Abstract
The hydrogen removal and carbon formation effects in dense palladium (Pd)-based membrane reactors for dry reforming of methane (DRM) performance is numerically analyzed in this study. The steady-state membrane reactor operation is described using a three-dimensional, heterogeneous, non-isothermal mathematical model. Based on the numerical simulation results for reaction temperature and pressure varied in the 400–600 °C and 1–30 atm ranges, methane conversion and hydrogen yield were found enhanced using the membrane reactor. However, carbon formation, which affects catalyst activity and limits the benefits of using a membrane reactor is also enhanced. A parametric study using reaction pressure as the primary parameter for the membrane reactor operation found that the CH4 conversion, hydrogen yield, H2 recovery, and carbon formation can be enhanced by increasing the reaction temperature, inlet CO2/CH4 ratio, and sweep gas flow rate. With the enhanced H2 removal, carbon formation is also enhanced. Because membrane permeance is inversely proportional to the membrane thickness, membrane thickness can be used as a parameter to control the carbon formation under given operating conditions.
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
Aresta, M., A. Dibenedetto, and E. Quaranta. 2016. “State of the Art and Perspectives in Catalytic Processes for CO2 Conversion into Chemicals and Fuels: The Distinctive Contribution of Chemical Catalysis and Biotechnology.” Journal of Catalysis 343: 2–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.04.003.Search in Google Scholar
Atkins, P. W. 1993. The Elements of Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baek, S. M., J. H. Kang, K. J. Lee, and J. H. Nam. 2014. “A Numerical Study of the Effectiveness Factors of Nickel Catalyst Pellets Used in Steam Methane Reforming for Residential Fuel Cell Applications.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39: 9180–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.067.Search in Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, P., I. Bajaj, and M. M. F. Hasan. 2018. “Simulation and Optimization of Reforming Reactors for Carbon Dioxide Utilization Using both Rigorous and Reduced Models.” Journal CO₂ Utilization 23: 80–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.10.014.Search in Google Scholar
Bird, R. B., W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot. 2005. Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Borgnakke, C. and R. E. Sonntag. 2009. Fundamentals of Thermodynamics. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Bosko, M. L., J. F. Múnera, E. A. Lombardo, and L. M. Cornaglia. 2010. “Dry Reforming of Methane in Membrane Reactors Using Pd and Pd-Ag Composite Membranes on a NaA Zeolite Modified Porous Stainless Steel Support.” Journal of Membrane Science 364: 17–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.039.Search in Google Scholar
Chein, R. Y., Y. C. Chen, and J. N. Chung. 2015a. “Sweep Gas Flow Effect on Membrane Reactor Performance for Hydrogen Production from High-Temperature Water-Gas Shift Reaction.” Journal of Membrane Science 475: 193–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.046.Search in Google Scholar
Chein, R. Y., Y. C. Chen, C. T. Yu, and J. N. Chung. 2015b. “Thermodynamic Analysis of Dry Reforming of CH4 with CO2 at High Pressures.” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 26: 617–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.07.001.Search in Google Scholar
Chein, R. Y., W. H. Hsu, and C. T. Yu. 2017. “Parametric Study of Catalytic Dry Reforming of Methane for Syngas Production at Elevated Pressures.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42: 14485–500, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.110.Search in Google Scholar
Chein, R. Y., and W. Y. Fung. 2019. “Syngas Production via Dry Reforming of Methane over CeO2 Modified Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44: 14303–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.113.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, X., J. Jiang, K. Li, S. Tian, and F. Yan. 2017. “Energy-efficient Biogas Reforming Process to Produce Syngas: The Enhanced Methane Conversion by O2.” Applied Energy 185: 687–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.114.Search in Google Scholar
Chiappetta, G., G. Clarizia, and E. Drioli. 2008. “Theoretical Analysis of the Effect of Catalyst Mass Distribution and Operation Parameters on the Performance of a Pd-Based Membrane Reactor for Water-Gas Shift Reaction.” Chemical Engineering Journal 136: 373–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.036.Search in Google Scholar
Chotirach, M., S. Tantayanon, S. Tungasmita, and K. Kriausakul. 2012. “Zr-based Intermetallic Diffusion Barriers for Stainless Steel Supported Palladium Membranes.” Journal of Membrane Science 405–406: 92–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.055.Search in Google Scholar
Coronel, L., J. F. Múnera, E. A. Lombardo, and L. M. Cornaglia. 2011. “Pd Based Membrane Reactor for Ultrapure Hydrogen Production through the Dry Reforming of Methane. Experimental and Modeling Studies.” Applied Catalysis A: General 400: 185–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.04.030.Search in Google Scholar
De Groote, A. M., and G. F. Froment. 1996. “Simulation of the Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas.” Applied Catalysis A: General 2: 245–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-860x(95)00299-5.Search in Google Scholar
Dębek, R., M. F. G. Ribeiro, A. Fernandes, and M. Motak. 2015. “Ni-Al Hydrotalcite-like Material as the Catalyst Precursors for the Dry Reforming of Methane at Low Temperature.” Comptes Rendus Chimie 18: 1205–10.10.1016/j.crci.2015.04.005Search in Google Scholar
Ding, Y., and E. Alpay. 2000. “Adsorption-enhanced Steam-Methane Reforming.” Chemical Engineering Science 55: 3929–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00597-7.Search in Google Scholar
Fan, M. S., A. Z. Abdullah, and S. Bhatia. 2009. “Catalytic Technology for Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane to Synthesis Gas.” ChemCatChem 1: 192–208, https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.200900025.Search in Google Scholar
Gallucci, F., S. Tosti, and A. Basile. 2008. “Pd-Ag Tubular Membrane Reactors for Methane Dry Reforming: A Reactive Method for CO2 Consumption and H2 Production.” Journal of Membrane Science 317: 96–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.058.Search in Google Scholar
Gao, X., K. Hidajat, and S. Kawi. 2016. “Facile Synthesis of Ni/SiO2 Catalyst by Sequential Hydrogen/Air Treatment: A Superior Anti-Coking Catalyst for Dry Reforming of Methane.” J. CO₂ Util. 15: 146–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2016.05.007.Search in Google Scholar
Jana, P., V. A. de la Peña O‘Shea, J. M. Coronado, and D. P. Serrano. 2013. “H2 Production by CH4 Decomposition over Metallic Cobalt Nanoparticles: Effect of the Catalyst Activation.” Applied Catalysis A: General 467: 371–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.08.004.Search in Google Scholar
Jang, W. J., J. O. Shim, H. M. Kim, S. Y. Yoo, and H. S. Roh. 2019. “A Review on Dry Reforming of Methane in Aspect of Catalytic Properties.” Catalysis Today 324: 15–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.07.032.Search in Google Scholar
Joensen, F., and J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen. 2002. “Conversion of Hydrocarbons and Alcohols for Fuel Cells.” Journal of Power Sources 105: 195–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00939-9.Search in Google Scholar
Karemore, A. L., P. D. Vaidya, R. Sinha, and P. Chugh. 2016. “On the Dry and Mixed Reforming of Methane over Ni/Al2O3- Influence of Reaction Variables on Syngas Production.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41: 22963–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.038.Search in Google Scholar
Kaviany, M. 1991. Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media. New York, USA: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4684-0412-8Search in Google Scholar
Kumar, S., B. Kumar, S. Kumar, and S. Jilani. 2017. “Comparative Modeling Study of Catalytic Membrane Reactor Configurations for Syngas Production by CO2 Reforming of Methane.” Journal CO2 Utilization 20: 336–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.06.004.Search in Google Scholar
Lavoie, J. M. 2014. “Review on Dry Reforming of Methane, A Potentially More Environmentally-Friendly Approach to the Increasing Natural Gas Exploitation.” Frontiers in Chemistry 2: 1–17, https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2014.00081.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, B., S. W. Yun, S. Kim, J. Heo, Y. T. Kim, S. Lee, and H. Lim. 2019. “CO2 Reforming of Methane for H2 Production in a Membrane Reactor as CO2 Utilization: Computational Fluid Dynamics Studies with a Reactor Geometry.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44: 2298–311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.184.Search in Google Scholar
Madia, G. S., G. Barbieri, and E. Drioli. 1999. “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Methane Steam Reforming in a Membrane Reactor.” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 77: 698–706, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450770411.Search in Google Scholar
Mills, A. F. 2001. Mass Transfer. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Pentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Nikoo, M. K., and N. A. S. Amin. 2011. “Thermodynamic Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane in View of Solid Carbon Formation.” Fuel Processing Technology 92: 678–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.027.Search in Google Scholar
Prabhu, A. K., A. Liu, L. G. Lovell, and S. T. Oyama. 2000. “Modeling of the Methane Reforming Reaction in Hydrogen Selective Membrane Reactors.” Journal of Membrane Science 177: 83–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388(00)00449-x.Search in Google Scholar
Samingprai, S., S. Tantayanon, and Y. H. Ma. 2010. “Chromium Oxide Intermetallic Diffusion Barrier for Palladium Membrane Supported on Porous Stainless Steel.” Journal of Membrane Science 347: 8–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.058.Search in Google Scholar
Sarker, S., J. J. Lamb, D. R. Hjelme, and K. M. Lien. 2018. “Overview of Recent Progress towards In-Situ Biogas Upgradation Techniques.” Fuel 226: 686–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.021.Search in Google Scholar
Scarlat, N., J. Dallemand, and F. Fahl. 2018. “Biogas: Developments and Perspectives in Europe.” Renewable Energy 129: 457–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006.Search in Google Scholar
Serrano-Lotina, A., and L. Daza. 2014. “Influence of the Operating Parameters over Dry Reforming of Methane to Syngas.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39: 4089–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.135.Search in Google Scholar
Sieverts, A., and W. Danz. 1936. “Solubilities of D2 and H2 in Palladium.” Abteilung Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 34: 158–59.10.1515/zpch-1936-3412Search in Google Scholar
Snoeck, J. W., G. F. Fromen, and M. Fowles. 2002. “Steam/CO2 Reforming of Methane. Carbon Filament Formation by the Boudouard Reaction and Gasification by CO2, by H2, and by Steam: Kinetic Study.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 41: 4252–65, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010666h.Search in Google Scholar
Sokolov, S., E. V. Kondratenko, M. M. Pohl, A. Barkschat, and U. Rodemerck. 2012. “Stable Low Temperature Dry Reforming of Methane over Mesoporous La2O3–ZrO2 Supported Ni Catalyst.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental s113–114: 19–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.035.Search in Google Scholar
Sumrunronnasak, S., S. Tantayanon, S. Kiatgamolchai, and T. Sukonket. 2016. “Improved Hydrogen Production from Dry Reforming Reaction Using a Catalytic Packed-Bed Membrane Reactor with Ni-Based Catalyst and Dense PdAgCu Alloy Membrane.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41: 2621–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.129.Search in Google Scholar
Usman, M., W. M. A. Wan Daud, and H. F. Abbas. 2015. “Dry Reforming of Methane: Influence of Process Parameters-A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 45: 710–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.026.Search in Google Scholar
Verykios, X. E. 2003. “Catalytic Dry Reforming of Natural Gas for the Production of Chemicals and Hydrogen.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 28: 1045–63.10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00215-XSearch in Google Scholar
Wang, H., X. Duan, X. Liu, G. Ye, X. Gu, K. Zhu, X. Zhou, and W. Yuan. 2018a. “Influence of Tubular Reactor Structure and Operating Conditions on Dry Reforming of Methane.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 139: 39–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.09.019.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Y., L. Yao, S. Wang, D. Mao, and C. Hua. 2018b. “Low-Temperature Catalytic CO2 Dry Reforming of Methane on Ni-Based Catalysts: A Review.” Fuel Processing Technology 169: 199–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.10.007.Search in Google Scholar
Ward, L., and T. Dao. 1999. “Model of Hydrogen Permeation Behavior in Palladium Membranes.” Journal of Membrane Science 153: 211–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388(98)00256-7.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, J., and G. F. Froment. 1989. “Methane Steam Reforming, Methanation and Water-Gas Shift: I. Intrinsic Kinetics.” AIChE Journal 35: 88–96, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690350109.Search in Google Scholar
Yao, L., Y. Wang, J. Shi, H. Xu, W. Shen, and C. Hu. 2017. “The Influence of Reduction Temperature on the Performance of ZrOx/Ni-MnOx/SiO2 Catalyst for Low-Temperature CO2 Reforming of Methane.” Catalysis Today 281: 259–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.05.031.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Performance and microbial community of a novel PVA/iron-carbon (Fe–C) immobilized bioreactor for nitrate removal from groundwater
- Modeling of dry reforming of methane for hydrogen production at low temperatures using membrane reactor
- Formation mechanism and chaotic reinforcement elimination of the mechanical stirring isolated mixed region
- CFD-DEM simulation of powders clogging in a packed bed with lateral inlet
- Degradation of basic violet 16 dye by electro-activated persulfate process from aqueous solutions and toxicity assessment using microorganisms: determination of by-products, reaction kinetic and optimization using Box–Behnken design
- Propargyloligosilazane matrixed composite for high temperature material combining polymer and ceramic properties
- An application of continuous flow microreactor in the synthesis and extraction of rabeprazole
- Numerical study on gas–liquid two-phase flow and mass transfer in a microchannel
- A new two-layer passive micromixer design based on SAR-vortex principles
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Performance and microbial community of a novel PVA/iron-carbon (Fe–C) immobilized bioreactor for nitrate removal from groundwater
- Modeling of dry reforming of methane for hydrogen production at low temperatures using membrane reactor
- Formation mechanism and chaotic reinforcement elimination of the mechanical stirring isolated mixed region
- CFD-DEM simulation of powders clogging in a packed bed with lateral inlet
- Degradation of basic violet 16 dye by electro-activated persulfate process from aqueous solutions and toxicity assessment using microorganisms: determination of by-products, reaction kinetic and optimization using Box–Behnken design
- Propargyloligosilazane matrixed composite for high temperature material combining polymer and ceramic properties
- An application of continuous flow microreactor in the synthesis and extraction of rabeprazole
- Numerical study on gas–liquid two-phase flow and mass transfer in a microchannel
- A new two-layer passive micromixer design based on SAR-vortex principles