The Anatolian stop system and the Indo-Hittite hypothesis
Abstract
This article argues that the phonetic distinction between the Hittite fortis and lenis stops was not one of voice, but rather one of length, and that this distinction must have been present in Proto-Anatolian as well. On the basis of typological and comparative considerations it is argued that the Proto-Anatolian stop system cannot have developed from the stop system that is traditionally reconstructed for the Proto-Indo-European mother language and in which voice is the basic distinction. Instead, the relationship must have been the other way around: the voice distinction of PIE is a younger development of the length distinction as found in the Proto-Anatolian stop system. This relationship can only be accounted for within the context of the Indo-Hittite hypothesis, and therefore forms a new argument in favor of it.
© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Inhalt
- Repetition Analysis Function (ReAF) II
- Studies in Armenian historical phonology (II)
- Hittite kapart-/kapirt - ‘small rodent’ and Proto-Semitic *ˁkbr-t- ‘mouse, jerboa’
- Hittite yaya(i)-i
- Some transitive motion verbs and related lexemes in Late Luwian
- On the origin of Latin suffixes in -d- and -es, -itis
- Zu lykisch ϑϑẽ und seiner etymologischen Interpretation
- Latin crassus, grossus, classis
- Hittite heterographic writings and their interpretation
- Phrygian mekas and the recently discovered New Phrygian inscription from Nacoleia
- The problem of the -a ending in the Hittite dative/locative
- On syncope of u-vocalism in Sabellic
- The Anatolian stop system and the Indo-Hittite hypothesis
- Beiträge zur Tagung. The Sound of Indo-European 3, Opava 2014
- Laryngeal aspiration and the weakening of dentals in Classical Armenian
- In defense of Narten roots
- Vowel weakening in the Sabellic languages as language contact
- Beiträge zum Workshop. Indo-European from within, Göttingen 2016
- Indo-European from within
- Zu einigen Perfektbildungen im Sabellischen
- Pronominierte Nominalformen im Altlitauischen
- The development of the Tocharian causative system – top-down or bottom-up?
- A partial tree of Central Iranian
- Induktive versus abduktive Rekonstruktion
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Inhalt
- Repetition Analysis Function (ReAF) II
- Studies in Armenian historical phonology (II)
- Hittite kapart-/kapirt - ‘small rodent’ and Proto-Semitic *ˁkbr-t- ‘mouse, jerboa’
- Hittite yaya(i)-i
- Some transitive motion verbs and related lexemes in Late Luwian
- On the origin of Latin suffixes in -d- and -es, -itis
- Zu lykisch ϑϑẽ und seiner etymologischen Interpretation
- Latin crassus, grossus, classis
- Hittite heterographic writings and their interpretation
- Phrygian mekas and the recently discovered New Phrygian inscription from Nacoleia
- The problem of the -a ending in the Hittite dative/locative
- On syncope of u-vocalism in Sabellic
- The Anatolian stop system and the Indo-Hittite hypothesis
- Beiträge zur Tagung. The Sound of Indo-European 3, Opava 2014
- Laryngeal aspiration and the weakening of dentals in Classical Armenian
- In defense of Narten roots
- Vowel weakening in the Sabellic languages as language contact
- Beiträge zum Workshop. Indo-European from within, Göttingen 2016
- Indo-European from within
- Zu einigen Perfektbildungen im Sabellischen
- Pronominierte Nominalformen im Altlitauischen
- The development of the Tocharian causative system – top-down or bottom-up?
- A partial tree of Central Iranian
- Induktive versus abduktive Rekonstruktion
