Home Techno-economic approach towards reactive power planning ensuring system security on energy transmission network
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Techno-economic approach towards reactive power planning ensuring system security on energy transmission network

  • Nihar Karmakar ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Biplab Bhattacharyya
Published/Copyright: March 22, 2021

Abstract

This research work proposes a planning strategy pertaining to the techno-economic operation of Indian power systems. The proposed strategy focused on the reactive power (VAr) planning (RPP) subject to the system operating cost minimization ensuring system security. To mitigate the RPP issue, unique meta-heuristic hybridized techniques are adopted to size the optimal parameter settings such as alternator’s reactive power, tap settings of transformers etc. instigated by power flow analysis satisfying all equality and inequality constraints. The controlling variables are optimally determined to solve this non-linear RPP problem. The bottleneck for the installation of static VAr compensators at weak buses is also wiped out by different analytical techniques viz. loss sensitivity, power flow and modal analysis. Two different inter-regional transmission networks prevailing in India are considered to measure the adaptability, efficacy and efficiency of the proposed approach. The results obtained by applying the proposed approach have confirmed that network loss-minimization procedures produce an acceptable solution and reduce the operating cost which is especially important in RPP. The responses of bench mark functions and statistical analysis of the outcomes from both systems allow us to assess the overall efficiency and efficacy of the proposed techno-economic planning approach.


Corresponding author: Nihar Karmakar, Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Police Line, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, 826004, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

Appendix

List of Principal Symbols

Load flow and cost related symbols

IBij,lGij

Susceptance and transfer conductance

gk

Line Conductance

nb

Number of buses

ng

Number of PV buses

Nch

Line charging elements

PDi,QDi

Active and VAr demand at the ith bus

Gi,Gi

Active and VAr generation at the ith bus

Qch

Total reactive power supplied during charging

Vi, Vj

ith and jth bus voltages

Ych

Admittance of line charging

δ0i, δ0j

ith and jth bus phase angles, respectively

Constraints and Ybus related symbols

Isec

Transformer secondary current

m

Number of lines

ntap

Number of transformer

OLTC

Open-loop tap changing transformers

QG

Generated reactive power

Gmax

High limit of generated reactive power

Gmin

Low limit of generated reactive power

tap

Tap settings of OLTC

VG

Alternator bus voltages

Vsec

Transformer secondary voltage

VGmax

Maximum limit of alternetor voltage

VGmin

Minimum limit of generator voltage

Yii

Sending end admittance

Yjj

Receiving end admittance

Weak nodes and SVC related symbols

Bsvc

Susceptance of SVC

nsvc

Number of SVCs

pop

Population

svc

Total reactive power supplied by SVC

svcmax

Maximum reactive power supplied by SVC

svcmin

Minimum reactive power supplied by SVC

ysvc

Admittance of SVC

References

1. Granville, S, Pereira, MVP, Monticelli, A. An integrated methodology for VAR sources planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1988;3:549–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.192906.Search in Google Scholar

2. Ajjarapu, V, Lau, PL, Battula, S. An optimal reactive power planning strategy against voltage collapse. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1994;9:906–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317656.Search in Google Scholar

3. CERC. Report on the grid disturbances on 30th July and 31st July 2012, CERC order in petition No. 167/Suo-Motu/2012; 2012:1–129 pp.Search in Google Scholar

4. Gomes, PV, João, TS. A two-stage strategy for security-constrained AC dynamic transmission expansion planning. Electr Power Syst Res 2020;180:106167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2019.106167.Search in Google Scholar

5. Hooshmand, RA, Hemmati, R, Parastegari, M. Combination of AC transmission expansion planning and reactive power planning in the restructured power system. Energy Convers Manag 2012;1:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.10.020.Search in Google Scholar

6. Chattopadhyay, D, Bhattacharya, K, Parikh, J. Optimal reactive power planning and its spot-pricing: an integrated approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1995;10:2014–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.476070.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cuello-Reyna, AA, Cedeño-Maldonado, JR. Combined analytic hierarchical process-differential evolution approach for optimal reactive power planning. In: international conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems. IEEE; 2006:1–8 pp.10.1109/PMAPS.2006.360246Search in Google Scholar

8. Parker, CJ, Morrison, IF, Sutanto, D. Application of an optimisation method for determining the reactive margin from voltage collapse in reactive power planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1996;11:1473–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.535688.Search in Google Scholar

9. Chattopadhyay, D, Chakrabarti, BB. Voltage stability constrained Var planning: model simplification using statistical approximation. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2001;23:349–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-0615(00)00073-9.Search in Google Scholar

10. Mahdad, B, Srairi, K. Multi objective large power system planning under sever loading condition using learning DE-APSO-PS strategy. Energy Convers Manag 2014;87:338–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.090.Search in Google Scholar

11. Moghadam, A, Seifi, AR. Fuzzy-TLBO optimal reactive power control variables planning for energy loss minimization. Energy Convers Manag 2014;77:208–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.09.036.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hong‐Zhong, L, Cheng, H‐Z, Zheng, Y. A novel reactive power planning method based on improved particle swarm optimization with static voltage stability. Eur Trans Electr Power 2010;20:1129–37.10.1002/etep.389Search in Google Scholar

13. El-Araby, ES, Yorino, N. Reactive power reserve management tool for voltage stability enhancement. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2018;12:1879–88.10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1356Search in Google Scholar

14. Raj, S, Bhattacharyya, B. Optimal placement of TCSC and SVC for reactive power planning using Whale optimization algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 2018;40:131–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2017.12.008.Search in Google Scholar

15. Thukaram, BD, Parthasarathy, K. Optimal reactive power dispatch algorithm for voltage stability improvement. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 1996;18:461–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-0615(96)00004-x.Search in Google Scholar

16. Udupa, AN, Thukaram, DT, Parthasarathy, K. An expert fuzzy control approach to voltage stability enhancement. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 1999;21:279–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-0615(98)00049-0.Search in Google Scholar

17. Thukaram, D, Parthasarathy, K, Khincha, HP, Udupa, N, Bansilal, A. Voltage stability improvement: case studies of Indian power networks. Electr Power Syst Res 1998;44:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7796(97)01208-x.Search in Google Scholar

18. Prabavathi, M, Gnanadass, R. Electric power bidding model for practical utility system. Alexandria engineering journal 2018;57:277–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

19. Khan, Q, Ahmad, F, Imran, M. Congestion management in Indian power transmission system. Int J Eng Technol 2017;9:26–31. https://doi.org/10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i3/170903s005.Search in Google Scholar

20. Karthikeyan, SP, Palanisamy, K, Rani, C, Raglend, IJ, Kothari, DP. Security constrained unit commitment problem with operational, power flow and environmental constraints. WSEAS Trans Power Syst 2009;4:53–6.Search in Google Scholar

21. Karmakar, N, Gupta, A, Bhattacharyya, B. Loss sensitivity based reactive power planning using hybrid intelligence technique. In: 2019 8th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS). IEEE; 2019:1–6 pp.10.1109/ICPS48983.2019.9067329Search in Google Scholar

22. Agrawal, R, Bharadwaj, SK, Kothari, DP. Population based evolutionary optimization techniques for optimal allocation and sizing of thyristor controlled series capacitor. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 2018;5:484–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesit.2017.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

23. Bijwe, PR, Tare, RS, Kelapure, SM. Anticipatory load shedding scheme for loadability enhancement. IEEE Proc Gen Transm Distrib 146;1999:483–90. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:19990319.10.1049/ip-gtd:19990319Search in Google Scholar

24. De, M, Goswami, SK. A direct and simplified approach to power-flow tracing and loss allocation using graph theory. Electr Power Compon Syst 2010;38:241–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325000903273395.Search in Google Scholar

25. Lamont, JW, Fu, J. Cost analysis of reactive power support. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1999;14:890–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.780900.Search in Google Scholar

26. Karmakar, N, Bhattacharyya, B. Optimal reactive power planning in power transmission network using sensitivity based bi-level strategy. Sustainable Energy Grids Netw 2020.10.1016/j.segan.2020.100383Search in Google Scholar

27. Wolpert David, H, Macready, WG. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1997;1:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893.Search in Google Scholar

28. Storn, R, Price, K. Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 1997;11:341–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008202821328.10.1023/A:1008202821328Search in Google Scholar

29. Askarzadeh, A. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 2016;169:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

30. Khalilpourazari, S, Pasandideh, SHR. Sine–cosine crow search algorithm: theory and applications. Neural Comput Appl 2019:1–18.10.1007/s00521-019-04530-0Search in Google Scholar

31. Mahammad, SSK, Srinivasa Rao, R. Optimal reactive power dispatch under unbalanced conditions using hybrid swarm intelligence. Comput Electr Eng 2018;69:183–93.10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.05.011Search in Google Scholar

32. Gnanadass, R, Venkatesh, P, Prasad Padhy, N. Evolutionary programming based optimal power flow for units with non-smooth fuel cost functions. Elec Power Compon Syst 2004;33:349–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325000590474708.Search in Google Scholar

33. Arul, P. Application and analysis of intelligent techniques towards optimal power flow problem [Ph.D. dissertation]. Anna University.Search in Google Scholar

34. Venkatesh, B. Optimal reactive power planning and scheduling through multi objective fuzzy LP and ANN [Ph.D. dissertation]. Anna University; 1999.Search in Google Scholar

35. Joaquín, D, García, S, Molina, D, Herrera, F. A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 2011;1:3–18.10.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-11-27
Accepted: 2021-03-04
Published Online: 2021-03-22

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2020-0260/html
Scroll to top button