Home Residence Time Distribution Studies in a Modified Rotating Packed Disc Contactor: Mathematical Modeling and Validation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Residence Time Distribution Studies in a Modified Rotating Packed Disc Contactor: Mathematical Modeling and Validation

  • Rohit P. Kalnake , D.V.R. Murthy , Akshay Achar and Keyur Raval EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 18, 2020

Abstract

A modified rotating packed disc contactor (RPDC) with the maximum working volume of 65 liter is designed for biological waste water treatment. A hollow disc with radial vanes mounted on the disc was a modified design of this contactor. Stimulus-response experiments were conducted in the contactor to understand liquid mixing behavior under different operating conditions. The recycle stream was also used in the operation of the contactor. Experiments were conducted for different number of discs, rotational speeds and recycle ratios. The disc design and recycle ratio had marked influence on the mixing behavior. An increase in disc rotation and recycle ratio produced a well-mixed flow behavior. Moreover, the surface area available in the RPDC was about 4 times more than the surface area available in a standard rotating biological contactor (RBC) operating at similar conditions. A mathematical model was developed for the flow behavior under recycle and a good agreement was found between the model and experimental results.

Notations

C

Tracer outlet concentration, mg/l

Co

Initial tracer concentration, mg/l

Cm

Tracer concentration at the inlet to first stage, mg/l

Ce

Tracer concentration at the exit of cascade, mg/l

Cn

Tracer concentration from nth stage, mg/l

E(θ)

The distribution function for a residence time

n

Number of stages given by the model.

N

Number of discs.

R

Recycle ratio

RMSE

Root mean square error

SS

Stainless steel

t

Time, h

V1

Total volume of liquid hold, l

V

Volume of each stage in the cascade, l

V0

Volume of mixing compartment at inlet, l

Ve

Volume of splitting compartment at outlet, l

w

Mass of tracer injected as pulse, mg

X

Conductivity of tracer, µS/cm

ʋo

Volumetric flow rate of fresh feed, l/h

ʋr

Volumetric flow rate of recycle feed, l/h

ʋm

Volumetric flow rate of mixed feed, l/h

ʋe

Volumetric flow rate of leaving, l/h

ω

Rotational speed of discs, rpm

ɸ

Constant having the dimesions of mass concentration

τ

Ratio of upper region stage volume to the feed flow rate, V/ʋ0

τ0

Ratio of stage volume to the feed flow rate, V00

θ

Dimensionless time,t/t¯

t¯

Mean residence time of exit age distribution, min−1.

α

Fraction of upper mixing volume in each stage in the model.

β

Fraction of cross flow between upper and lower mixing volumes in each stage in the model.

References

Ando, K., M. Shirahige, T. Fukuda, and K. Endoh. 1981. “Effects of Perforated Partition Plate on Mixing Characteristics of Horizontal Stirred Vessel.” AIChE Journal 27 (4): 599–604.10.1002/aic.690270410Search in Google Scholar

Basha, O. M., and B. I. Morsi. 2018. “Effects of Sparger and Internals Designs on the Local Hydrodynamics in Slurry Bubble Column Reactors Operating under Typical Fischer-Tropsch Process Conditions-I.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 16 (3): 20170058. ISSN (Online) 1542-6580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2017-0058.Search in Google Scholar

Brazil, B. L. 2006. “Performance and Operation of a Rotating Biological Contactor in a Tilapia Recirculating Aquaculture System.” Aquacultural Engineering 34 (3): 261–74.10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Chavan, A., and S. Mukherji. 2008. “Dimensional Analysis for Modeling Oxygen Transfer in Rotating Biological Contactor.” Bioresource Technology 99 (9): 3721–28.10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.021Search in Google Scholar

Cortez, S., P. Teixeira, R. Oliveira, and M. Mota. 2008. “Rotating Biological Contactors: A Review on Main Factors Affecting Performance.” Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology (Online) 7 (2): 155–72.10.1007/s11157-008-9127-xSearch in Google Scholar

Delgado, N., A. Navarro, D. Marino, G. A. Peñuela, and A. Ronco. 2019. “Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products from Domestic Wastewater Using Rotating Biological Contactors.” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 16 (1): 1–10.10.1007/s13762-018-1658-2Search in Google Scholar

Dhanasekaran, S., and T. Karunanithi. 2010. “Axial Mixing in a Novel Perforated Plate Bubble Column.” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 8 (1). ISSN (Online) 1542–6580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.2332.Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Ochoa, F., and E. Gomez. 2009. “Bioreactor Scale-up and Oxygen Transfer Rate in Microbial Processes: An Overview.” Biotechnology Advances 27 (2): 153–76.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Gulhane, M., and P. Ashwin. 2015. “Modified Rotating Biological Contactor Fitted Perforated Baffles.” Journal of Environmental Research and Development 9 (3): 1003–05.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, A. B., and S. K. Gupta. 2001. “Simultaneous Carbon and Nitrogen Removal from High Strength Domestic Wastewater in an Aerobic RBC Biofilm.” Water Research 35 (7): 1714–22.10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00442-5Search in Google Scholar

Hassard, F., J. Biddle, E. Cartmell, B. Jefferson, S. Tyrrel, and T. Stephenson. 2015. “Rotating Biological Contactors for Wastewater Treatment - A Review.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection 94 (C): 285–306.10.1016/j.psep.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Haug, H. F. 1971. “Backmixing in Multistage Agitated Contactors-a Correlation.” AIChE Journal 17 (3): 585–89.10.1002/aic.690170319Search in Google Scholar

Hewawasam, C., N. Matsuura, N. Maharjan, M. Hatamoto, and T. Yamaguchi. 2017. “Oxygen Transfer Dynamics and Nitrification in a Novel Rotational Sponge Reactor.” Biochemical Engineering Journal 128: 162–67.10.1016/j.bej.2017.09.021Search in Google Scholar

Kapdan, I. K., F. Kargi, G. McMullan, and R. Marchant. 2000. “Biological Decolorization of Textile Dyestuff by Coriolus Versicolor in a Packed Column Reactor.” Environmental Technology 21 (2): 231–36.10.1080/09593330.2000.9618905Search in Google Scholar

Kargı, F., and S. Eker. 2002. “Comparison of Performances of Rotating Perforated Tubes and Rotating Biodiscs Biofilm Reactors for Wastewater Treatment.” Process Biochemistry 37 (11): 1201–06.10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00338-7Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. I. N., S. Ghim, and H. O. N. A. M. Chang. 1984. “Residence Time Distribution Analysis In Controllable Flow Conditions : Case Of Rotating Disk Reactor.” Chemical Engineering Science 39 (5): 813–19.10.1016/0009-2509(84)85050-2Search in Google Scholar

Kumaresan, T., and J. B. Joshi. 2006. “Effect of Impeller Design on the Flow Pattern and Mixing in Stirred Tanks.” Chemical Engineering Journal 115 (3): 173–93.10.1016/j.cej.2005.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Leon, M. A., T. A. Nijhuis, J. Van Der Schaaf, and J. C. Schouten. 2014. “Residence Time Distribution and Reaction Rate in the Horizontal Rotating Foam Stirrer Reactor.” Chemical Engineering Science 117: 8–17.10.1016/j.ces.2014.06.016Search in Google Scholar

Levenspiel, O. 1999. “Chemical Reaction Engineering.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 38 (11): 4140–43.10.1021/ie990488gSearch in Google Scholar

Matar, O. K., G. M. Sisoev, and C. J. Lawrence. 2006. “The Flow of Thin Liquid Films over Spinning Discs.” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 84 (6): 625–42.10.1002/cjce.5450840601Search in Google Scholar

Mathure, P., and A. Patwardhan. 2005. “Comparison of Mass Transfer Efficiency in Horizontal Rotating Packed Beds and Rotating Biological Contactors.” Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 80 (4): 413–19.10.1002/jctb.1190Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, L. N., F. I. Hai, A. Dosseto, C. Richardson, W. E. Price, and L. D. Nghiem. 2016. “Continuous Adsorption and Biotransformation of Micropollutants by Granular Activated Carbon-bound Laccase in a Packed-bed Enzyme Reactor.” Bioresource Technology 210: 108–16.10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.014Search in Google Scholar

Ni, X. 1994. “Residence Time Distribution Measurements in a Pulsed Baffled Tube Bundle.” Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research in Process, Environmental AND Clean Technology 59 (3): 213–21.10.1002/jctb.280590302Search in Google Scholar

Patwardhan, A. W. 2003. “Rotating Biological Contactors: A Review.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 42 (10): 2035–51.10.1021/ie0200104Search in Google Scholar

Poon, C. P. C., Y.-L. Chao, and W. J. Mikucki. 1979. “Factors Controlling Rotating Biological Contactor Performance.” Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 51 (3): 601–11.Search in Google Scholar

Raghuraman, J., and Y. B. G. Varma. 1974. “A Stochastic Model for Residence Time and Contact Time Distributions of the Gas in Multistage Fluidised Beds.” Chemical Engineering Science 29 (3): 697–703.10.1016/0009-2509(74)80185-5Search in Google Scholar

Řeháková, M., and Z. Novosad. 1968. “Residence Time Distribution and Fractional Conversion for a Multistage Reactor with Backmixing between Real Stages.” Chemical Engineering Science 23 (2): 139–45.10.1016/0009-2509(68)87058-7Search in Google Scholar

Šíma, J., J. Pocedič, and P. Hasal. 2016. “Decolorization of Reactive Orange 16 in Rotating Drum Biological Contactor.” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4 (4): 4540–48.10.1016/j.jece.2016.10.010Search in Google Scholar

Sirianuntapiboon, S., and T. Tondee. 2000. “Application of Packed Cage RBC System for Treating Waste Water Contaminated with Nitrogenous Compounds.” Thammasat International Journal of Science and Technology 5 (1): 28–39.Search in Google Scholar

Sirivat, A. 1991. “Stability Experiment of Flow between a Stationary and a Rotating Disk.” Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 3 (11): 2664–71.10.1063/1.858156Search in Google Scholar

Vidaurri, F. C., and F. T. Sherk. 1985. “Low Backmixing in Multistage Agitated Contactors Used as Reactors.” AIChE Journal 31 (5): 705–10.10.1002/aic.690310502Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2019-0161).


Received: 2019-09-19
Revised: 2020-01-23
Accepted: 2020-02-03
Published Online: 2020-03-18

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2019-0161/html
Scroll to top button