Home An intelligent dynamic setting control framework for a multimode impurity removal process
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An intelligent dynamic setting control framework for a multimode impurity removal process

  • Bei Sun , Weiyang Chen ORCID logo , Yonggang Li EMAIL logo , Xulong Zhang and Guoxin Liu
Published/Copyright: September 22, 2022

Abstract

The main task of the impurity removal process is to control the oxidation reduction potential (ORP) within the range of the optimized set value. The impurity removal process is essentially an oxidation-reduction process. Oxidation reduction potential (ORP) is an external reflection of reaction state inside the impurity removal reactor. However, actual industry is time-varying, nonlinear and multimode. It is difficult to determine the appropriate dosage of impurity remover in practice. This will lead to large fluctuations in the operation mode, affecting the safety and stability of the process and the final product quality. To solve these problems, an intelligent dynamic setting control framework (IDSCF) for the multimode impurity removal process is proposed in this paper. It includes a preset module of the dosage of impurity remover based on impurity remover utilization (IRU) estimation, an operation mode detection module based on autoencoder, a normal mode adjustment module based on fuzzy logic, and an unsteady mode adjustment module based on case-based reasoning (CBR). The framework can determine the reasonable preset dosage of impurity remover and adjust the dosage according to the current operation mode of the impurity removal process. Because the operation mode is related to the residual dosage of impurity remover added over a period of time, that is, the accumulative effect of the large-scale metallurgical reactor. When calculating the preset dosage of impurity remover, the reactant accumulation ratio (RAR) is calculated, which makes the calculation of the preset value more reasonable. In addition, it can detect the unsteady modes causing large fluctuations in the process and adjust them in time. Experiments are carried out in accordance with the data of an actual cobalt removal process. The results show that this method can effectively improve the stability of the impurity removal process, control the ORP within the set range and cope with complex mode changes.


Corresponding author: Yonggang Li, School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China, E-mail:

Funding source: National key research and development program

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2020YFB1713700

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61973321

Funding source: Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges NSFC

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61860206014

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was financially supported by the National key research and development program (Grant No. 2020YFB1713700), the Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges NSFC (Grant No. 61860206014) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61973321).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Bøckman, O., and T. Østvold. 2000. “Products Formed during Cobalt Cementation on Zinc in Zinc Sulfate Electrolytes.” Hydrometallurgy 54: 65–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-386x(99)00059-6.Search in Google Scholar

Chai, T. Y., J. L. Ding, and F. H. Wu. 2011. “Hybrid Intelligent Control for Optimal Operation of Shaft Furnace Roasting Process.” Control Engineering Practice 19: 264–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2010.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

Chai, T. Y., S. J. Qin, and H. Wang. 2014. “Optimal Operational Control for Complex Industrial Processes.” Annual Reviews in Control 38: 81–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2014.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, J. H., and T. C. Huang. 2004. “Applying Neural Networks to Online Updated PID Controllers for Nonlinear Process Control.” Journal of Process Control 14: 211–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-1524(03)00039-8.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Z., C. K. Yeo, B. S. Lee, and C. T. Lau. 2018. “Autoencoder Based Network Anomaly Detection.” In Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS), 1–5. Phoenix, AZ, USA: IEEE.10.1109/WTS.2018.8363930Search in Google Scholar

Corrigan, J., and J. Zhang. 2020. “Integrating Dynamic Slow Feature Analysis with Neural Networks for Enhancing Soft Sensor Performance.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 139: 106842, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106842.Search in Google Scholar

Cui, M. L., Y. Q. Wang, X. S. Lin, and M. Y. Zhong. 2020. “Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearings Based on an Improved Stack Autoencoder and Support Vector Machine.” IEEE Sensors Journal 21: 4927–37, https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2020.3030910.Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, C. R., and B. L. Ramaker. 1980. “Dynamic Matrix Control? A Computer Control Algorithm.” Joint Automatic Control Conference 17: 72.Search in Google Scholar

Esfandyari, M., M. A. Fanaei, and H. Zohreie. 2013. “Adaptive Fuzzy Tuning of PID Controllers.” Neural Computing & Applications 23: 19–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1215-8.Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Z. X., Y. G. Li, B. Sun, C. H. Yang, H. Q. Zhu, and Z. S. Chen. 2021. “A Trend Based Event Triggering Fuzzy Controller for the Stabilizing Control of a Large Scale Zinc Roaster.” Journal of Process Control 97: 59–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.11.009.Search in Google Scholar

Flores-Hernández, A. A., J. Reyes-Reyes, C. M. Astorga-Zaragoza, G. L. Osorio-Gordillo, and C. D. García-Beltrán. 2018. “Temperature Control of an Alcoholic Fermentation Process through the Takagi–Sugeno Modeling.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 140: 320–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.10.021.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, Y. J., F. J. Muzzio, and M. G. Ierapetritou. 2012. “A Review of the Residence Time Distribution (RTD) Applications in Solid Unit Operations.” Powder Technology 228: 416–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.05.060.Search in Google Scholar

Gers, F. A., and J. Schmidhuber. 2000. “Recurrent Nets that Time and Count.” In Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN 2000. Neural Computing: New Challenges and Perspectives for the New Millennium, Vol. 3, 189–94. Como, Italy: IEEE.10.1109/IJCNN.2000.861302Search in Google Scholar

Gui, W. H., C. H. Yang, Y. G. Li, J. J. He, and L. Z. Yin. 2009. “Data Driven Operational Pattern Optimization for Copper Flash Smelting Process.” Acta Automatica Sinica 35: 717–24, https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1004.2009.00717.Search in Google Scholar

Hochreiter, S., and J. Schmidhuber. 1997. “Long Short-Term Memory.” Neural Computation 9: 1735–80, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Jia, Q., J. Cai, X. Y. Jiang, and S. J. Li. 2020. “A Subspace Ensemble Regression Model Based Slow Feature for Soft Sensing Application.” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 28: 3061–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.07.047.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S., K. E. Kim, E. K. Park, S. W. Song, and S. Jung. 2007. “Estimation Methods for Efficiency of Additive in Removing Impurity in Hydrometallurgical Purification Process.” Hydrometallurgy 89: 242–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.07.009.Search in Google Scholar

Kumari, S., P. Aryan, and G. L. Raja. 2021. “Design and Simulation of a Novel FOIMC-PD/P Double-Loop Control Structure for CSTRs and Bioreactors.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 19: 1287–303, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0140.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, F. L., W. K. Tim, L. Z. Wang, and Z. X. Li. 1999. “Deadzone Compensation in Motion Control Systems Using Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Control.” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 7: 731–42, https://doi.org/10.1109/87.799674.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, L., and J. Q. Zeng. 2021. “Consideration of Green Intelligent Steel Processes and Narrow Window Stability Control Technology on Steel Quality.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials 28: 1264–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2246-2.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, X., Y. B. Si, Z. Yuan, Y. H. Qin, and Y. Q. Wang. 2020. “Multistep Dynamic Slow Feature Analysis for Industrial Process Monitoring.” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 69: 9535–48, https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2020.3004681.Search in Google Scholar

Mamdani, E. H. 1974. “Application of Fuzzy Algorithms for Control of Simple Dynamic Plant.” Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers 121: 1585–8, https://doi.org/10.1049/piee.1974.0328.Search in Google Scholar

Mani, M., M. Deivasigamani, R. C. Panda, and R. N. Ramasami. 2022. “Modelling, Control and Supervisory Optimization of Generalized Predictive Control in Catalytic Cracking Reactor.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 20 (7): 713–22, doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0172.Search in Google Scholar

Näsi, J. 2004. “Statistical Analysis of Cobalt Removal from Zinc Electrolyte Using the Arsenic Activated Process.” Hydrometallurgy 73: 123–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2003.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. D., K. P. Tran, S. Thomassey, and M. Hamad. 2021. “Forecasting and Anomaly Detection Approaches Using LSTM and LSTM Autoencoder Techniques with the Applications in Supply Chain Management.” International Journal of Information Management 57: 102282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102282.Search in Google Scholar

Riehalet, J., A. Rault, J. L. Testud, and J. Papon. 1978. “Model Predictive Heuristic Control: Applications to Industrial Processes.” Automatica 14: 413–28.10.1016/0005-1098(78)90001-8Search in Google Scholar

Rodrigues, A. E. 2021. “Residence Time Distribution (RTD) Revisited.” Chemical Engineering Science 230: 116188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.116188.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Sarhadi, P., B. Rezaie, and Z. Rahmani. 2016. “Adaptive Predictive Control Based on Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System for a Class of Nonlinear Industrial Processes.” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 61: 132–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.03.019.Search in Google Scholar

Schank, R. C. 1983. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. USA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shang, C., F. Yang, X. Q. Gao, X. L. Huang, J. A. Suykens, and D. Huang. 2015. “Concurrent Monitoring of Operating Condition Deviations and Process Dynamics Anomalies with Slow Feature Analysis.” AIChE Journal 61: 3666–82, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14888.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, L. 2015. “Integration of Optimization and Model Predictive Control of an Intensified Continuous Three-phase Catalytic Reactor.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 13: 51–62, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2014-0101.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, B., W. H. Gui, T. B. Wu, Y. L. Wang, and C. H. Yang. 2013. “An Integrated Prediction Model of Cobalt Ion Concentration Based on Oxidation Reduction Potential.” Hydrometallurgy 140: 102–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.09.015.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, B., W. H. Gui, Y. L. Wang, and C. H. Yang. 2014. “Intelligent Optimal Setting Control of a Cobalt Removal Process.” Journal of Process Control 24: 586–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, B., J. T. Dai, K. K. Huang, C. H. Yang, and W. H. Gui. 2022. “Smart Manufacturing of Nonferrous Metallurgical Processes: Review and Perspectives.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials 29: 611–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-022-2448-x.Search in Google Scholar

Stéphane, N., and L. L. J. Marc. 2008. “Case-based Reasoning for Chemical Engineering Design.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 86: 648–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2008.02.011.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, I. 1999. “Case Based Reasoning Is a Methodology Not a Technology.” In Research and Development in Expert Systems XV, 213–23. London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-0835-1_15Search in Google Scholar

Wiskott, L., and T. J. Sejnowski. 2002. “Slow Feature Analysis: Unsupervised Learning of Invariances.” Neural Computation 14: 715–70, https://doi.org/10.1162/089976602317318938.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Yin, R. Y. 2021. “Review on the Study of Metallurgical Process Engineering.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials 28: 1253–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2220-z.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Y., X. S. Si, C. H. Hu, and J. X. Zhang. 2019. “A Review of Recurrent Neural Networks: LSTM Cells and Network Architectures.” Neural Computation 31: 1235–70, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01199.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zadeh, L. A. 1973. “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-3: 28–44, https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1973.5408575.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, B., C. H. Yang, Y. G. Li, X. L. Wang, H. Q. Zhu, and W. H. Gui. 2016. “Additive Requirement Ratio Prediction Using Trend Distribution Features for Hydrometallurgical Purification Processes.” Control Engineering Practice 46: 10–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2015.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, B., C. H. Yang, H. Q. Zhu, P. Shi, and W. H. Gui. 2017. “Controllable Domain Based Fuzzy Rule Extraction for Copper Removal Process Control.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 26: 1744–56, https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2017.2751000.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, P., T. Y. Chai, and J. Sun. 2012. “Intelligence Based Supervisory Control for Optimal Operation of a DCS Controlled Grinding System.” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 21: 162–75, https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2012.2182996.Search in Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. G., and N. B. Nichols. 1942. “Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers.” Transactions of the ASME 65: 433–44.10.1115/1.4019264Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-01
Accepted: 2022-09-11
Published Online: 2022-09-22

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2022-0116/html
Scroll to top button