Home On Joking Contexts: An Example of Stand-Up Comedy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On Joking Contexts: An Example of Stand-Up Comedy

  • Ibukun Filani EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 18, 2017

Abstract

Studies on stand-up comedy and jokes have noted that context plays a major role in the generation and interpretation of jokes and humorous routines. However, these studies do not formalize the concept and what constitute it in joke exchanges. Focusing on Nigerian stand-up comedy, this study is aimed at conceptualizing and describing the contexts that could be found in joking exchanges. The study proposes two types: context-of-the-joke and context-in-the-joke. The context-of-the-joke is grounded in shared beliefs that exist between the participants-of-the-joke. The context-in-the-joke is characterized by features such as joke utterance, participants-in-the-joke (most especially the target) and activity-in-the-joke among others. These features make up the contextualization cues that the participants-of-the-joke (both the joke teller and recipient) use in joke generation and interpretation.

Appendix

Transcription conventions

/

Indicates line boundaries in the translations

!

Accents, it indicates emphasis. When it is more than one, it indicates a stronger degree of emphasis

?

Raising intonation

“”

Quotation marks, denotes utterances adduced to participants-in-the-joke

:

Length

CL

Comedian laughs

AL

Audience laughs

Word

Yellow highlight indicates a slower speech rate

Word

Green highlight indicates a faster speech rate

References

Adetunji, Akin. 2013. The interactional context of humor in Nigerian stand-up comedy. Pragmatics, 23:1, 1–22.10.1075/prag.23.1.01adeSearch in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. New York: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Ayakoroma, Barclays Foubiri. 2013. The rise of stand-up comedy genre in Nigeria. Paper presented at the society of Nigerian Theatre Artists Annual Conference, Benue State University, Makurdi, 4–8 June. Retrieved Februrary 14, 2014 from http://www.nico.gov.ng/index.php/features/91-the-rise-of-stand-up-comedy-genre-in-nigeria.Search in Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. 2006. Narrativity and voice. In Mey, Jacob L. (ed.) Concise encyclopaedia of pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 1990. Ethnic Humor around the World: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2009. Beyond a joke: types of conversational humor. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3:5, 1284–1299.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00152.xSearch in Google Scholar

Filani, Ibukun. 2015A. Discourse types in stand-up comedy performances: an example of Nigerian stand-up comedy. European Journal of Humor Research, 31, 41–60.10.7592/EJHR2015.3.1.filaniSearch in Google Scholar

Filani, Ibukun. 2015B. Stand-up comedy as an activity type. Israeli Journal of Humor Research, 41, 73–97.Search in Google Scholar

Filani, Ibukun. 2016. The use of mimicry in Nigerian stand-up comedy. Comedy Studies, 71, 89–102; DOI:10.1080/2040610X.2016.1139810.Search in Google Scholar

Glick, Douglas J. 2007. Some performative techniques of stand-up comedy: an exercise in the textuality of temporalization. Language and Communication 2, 291–306.10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Andrea. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: an investigation of comic culture. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 12:1, 33–46.10.1515/humr.1999.12.1.33Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611834Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John. 1992. Contextualization and understanding. In Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, David. 1996. Contexts and cues in cyberspace: the pragmatics of naming in text-based virtual realities. Journal of Anthropological Research 52: 4, 461–479.10.1086/jar.52.4.3630297Search in Google Scholar

Jodłowiec, Maria. 1991. What makes a joke tick. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 241–253.Search in Google Scholar

Laineste, Liisi. 2005. Targets of Estonian Ethnic Jokes within the theory of ethnic humor (Ch. Davies). Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 29, 7–24.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, Moira. 2014. On going too far. European Journal of Humor Research 2:4, 126–139.10.7592/EJHR2014.2.4.marshSearch in Google Scholar

Marsh, Moira. 2015. Practically Joking. Logan: Utah State University Press.10.7330/9780874219845Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Bronwen and Felizitas Ringham. 2000. Dictionary of Semiotics. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob. 2011. Pragmatics and literature. In Bublitz, Wolfram and Neal Norrick (ed.) Foundation of pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Mintz, Lawrence E. 1985. Standup comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly 37:1, 71–80.Search in Google Scholar

Odebunmi, Akin. 2006. Meaning in English: an Introduction. Ogbomosho: Critical Sphere.Search in Google Scholar

Oring, Elliott. 1984. Dyadic Traditions. Journal of Folklore Research 21:1, 19–28.10.4324/9780203787892-11Search in Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1940. On joking relationship. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 13:3, 195–210.10.2307/1156093Search in Google Scholar

Scarpetta, Fabiola and Anna Spagnolli. 2009. The interactional context of humor in stand-up comedy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42:3, 1–22.10.1080/08351810903089159Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Claire. 2011. Prisons, Performance Arena and Occupational humor. Oral Tradition, 26:2, 613–616.10.1353/ort.2011.0023Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, Paul. 2006. Humor: Stylistic Approaches. In Mey, Jacob L. (ed.) Concise encyclopaedia of pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2003. Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 35, 1295–1331.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0Search in Google Scholar

Yus, F. 2004. Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El club de la comedia. Current Trendsin the Pragmatics of Spanish R. Marquez-Reiter and M.E. Placencia. Eds. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 320–344.10.1075/pbns.123.25yusSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-8-18
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2016-0107/pdf
Scroll to top button