Home Technology Optimal ranking-based charging station selection for electric vehicles
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimal ranking-based charging station selection for electric vehicles

  • Nongmaithem Nandini Devi ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Gayadhar Panda and Surmila Thokchom
Published/Copyright: May 26, 2023

Abstract

In recent times, as many people have started using an electric vehicle (EV) as it provides benefits such as low fuel economy, reduced emission, etc., the deployment of fixed electric vehicle charging stations has been a popular method for supplying EVs with charging services. The charging requirement of EVs varies from vehicle to vehicle. Various schemes have been introduced recently regarding electric vehicles’ energy trading, charging station deployments, etc. Selecting an optimal charging station for booking charging slots by electric vehicle is one of the main concerns to avoid inappropriate services. To address this challenge, we proposed an optimal charging station selection scheme to book charging slots by EV. The proposed method used a multi-criteria decision-making technique called technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) based on various parameters of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs). In this, the performance score of each EVCS is determined, and the ranking process is made according to their performance score. Then, EV selects the EVCS with the highest ranked and books the charging slot. Further, an analysis of the proposed scheme is carried out for 10 EVCSs and 3 EVs.


Corresponding author: Nongmaithem Nandini Devi, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Meghalaya, Shillong, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Turker, H, Bacha, S. Optimal minimization of plug-in electric vehicle charging cost with vehicle-to-home and vehicle-to-grid concepts. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2018;67:10281–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2018.2867428.Search in Google Scholar

2. Triviño-Cabrera, A, Aguado, JA, de la Torre, S. Joint routing and scheduling for electric vehicles in smart grids with v2g. Energy 2019;175:113–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.184.Search in Google Scholar

3. Ginigeme, K, Wang, Z. Distributed optimal vehicle-to-grid approaches with consideration of battery degradation cost under real-time pricing. IEEE Access 2020;8:5225–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2963692.Search in Google Scholar

4. Yang, Q, Li, J, Cao, W, Li, S, Lin, J, Huo, D, et al.. An improved vehicle to the grid method with battery longevity management in a microgrid application. Energy 2020;198:117374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117374.Search in Google Scholar

5. Amamra, SA, Marco, J. Vehicle-to-grid aggregator to support power grid and reduce electric vehicle charging cost. IEEE Access 2019;7:178528–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2958664 Search in Google Scholar

6. Devi, NN, Thokchom, S. Multi-attribute based prosumers prioritization for energy trading in smart grid. In: 2021 IEEE 18th iindia council international conference (INDICON). IEEE; 2021:1–6 pp.10.1109/INDICON52576.2021.9691544Search in Google Scholar

7. Pirouzi, S, Aghaei, J, Vahidinasab, V, Niknam, T, Khodaei, A. Robust linear architecture for active/reactive power scheduling of ev integrated smart distribution networks. Elec Power Syst Res 2018;155:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.09.021.Search in Google Scholar

8. Tan, J, Wang, L. Real-time charging navigation of electric vehicles to fast charging stations: a hierarchical game approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2017;8:846–56.Search in Google Scholar

9. Qian, T, Shao, C, Li, X, Wang, X, Shahidehpour, M. Enhanced coordinated operations of electric power and transportation networks via ev charging services. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2020;11:3019–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2020.2969650.Search in Google Scholar

10. Qian, T, Shao, C, Li, X, Wang, X, Chen, Z, Shahidehpour, M. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning method for ev charging station game. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2022;37:1682–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2021.3111014.Search in Google Scholar

11. Yan, Q, Zhang, B, Kezunovic, M. Optimized operational cost reduction for an ev charging station integrated with battery energy storage and pv generation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2019;10:2096–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2017.2788440.Search in Google Scholar

12. Morstyn, T, Crozier, C, Deakin, M, McCulloch, MD. Conic optimization for electric vehicle station smart charging with battery voltage constraints. IEEE Trans Transport Elect 2020;6:478–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/tte.2020.2986675.Search in Google Scholar

13. Luo, C, Huang, Y-F, Gupta, V. Stochastic dynamic pricing for ev charging stations with renewable integration and energy storage. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2018;9:1494–505. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2017.2696493.Search in Google Scholar

14. Liu, Y, Wang, Y, Li, Y, Gooi, HB, Xin, H. Multi-agent based optimal scheduling and trading for multi-microgrids integrated with urban transportation networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2021;36:2197–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2020.3040310.Search in Google Scholar

15. El-Taweel, NA, Farag, H, Shaaban, MF, AlSharidah, ME. Optimization model for ev charging stations with pv farm transactive energy. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2022;18:4608–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2021.3114276.Search in Google Scholar

16. Affolabi, L, Shahidehpour, M, Gan, W, Yan, M, Chen, B, Pandey, S, et al.. Optimal transactive energy trading of electric vehicle charging stations with on-site pv generation in constrained power distribution networks. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2022;13:1427–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2021.3131959.Search in Google Scholar

17. Baghali, S, Guo, Z, Wei, W, Shahidehpour, M. Electric vehicles for distribution system load pickup under stressed conditions: a network equilibrium approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2022;1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2022.3185605.Search in Google Scholar

18. Liu, WL, Gong, YJ, Chen, WN, Liu, Z, Wang, H, Zhang, J. Coordinated charging scheduling of electric vehicles: a mixed-variable differential evolution approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 2019;21:5094–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2948596.Search in Google Scholar

19. Shin, M, Choi, DH, Kim, J. Cooperative management for pv/ess-enabled electric vehicle charging stations: a multiagent deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2020;16:3493–503. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2944183.Search in Google Scholar

20. Xu, X, Li, K, Wang, F, Mi, Z, Jia, Y, Wei, W, et al.. Evaluating multitimescale response capability of ev aggregator considering users’ willingness. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2021;57:3366–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2021.3081402.Search in Google Scholar

21. Danish, SM, Zhang, K, Jacobsen, H-A, Ashraf, N, Qureshi, HK. Blockev: efficient and secure charging station selection for electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 2021;22:4194–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2020.3044890.Search in Google Scholar

22. Affolabi, L, Shahidehpour, M, Rahimi, F, Aminifar, F, Nodehi, K, Mokhtari, S. Hierarchical transactive energy scheduling of electric vehicle charging stations in constrained power distribution and transportation networks. IEEE Trans Transport Elect 2022;1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tte.2022.3219721.Search in Google Scholar

23. Hashemipour, N, Aghaei, J, Granado, PCD, Kavousi-Fard, A, Niknam, T, Shafie-khah, M, et al.. Uncertainty modeling for participation of electric vehicles in collaborative energy consumption. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2022;71:10293–302.10.1109/TVT.2022.3184514Search in Google Scholar

24. Cao, Y, Jiang, T, Kaiwartya, O, Sun, H, Zhou, H, Wang, R. Toward pre-empted ev charging recommendation through v2v-based reservation system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2021;51:3026–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2019.2917149.Search in Google Scholar

25. Thi Kim, OT, Le, THT, Shin, MJ, Nguyen, V, Han, Z, Hong, CS. Distributed auction-based incentive mechanism for energy trading between electric vehicles and mobile charging stations. IEEE Access 2022;10:56331–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3170709 Search in Google Scholar

26. Özbakir, L, Baykasoğlu, A, Tapkan, P. Bees algorithm for generalized assignment problem. Appl Math Comput 2010;215:3782–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.11.018.Search in Google Scholar

27. Hwang, C, Yoon, K. Multi-objective decision making–methods and application. A State-of-the-Art Study. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981.Search in Google Scholar

28. Tzeng, GH, Huang, JJ. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011.10.1201/b11032Search in Google Scholar

29. Lai, YJ, Liu, TY, Hwang, CL. Topsis for modm. Eur J Oper Res 1994;76:486–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-14
Accepted: 2023-04-17
Published Online: 2023-05-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2023-0124/html
Scroll to top button