Satire and definition
-
Conal Condren,
Abstract
This paper explores some of the difficulties involved in defining satire.
Neither the formal characteristics of satire nor its informing purposes, including its variable associations with humour and the provocation of amusement allow for a unifying definition over the long term. It considers a range of approaches to and types of definition and takes as a principle example the notion of Menippean satire. It argues that a characterisation in terms of family resemblance is more helpful for a strictly historical understanding than formal definitions and that it is misleading to take satire as a genre, let along a literary one. Throughout it also suggests that the case of satire tells us something about definition and the often naïve expectations of what definitions can establish.
©[2012] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Satire and definition
- The Aristocrats!: Comedy, grotesqueries and political inversions of the masculine code
- Disclosure humor and distortion humor: A reversal theory analysis
- Humor support in synchronous computer-mediated classroom discussions
- Humor perception in bilinguals: Is language more than a code?
- Humor use in power-differentiated interactions
- Childhood experiences of professional comedians: Peer and parent relationships and humor use
- Book Reviews
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Satire and definition
- The Aristocrats!: Comedy, grotesqueries and political inversions of the masculine code
- Disclosure humor and distortion humor: A reversal theory analysis
- Humor support in synchronous computer-mediated classroom discussions
- Humor perception in bilinguals: Is language more than a code?
- Humor use in power-differentiated interactions
- Childhood experiences of professional comedians: Peer and parent relationships and humor use
- Book Reviews
