Home Linguistics & Semiotics The effect of joke-origin-induced expectancy on cognitive humor
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The effect of joke-origin-induced expectancy on cognitive humor

  • Andrew J. Johnson

    Andrew J. Johnson is a Cognitive Psychology lecturer at Bournemouth University, UK. He gained his PhD from Cardiff University in 2007. His main area of research is modularity in short-term memory.

    EMAIL logo
    and Kamleshwari Mistry

    Kamleshwari Mistry was a Psychology undergraduate student at Coventry University who graduated in 2011.

Published/Copyright: May 10, 2013

Abstract

Four experiments explored the effect of humor expectancy on the cognitive evaluation of jokes. Participants read jokes purportedly delivered by celebrity comedians or celebrity non-comedians. Participants reported jokes in the comedian condition to be significantly more amusing (Experiment 1). Furthermore, this effect was repeated in a within-participants replication where celebrity comedians and celebrity non-comedians were matched on positive evaluations (Experiment 2). This indicates that the findings cannot be explained via differential positive attitudes towards the celebrities in each condition. In Experiment 3, different types of jokes (incongruency/nonsensical) and humor levels (high/low) were compared. The expectancy effect was found to be more pronounced for nonsensical jokes. This was argued to be due to nonsensical jokes being more uniquely associated with comedians, whereas the ubiquity of incongruency jokes dilutes any effect of expectancy. However, Experiment 4 demonstrated that the expectancy effect is contingent on the name of the comedian being observed. In summary, it is argued that prior exposure to the named comedian primes an expectancy of forthcoming humor; this expectancy influences humor ratings. These findings are consistent with Wimer and Beins (2008), who showed that priming humor expectations through joke ratings can influence cognitive humor. The current study may explain why new comics need to “win over the audience” whereas established comedians can rely upon the expectation of humor derived from past exposures.


Psychology Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK

About the authors

Andrew J. Johnson

Andrew J. Johnson is a Cognitive Psychology lecturer at Bournemouth University, UK. He gained his PhD from Cardiff University in 2007. His main area of research is modularity in short-term memory.

Kamleshwari Mistry

Kamleshwari Mistry was a Psychology undergraduate student at Coventry University who graduated in 2011.

Published Online: 2013-05-10
Published in Print: 2013-05-20

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 2.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2013-0011/html
Scroll to top button