Home Effect of flue gas components on the NO removal and element mercury oxidation performance of Mn-modified low-temperature catalyst
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of flue gas components on the NO removal and element mercury oxidation performance of Mn-modified low-temperature catalyst

  • Guangwei Shi , Meng Liu EMAIL logo , Yufeng Duan , Peng Hu , Tao Li and Yinsheng Li
Published/Copyright: June 28, 2021

Abstract

The development of a low-temperature water and sulfur-resistant catalyst with high efficiency of NO removal and element mercury Hg(0) oxidation performance is one of the main directions for the synergistic removal of multiple pollutants from flue gas. The transition metal Mn is used to modify the V-W/Ti catalyst to prepare a modified Mn-SCR catalyst. The effects of Mn loading and complex flue gas components (SO2, H2O and HCl) on the modified catalysts activity were investigated on a small fixed-bed experimental bench, respectively. As the Mn loading increases, the acid sites on the catalyst surface are significantly enhanced, the window of NO removal temperature is significantly widened, and the Hg(0) oxidation performance is nearly 100%. The optimal loading amount of Mn is 0.2(Mn/Ti, mol). When the Mn loading exceeds 0.2, the particles on the catalyst surface sinter, and the specific surface area decreases. However, little difference is observed in catalyst activity. When SO2 and H2O are present in the flue gas, dual-action catalyst activity can be significantly suppressed, but the effect of H2O on catalyst activity is greater than that of SO2. With the increase of the HCl concentration from 0 ppm to 50 ppm, the oxidation efficiency of Hg(0) and the removal efficiency of NO increased slightly.


Corresponding author: Meng Liu, Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2016YFB0600604-02

Funding source: Transformation of Scientific Achievements in Jiangsu Province

Award Identifier / Grant number: SBA2018020041

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This project was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0600604-02) and the Special Funds for Transformation of Scientific Achievements in Jiangsu Province (SBA2018020041).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

Al-Kandari, H., F. Al-Kharafi, N. Al-Awadi, O. M. El-Dusouqui, and A. Katrib. 2006. “Surface Electronic Structure–Catalytic Activity Relationship of Partially Reduced WO3 Bulk or Deposited on TiO2.” Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 151 (2): 128–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2005.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Amiridis, M. D., R. V. Duevel, and I. E. Wachs. 1999. “The Effect of Metal Oxide Additives on the Activity of V2O5/TiO2 Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide by Ammonia.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 20 (2): 111–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-3373(98)00101-5.Search in Google Scholar

Boningari, T., and R. Koirala. 2013. “Low-Temperature Catalytic Reduction of NO by NH3 over Vanadia-Based Nanoparticles Prepared by Flame-Assisted Spray Pyrolysis: Influence of Various Supports.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 140–1: 289–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.033.Search in Google Scholar

Busca, G., L. Lietti, G. Ramis, and F. Berti. 1998. “Chemical and Mechanistic Aspects of the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by Ammonia over Oxide Catalysts: A Review.” Applied Catalysis BEnvironmental 18 (1–2): 1–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-3373(98)00040-x.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, J., X. Chen, X. Chen, W. Xu, Z. Xu, H. Jia, and J. Chen. 2018. “Homogeneous Introduction of CeOy into MnOx-Based Catalyst for Oxidation of Aromatic VOCs.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 224: 825–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.036.Search in Google Scholar

Du, X., X. Gao, L. Cui, Z. Zheng, P. Ji, Z. Luo, and K. F. Cen. 2013. “Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Influence of Water Vapor on the Performance of a Ce-Cu-Ti Oxide SCR Catalyst.” Applied Surface Science 270: 370–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.032.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, W, Q Liu, C-Y Wu, H Li, Y Li, J Yang, and G Wu. 2013. “Kinetics of Mercury Oxidation in the Presence of Hydrochloric Acid and Oxygen over a Commercial SCR Catalyst.” Chemical Engineering Journal 220: 53–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.062.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, F., X. Tang, H. Yi, S. Zhao, C. Li, J. Li, Y. Shi, and X. Meng. 2017. “A Review on Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3 over Mn-Based Catalysts at Low Temperatures: Catalysts, Mechanisms, Kinetics and DFT Calculations.” Catalysts 7 (7): 199, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7070199.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, C., J. W. Shi, Z. Fan, G. Gao, and C. Niu. 2018. “Sulfur and Water Resistance of Mn-Based Catalysts for Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx: A Review.” Catalysts 8 (1): 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8010011.Search in Google Scholar

Gong, X., F. Ye, R. Liu, H. Guan, L. Ji, and M. Yang. 2015. “Low-temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction with NH3 over MnOx-CeO2 Catalysts Supported on Nano Tetragonal-phase Zirconia.” Journal of Functional Materials 46 (10): 10090–4.Search in Google Scholar

He, S., J. Zhou, Y. Zhu, Z. Luo, M. Ni, and K. Cen. 2009. “Mercury Oxidation over a Vanadia-Based Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalyst.” Energy and Fuels 23 (1-2): 253–9, https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800730f.Search in Google Scholar

He, J., G. K. Reddy, S. W. Thiel, P. G. Smirniotis, and N. G. Pinto. 2013. “Simultaneous Removal of Elemental Mercury and NO from Flue Gas Using CeO2 Modified MnOx/TiO2 Materials.” Energy and Fuels 27 (8): 4832–9, https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400718n.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, H., S. Cai, H. Li, L. Huang, L. Shi, and D. Zhang. 2015. “Mechanistic Aspects of deNOx Processing over TiO2 Supported Co–n Oxide Catalysts: Structure–Activity Relationships and In Situ DRIFTs Analysis.” ACS Catalysis 5 (10): 6069–77, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b01039.Search in Google Scholar

Inturi, S. N. R., T. Boningari, M. Suidan, and P. G. Smirniotis. 2014. “Visible-light-induced Photodegradation of Gas Phase Acetonitrile Using Aerosol-Made Transition Metal (V, Cr, Fe, Co, Mn, Mo, Ni, Cu, Y, Ce, and Zr) Doped TiO2.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 144: 333–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.032.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, M., E. D. Park, J. M. Kim, and J. E. Yie. 2007. “Manganese Oxide Catalysts for NOx Reduction with NH3 at Low Temperatures.” Applied Catalysis A: General 327 (2): 261–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.05.024.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, S. M., and S. C. Hong. 2015. “Promotional Effect of Vanadium on the Selective Catalytic Oxidation of NH3 to N2 over Ce/V/TiO2 Catalyst.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 163: 30–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.043.Search in Google Scholar

Li, J., N. Yan, Z. Qu, S. Qiao, S. Yang, Y. Guo, P. Liu, and J. Jia. 2010. “Catalytic Oxidation of Elemental Mercury over the Modified Catalyst Mn/α-Al2O3 at Lower Temperatures.” Environmental Science and Technology 44 (1): 426–31.https://doi.org/10.1021/es9021206.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Li, H., C. Y. Wu, Y. Li, and J. Zhang. 2012. “Superior Activity of MnOx-CeO2/TiO2 Catalyst for Catalytic Oxidation of Elemental Mercury at Low Flue Gas Temperatures.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 111-112: 381–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.10.021.Search in Google Scholar

Li, J., J. Chen, Y. Yu, and C. He. 2015. “Fe–Mn–Ce/ceramic Powder Composite Catalyst for Highly Volatile Elemental Mercury Removal in Simulated Coal-Fired Flue Gas.” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 25: 352–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

Li, H., Y. Wang, S. Wang, X. Wang, and J. Hu. 2017. “Removal of Elemental Mercury in Flue Gas at Lower Temperatures over Mn-Ce Based Materials Prepared by Co-precipitation.” Fuel 208: 576–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.061.Search in Google Scholar

Li, X., H. Wang, G. Shao, G. Wang, and L. Lu. 2019. “Low Temperature Reduction of NO by Activated Carbons Impregnated with Fe Based Catalysts.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (36): 25265–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.008.Search in Google Scholar

Meng, J., Y. Duan, P. Hu, Y. Xu, X. Geng, T. Yao, S. Ren, and H. Wei. 2019. “Simultaneous Removal of Elemental Mercury and NO from Simulated Flue Gas at Low Temperatures over Mn–V–W/TiO2 Catalysts.” Energy and Fuels 33 (9): 8896–906, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01503.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, H. Y., R. G. Minet, S. W. Benson, and T. T. Tsotsis. 1994. “Process for Converting Hydrogen Chloride to Chlorine.” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 33 (12): 2996–3003, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00036a014.Search in Google Scholar

Park, K. H., S. M. Lee, S. S. Kim, D. W. Kwon, and S. C. Hong. 2013. “Reversibility of Mn Valence State in MnOx/TiO2 Catalysts for Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction for NO with NH3.” Catalysis Letters 143 (3): 246–53, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-012-0952-8.Search in Google Scholar

Sliger, R. N., J. C. Kramlich, and N. M. Marinov. 2000. “Towards the Development of a Chemical Kinetic Model for the Homogeneous Oxidation of Mercury by Chlorine Species.” Fuel Processing Technology 65: 423–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00108-3.Search in Google Scholar

Smirniotis, P. G., P. M. Sreekanth, D. A. Pena, and R. G. Jenkins. 2006. “Manganese Oxide Catalysts Supported on TiO2, Al2O3, and SiO2: A Comparison for Low-Temperature SCR of NO with NH3.” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 45 (19): 6436–43, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060484t.Search in Google Scholar

Sultana, A., M. Sasaki, and H. Hamada. 2012. “Influence of Support on the Activity of Mn Supported Catalysts for SCR of NO with Ammonia.” Catalysis Today 185 (1): 284–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.09.018.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, T., J. Xu, R. Lu, J. Wo, and X. Xu. 2010. “Enhanced Hg2+ Removal and Hg0 Re-emission Control from Wet Fuel Gas Desulfurization Liquors with Additives.” Fuel 89 (12): 3613–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.045.Search in Google Scholar

Tian, Z. Y., P. H. Tchoua Ngamou, V. Vannier, K. Kohse-Höinghaus, and N. Bahlawane. 2012. “Catalytic Oxidation of VOCs over Mixed Co–mn Oxides.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 117-118: 125–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.01.013.Search in Google Scholar

Trawczyński, J., B. Bielak, and W. Miśta. 2005. “Oxidation of Ethanol over Supported Manganese Catalysts—Effect of the Carrier.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 55 (4): 277–85.10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Wang, P., S. Su, J. Xiang, H. You, F. Cao, L. Sun, S. Hu, and Y. Zhang. 2014. “Catalytic Oxidation of Hg0 by MnOx–CeO2/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst at Low Temperatures.” Chemosphere 101: 49–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.034.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Wang, F., B. Shen, S. Zhu, and Z. Wang. 2019. “Promotion of Fe and Co Doped Mn-Ce/TiO2 Catalysts for Low Temperature NH3-SCR with SO2 Tolerance.” Fuel 249: 54–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.113.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Y., W. Xu, Y. Yang, J. Wang, and T. Zhu. 2018. “Support Effect of Mn-Based Catalysts for Gaseous Elemental Mercury Oxidation and Adsorption.” Catalysis Science and Technology 8 (1): 297–306.https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cy02175e.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, J., Q. Yang, J. Sun, Q. Liu, D. Zhao, W. Gao, and L. Liu. 2015. “Effects of Mercury Oxidation on V2O5–WO3/TiO2 Catalyst Properties in NH3-SCR Process.” Catalysis Communications 59: 78–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2014.09.049.Search in Google Scholar

Yao, X., R. Zhao, L. Chen, J. Du, C. Tao, F. Yang, and L. Dong. 2017. “Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3 over CeO2 Supported on TiO2: Comparison of Anatase, Brookite, and Rutile.” Applied Catalysis BEnvironmental 208: 82–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.060.Search in Google Scholar

Ye, D., R. Qu, H. Song, C. Zheng, X. Gao, Z. Luo, M. Ni, and K. Cen. 2016. “Investigation of the Promotion Effect of WO3 on the Decomposition and Reactivity of NH4HSO4 with NO on V2O5–WO3/TiO2 SCR Catalysts.” RSC Advances 6 (60): 55584–92, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra09072a.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Y. Zhao, J. Yang, J. Zhang, and C. Zheng. 2018. “Fe-modified MnOx/TiO2 as the SCR Catalyst for Simultaneous Removal of NO and Mercury from Coal Combustion Flue Gas.” Chemical Engineering Journal 348: 618–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.037.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, B., X. Liu, Z. Zhou, H. Shao, and M. Xu. 2016. “Catalytic Oxidation of Elemental Mercury by Mn-Mo/CNT at Low Temperature.” Chemical Engineering Journal 284: 1233–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.090.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, B., H. Yi, X. Tang, Q. Li, D. Liu, and F. Gao. 2019. “Using CuO-MnOx/AC-H as Catalyst for Simultaneous Removal of Hg Degrees and NO from Coal-Fired Flue Gas.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 364: 700–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhi, B., H. Ding, D. Wang, Y. Cao, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Liu, and Q. Huo. 2014. “Ordered Mesoporous MnO2 as a Synergetic Adsorbent for Effective Arsenic(iii) Removal.” Journal of Materials Chemistry 2 (7): 2374–82, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta13790b.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, H. 2017. Study on Low-Temperature Denitrification Performance f Mn-Ce/ETS-10 Catalyst. PhD Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, N., W. Shan, Y. Shan, J. Du, Z. Lian, Y. Zhang, and H. He. 2020. “Effects of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metals on Cu-SSZ-39 Catalyst for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3.” Chemical Engineering Journal 388: 124250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124250.Search in Google Scholar

Zong, L., F. Dong, G. Zhang, W. Han, Z. Tang, and J. Zhang. 2017. “Highly Efficient Mesoporous V2O5/WO3–TiO2 Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx: Effect of the Valence of V on the Catalytic Performance.” Catalysis Surveys from Asia 21 (3): 103–13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-017-9229-y.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-09
Accepted: 2021-06-16
Published Online: 2021-06-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0051/pdf
Scroll to top button