Home Smaller pelvic size in pregnant adolescents contributes to lower birth weight
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Smaller pelvic size in pregnant adolescents contributes to lower birth weight

  • João G. Alves EMAIL logo , Lídia C. Siqueira , Luiza M. Melo and José N. Figueiroa
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2013

Abstract

Adolescent pregnancy is associated with low birth weight. This has been explained by socioeconomic or emotional factors. However, an adolescent’s pelvis may not be completely developed and this can contribute to impairing fetal growth. Our aim was to compare the relationship between pelvic size and birth weight among adolescents and adult mothers. A cross-sectional study was carried out at Instituto de Medicina Infantil Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Brazil. We studied 125 healthy adolescents and 207 healthy adult women, all of whom were primiparous with a singleton term and low-risk pregnancy. The conjugate, intercristal and interspinous diameters were assessed by the Collins pelvimeter. The effect of pelvic size on the birth weight was evaluated using principal component analysis and multiple linear regression model. The mean pelvic size was smaller in adolescent mothers compared to adult ones (35.1 cm vs. 37.5 cm; p<0.001; t-test). After adjusting for other confounding variables, the predicted birth weights corresponding to these mean values of pelvic size were: 3020±27 g for adolescent mothers and 3145±26 g for adult mothers and showed a significant difference (p<0.001). We concluded that a pelvis that is less than fully developed in adolescents, as assessed by pelvic size, may contribute to lower birth weight in adolescent mothers.


Corresponding author: João G. Alves, Department of Pediatrics and Statistics Unit, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Medical School, Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), Coelhos Street, 300, Boa Vista, Recife, PE Brazil 52050-080, Brazil

Coauthor Lidia Cardoso de Siqueira was sponsored by Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Iniciação Científica (PIBIC), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico de Pesquisa (CNPq).

References

1. World Health Organization. Low birthweight. Country, regional and global estimates. Geneva: WHO, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

2. Ashdown-Lambert JR. A review of low birth weight: predictors, precursors and morbidity outcomes. J R Soc Promot Health 2005;125:76–83.10.1177/146642400512500211Search in Google Scholar

3. Rizzo G, Arduini D. Intrauterine growth restriction: diagnosis and management. A review. Minerva Ginecol 2009;61:411–20.Search in Google Scholar

4. Barker DJ. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:270–83.10.1097/00003081-200606000-00009Search in Google Scholar

5. Gale CR, Ashurst HE, Hall NF, MacCallum PK, Martyn CN. Size at birth and carotid atherosclerosis in later life. Atherosclerosis 2002;163:141–7.10.1016/S0021-9150(01)00760-2Search in Google Scholar

6. Yajnik CS, Deshmukh US. Maternal nutrition, intrauterine programming and consequential risks in the offspring. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2008;9:203–11.10.1007/s11154-008-9087-zSearch in Google Scholar

7. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Maternal constraint of fetal growth and its consequences. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;9:419–25.10.1016/j.siny.2004.03.001Search in Google Scholar

8. Robalo Silva J, Noakes DE. Pelvic dimensions, bodyweight and parturition in rare breeds of sheeps. Vet Rec 1984;115:242–5.10.1136/vr.115.10.242Search in Google Scholar

9. Moerman ML. Growth of the birth canal in adolescent girls. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;143:528–32.10.1016/0002-9378(82)90542-7Search in Google Scholar

10. Amy JJ, Loeber O. Pregnancy during adolescence: a major social problem. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2007;12: 299–302.10.1080/13625180701737635Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Mehra S, Agrawal D. Adolescent health determinants for pregnancy and child health outcomes among the urban poor. Indian Pediatr 2004;41:137–45.Search in Google Scholar

12. Shields BM, Knight BA, Powell RJ, Hattersley AT, Wright DE. Assessing newborn body composition using principal components analysis: differences in the determinants of fat and skeletal size. BMC Pediatrics 2006;6:24. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-6-24.10.1186/1471-2431-6-24Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Liselele HB, Tshibangu CK, Meuris S. Association between external pelvimetry and vertex delivery complications in African women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:673–8.Search in Google Scholar

14. Liselele HB, Boulvain M, Tshibangu KC, Meuris S. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:947–52.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb10394.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Martyn CN, Barker DJ, Osmond C. Mothers’ pelvic size, fetal growth, and death from stroke and coronary heart disease in men in the UK. Lancet 1996;348:1264–8.10.1016/S0140-6736(96)04257-2Search in Google Scholar

16. Brooks AA, Johnson MR, Steer PJ, Pawson ME, Abdalla HI. Birth weight: nature or nurture? Early Hum Dev 1995;42(1):29–35.10.1016/0378-3782(95)01637-ISearch in Google Scholar

17. Poma PA. X-Ray pelvimetry in primiparas. J Natl Med Assoc 1982;74:173–9.Search in Google Scholar

18. Thoms H, Godfried MS. The interrelationships between fetal weight, size of pelvic inlet, and maternal height. Yale J Biol Med 1939;11:355–62.Search in Google Scholar

19. Novotny R, Davis J, Wasnich R, Biernacke I, Onaka A. Maternal pelvic size, measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, predicts infant birthweight. Am J Hum Biol 2000;12:552–7.10.1002/1520-6300(200007/08)12:4<552::AID-AJHB14>3.0.CO;2-3Search in Google Scholar

20. Rozenholc AT, Ako SN, Leke RJ, Boulvain M. The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry and maternal height to predict dystocia in nulliparous women: a study in Cameroon. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;114:630–5.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01294.xSearch in Google Scholar

21. Adinma JI, Agbal AO, Anolue FC. Relevance of clinical pelvimetry to obstetric practice in developing countries. West Afr J Med 1997;16:40–3.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-1-25
Accepted: 2012-4-21
Published Online: 2013-01-12
Published in Print: 2013-06-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0021/html
Scroll to top button