Home Analysis of the positioning of the head, trunk, and upper limbs during gait in children with visual impairment
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analysis of the positioning of the head, trunk, and upper limbs during gait in children with visual impairment

  • Andréia Naomi Sankako , Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli , Sebastião Marcos Ribeiro de Carvalho and Lígia Maria Presumido Braccialli EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2014

Abstract

Background: This study analyzed the positioning of the head, trunk, and upper extremities during gait in children with visual impairment.

Methods: A total of 11 children participated in this study: 6 with blindness and 5 with low vision. The kinematics of the positioning of the head, trunk, shoulders, and elbows in each participant was analyzed during the four phases of the gait cycle: foot strike, support, toe-off, and swing.

Results: There were significant differences between children with blindness and low vision in the positioning of the trunk in the sagittal plane during the foot strike, support, and swing phases.

Conclusions: The analysis identified postural alterations of the head, trunk, shoulder, and elbow during the children’s gait, highlighting the relevance of appropriate stimulation at an early age in orientation and mobility programs, as well as the essential presence of professionals who work with movement.


Corresponding author: Lígia Maria Presumido Braccialli, MD, Department of Special Education, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Unesp – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Avenida Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737, Caixa Postal: 181, C.E.P.: 17.525-900, Marília, São Paulo, Brazil, Phone: +55-14-3402-1331, Fax: +55 14 3402-1331, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for financial support in the form of fellowships, and the Centro Universitário São Camilo and the Associação Brasileira de Assistência ao Deficiente Visual-Laramara for study partnership.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. Research support played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Wade MG, Jones G. The role of vision and spatial orientation in the maintenance of posture. Phys Ther 1997;77:619–28.10.1093/ptj/77.6.619Search in Google Scholar

2. Martín-Rincón MR, Patrón CG, Vásquez AI, Gallego ML, Revuelta MR, Tagarro MR. Atención temprana a niños con ceguera o deficiencia visual. 1. ed. Madrid: ONCE, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

3. Guerraz M, Thilo KV, Bronstein AM, Gresty MA. Influence of action and expectation on visual control of posture. Cognitive Brain Research 2011;11:259–66.10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00080-XSearch in Google Scholar

4. Navarro AS, Fukujima MM, Fontes SV, Matas SL, Prado GF. Balance and motor coordination are not fully developed in 7 years old blind children. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2004;62:654–57.10.1590/S0004-282X2004000400016Search in Google Scholar

5. Patla AE. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait Posture 1997;5:54–69.10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01109-5Search in Google Scholar

6. Aust AM. Kinesiology. In: Welsh RL, Blash BB, editors. Foundations of orientation and mobility, 3rd ed. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1987:37–72.Search in Google Scholar

7. Rosen S, Joffee E. Motor development. In: Huebner KM et al., editors. Hand in hand: essentials of communication and orientation and mobility for your students who are deaf-blind. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1995:494–517.Search in Google Scholar

8. Sánchez PA. Deficiencias visuals y psicomotricidad: Teoría e practica. Madrid: Once, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

9. BRASIL. Ministério da Educação e Secretaria de Educação Especial. Saberes e práticas da inclusão: dificuldades da comunicação e sinalização: deficiência visual. 2.ed.rev. Brasília: MEC, SEESP (2003). http//portal.mec.gov.br/arquivos/pdf/dificuldade4.pdf. Update: July 19 2008. Acessed: July 19 2008.Search in Google Scholar

10. Mount J, Howard PD, Palu AL, Grafstrom A, Pinto DM, Rudy SL. Postures and repetitive movements during use of a long cane by individuals with visual impairment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001;31:375–83.10.2519/jospt.2001.31.7.375Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Gerente JG, Pascoal AG, Pereira ML. Localização espacial de estímulos sonoros em indivíduos cegos congênitos: estudo comparativo da posição tridimensional da cabeça em adultos cegos congênitos e indivíduos videntes. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial 2008;14:111–20.10.1590/S1413-65382008000100009Search in Google Scholar

12. Easton RD, Greene AJ, Dizio P, Lackner JR. Auditory cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and congenitally blind people. Exp Brain Res 1998;118:541–50.10.1007/s002210050310Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Sforza C, Eid L, Michielon G, Fragnito N, Ferrario VF. Sensorial afferents, expectations and craniocervical postural relations in adults who are blind and sighted. J Vis Impair Blind 2003;93:17–27.10.1177/0145482X0309700103Search in Google Scholar

14. Gipsman SC. Effect of visual condition on use of proprioceptive cues in performing a balance task. J Vis Impair Blind 1981;76:50–4.10.1177/0145482X8107500203Search in Google Scholar

15. Long RG, Rieser JJ, Hill EW. Mobility in individuals with moderate visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind 1990; 84:111–8.10.1177/0145482X9008400303Search in Google Scholar

16. Keshner EA, Dhaher Y. Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbance in healthy and visually sensitive subjects. Gait Posture 2008;28:127–34.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Lippert LS. Cinesiologia clínica para fisioterapeutas. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kendall FP, Mccreary EK, Provance PG. Músculos. Provas e funções. 1. ed. São Paulo: Editora Manole, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

19. Perry J. Análise de marcha: Marcha normal. São Paulo: Editora Manole, v. 1, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

20. Cook S. Reciprocal movement and the blind child: an informal study. Fall 2006;38:114–23.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-11-3
Accepted: 2014-1-4
Published Online: 2014-3-26
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijdhd-2013-0040/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button