Home Medicine Sexual temptation: substance abuse, no sex, safe sex, risky sex, and STDs
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sexual temptation: substance abuse, no sex, safe sex, risky sex, and STDs

  • Toto Sutarso , Thomas Li-Ping Tang EMAIL logo , Denny R. Anerin , Intan W. S. McCartt and Courtney B. Gibson
Published/Copyright: December 23, 2016

Abstract

Background

University students’ substance abuse and risky sex contribute to sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

Purpose

We develop and empirically test a formative theoretical model of sexual temptation involving substance abuse (cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana), safe sexual behavior (use of condom/barrier for oral and vaginal intercourse), risky sexual behavior (unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners), and STDs: gonorrhea, HIV, and genital herpes. We simultaneously explore these constructs, controlling membership in social groups (fraternity/sorority, varsity athlete, and club sports) and perceived norm of substance abuse.

Methods

A total of 687 American university students completed the National College Health Assessment (NCHA). We use structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the goodness of fit between our formative theoretical model and actual data.

Results

Results reveal the following discoveries: membership in campus social groups is positively associated with STDs, whereas perceived norm of peer substance abuse is negatively related to STDs. Under the influence of substance abuse, we test three outcomes of sexual temptation as related to STDs. Those who have no sex do not contract STDs. For those who fall into temptation and have sex, substance abuse is more strongly related to risky sex which leads to STDs than safe sex which does not. Those engaging in risky sex have significantly higher cognitive impairment than those practicing safe sex.

Conclusions

Substance abuse contributes to STDs through risky sex only. Those having risky sex suffer higher cognitive impairment than those practicing safe sex. We provide novel implications to policy makers, practitioners, and researchers.

  1. Compliance with ethical standards, human and animal rights, and informed consent: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from participants in this study.

  2. Funding: The authors received no funding.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

2. Wallace AR, Blood EA, Crosby RA, Shrier LA. Differences in correlates of condom use between young adults and adults attending sexually transmitted infection clinics. Int J Std Aids 2015;26:526–33.10.1177/0956462414545525Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Lau JS, Adams SH, Irwin CE, Ozer EM. Receipt of preventive health services in young adults. J Adolesc Health 2013;52:42–9.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. MacDonald NE, Wells GA, Fisher WA, Warren WK, King MA, et al. High-risk STD/HIV behavior among college students. J Am Med Assoc 1990;263:3155–9.10.1001/jama.1990.03440230051031Search in Google Scholar

5. Reece M, Herbenick D, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, et al. Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States. J Sex Med 2010;7:266–76.10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02017.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Liddon N, Olsen EO, Carter M, Hatfield-Timajchy K. Withdrawal as pregnancy prevention and associated risk factors among US high school students: findings from the 2011 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Contraception 2016;93:126–32.10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Chesson H, Harrison P, Kassler WJ. Sex under the influence: the effect of alcohol policy on sexually transmitted disease rates in the United States. J Law Econ 2000;43:215–38.10.1086/467453Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Huebner AJ, Howell LW. Examining the relationship between adolescent sexual risk-taking and perceptions of monitoring, communication, and parenting styles. J Adolesc Health 2003;33:71–8.10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00141-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Tolou-Shams M, Conrad S, Louis A, Suford SH, Brown LK. HIV testing among non-incarcerated substance-abusing juvenile offenders. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2015;27:467–9.10.1515/ijamh-2014-0052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Guo J, Chung IJ, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, et al. Developmental relationships between adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in young adulthood. J Adolesc Health 2002;31:354–62.10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00402-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Seth P, Sales JM, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Rose E, et al. Longitudinal examination of alcohol use: a predictor of risky sexual behavior and trichomonas vaginalis among African-American female adolescents. Sex Transm Dis 2011;38:96–101.10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181f07abeSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Valois RF, Oelmann JE, Waller J, Hussey JR. Relationship between number of sexual intercourse partners and selected health risk behaviors among public high school adolescents. J Adolesc Health 1999;25:328–35.10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00051-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Swartzendruber A, Sales JM, Brown JL, DiClemente RJ, Rose ES. Comparison of substance use typologies as predictors of sexual risk outcomes in African American adolescent females. Arch Sex Behav 2016;45:63–72.10.1007/s10508-015-0518-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Reidy DE, Smith-Darden JP, Cortina KS, Kernsmith RM, Kernsmith PD. Masculine discrepancy stress, teen dating violence, and sexual violence perpetration among adolescent boys. J Adolesc Health 2015;56:619–24.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Agardh A, Cantor-Graae E, Ostergren PO. Youth, sexual risk-taking behavior, and mental health: a study of university students in Uganda. Int J Behav Med 2012;19:208–16.10.1007/s12529-011-9159-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Buhi ER, Marhefka SL, Hoban MT. The state of the union: sexual health disparities in a national sample of US college students. J Am Coll Health 2010;58:337–36.10.1080/07448480903501780Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF, Tice DM. Losing control: how and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gino F, Schweitzer ME, Mead NL, Ariely D. Unable to resist temptation: how self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec Process 2011;115:191–203.10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.001Search in Google Scholar

19. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

20. Gannon-Loew KE, Eickhoff JC, Moreno MA. The relationship between attitude, social norms and alcohol use: a longitudinal analysis using Facebook. J Adolesc Health 2016;58:S108–9.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.10.228Search in Google Scholar

21. Quinn PD, Fromme K. Self-regulation as a protective factor against risky drinking and sexual behavior. Psychol Addict Behav 2010;24:376–85.10.1037/a0018547Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Moreno MA, Cox ED, Young HN, Haaland W. Underage college students’ alcohol displays on Facebook and real-time alcohol behaviors. J Adolesc Health 2015;56:646–51.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Hirschi T. Causes of delinquency. Berkley, CA: University of California, 1969.Search in Google Scholar

24. Gentina E, Tang TLP, Gu QX. Does bad company corrupt good morals? Social bonding and academic cheating among French and Chinese teens. J Bus Ethics 2015. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2939-z.Search in Google Scholar

25. Gentina E, Tang TLP, Gu QX. Do parents and peers influence adolescents’ monetary intelligence, and consumer ethics? French and Chinese adolescents and behavioral economics. J Bus Ethics 2016. DOI:10.1007/s10551-016-3206-7.Search in Google Scholar

26. Gu QX, Tang TLP, Jiang W. Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader-member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. J Bus Ethics 2015;126:513–29.10.1007/s10551-013-1967-9Search in Google Scholar

27. Tang TLP, Liu H. Love of money and unethical behavior intention: does an authentic supervisor’s personal integrity and character (ASPIRE) make a difference? J Bus Ethics 2012;107:295–312.10.1007/s10551-011-1040-5Search in Google Scholar

28. Ali MM, Dwyer DS. Estimating peer effects in sexual behavior among adolescents. J Adolescence 2011;34:183–90.10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:8788–90.10.1073/pnas.1320040111Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Soule EK, Barnett TE, Moorhouse MD. Protective behavioral strategies and negative alcohol-related consequences among US college fraternity and sorority members. J Subst Abuse 2015;20:16–21.10.3109/14659891.2013.858783Search in Google Scholar

31. Wechsler H, Dowdall GW, Maenner G, Gledhill-Hoyt J, Lee H. Changes in binge drinking and related problems among American college students between 1993 and 1997: Results of the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study. J Am Coll Health 1998;47:57–68.10.1080/07448489809595621Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. LaBrie J, Earleywine M, Schiffman J, Pedersen E, Marriot C. Effects of alcohol, expectancies, and partner type on condom use in college males: Event-level analyses. J Sex Res 2005;42:259–66.10.1080/00224490509552280Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Primack BA, Fertman CI, Rice KR, Adachi-Mejia AM, Fine MJ. Waterpipe and cigarette smoking among college athletes in the United States. J Adolesc Health 2010;46:45–51.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Reidy DE, Brookmeyer KA, Gentile B, Berke DS, Zeichner A. Gender role discrepancy stress, high-risk sexual behavior, and sexually transmitted disease. Arch Sex Behav 2016;45:459–65.10.1007/s10508-014-0413-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Perkins HW, Haines MP, Rice R. Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms, and student alcohol misuse. J Stud Alcohol 2005;66:470–8.10.15288/jsa.2005.66.470Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Haines MP, Barker G, Rice RM. The personal protective behaviors of college student drinkers: evidence of indigenous protective norms. J Am Coll Health 2006;55:69–75.10.3200/JACH.55.2.69-76Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Lindley LL, Barnett CL, Brandt HM, Hardin JW, Burcin M. STDs among sexually active female college students: does sexual orientation make a difference? Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008;40:212–7.10.1363/4021208Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Chen JQ, Tang TLP, Tang NY. Temptation, monetary intelligence (love of money), and environmental context on unethical intentions and cheating. J Bus Ethic 2014;123:197–219.10.1007/s10551-013-1783-2Search in Google Scholar

39. Tang TLP, Sutarso T. Falling or not falling into temptation? Multiple faces of temptation, monetary intelligence, and unethical intentions across gender. J Bus Ethic 2013;116:529–52.10.1007/s10551-012-1475-3Search in Google Scholar

40. Ariely D, Loewenstein G. The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. J Behav Decis Making 2006;19:87–98.10.1002/bdm.501Search in Google Scholar

41. Hoban M. American college health association-national college health assessment spring 2008 reference group data report (abridged). J Am College Health 2009;57:477–88.10.3200/JACH.57.5.477-488Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003;88:879–903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Muraven M, Baumeister RF. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychol Bull 2000;126:247–59.10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers 2004;72:271–324.10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Covey J, Rosenthal-Stott HES, Howell SJ. A synthesis of meta-analytic evidence of behavioral interventions to reduce HIV/STIs. J Behav Med 2016;39:371–85.10.1007/s10865-016-9714-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Hall KS, Sales JM, Komro KA, Santelli J. The state of sex education in the United States. J Adolesc Health 2016;58:596–7.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Lederman RP, Chan WY, Roberts-Gray C. Parent-adolescent relationship education (PARE): program delivery to reduce risks for adolescent pregnancy and STDs. Behav Med 2008;33:137–43.10.3200/BMED.33.4.137-144Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Durvasula R, Miller TR. Substance abuse treatment in persons with HIV/AIDS: challenges in managing triple diagnosis. Behav Med 2014;40:43–52.10.1080/08964289.2013.866540Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Howard LW, Tang TLP, Austin MJ. Teaching critical thinking skills: ability, motivation, intervention, and the Pygmalion effect. J Bus Ethic 2015;128:133–47.10.1007/s10551-014-2084-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-19
Accepted: 2016-10-25
Published Online: 2016-12-23

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2016-0101/html
Scroll to top button