Home Technology Optimal Rescheduling of Generators for Congestion Management and Benefit Maximization in a Decentralized Bilateral Multi-transactions Power Network
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimal Rescheduling of Generators for Congestion Management and Benefit Maximization in a Decentralized Bilateral Multi-transactions Power Network

  • Brijesh Singh EMAIL logo , Ranjit Mahanty and S.P. Singh
Published/Copyright: May 30, 2013

Abstract

This paper presents a framework to achieve an optimal power flow solution in a decentralized bilateral multitransaction-based market. An independent optimal dispatch solution has been used for each market. The interior point (IP)-based optimization technique has been used for finding a global economic optimal solution of the whole system. In this method, all the participants try to maximize their own profits with the help of system information announced by the operator. In the present work, a parallel algorithm has been used to find out a global optimum solution in decentralized market model. The study has been carried out on a modified IEEE-30 bus system. The results show that the suggested decentralized approach can provide a better optimal solution. The obtained results show the effectiveness of IP optimization-based optimal generator schedule and congestion management in the decentralized market.

References

1. NayakAS, PaiMA. Congestion management in restructured power systems using an optimal power flow framework. PSERC, Publication June 2002.Search in Google Scholar

2. ChristilRD. Transmission management in deregulated environment. Proc IEEE2000;141:17095.10.1109/5.823997Search in Google Scholar

3. NishimuraF, TaborsRD, LlicMD, Lacalle-MeleroJR. Benefit optimization of centralized and decentralized power systems in a multi area environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst1993;141:11806.10.1109/59.260879Search in Google Scholar

4. SinghH, HaoS, PapalexopoulosA. Transmission congestion management in competitive electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst1998;141:6729.10.1109/59.667399Search in Google Scholar

5. DuttaS, SinghSP. Optimal rescheduling of generators for congestion management based on particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Power Syst2008;141:15609.10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922647Search in Google Scholar

6. BakirtizsAG, BiskasPN. A decentralized solution to the DC-OPF of interconnected power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst2003;141:100713.10.1109/TPWRS.2003.814853Search in Google Scholar

7. BakirtizsAG, BiskasPN. A decentralized implementation of DC optimal power flow on a network of computers. IEEE Trans Power Syst2005;141:2533.10.1109/TPWRS.2004.831283Search in Google Scholar

8. ConejoAJ, AguadoJA. Multi area coordinated decentralized DC optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1998;141:12728.10.1109/59.736264Search in Google Scholar

9. HaoS. Decentralized approach to inter congestion management. IEEE Trans Power Syst2005;141:67583.10.1109/TPWRS.2005.846094Search in Google Scholar

10. HaoS, ShirmohammadiD. Congestion management with ex ante pricing for decentralized electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst2002;141:10306.10.1109/TPWRS.2002.804944Search in Google Scholar

11. LiuK, NiY, WuFF, BiTS. Decentralized congestion management for multilateral transactions based on optimal recourse allocation. IEEE Trans Power Syst2007;141:183542.10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907540Search in Google Scholar

12. GribikPR, AngelidisGA, KovacsRR. Transmission access and pricing. IEEE Trans Power Syst1999;141:86576.10.1109/59.780897Search in Google Scholar

13. BiskasPN, BakirtzisAG. Decentralized congestion management of interconnected power systems. Proc IET Generation Transm Distrib2002;141:4328.10.1049/ip-gtd:20020303Search in Google Scholar

14. WangX, SongYH. Advanced real-time congestion management through both pool balancing market and bilateral market. IEEE Power Eng Rev2000;141:479.10.1109/39.819917Search in Google Scholar

15. WangX, SongYH, LuQ. Lagrangian decomposition approach to active power congestion management across interconnected regions. Proc IET Generation Transm Distrib2001;141:497503.10.1049/ip-gtd:20010490Search in Google Scholar

16. HuangA, Sung-KwanJ, Bin SongK, KimJ-H, LeeK. Asynchronous decentralized method for interconnected electricity markets. Electric Power Syst Res2008;14:28390.10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.10.001Search in Google Scholar

17. WeiP, NiY, WuFF. Decentralized approach for congestion management and congestion price discovering. Proc IET Generation Transm Distrib2002;141:64552.10.1049/ip-gtd:20020716Search in Google Scholar

18. BotterudA, IlicMD, WangesteenI. Optimal investments in power generation under centralized and decentralized decision making. IEEE Trans Power Syst2005;141:25463.10.1109/TPWRS.2004.841217Search in Google Scholar

19. ShayestehE, MoghaddermMP, YousefiA, HaghifamMR, Sheik-El-EslamiMK. A demand side approach for congestion management in competitive environment. Eur Trans Electrical Power2010;14:47090.10.1002/etep.330Search in Google Scholar

20. SongYH, WangX. Operation of market-oriented power system. London: Springer-Verlag, 2003.10.1007/978-1-4471-3735-1Search in Google Scholar

21. VisalakshiS, BaskarS. Covariance matrix adapted evolution strategy-based decentralized congestion management for multilateral transactions. Proc IET Generation Transm Distrib2010;141:40017.10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0132Search in Google Scholar

22. WuYC, DebsAS, MarstenRE. Adirect nonlinear predictor-corrector primal-dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows. IEEE Trans Power Syst1994;141:87683.10.1109/59.317660Search in Google Scholar

23. TorresGL, QuintanaVH. On a nonlinear multiple-centrality corrections interior-point method for optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst2001;141:2228.10.1109/59.918290Search in Google Scholar

24. YanW, YuJ, YuDC, BhattaraiK. A new optimal reactive power flow model in rectangular form and its solution by predictor corrector primal dual interior point method. IEEE Trans Power Syst2006;141:617.10.1109/TPWRS.2005.861978Search in Google Scholar

25. WeiH, SasakiH, KubakawaJ, YokoyamaR. An interior point nonlinear programming for optimal power flow problems with a novel data structure. IEEE Trans Power Syst1998;141:8707.10.1109/59.708745Search in Google Scholar

26. TahaHA. Operation research: an introduction. Singapore: Pearson Education, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

27. KarmarkarN. A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica1984;141:373395.10.1007/BF02579150Search in Google Scholar

28. YanX, QuintanaVH. Improving an interior-point-based OPF by dynamic adjustments of step sizes and tolerances. IEEE Trans Power Syst1999;141:70917.10.1109/59.761902Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-05-30

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 17.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2013-0024/html
Scroll to top button