Home Basic pituitary-ovarian hormones and ultrasound parameters of uterine appendages in full-term and preterm neonate girls
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Basic pituitary-ovarian hormones and ultrasound parameters of uterine appendages in full-term and preterm neonate girls

  • Natalia Artymuk , Svetlana I. Yelgina EMAIL logo and Elena Nikulina
Published/Copyright: April 10, 2018

Abstract

Objective

To determine the basic pituitary-ovarian hormones and ultrasound parameters of uterine appendages in full-term and preterm newborn girls.

Materials and methods

One hundred full-term and premature newborn girls (58 and 42, respectively) were studied with clinical, instrumental, laboratory (enzyme immunoassay) and statistical methods.

Results

Statistically significant differences in the pituitary-ovarian hormones and ultrasound parameters of uterine appendages in preterm neonate girls compared to full-term girls were defined. The pituitary hormone levels (follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormone levels) were higher in preterm newborn girls [0.15 (0.06–0.53) and 0.06 (0.05–0.08) (p = 0.0001); 0.03 (0.00–0.23) and 0.00 (0.00–0.03), (p = 0.003)]; the ovarian hormone levels (estradiol, anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin В levels) were lower [0.44 (0.25–0.85) and 1.55 (1.06–1.84) (p = 0.0001); 2.73 (2.12–3.65) and 3.66 (2.59–5.0), (p = 0.026), 60.81 (37.19–128.80) and 104.75 (54.35–159.18), (p = 0.019), respectively]. Ultrasound investigation showed that the ovarian reserve in preterm neonates was smaller compared to the full-term neonates [38.48 (22.01–56.49) and 102.47 (85.36–111.37), (p = 0.0001); 36.95 (25.21–70.59) and 108.05 (91.74–116.44), (p = 0.0001), respectively (p = 0.0001)]. The number of antral follicles in the slice was also statistically significantly smaller [2 – in the right ovary, 1 – in the left ovary, vs. 4 and 4, respectively (p = 0.0001)].

Conclusion

Premature neonates have different pituitary-ovarian hormones and ovarian size compared to full-term babies.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to their scientific supervisor Professor Galina A. Ushakova.

Author Statement

  1. Research funding: Test systems for hormonal studies were paid by the Kemerovo Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital, Kemerovo, Russia, represented by the Director Mikhail I. Likstanov, MD, PhD, Doctor of Medical Sciences.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

  3. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

  4. Ethical approval: The research related to human use complied with all the relevant national regulations and institutional policies and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration and has been approved by the author’s institutional review board or equivalent committee.

References

[1] Guzy L, Demeestere I. Assessment of ovarian reserve and fertility preservation strategies in children treated for cancer.MinervaMinerva Ginecol. 2016;69:57–67.10.23736/S0026-4784.16.03992-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Miyoshi Y, Yasuda K, Tachibana M, Yoshida H, Miyashita E, Miyamura T. Longitudinal observation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone in three girls after cancer treatment. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2016;25:119–26.10.1297/cpe.25.119Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] El Issaoui M, Giorgione V, Mamsen LS, Rechnitzer C, Birkebæk N, Clausen N. Effect of first line cancer treatment on the ovarian reserve and follicular density in girls under the age of 18 years. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1757–62.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Filippi F, Meazza C, Paffoni A, Raspagliesi F, Terenziani M, Somigliana E. Egg freezing in childhood and young adult cancer survivors. Pediatrics. 2016;138:pii: e20160291.10.1542/peds.2016-0291Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Sominsky L, Ziko I, Soch A, Smith JT, Spencer SJ. Neonatal overfeeding induces early decline of the ovarian reserve: implications for the role of leptin. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;431:24–35.10.1016/j.mce.2016.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Thomas-Teinturier C, Allodji RS, Svetlova E, Frey MA, Oberlin O, Millischer AE. Ovarian reserve after treatment with alkylating agents during childhood. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1437–46.10.1093/humrep/dev060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Oktay K, Bedoschi GJ, Tabone MD, Sudour-Bonnange H, Baruchel A, Lahlou N. Oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in postpubertal female children at risk for premature ovarian failure due to accelerated follicle loss in Turner syndrome or cancer treatments. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27:342–6.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.01.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Imbert R, Moffa F, Tsepelidis S, Simon P, Delbaere A, Devreker F. Safety and usefulness of cryopreservation of ovarian tissue to preserve fertility: a 12-year retrospective analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1931–40.10.1093/humrep/deu158Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Kallio S, Aittomäki K, Piltonen T, Veijola R, Liakka A, Vaskivuo TE. Anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictor of follicular reserve in ovarian insufficiency: special emphasis on FSH-resistant ovaries.HumHum Reprod. 2012;27:854–60& .10.1093/humrep/der473Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Badik JR, Castañeda U, Gleason TJ, Spencer JB, Epstein MP, Ficicioglu C. Ovarian function in Duarte galactosemia. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:469–73.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.088Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Dunlop CE, Telfer EE, Anderson RA. Ovarian stem cells-potential roles in infertility treatment and fertility preservation. Maturitas. 2013;76:279–83.10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.04.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Spencer JB, Badik JR, Ryan EL, Gleason TJ, Broadaway KA, Epstein MP. Modifiers of ovarian function in girls and women with classic galactosemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E1257–65.10.1210/jc.2013-1374Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Nikulina EN, Yelgina SI, Ushakova GA. Reproductive health of teenage girls born preterm. Fundamental Clin Med. 2017;2:50–9. Russian.10.23946/2500-0764-2017-2-1-50-58Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-10-1
Accepted: 2017-11-21
Published Online: 2018-4-10

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hmbci-2017-0064/html
Scroll to top button