Home Simultaneous Energy and Reserve Market Clearing with Consideration of Interruptible Loads as One of Demand Response Resources and Different Reliability Requirements of Consumers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Simultaneous Energy and Reserve Market Clearing with Consideration of Interruptible Loads as One of Demand Response Resources and Different Reliability Requirements of Consumers

  • Mojtaba Najafi EMAIL logo , Samaneh Ahmadi and Masoud Dashtdar ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: September 18, 2019

Abstract

Determining the optimal reserve in power systems is closely related to uncertainties in power generation and risks of outage of supply to consumers. Distributed generation sources such as wind farms are usual reasons for uncertainties in MW production. This uncertainty can be alleviated by providing enough reserve in which demand response (DR) programs can play role of resources for reserve. In an electricity market structure, the mentioned points are usually handled by Independent System Operator (ISO) in energy and reserve markets. This paper deals with the problem of reliability-based reserve management. In the mentioned problem, the DR program in the form of interruptible loads is also considered. A new method is proposed in which ISO settle energy and reserve markets simultaneously while employing the DR in the first stage. In addition, consumers’ requirements of reliability are included by assuming that they have possibility to offer their desired levels of reliability to the ISO. The amount of reserve obtained from market settlement is adjusted based on the different reliability requirements of the consumers and different scenarios of the wind farm operation, in the second stage of the proposed method. Also the cost of the reserve adjustment is fairly allocated to producers and consumers. The proposed method applies stochastic programming formulation and its validity is assessed by the GAMS software. Simulation results show that how amount and cost of reserve could be adjusted to cover power balance, cost of power production and load interruption and required reliability of consumers.

References

[1] Constantinescu EM, Zavala VM, Rocklin M, Lee S, Anitescu M. A computational framework for uncertainty quantification and stochastic optimization in unit commitment with wind power generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2011;26:431–41.10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2048133Search in Google Scholar

[2] Surender Reddy S, Panigrahi BK, Kundu R, Mukherjee R, Debchoudhury S. Energy and spinning reserve scheduling for a wind-thermal power system using CMA-ES with mean learning technique Multi-objective market clearing of electrical energy, spinning reserves and emission for wind-thermal power system. Electr Power Energy Syst. 2013;53:113–22.10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.03.032Search in Google Scholar

[3] Surender Reddy S, Bijwe PR, Abhyankar AR. Joint energy and spinning reserve market clearing incorporating wind power and load forecast uncertainties. IEEE Syst J. 2013;3:152–64Search in Google Scholar

[4] Surender Reddy S, Bijwe PR, Abhyankar AR. Multi-objective market clearing of electrical energy, spinning reserves and emission for wind-thermal power system. Electr Power Energy Syst. 2013;53:782–94.10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.05.050Search in Google Scholar

[5] Surender Reddy S, Bijwe PR, Abhyankar AR. Real-time economic dispatch considering renewable power generation variability and uncertainty over scheduling period. IEEE Syst J. 2014;9:1440–5110.1109/JSYST.2014.2325967Search in Google Scholar

[6] Surender Reddy S, Momoh JA. Realistic and transparent optimum scheduling strategy for hybrid power system. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2015;6:3114–2510.1109/TSG.2015.2406879Search in Google Scholar

[7] Sun C, Bie Z, Xie M, Ning G. Effects of wind speed probabilistic and possibilistic uncertainties on generation system adequacy. IET Gener Transm Distrib. 2015;9:339–47.10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0708Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ghorashi AH, Rahimi A. Renewable and non-renewable energy status in Iran: art of know-how and technology-gaps. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2011;15:729–36. ISSN 1364-0321. DOI: 1016/10/j.rser.09/2010.037.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kumar A, Kumar K, Kaushik N, Sharma S, Mishra S. Renewable energy in India: current status and future potentials. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2010;14:2434–42.10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.003Search in Google Scholar

[10] Klessmann C, Held A, Rathmann M, Ragwitz M. Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? Energy Policy. 2011;39:7637–57.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.038Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ding Y, Wang P, Lisnianski A. Optimal reserve management for restructured power generating systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 2006;91:792–9.10.1016/j.ress.2005.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gooi B, Mendes DP, Bell KR, Kirschen DS. Optimal scheduling of spinning reserve. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1999;14:1485–92.10.1109/59.801936Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chattopadhay D, Baldick R. Unit commitment with probabilistic reserve. Proc IEEE Power Eng Soc Winter Meeting. 2002;1:280–5.10.1109/PESW.2002.984999Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fotuhi-Firoozabad M, Rashidi-nejad M. Allocation of spinning reserve among generating units using hybrid deterministic/probabilistic approach. Proc. Large Engineering Systems Conf. Power Engineering (LESCOPE04). 2004:81–7.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Simopoulos N, Kavatza SD, Vournas CD. Reliability constrained unit commitment using simulated annealing. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2006;21:1699–706.10.1109/TPWRS.2006.881128Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bouffard F, Galiana FD, Conejo AJ. Market-clearing with stochastic security-part I: formulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2005;20:1818–26.10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857016Search in Google Scholar

[17] Fumagalli E, Black JW, Vogelsang I, Ilic M. Quality of service provision in electric power distribution systems through reliability insurance. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2004;19:1286–93.10.1109/TPWRS.2004.831294Search in Google Scholar

[18] Attaviriyanupap P, Yokoyama A. Price volatility and service interruption risk-hedging by transmission contract. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2006;21:211–23.10.1109/TPWRS.2005.860935Search in Google Scholar

[19] Xia LM, Gooi HB, Bai J. A probabilistic reserve with zero-sum settlement scheme. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2005;20:993–1000.10.1109/TPWRS.2005.846090Search in Google Scholar

[20] Wang MQ, Yang PP, Zhang Q, Wang Y. Spinning reserve optimization using reliability constrained unit commitment. TENCON 2015-2015 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 1–5. Macao, 2015.10.1109/TENCON.2015.7372713Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zhao Q, Wang P, Goel L, Ding Y. Impacts of contingency reserve on nodal price and nodal reliability risk in deregulated power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2013;28:2497–506.10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2246588Search in Google Scholar

[22] Najafi M, Ehsan M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Akhavein A, Afshar K. Optimal reserve capacity allocation with consideration of customer reliability requirements. Energy. 2010;35:3883–90.10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.044Search in Google Scholar

[23] Ahmadi-Khatir F, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M. Customer choice of reliability in spinning reserve procurement and cost allocation. Electric Power Conference, 2008. EPEC 2008. IEEE Canada, Vancouver, BC, 2008:1–7.10.1109/EPC.2008.4763310Search in Google Scholar

[24] Jaefari-Nokandi M, Monsef H. Scheduling of spinning reserve considering customer choice on reliability. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2009;24:1780–9.10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2023270Search in Google Scholar

[25] Reliability Test System Task Force. The IEEE reliability test system—1996. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1999;14:1010–20.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-01-15
Revised: 2019-07-30
Accepted: 2019-08-30
Published Online: 2019-09-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2019-0018/html
Scroll to top button