Risky Group Decision-Making Method for Distribution Grid Planning

Reference

1. Nykamp S, Molderink A, Hurink JL. Statistics for PV wind and biomass generators and their impact on distribution grid planning. Energy 2012;45:924–32.10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.067Search in Google Scholar

2. Mojtaba S, Mohammad TA. A multistage framework for reliability-based distribution expansion planning considering distributed generations by a self-adaptive global harmony search algorithm. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2015;139:68–81.10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.001Search in Google Scholar

3. Ravadanegh NS, Roshanagh RG. On optimal multistage electric power distribution networks expansion planning. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2014;54:487–97.10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.008Search in Google Scholar

4. Marin MR, Sumper A, Robles RV, Jane JB. Active power estimation of photovoltaic generators for distribution network planning based on correlation models. Energy 2014;64:758–70.10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.043Search in Google Scholar

5. Adoghe AU, Awosope CO, Ekeh JC. Asset maintenance planning in electric power distribution network using statistical analysis of outage data. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2013;47:424–35.10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.061Search in Google Scholar

6. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND. A review of power distribution planning in the modern power systems era: Models, methods and future research. Electr Power Syst Res 2015;121:89–100.10.1016/j.epsr.2014.12.010Search in Google Scholar

7. Niknam T, Bornapour M, Ostadi A, Gheisari A. Optimal planning of molten carbonate fuel cell power plants at distribution networks considering combined heat, power and hydrogen production. J Power Sources 2013;239:513–26.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.117Search in Google Scholar

8. Bagheri A, Monsef H, Lesani H. Integrated distribution network expansion planning incorporating distributed generation considering uncertainties, reliability, and operational conditions. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2015;73:56–70.10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.03.010Search in Google Scholar

9. Bagheri A, Monsef H, Lesani H. Renewable power generation employed in an integrated dynamic distribution network expansion planning. Electr Power Syst Res 2015;127:280–96.10.1016/j.epsr.2015.06.004Search in Google Scholar

10. Ahmadigorji M, Amjady N. Optimal dynamic expansion planning of distribution systems considering non-renewable distributed generation using a new heuristic double-stage optimization solution approach. Appl Energy 2015;156:655–65.10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.042Search in Google Scholar

11. Saboori H, Hemmati R, Abbasi V. Multistage distribution network expansion planning considering the emerging energy storage systems. Energy Convers Manage 2015;105:938–45.10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.055Search in Google Scholar

12. Zhong Q, Sun W, Yu NH, Liu CF, Wang F, Load ZX. Power forecasting in active distribution network planning. Proc CSEE 2014;34:3050–6.Search in Google Scholar

13. Golam K, Razia SS. Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from Bangladesh. Energy 2014;72:717–30.10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.098Search in Google Scholar

14. Wei G, Liu J, Zhang X, Min B. Comprehensive decision-making of AHP/PROMETHEE in distribution network planning. Proc CSE-EPSA 2009;21:36–40.Search in Google Scholar

15. Yi Y, Wei G, Yang JJ, Hu Y. Comprehensive decision making of distribution network planning based on group AHP. Electr Power 2012;45:23–8.Search in Google Scholar

16. Yang JJ, Liu Y, Shen L, Xue Q. Comprehensive assessment of the distribution network based on GAHP. East China Electr Power 2013;41:2323–7.Search in Google Scholar

17. Jahromi SN, Rashidinejad M, Abdollahi A. Multistage distribution network expansion planning under smart grids environment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2015;71:222–30.10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.02.021Search in Google Scholar

18. Chen HY, Wang ZY, Yan HF, Zou HB, Luo B. Integrated planning of distribution systems with distributed generation and demand side response. Energy Procedia 2015;75:981–6.10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.314Search in Google Scholar

19. Bornapour M, Hooshmand R. An efficient scenario-based stochastic programming for optimal planning of combined heat, power, and hydrogen production of molten carbonate fuel cell power plants. Energy 2015;83:734–48.10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.082Search in Google Scholar

20. Zhang LM, Tang W, Liu YF, Lv T. Multiobjective optimization and decision-making for DG planning considering benefits between distribution company and DGs owner. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2015;73:465–74.10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.05.019Search in Google Scholar

21. Liu CY, Gan WY, Wu T. A comparative study of cloud model and extended fuzzy sets. Rough Set Knowl Technol 2010;64:626–31.10.1007/978-3-642-16248-0_85Search in Google Scholar

22. Ochmann S, Vock R, Wessel R, Klein R. Automatic reconstruction of parametric building models from indoor point clouds. Comput Graph 2016;54:94–103.10.1016/j.cag.2015.07.008Search in Google Scholar

23. Maheshwari K, Jung ES, Meng JY, Morozov V, Vishwanath V, Kettimuthu R. Workflow performance improvement using model-based scheduling over multiple clusters and clouds. Future Gener Comput Syst 2016;54:206–18.10.1016/j.future.2015.03.017Search in Google Scholar

24. Magalhães D, Calheiros RN, Buyya R, Gomes DG. Workload modeling for resource usage analysis and simulation in cloud computing. Comput Electr Eng 2015;47:69–81.10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.08.016Search in Google Scholar

25. Li DY, Liu CY, Gan WY. A new cognitive model: cloud model. Int J Intell Syst 2009;24:357–75.10.1002/int.20340Search in Google Scholar

26. Shakya P, Kulkarni MS, Darpe AK. Bearing diagnosis based on Mahalanobis–Taguchi–Gram–Schmidt method. J Sound Vibr 2015;337:342–62.10.1016/j.jsv.2014.10.034Search in Google Scholar

27. Iquebal AS, Pal A, Ceglarek D, Tiwari MK. Enhancement of Mahalanobis–Taguchi System via rough sets based feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 2014;41:8003–15.10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.019Search in Google Scholar

28. Taguchi G, Juguliini R. New trends in multivariate diagnosis. Indian J Stat 2000;62:233–48.Search in Google Scholar

29. Yazid AM, Rijal JK, Awaluddin MS, Sari E. Pattern recognition on remanufacturing automotive component as support decision making using Mahalanobis-Taguchi system. Procedia CIRP 2015;26:258–63.10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.025Search in Google Scholar

30. Ketkar M, Vaidya OS. Evaluating and ranking candidates for MBA program: Mahalanobis Taguchi system approach. Procedia Econ Finance 2014;11:654–64.10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00231-7Search in Google Scholar

31. Niu JL. Methods of classification and sort evaluation using Mahalanobis-Taguchi system based on omni-optimizer algorithm and applications, Ph.D. Dissertation, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

32. Taguchi G, Jugulum R. The Mahalanobis-Taguchi strategy: A pattern technology system. New York: John Wiley &Sons, 2002.10.1002/9780470172247Search in Google Scholar

33. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty 1992;5:297–323.10.1007/BF00122574Search in Google Scholar

34. Wilton E, Delarue E, D’haeseleer W, Sark WV. Reconsidering the capacity credit of wind power: Application of cumulative prospect theory. Renew Energy 2014;68:752–60.10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.051Search in Google Scholar

35. Kaluszka M, Krzeszowiec M. On iterative premium calculation principles under cumulative prospect theory.Insurance: Math Econ. 2013;52:435–40.10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.02.009Search in Google Scholar

36. Chang ZP, Cheng LS, Liu JS. Multiple attribute decision making method with intervals based on Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and TOPSIS method. Syst Eng –Theory Pract 2014;01:168–75.Search in Google Scholar

37. Shi F, Liu PL. Decision making method for urban power distribution grid planning using entropy weight. Eng J Wuhan Univ 2012;45:212–15.Search in Google Scholar

38. Fan ZP, Chen FD, Zhang X. Method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making based on cumulative prospect theory. J Syst Eng 2012;03:295–301.Search in Google Scholar

39. Wang JQ, Yang WE. Multiple criteria group decision making method based on intuitionistic normal cloud by Monte Carlo simulation. Syst Eng Theory Pract 2013;11:2859–65.Search in Google Scholar