Home The potent inhibition of human cytosolic sulfotransferase 1A1 by 17α-ethinylestradiol is due to interactions with isoleucine 89 on loop 1
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The potent inhibition of human cytosolic sulfotransferase 1A1 by 17α-ethinylestradiol is due to interactions with isoleucine 89 on loop 1

  • Katie Jo Rohn-Glowacki and Charles N. Falany EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 22, 2014

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDI) with oral contraceptives containing 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) have been well characterized with regard to interactions with phase I drug metaolizing enzymes; however, DDI with EE2 and phase II enzymes have not been as thoroughly addressed. Our laboratory recently reported that in vitro EE2 potently inhibits human cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 while EE2 was not sulfated until micromolar concentrations. Molecular docking studies demonstrated that Tyr169 and isoleucine 89 (Ile89) may play a role in the inhibitory and/or catalytic positioning of EE2 within the active site of SULT1A1. Therefore, the current study focused on determining the role of Ile89 in the inhibition of SULT1A1 utilizing site-directed mutagenesis. Ile89 was mutated to an alanine and the effect of the mutation was characterized using kinetic and binding assays. SULT1A1-Ile89Ala was found to have a Km for EE2 that was 11-fold greater than wild-type enzyme. A decreased affinity (Kd) of EE2 for SULT1A1-Ile89Ala was apparently responsible for the increase in Km, and also resulted in the loss of the potent inhibition. Molecular modeling was used in an attempt to determine the atomic level changes in binding of EE2 to SULT1A1-Ile89Ala. However, analysis of the effect of the single Ile89 mutation on both the open and closed homology models was not consistent with the docking and kinetic results. Overall, the mechanism of inhibition of EE2 for SULT1A1 is apparently the result of interactions of Ile89 with EE2 holding it in a potent inhibitory conformation, and mutation of the Ile89 significantly decreases the inhibition.


Corresponding author: Charles N. Falany, PhD, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Volker Hall 151, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA, Phone: 205-934-9848, Fax: 205-934-8240, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Institute of Health Grant GM38953. The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

References

1. Jones J, Mosher W, Daniels K. Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006–2010 and changes in patterns of use since 1995. National Health Statistics Reports, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

2. Inhoffen HH, Hohlweg W. Neue per os-wirksame weibliche Keimdrüsenhormon-Derivate: 17-Aethinyl-oestradiol und Pregnen-in-on-3-ol-17. Naturwissenschaften 1938;26:96.10.1007/BF01681040Search in Google Scholar

3. Crawford P, Chadwick DJ, Martin C, Tjia J, Back DJ, Orme M. The interaction of phenytoin and carbamazepine with combined oral contraceptive steroids. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1990;30:892–6.10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb05457.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Fernández N, Sierra M, Diez MJ, Terán T, Pereda P, García JJ. Study of the pharmacokinetic interaction between ethinylestradiol and amoxicillin in rabbits. Contraception 1997;55:47–52.10.1016/S0010-7824(96)00253-3Search in Google Scholar

5. Rogers SM, Back DJ, Stevenson PJ, Grimmer SF, Orme ML. Paracetamol interaction with oral contraceptive steroids: increased plasma concentrations of ethinyloestradiol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987;23:721–5.10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03107.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Weber A, Jäger R, Börner A, Klinger G, Vollanth R, Matthey K, Balogh A. Can grapefruit juice influence ethinylestradiol bioavailability? Contraception 1996;53:41–7.10.1016/0010-7824(95)00252-9Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhang H, Cui D, Wang B, Han YH, Balimane P, Yang Z, Sinz M, Rodrigues AD. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving 17alpha-ethinylestradiol: a new look at an old drug. Clin Pharmacokinet 2007;46:133–57.10.2165/00003088-200746020-00003Search in Google Scholar

8. Klehr-Bathmann I, Kuhl H. Formation of ethinylestradiol in postmenopausal women during continuous treatment with a combination of estradiol, estriol and norethisterone acetate. Maturitas 1995;21:245–50.10.1016/0378-5122(94)00894-DSearch in Google Scholar

9. Sinofsky FE, Pasquale SA. The effect of fluconazole on circulating ethinyl estradiol levels in women taking oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:300–4.10.1016/S0002-9378(98)80016-1Search in Google Scholar

10. van den Heuvel MW, van Bragt AJ, Alnabawy AK, Kaptein MC. Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive. Contraception 2005;72:168–74.10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.005Search in Google Scholar

11. Barditch-Crovo P, Trapnell CB, Ette E, Zacur HA, Coresh J, Rocco LE, Hendrix CW, Flexner C. The effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999;65:428–38.10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70138-4Search in Google Scholar

12. Schmider J, Greenblatt DJ, Moltke LL, Karsov D, Vena R, Friedman HL, Shader RI. Biotransformation of mestranol to ethinyl estradiol in vitro: the role of cytochrome P-450 2C9 and metabolic inhibitors. J Clin Pharmacol 1997;37:193–200.10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04781.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Palovaara S, Kivistö KT, Tapanainen P, Manninen P, Neuvonen PJ, Laine K. Effect of an oral contraceptive preparation containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene on CYP3A4 activity as measured by midazolam 1′-hydroxylation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000;50:333–7.10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00271.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Weisberg E. Interactions between oral contraceptives and antifungals/antibacterials. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999;36:309–13.10.2165/00003088-199936050-00001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Doose DR, Wang SS, Padmanabhan M, Schwabe S, Jacobs D, Bialer M. Effect of topiramate or carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol in healthy obese and nonobese female subjects. Epilepsia 2003;44:540–9.10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.55602.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Zhang J, Chung E, Yones C, Persson A, Mahnke L, Eley T, Xu X, Bertz R. The effect of atazanavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate in healthy women. Antiviral Ther 2011;16:157.10.3851/IMP1724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Chu XY, Huskey SE, Braun MP, Sarkadi B, Evans DC, Evers R. Transport of ethinylestradiol glucuronide and ethinylestradiol sulfate by the multidrug resistance proteins MRP1, MRP2, and MRP3. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004;309:156–64.10.1124/jpet.103.062091Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Nowell S, Falany CN. Pharmacogenetics of human cytosolic sulfotransferases. Oncogene 2006;25:1673–8.10.1038/sj.onc.1209376Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Falany CN. Enzymology of human cytosolic sulfotransferases. FASEB J 1997;11:206–16.10.1096/fasebj.11.4.9068609Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Wang L-Q, James MO. Inhibition of sulfotransferases by xenobiotics. Curr Drug Metab 2006;7:83–104.10.2174/138920006774832596Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Vietri M, Pietrabissa A, Mosca F, Spisni R, Pacifici G. Curcumin is a potent inhibitor of phenol sulfotransferase (SULT1A1) in human liver and extrahepatic tissues. Xenobiotica 2003;33:357–63.10.1080/0049825031000065197Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. De Santi C, Pietrabissa A, Mosca F, Rane A, Pacifici G. Inhibition of phenol sulfotransferase (SULT1A1) by quercetin in human adult and foetal livers. Xenobiotica 2002;32:363–8.10.1080/00498250110119108Search in Google Scholar

23. Nishimuta H, Ohtani H, Tsujimoto M, Ogura K, Hiratsuka A, Sawada Y. Inhibitory effects of various beverages on human recombinant sulfotransferase isoforms SULT1A1 and SULT1A3. Biopharm Drug Dispos 2007;28:491–500.10.1002/bdd.579Search in Google Scholar

24. King RS, Ghosh AA, Wu J. Inhibition of human phenol and estrogen sulfotransferase by certain non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Curr Drug Metab 2006;7:745.10.2174/138920006778520615Search in Google Scholar

25. Rohn KJ, Cook IT, Leyh TS, Kadlubar SA, Falany CN. Potent inhibition of human sulfotransferase 1A1 by 17α-ethinylestradiol: role of 3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate binding and structural rearrangements in regulating inhibition and activity. Drug Metab Dispos 2012;40:1588–95.10.1124/dmd.112.045583Search in Google Scholar

26. Young WF Jr, Gorman CA, Weinshilboum RM. Triiodothyronine: a substrate for the thermostable and thermolabile forms of human phenol sulfotransferase. Endocrinology 1988;122: 1816–24.10.1210/endo-122-5-1816Search in Google Scholar

27. Falany JL, Lawing L, Falany CN. Identification and characterization of cytosolic sulfotransferase activities in MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1993;46:481–7.10.1016/0960-0760(93)90102-3Search in Google Scholar

28. Teubner W, Meinl W, Florian S, Kretzschmar M, Glatt H. Identification and localization of soluble sulfotransferases in the human gastrointestinal tract. Biochem J 2007;404:207–15.10.1042/BJ20061431Search in Google Scholar

29. Hart RF, Renskers KJ, Nelson EB, Roth JA. Localization and characterization of phenol sulfotransferase in human platelets. Life Sci 1979;24:125–30.10.1016/0024-3205(79)90121-8Search in Google Scholar

30. Falany CN, Vazquez ME, Heroux JA, Roth JA. Purification and characterization of human liver phenol-sulfating phenol sulfotransferase. Arch Biochem Biophys 1990;278:312–8.10.1016/0003-9861(90)90265-ZSearch in Google Scholar

31. Schrag ML, Cui D, Rushmore TH, Shou M, Ma B, Rodrigues AD. Sulfotransferase 1E1 is a low km isoform mediating the 3-O-sulfation of ethinyl estradiol. Drug Metab Dispos 2004;32:1299–303.10.1124/dmd.32.11.1299Search in Google Scholar

32. Zhang H, Varlamova O, Vargas FM, Falany CN, Leyh TS, Varmalova O. Sulfuryl transfer: the catalytic mechanism of human estrogen sulfotransferase. J Biol Chem 1998;273:10888–92.10.1074/jbc.273.18.10888Search in Google Scholar

33. Falany JL, Falany CN. Expression of cytosolic sulfotransferases in normal mammary epithelial cells and breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1996;56:1551–5.Search in Google Scholar

34. Falany CN, Wheeler J, Oh TS, Falany JL. Steroid sulfation by expressed human cytosolic sulfotransferases. J Steriod Biochem Mol Biol 1994;48:369–75.10.1016/0960-0760(94)90077-9Search in Google Scholar

35. Cook IT, Duniec-Dmuchowski Z, Kocarek TA, Runge-Morris M, Falany CN. 24-hydroxycholesterol sulfation by human cytosolic sulfotransferases: formation of monosulfates and disulfates, molecular modeling, sulfatase sensitivity, and inhibition of liver x receptor activation. Drug Metab Dispos 2009;37:2069–78.10.1124/dmd.108.025759Search in Google Scholar

36. Falany CN, Krasnykh V, Falany JL. Bacterial expression and characterization of a cDNA for human liver estrogen sulfotransferase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1995;52:529–39.10.1016/0960-0760(95)00015-RSearch in Google Scholar

37. Meloche CA, Falany CN. Expression and characterization of the human 3 beta-hydroxysteroid sulfotransferases (SULT2B1a and SULT2B1b). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2001;77:261–9.10.1016/S0960-0760(01)00064-4Search in Google Scholar

38. Segel IH. Enzyme kinetics behavior and analysis of rapid equilibrium and steady-state enzyme systems. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

39. Cook IT, Leyh TS, Kadlubar SA, Falany CN. Structural rearrangement of SULT2A1: effects on dehydroepiandrosterone and raloxifene sulfation. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest 2009;1:81–7.Search in Google Scholar

40. Cook IT. Anaylsis of the structural and kinetic properties of human SULT2A1 induced by the binding of 3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate. Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 2011:266.Search in Google Scholar

41. Rens-Domiano SS, Roth JA. Inhibition of M and P phenol sulfotransferase by analogues of 3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate. J Neurochem 1987;48:1411–5.10.1111/j.1471-4159.1987.tb05679.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235–42.10.1093/nar/28.1.235Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Cook I, Wang T, Almo SC, Kim J, Falany CN, Leyh TS. The gate that governs sulfotransferase selectivity. Biochemistry 2013;52:415–24.10.1021/bi301492jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE III, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Walker RC, Zhang W, Merz KM, Roberts B, Hayik S, Roitberg A, Seabra G, Swails J, Götz AW, Kolossváry I, Wong KF, Paesani F, Vanicek J, Wolf RM, Liu J, Wu X, Brozell SR, Steinbrecher T, Gohlke H, Cai Q, Ye X, Wang J, Hsieh M-J, Cui G, Roe DR, Mathews DH, Seetin MG, Salomon-Ferrer R, Sagui C, Babin V, Luchko T, Gusarov S, Kovalenko A, Kollman PA. AMBER 12. San Francisco: University of California, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

45. Chen G, Rabjohn PA, York JL, Wooldridge C, Zhang D, Falany CN, Radominska-Pandya A. Carboxyl residues in the active site of human phenol sulfotransferase (SULT1A1). Biochemistry 2000;39:16000–7.10.1021/bi0021479Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Salman ED, Kadlubar SA, Falany CN. Expression and localization of cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 and SULT1A3 in normal human brain. Drug Metab Dispos 2009;37:706–9.10.1124/dmd.108.025767Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Cappiello M, Franchi M, Giuliani L, Pacifici GM. Distribution of 2-naphthol sulphotransferase and its endogenous substrate adenosine 3’-phosphate 5’-phosphosulphate in human tissues. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989;37:317–20.10.1007/BF00679793Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Klaassen CD, Boles JW. Sulfation and sulfotransferases 5: the importance of 3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate (PAPS) in the regulation of sulfation. FASEB J 1997;11:404–18.10.1096/fasebj.11.6.9194521Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Hazelton GA, Hjelle JJ, Dills RL, Klaassen CD. A radiometric method for the measurement of adenosine 3’-phosphate 5’-phosphosulfate in rat and mouse liver. Drug Metab Dispos 1985;13:30–4.Search in Google Scholar

50. Brzeznicka EA, Hazelton GA, Klaassen CD. Comparison of adenosine 3’-phosphate 5’-phosphosulfate concentrations in tissues from different laboratory animals. Drug Metab Dispos 1987;15:133–5.Search in Google Scholar

51. Sakakibara Y, Takami Y, Nakayama T, Suiko M, Liu M-C. Localization and functional analysis of the substrate specificity/catalytic domains of human M-form and P-form phenol sulfotransferases. J Biol Chem 1998;273:6242–7.10.1074/jbc.273.11.6242Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Liu M-C, Suiko M, Sakakibara Y. Mutational analysis of the substrate binding/catalytic domains of human M form and P form phenol sulfotransferases. J Biol Chem 2000;275: 13460–4.10.1074/jbc.275.18.13460Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Allali-Hassani A, Pan PW, Dombrovski L, Najmanovich R, Tempel W, Dong A, Loppnau P, Martin F, Thonton J, Edwards AM. Structural and chemical profiling of the human cytosolic sulfotransferases. PLoS Biol 2007;5:e97.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050097Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

54. Cook I, Wang T, Almo SC, Kim J, Falany CN, Leyh TS. Testing the sulfotransferase molecular pore hypothesis. J Biol Chem 2013;288:8619–26.10.1074/jbc.M112.445015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2014-9-23
Accepted: 2014-10-20
Published Online: 2014-11-22
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 27.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hmbci-2014-0028/html
Scroll to top button