Kinetic and thermodynamic study of maize stalk biomass using thermogravimetric analysis
- 
            
            
        Rida Khalid
        , Zaib Hussain 
Abstract
Investigating thermodynamic and kinetic aspects is crucial for assessing efficiency of converting biomass into energy. This study presents kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics of maize stalk using thermogravimetric analysis. The novelty of this research stems from the combination of kinetic and thermodynamic analysis, the application of multiple kinetic models and understanding of pyrolysis-based bioenergy production process from maize stalk. Analysis was performed using a temperature range of 25–650 °C employing 5, 10, 15 and 20 °C/min heating rate. The temperature range of 250–650 °C was selected to analyze the complete decomposition of the three main components of maize stalk i.e. hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin and to prevent the decomposition of inorganic substances such as CaCO3 which decompose at high temperature. The apparent activation energy values were evaluated using Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS), Friedman and Ozawa-Flynn-Wall (OFW) models. The resulting mean apparent Ea values calculated for KAS, Friedman and OFW were 167.86, 177.34 and 162.96 kJ/mol, accordingly. Additionally, Gibbs free energy (ΔG) values were 164.17 kJ/mol, enthalpy (ΔH) −178.31 J/molK and entropy (ΔS) 285.59 kJ/mol, respectively. These findings suggest that maize stalk holds promise as a potential bioenergy source, aligning with sustainable goals and waste-to-energy strategies.
- 
Research ethics: Not applicable. 
- 
Informed consent: Not applicable. 
- 
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. 
- 
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared. 
- 
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest. 
- 
Research funding: None declared. 
- 
Data availability: Not applicable. 
References
[1] F. Rego, A. P. S. Dias, M. Casquilho, F. C. Rosa, and A. Rodrigues, “Pyrolysis kinetics of short rotation coppice poplar biomass,” Energy, vol. 207, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118191.Search in Google Scholar
[2] R. K. Mishra and K. Mohanty, “Kinetic analysis and pyrolysis behavior of low-value waste lignocellulosic biomass for its bioenergy potential using thermogravimetric analyzer,” Mater. Sci. Energy Technol., vol. 4, pp. 136–147, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2021.03.003.Search in Google Scholar
[3] S. Rajamohan, J. J. Marshal, and S. Suresh, “Derivation of synthetic fuel from waste plastic: investigation of engine operating characteristics on DI diesel engine,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 28, pp. 11976–11987, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08625-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] D. V. Suriapparao and R. Tejasvi, “A review on role of process parameters on pyrolysis of biomass and plastics: present scope and future opportunities in conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis technologies,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 162, pp. 435–462, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.024.Search in Google Scholar
[5] N. Muhammad, et al.., “A comprehensive review of liquid chromatography hyphenated to post-column photoinduced fluorescence detection system for determination of analytes,” Arab. J. Chem., vol. 15, no. 9, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104091.Search in Google Scholar
[6] N. Muhammad, Q. Subhani, F. Wang, C. Lou, J. Liu, and Y. Zhu, “Simultaneous determination of two plant growth regulators in ten food samples using ion chromatography combined with QuEChERS extraction method (IC-QuEChERS) and coupled with fluorescence detector,” Food chemistry, vol. 241, pp. 308–316, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.08.112.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] N. Muhammad, W. Li, Q. Subhani, F. Wang, Y.-G. Zhao, and Y. Zhu, “Dual application of synthesized SnO 2 nanoparticles in ion chromatography for sensitive fluorescence determination of ketoprofen in human serum, urine, and canal water samples,” New J. Chem., vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 9321–9329, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nj01757j.Search in Google Scholar
[8] R. K. Mishra and K. Mohanty, “Kinetic analysis and pyrolysis behaviour of waste biomass towards its bioenergy potential,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 311, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123480.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] D. B. Pal, et al.., “Thermo-chemical potential of solid waste seed biomass obtained from plant Phoenix dactylifera and Aegle marmelos L. Fruit core cell,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 345, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126441.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] S. Subramanian and U. B. R. Ragula, “Pyrolysis kinetics of Hibiscus rosa sinensis and Nerium oleander,” Biofuels, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 903–917, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2018.1432274.Search in Google Scholar
[11] N. Muhammad, et al.., “Comprehensive two-dimensional ion chromatography (2D-IC) coupled to a post-column photochemical fluorescence detection system for determination of neonicotinoids (imidacloprid and clothianidin) in food samples,” RSC advances, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 9277–9286, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra12555k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] Q. Subhani, et al.., “Simultaneous determination of acetamiprid and 6‐chloronicotinic acid in environmental samples by using ion chromatography hyphenated to online photoinduced fluorescence detector,” J. Separat. Sci., vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 3921–3930, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202000635.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] N. Muhammad, et al.., “Ion chromatography coupled with fluorescence/UV detector: a comprehensive review of its applications in pesticides and pharmaceutical drug analysis,” Arabi. J. Chem., vol. 14, no. 3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.102972.Search in Google Scholar
[14] M. R. Barr, M. Volpe, A. Messineo, and R. Volpe, “On the suitability of thermogravimetric balances for the study of biomass pyrolysis,” Fuel, vol. 276, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118069.Search in Google Scholar
[15] Đ. Katnić, et al.., “Characterization and kinetics of thermal decomposition behavior of plum and fig pomace biomass,” J. Clean. Product., vol. 352, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131637.Search in Google Scholar
[16] R. K. Singh, T. Patil, and A. N. Sawarkar, “Pyrolysis of garlic husk biomass: physico-chemical characterization, thermodynamic and kinetic analyses,” Bioresour. Technol. Rep., vol. 12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100558.Search in Google Scholar
[17] A. K. Tiwari, et al.., “Waste biomass valorisation of Bambusa vulgaris dust and Delonix regia pods: characterization and kinetic study,” Sust. Energy Technol. Assessm., vol. 53, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102590.Search in Google Scholar
[18] O. Y. Fetisova, N. M. Mikova, A. I. Chudina, and A. S. Kazachenko, “Kinetic study of pyrolysis of coniferous bark wood and modified fir bark wood,” Fire, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 59, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020059.Search in Google Scholar
[19] S. Vyazovkin, et al.., “ICTAC Kinetics Committee recommendations for analysis of multi-step kinetics,” Thermochim. acta, vol. 689, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2020.178597.Search in Google Scholar
[20] C. Buratti, M. Barbanera, P. Bartocci, and F. Fantozzi, “Thermogravimetric analysis of the behavior of sub-bituminous coal and cellulosic ethanol residue during co-combustion,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 186, pp. 154–162, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] H. Cai, et al.., “Thermal degradations and processes of waste tea and tea leaves via TG-FTIR: combustion performances, kinetics, thermodynamics, products and optimization,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 268, pp. 715–725, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.068.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] X. Xu, R. Pan, and R. Chen, “Combustion characteristics, kinetics, and thermodynamics of pine wood through thermogravimetric analysis,” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., vol. 193, pp. 1427–1446, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03480-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] L. Huang, et al.., “Thermodynamics and kinetics parameters of co-combustion between sewage sludge and water hyacinth in CO2/O2 atmosphere as biomass to solid biofuel,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 218, pp. 631–642, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] O. Senneca and F. Cerciello, “Kinetics of combustion of lignocellulosic biomass: recent research and critical issues,” Fuel, vol. 347, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128310.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Y. S. Kim, Y. S. Kim, and S. H. Kim, “Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the thermal decomposition of plastic waste− waste lube oil compounds,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 5313–5317, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1021/es101163e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] A. Fernandez, et al.., “Clean recovery of phenolic compounds, pyro-gasification thermokinetics, and bioenergy potential of spent agro-industrial bio-wastes,” Biomass Convers. Bioref., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 12509–12526, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02197-z.Search in Google Scholar
[27] D. Zalazar-Garcia, et al.., “Exergo-ecological analysis and life cycle assessment of agro-wastes using a combined simulation approach based on Cape-Open to Cape-Open (COCO) and SimaPro free-software,” Renew. Energy, vol. 201, pp. 60–71, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.084.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Y.-l. Li, et al., “Preparation and structural analysis of humic acid by co-thermal oxidation of wheat straw and Heilongjiang lignite,” J. Fuel Chem. Technol., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 145–154, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-5813(21)60033-1.Search in Google Scholar
[29] R. Torres Ramos, et al.., “Torrefaction under different reaction atmospheres to improve the fuel properties of wheat straw,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1971, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071971.Search in Google Scholar
[30] S. Jamilatun, A. Aktawan, A. Budiman, and I. Mufandi, “Thermogravimetric analysis kinetic study of Spirulina platensis residue pyrolysis,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science, vol. 963, Yogyakarta, IOP Publishing, 2022, p. 012010.10.1088/1755-1315/963/1/012010Search in Google Scholar
[31] A. Fernandez, A. Saffe, G. Mazza, and R. Rodriguez, “Nonisothermal drying kinetics of biomass fuels by thermogravimetric analysis under oxidative and inert atmosphere,” Drying Technol., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2016.1163265.Search in Google Scholar
[32] R. Torres-Sciancalepore, et al.., “Two-step valorization of invasive species Rosa rubiginosa L. husk waste through eco-friendly optimized pectin extraction and subsequent pyrolysis,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 11, no. 5, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110802.Search in Google Scholar
[33] N. Agnihotri, G. K. Gupta, and M. K. Mondal, “Thermo-kinetic analysis, thermodynamic parameters and comprehensive pyrolysis index of Melia azedarach sawdust as a genesis of bioenergy,” Biomass Convers. Bioref., no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02524-y.Search in Google Scholar
[34] P. S. Kumar, M. Edwin, and A. J. Percy, “Comparative study on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of Indian almond fruit and Gracilaria changii seaweed by thermogravimetric analysis,” Biomass Convers. Bioref., vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 1–16, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03662-z.Search in Google Scholar
[35] P. R. Havilah, P. K. Sharma, and A. K. Sharma, “Characterization, thermal and kinetic analysis of Pinusroxburghii,” Environ., Develop. Sustainab., vol. 23, pp. 8872–8894, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01001-8.Search in Google Scholar
[36] R. K. Singh, D. Pandey, T. Patil, and A. N. Sawarkar, “Pyrolysis of banana leaves biomass: physico-chemical characterization, thermal decomposition behavior, kinetic and thermodynamic analyses,” Biores. Technol., vol. 310, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123464.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[37] A. Petrovič, et al.., “Thermo-kinetic analysis of pyrolysis of thermally pre-treated sewage sludge from the food industry,” Thermal Sci. Eng. Progress, vol. 42, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101863.Search in Google Scholar
[38] A. Nawaz and P. Kumar, “Pyrolysis behavior of low value biomass (Sesbania bispinosa) to elucidate its bioenergy potential: kinetic, thermodynamic and prediction modelling using artificial neural network,” Renew. Energy, vol. 200, pp. 257–270, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.110.Search in Google Scholar
[39] M. Raza, B. Abu-Jdayil, and A. Inayat, “Pyrolytic kinetics and thermodynamic analyses of date seeds at different heating rates using the Coats–Redfern method,” Fuel, vol. 342, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127799.Search in Google Scholar
[40] Y. Li, Y. Wang, M. Chai, C. Li, D. Yellezuome, and R. Liu, “Pyrolysis kinetics and thermodynamic parameters of bamboo residues and its three main components using thermogravimetric analysis,” Biomass and Bioenerg., vol. 170, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106705.Search in Google Scholar
[41] I. Mian, et al.., “Kinetic study of biomass pellet pyrolysis by using distributed activation energy model and Coats Redfern methods and their comparison,” Biores. Technol., vol. 294, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122099.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[42] D. Rammohan, N. Kishore, and R. Uppaluri, “Insights on kinetic triplets and thermodynamic analysis of Delonix regia biomass pyrolysis,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 358, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127375.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[43] H. Siddiqi, M. Bal, U. Kumari, and B. Meikap, “In-depth physiochemical characterization and detailed thermo-kinetic study of biomass wastes to analyze its energy potential,” Renew. Energy, vol. 148, pp. 756–771, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.162.Search in Google Scholar
[44] J. Wang, et al.., “Understanding pyrolysis mechanisms of pinewood sawdust and sugarcane bagasse from kinetics and thermodynamics,” Ind. Crops Prod., vol. 177, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114378.Search in Google Scholar
[45] R. K. Singh, T. Patil, D. Pandey, and A. N. Sawarkar, “Pyrolysis of mustard oil residue: a kinetic and thermodynamic study,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 339, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125631.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[46] R. D. J. Subagyono, et al.., “Pyrolysis of fast growing wood Macaranga gigantea: product characterisation and kinetic study,” Fuel, vol. 315, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123182.Search in Google Scholar
[47] X. Yuan, T. He, H. Cao, and Q. Yuan, “Cattle manure pyrolysis process: kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods,” Renew. Energy, vol. 107, pp. 489–496, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.026.Search in Google Scholar
[48] C. Chen, B. Qu, W. Wang, W. Wang, G. Ji, and A. Li, “Rice husk and rice straw torrefaction: properties and pyrolysis kinetics of raw and torrefied biomass,” Environ. Technol. & Innovat., vol. 24, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101872.Search in Google Scholar
[49] S. Clemente-Castro, A. Palma, M. Ruiz-Montoya, I. Giráldez, and M. Díaz, “Pyrolysis kinetic, thermodynamic and product analysis of different leguminous biomasses by Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 162, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105457.Search in Google Scholar
[50] P. Parthasarathy, et al.., “Thermogravimetric analysis of camel dung, date stone, and their blend for pyrolytic, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies,” Clean. Chem. Eng., vol. 4, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clce.2022.100072.Search in Google Scholar
[51] G. Gözke, “Kinetic and thermodynamic analyses based on thermogravimetric pyrolysis of watermelon seed by isoconversional and master plots methods,” Renew. Energy, vol. 201, pp. 916–927, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.100.Search in Google Scholar
[52] H. I. Mohammed, K. Garba, S. I. Ahmed, and L. G. Abubakar, “Thermodynamics and kinetics of Doum (Hyphaene thebaica) shell using thermogravimetric analysis: a study on pyrolysis pathway to produce bioenergy,” Renew. Energy, vol. 200, pp. 1275–1285, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.042.Search in Google Scholar
[53] A. Inayat, et al.., “Thermal degradation characteristics, kinetic and thermodynamic analyses of date palm surface fibers at different heating rates,” Fuel, vol. 335, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127076.Search in Google Scholar
[54] X. Guo, Z. Xu, X. Zheng, X. Jin, and J. Cai, “Understanding pyrolysis mechanisms of corn and cotton stalks via kinetics and thermodynamics,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 164, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105521.Search in Google Scholar
[55] A. Jagtap and S. Kalbande, “Investigation on pyrolysis kinetics and thermodynamic parameters of soybean straw: a comparative study using model-free methods,” Biomass Convers. Bioref., pp. 1–12, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02228-9.Search in Google Scholar
[56] H. Alhumade, et al.., “Exploration of the bioenergy potential of Dactyloctenium aegyptium through pyrolysis, kinetics, and thermodynamic parameters to produce clean fuels and biochemicals,” Fuel, vol. 341, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127663.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Toxicological assessment of reactive blue 19 dye aqueous solutions under UV-LED light
- Enhanced degradation of malachite green through heterogeneous processes using an iron oxide catalyst
- Optimization design of a two-step microreactor with spiral structure for high-performance catalytic reactions
- Kinetics of manganese removal from groundwater via biological activated carbon fiber
- Study of temperature dynamics and influencing factors during composting process
- Nonlocal modeling of continuously stirred tank reactors with residence time distribution
- Enhanced tribological performance of transesterified corn oil biodiesel blends with CuO and TiO2 nanoparticles: experimental analysis on wear and friction reduction using environment friendly lubricants
- Maximum sensitivity constrained modified Smith predictor for delayed integrating type stirred tank reactors model
- Effect of ion exchange resin membranes and activated carbon electrodes in water desalination using capacitive deionization technique with saline streams
- Kinetic and thermodynamic study of maize stalk biomass using thermogravimetric analysis
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Toxicological assessment of reactive blue 19 dye aqueous solutions under UV-LED light
- Enhanced degradation of malachite green through heterogeneous processes using an iron oxide catalyst
- Optimization design of a two-step microreactor with spiral structure for high-performance catalytic reactions
- Kinetics of manganese removal from groundwater via biological activated carbon fiber
- Study of temperature dynamics and influencing factors during composting process
- Nonlocal modeling of continuously stirred tank reactors with residence time distribution
- Enhanced tribological performance of transesterified corn oil biodiesel blends with CuO and TiO2 nanoparticles: experimental analysis on wear and friction reduction using environment friendly lubricants
- Maximum sensitivity constrained modified Smith predictor for delayed integrating type stirred tank reactors model
- Effect of ion exchange resin membranes and activated carbon electrodes in water desalination using capacitive deionization technique with saline streams
- Kinetic and thermodynamic study of maize stalk biomass using thermogravimetric analysis