificial neural networks overcomes the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of Black--Scholes partial differential equations[J]. SIAM J Math Data Sci, 2020, 2: 631-57, https://doi.org/10.1137/19m125649x.Search in Google Scholar

17. Lander, S, Shang, Y. EvoAE--a new evolutionary method for training autoencoders for deep learning networks[C]. In: 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference. Taichung, Taiwan: IEEE; 2015:2:790-5 pp.10.1109/COMPSAC.2015.63Search in Google Scholar

18. Tautz‐Weinert, J, Watson, SJ. Using SCADA data for wind turbine condition monitoring–a review[J]. IET Renew Power Gener, 2017, 11: 382-94, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0248.Search in Google Scholar

19. Li, C, Lin, S, Xu, F, Liu, D, Liu, J. Short-term wind power prediction based on data mining technology and improved support vector machine method: a case study in Northwest China[J]. J Clean Prod, 2018, 205: 909-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.143.Search in Google Scholar

20. Wang, Z, Liu, W, Wang, X. Abnormal data cleaning of wind turbine power curve using Bayesian change point-quartile combined algorithm[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng A J Power Energy, 2023, 237: 495-503, https://doi.org/10.1177/09576509221119563.Search in Google Scholar

21. Lin, Z, Liu, X, Collu, M. Wind power prediction based on high-frequency SCADA data, isolation forest, and deep learning neural networks[J]. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 2020, 118: 105835, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105835.Search in Google Scholar

22. Shoaib, M, Siddiqui, I, Rehman, S, Khan, S, Alhems, LM. Assessment of wind energy potential using wind energy conversion system[J]. J Clean Prod, 2019, 216: 346-60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.128.Search in Google Scholar

23. Bushra, AA, Yi, G. Comparative analysis review of pioneering DBSCAN and successive density-based clustering algorithms[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 87918-35, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3089036.Search in Google Scholar

24. Stanković, L, Brajović, M, Stanković, I, Lerga, J, Daković, M. RANSAC-based signal denoising using compressive sensing[J]. Circ Syst Signal Process, 2021, 40: 3907-28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-021-01654-4.Search in Google Scholar

25. Durgadevi, M. Generative Adversarial Network (GAN): a general review on different variants of GAN and applications[C]. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES). Coimbatore, India: IEEE; 2021:1-8 pp.10.1109/ICCES51350.2021.9489160Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhu, G, Kwong, S. Gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization[J]. Appl Math Comput, 2010, 217: 3166-73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.08.049.Search in Google Scholar

27. Zhang, Y, Li, Y, Zhang, G. Short-term wind power forecasting approach based on Seq2Seq model using NWP data[J]. Energy, 2020, 213: 118371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118371.Search in Google Scholar

28. Wang, F, Zhang, Z, Liu, C, Yu, Y, Pang, S, Duić, N, et al.., Generative adversarial networks and convolutional neural networks based weather classification model for day ahead short-term photovoltaic power forecasting[J]. Energy Convers Manag, 2019, 181: 443-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.074.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-01-04
Accepted: 2025-03-29
Published Online: 2025-04-22

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2025-0005/pdf
Scroll to top button