Home Sulfation and Carbonation Competition in the Treatment of Flue Gas from a Coal-Based Power Plant by Calcium Hydroxide
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sulfation and Carbonation Competition in the Treatment of Flue Gas from a Coal-Based Power Plant by Calcium Hydroxide

  • Josefa Fernández EMAIL logo and M. J. Renedo
Published/Copyright: January 6, 2015

Abstract

In this work, a gas containing CO2 and SO2 at the usual concentrations on the coal combustion flue gas reacted with calcium hydroxide to evaluate and quantify the influence of SO2 on the CO2 capture and vice versa. This influence was quantified with a continuous gas analyzer and by thermogravimetry (TG). Results show that the CO2 retained increases in general as its concentration does and decreases as the SO2 concentration increases. A similar behavior was found for the SO2 retention at different CO2 concentrations being more relevant the influence of the presence of SO2 on the CO2 capture than the opposite one. Results suggest that for a high CO2 capture, SO2 should be eliminated previously. With respect to the reaction process it was found that the desulfurization product clearly identified was CaSO3·½H2O; in the reaction between Ca(OH)2 and CO2, CaCO3 is mainly obtained, the complex CaO·CO2 being another possible product synthesized in low amount. Gas analyzer shows that SO2 and CO2 react simultaneously and that a part of the CaCO3 reacts with the SO2 and releases CO2. Sulfation values calculated by TG and from the gas analyzer are very similar but the amount of CO2 captured is not possible to know clearly by TG due to the synthesis and decomposition of CaCO3 during the process. The study of the evolution of the sorbent porosity in the process reveals that the presence of both acid gases produces a lower blockage of the pores than when only one gas is present probably due to the generation of new pores in the reaction of CaCO3 and SO2.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to MICINN in Spain, National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Innovation, for financial support under Project: MAT2010-18862 and to the University of Cantabria, Project Ref. 51.VP10.64005.

References

1. BOE Núm. 51, 27 de febrero de 2010 Sec. I. Pág. 19123. Real Decreto134/2010, de 12 de febrero.Search in Google Scholar

2. RojeyA, TorpTA. Capture and geological storage of CO2: an overview. Oil Gas Sci Technol2005;60:445.Search in Google Scholar

3. StephensJC, van der ZwaanB. CO2 capture and storage (CCS): exploring the research, development, demonstration and deployment continuum, BCSIA discussion paper, Harvard University, 2005:1–20.Search in Google Scholar

4. IPPC Special Report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

5. MinchenerAJ, McMullanJT. Sustainable clean coal power generation within a European context – the view in 2006. Fuel2007;86:2124.10.1016/j.fuel.2007.01.022Search in Google Scholar

6. SatyapalS, FilburnT, TrelaJ, StrangeJ. Performance and properties of a solid amine sorbent for carbon dioxide removal in space life support applications. Energy Fuels2001;15:250.10.1021/ef0002391Search in Google Scholar

7. VeawapA, TontiwachwuthikulP, ChakmaA. Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in the CO2 absorption process using aqueous amine solutions. Ind Eng Chem Res1999;38:39.10.1021/ie9901630Search in Google Scholar

8. CarterLD. United States carbon sequestration council. Capture and storage of CO2 with other air pollutants. IEA Clean Coal Centre, January 2010.Search in Google Scholar

9. AriasB, CorderoJM, AlonsoM, AbanadesJC. Sulfation rates of cycled CaO particles in the carbonator of a Ca-looping cycle for postcombustion CO2 capture. AIChE J2012;58:2262.10.1002/aic.12745Search in Google Scholar

10. SunP, GraceJR, LimCJ, AnthonyEJ. Removal of CO2 by calcium based sorbents in the presence of SO2. Energy Fuels2007;21:16370.10.1021/ef060329rSearch in Google Scholar

11. ManovicV, AnthonyEJ. Competition of sulfation and carbonation reactions during looping cycles for CO2 capture by CaO-based sorbents. J Phys Chem A2010;114:39974002.10.1021/jp910536wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

12. KramerG, BrunnerCh, KhinastJ, StaudingerG. Reaction of Ca(OH)2 with SO2 at low temperature. Ind Eng Chem Res1997;36:141018.10.1021/ie960628bSearch in Google Scholar

13. GuangGL, KeenerTC, SteinAW, KhangSJ. CO2 reaction with Ca(OH)2 during SO2 removal with convective pass sorbent injection and high temperature filtration. Environ Eng Policy2000;2:4756.10.1007/BF03500906Search in Google Scholar

14. HoC-S, ShihS-M, LeeC-D. Influence of CO2 and O2 on the reaction of Ca(OH)2 under spray-drying flue gas desulfurization conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res1996;35:391519.10.1021/ie9600506Search in Google Scholar

15. LiuC-F, ShihS-M, Tsai-BangH. Effect of SO2 on the reaction of calcium hydroxide with CO2 at low temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Res2010;49:90527.10.1021/ie100924zSearch in Google Scholar

16. FernándezJ, GonzálezF, PesqueraC, BlancoC, RenedoMJ. Study of CO2/sorbent interaction in sorbents prepared with mesoporous support and calcium compounds. Ind Eng Chem Res2010;49:298691.10.1021/ie901815uSearch in Google Scholar

17. RenedoMJ, PesqueraC, GonzálezF, FernándezJ. Use of TG-DSC-MS and gas analyzer data to investigate the reaction of CO2 and SO2 by Ca(OH)2 at low temperature. CET2013;35:73944.Search in Google Scholar

18. SwiftWM, PanekAF, SmithGW, VogelGJ, JonkeAA. Decomposition of calcium sulfate: a review of the literature Technical Report Number: ANL-76–122, Argone National Lab., IL, USA, 1976.Search in Google Scholar

19. RenedoMJ, PesqueraC, GonzálezF, OrtizB, BlancoC, FernándezJ. Evolution of the sorbent structure in the simultaneous retention of CO2 and SO2 by Ca(OH)2. In: The 3rd International Congress of GPE, Kuala-Lumpur, (Malaysia), 2011: 229–20.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-1-6
Published in Print: 2015-6-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2014-0182/pdf
Scroll to top button