Abstract
Authors of written texts may mark the use of verbal irony in a variety of ways. One possibility for doing so is the use of so-called co-textual markers of irony (i.e., support strategies that open up a non-serious frame). This study aims to classify and categorize these co-textual irony markers. A content analysis of 2,042 co-textual utterances of irony across four text genres (advertisements, newspaper columns, book and film reviews, and letters to the editor) shows that three categories of support strategies could be identified: other ironic utterances, tropes and mood markers. The use of irony support strategies was positively related to the genre of newspaper columns: columns used more ironic utterances and tropes as irony support strategies than the other genres in the corpus.
©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- >From the editor
- Humorous similes
- No laughing matter? Young adults and the “spillover effect” of candidate-centered political humor
- The use of co-textual irony markers in written discourse
- Joke telling, humor creation, and humor recall in children with and without hearing loss
- Early maladaptive schemas, styles of humor and aggression
- Characteristics of Job Burnout and Humor among Psychotherapists
- Humorous cartoons in college textbooks: Student perceptions and learning
- A second look at laughter: Humor in the visual arts
- Book Reviews
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- >From the editor
- Humorous similes
- No laughing matter? Young adults and the “spillover effect” of candidate-centered political humor
- The use of co-textual irony markers in written discourse
- Joke telling, humor creation, and humor recall in children with and without hearing loss
- Early maladaptive schemas, styles of humor and aggression
- Characteristics of Job Burnout and Humor among Psychotherapists
- Humorous cartoons in college textbooks: Student perceptions and learning
- A second look at laughter: Humor in the visual arts
- Book Reviews