Home Technology Protection strategy for fault detection in AC microgrid based on MVMD & differential CUSUM
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Protection strategy for fault detection in AC microgrid based on MVMD & differential CUSUM

  • Akash Abhisek ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Chinmayee Biswal , Pravat Kumar Rout and Gayadhar Panda
Published/Copyright: July 2, 2024

Abstract

In the era of smart grids and microgrids, the transformation of the traditional grid system brings many operational, technical, and economic benefits. However, the complexity of the network due to the integration of various distributed generations (DGs), continuous change of topology, and non-linear load make fault detection a major issue that forces power engineers to focus on. In this paper, a novel fault detection scheme is suggested based on the multivariate variational mode decomposition mode (MVMD) and differential cumulative sum (DCUSUM). As a generalized extension of the original variational mode decomposition (VMD) algorithm for multivariate data residing in multidimensional spaces, the main goal of MVMD is to decompose the input signal into different band-limited intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Due to the inherent characteristics of being insensitive to noise and very effective in decomposing the local features even with similar frequencies, it is very effective for fault detection in microgrid distribution systems. The proposed DCUSUM algorithm computes the differential cumulative energy for the remaining significant modes. A fault detection index is considered in this approach and applied for fault detection by adaptively through the threshold setting to accurately result in fault detection. To justify the proposed approach, a standard AC microgrid test system is considered and the approach is verified for fault detection under various fault conditions and resistances. The obtained results and the comparative analysis with other methods reflect the better accuracy, robustness, and reliability of the proposed approach.


Corresponding author: Akash Abhisek, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT, Shillong, Meghalaya, India, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have equal contributions.

  3. Competing interests: No competing interests.

  4. Research funding: No research funding.

  5. Data availability: No data is included in this paper.

Appendix

Serial no. Items Parameters
1 Power grid Grid voltage: 192 MVA,
Base voltage: 18 kV, frequency: 60 Hz
Impedance: R = 500 Ω & L = 500 Ω
T1: 18 kV/230 kV, T2: 13.8 kV/230 kV, T3: 13.8 kV/230 kV,
T4: 13.8 kV/230 kV, T5: 13.8 kV/230 kV, T6: 16.5 kV/230 kV,
T7: 16.5 kV/230 kV
2 Solar array Irradiance: 1000 W/m2, temperature: 25 °,
Parallel strings: 66, series module per string: 5, cell per module: 96, short circuit current: 5.96 A, open circuit voltage: 64.2 V, rated voltage: 54.7 V, rated current: 5.58 A
3 DIFG wind turbine Generator rating: 8 MW, no. of wind turbine: 4, speed: 15 m/s, system voltage: 575 V, nominal frequency: 60 Hz
4 Synchronous generator Generator rating: 2 MVA, system voltage: 400 V, nominal frequency: 60 Hz, field current: 100 A
5 Load parameter L1: 100 kW, 35 × 106 VAR,
L2: 0.125 W, 50 × 106 VAR,
L3: 90 kW, 30 × 106 VAR

References

1. Hare, J, Shi, X, Gupta, S, Bazzi, A. Fault diagnostics in smart micro-grids: a survey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;60:1114–24.10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.122Search in Google Scholar

2. Chen, K, Huang, C, He, J. Fault detection, classification and location for transmission lines and distribution systems: a review on the methods. High Volt 2016;1:25–33.10.1049/hve.2016.0005Search in Google Scholar

3. Hussain, N, Nasir, M, Vasquez, JC, Guerrero, JM. Recent developments and challenges on AC microgrids fault detection and protection systems–a review. Energies 2020;13:2149.10.3390/en13092149Search in Google Scholar

4. Bansal, Y, Sodhi, R. Microgrid fault detection methods: reviews, issues and future trends. In: 2008 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT Asia). Singapore: IEEE; 2018:401–6 pp.10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2018.8467938Search in Google Scholar

5. Mar, A, Pereira, P, F. Martins J. A survey on power grid faults and their origins: a contribution to improving power grid resilience. Energies 2019;12:4667.10.3390/en12244667Search in Google Scholar

6. Sarangi, S, Sahu, BK, Rout, PK. Review of distributed generator integrated AC microgrid protection: issues, strategies, and future trends. Int J Energy Res 2021;45:14117–44.10.1002/er.6689Search in Google Scholar

7. Prince, SK, Affijulla, S, Panda, G. A fault detection technique based on line parameters in ring-configured DC microgrid. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2022;23:523–42.10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0173Search in Google Scholar

8. Ghosh, C, Verma, A, Verma, P. Real time fault detection in railway tracks using fast Fourier transformation and discrete wavelet transformation. Int J Inf Technol 2022;14:31–40.10.1007/s41870-021-00784-xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Sarangi, S, Biswal, C, Sahu, BK, Samanta, IS, Rout, PK. Fault detection technique using time-varying filter-EMD and differential-CUSUM for LVDC microgrid system. Elec Power Syst Res 2023;219:109254.10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109254Search in Google Scholar

10. Nazari, M, Sakhaei, SM. Successive variational mode decomposition. Signal Process 2020;174:107610.10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107610Search in Google Scholar

11. Ur Rehman, N, Aftab, H. Multivariate variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2019;67:6039–52.10.1109/TSP.2019.2951223Search in Google Scholar

12. Liu, S, Yu, K. Successive multivariate variational mode decomposition based on instantaneous linear mixing model. Signal Process 2022;190:108311.10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108311Search in Google Scholar

13. Dragomiretskiy, K, Zosso, D. Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2013;62:531–44.10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675Search in Google Scholar

14. Zare, M, Nouri, NM. A novel hybrid feature extraction approach of marine vessel signal via improved empirical mode decomposition and measuring complexity. Ocean Eng 2023;271:113727.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113727Search in Google Scholar

15. Reddy, SVR, Premila, TR, Reddy, CR, Gulzar, MM, Khalid, M. A new variational mode decomposition-based passive islanding detection strategy for hybrid distributed renewable generations. Arabian J Sci Eng 2023;48:15435–43.10.1007/s13369-023-08103-1Search in Google Scholar

16. Wang, X, Zhang, F, Wei, X, Gao, J, Guo, L, Wang, Y. Fault location of flexible grounding distribution system based on multivariate modes and kurtosis calibration. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2023;150:109108.10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109108Search in Google Scholar

17. Shakerighadi, B, Johansson, N, Eriksson, R, Mitra, P, Bolzoni, A, Clark, A, et al.. An overview of stability challenges for power-electronic-dominated power systems: the grid-forming approach. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2023;17:284–306.10.1049/gtd2.12430Search in Google Scholar

18. Li, P, Hou, J, Yang, Y, Bai, X. Small signal stability constrained optimal power flow model based on trajectory optimization. Energy Rep 2023;9:489–99.10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.188Search in Google Scholar

19. Sarangi, S, Biswal, C, Sahu, BK, Rout, PK. Active islanding detection and analysis of total harmonic distortion for inverter-interfaced microgrid based on high-frequency signal installation. In: 2022 1st International Conference on Sustainable Technology for Power and Energy Systems (STPES). Srinagar, India: IEEE; 2022:1–6 pp.10.1109/STPES54845.2022.10006560Search in Google Scholar

20. Sharma, NK, Samantaray, SR, Bhende, CN. VMD-enabled current-based fast fault detection scheme for DC microgrid. IEEE Syst J 2021;16:933–44.10.1109/JSYST.2021.3057334Search in Google Scholar

21. Augustine, S, Reno, MJ, Brahma, SM, Lavrova, O. Fault current control and protection in a standalone DC microgrid using adaptive droop and current derivative. IEEE J Emerg Select Top Power Electr 2020;9:2529–39.10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2984609Search in Google Scholar

22. Sharma, NK, Pattanayak, R, Samantaray, SR, Bhende, CN. A fast fault detection scheme for low voltage DC microgrid. In: 2020 21st national power systems conference (NPSC). Gandhinagar, India: IEEE; 2020:1–6 pp.10.1109/NPSC49263.2020.9331862Search in Google Scholar

23. Jarrahi, MA, Samet, H. Modal current and cumulative sum based fault detection approach in transmission lines. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2018;19:20180037.Search in Google Scholar

24. Zhao, H, Li, L. Fault diagnosis of wind turbine bearing based on variational mode decomposition and Teager energy operator. IET Renew Power Gener 2017;11:453–60.10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0070Search in Google Scholar

25. Novoa, NM, Varela, G. Monitoring surgical quality: the cumulative sum (CUSUM) approach. Mediastinum 2020;4:4.10.21037/med.2019.10.01Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Abbas, N, Abujiya, MAR, Riaz, M, Mahmood, T. Cumulative sum chart modeled under the presence of outliers. Mathematics 2020;8:269.10.3390/math8020269Search in Google Scholar

27. Prince, SK, Panda, KP, Affijulla, S, Panda, G. A reliable islanding identification mechanism for DC microgrid using PCC transient signal. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2022;23:729–39.10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0411Search in Google Scholar

28. Jarrahi, MA, Samet, H. Modal current and cumulative sum based fault detection approach in transmission lines. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2018;19:20180037.10.1515/ijeeps-2018-0037Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-15
Accepted: 2024-05-16
Published Online: 2024-07-02

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2024-0147/html
Scroll to top button