Home Physical Sciences Natural cork and its agglomerates as substitutes for high-density expanded polystyrene foams in sandwich cores
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Natural cork and its agglomerates as substitutes for high-density expanded polystyrene foams in sandwich cores

  • ORCID logo EMAIL logo , , ORCID logo and ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: June 4, 2021

Abstract

Natural cork (NC) and its agglomerates are renewable materials that could be effective substitutes for non-renewable foams, such as expanded polystyrene (EPS), in the cores of sandwich materials. Although many existing studies have analysed the behaviour of different cork agglomerates under tensile, compression, or shear loads, no studies to date have simultaneously analysed the behaviour of multiple cork materials under all these loads. Therefore, in this study, the behaviour of NC and five cork agglomerates were analysed under tensile, compression and shear loads, and the mechanical and specific properties and the shape of the stress–strain curves were compared with those obtained for five EPS counterparts to analyse the relationship between the mechanical behaviour of the core and the main failure modes of the sandwich. Although EPS exhibited higher specific properties, NC exhibited higher mechanical properties under all the loads. The agglomerates all exhibited lower mechanical properties except for shear strain. Additionally, because no specific standards were available for testing cork products, slightly modified standards for testing other materials were adopted.


Corresponding author: Ramon Miralbes, Department of Design and Manufacturing, University of Zaragoza, C/María de Luna, 3, Zaragoza 50009, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: “Ibercaja Foundation” Young Research Grant

Funding source: IberDoD HBCU/MI Basic Research Grant

Award Identifier / Grant number: JIUZ-2018-TEC-09

Funding source: University of Zaragoza

Funding source: ID-ERGO

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by the “Ibercaja Foundation” Young Research Grant, IberDoD HBCU/MI Basic Research Grant (grant no. JIUZ-2018-TEC-09), the University of Zaragoza (Spain) and the research group ID-ERGO.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (2014). Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics, ASTM D638 – 14:2014. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2016). Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions, ASTM C297/C297M – 16:2016. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2016). Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics, ASTM D1621 – 16:2016. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2017). Standard test method for tensile and tensile adhesion properties of rigid cellular plastics, ASTM D1623 – 17:2017. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2017). Standard test methods for flexible cellular materials — slab, bonded, and molded urethane foams, ASTM D3574 – 17:2017. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2019). Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by the V-notched beam method, ASTM D5379/D5379M – 19e1:2019. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2020). Standard test method for shear properties of sandwich core material, ASTM C273/C273M – 20:2020. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2020). Standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure, ASTM C393/C393M – 20:2020. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (2020). Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by V-notched rail shear method, ASTM D7078/D7078M – 20e1:2020. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.Search in Google Scholar

Andersson, A., Lundmark, S., Magnusson, A., and Maurer, F.H.J. (2009). Shear behavior of flexible polyurethane foams under uniaxial compression. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 111: 2290–2298, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.29244.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, M.R., Chalivendra, V.B., Alves, C., and Depina, E. (2017). Mechanical characterization of natural biodegradable sandwich materials. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 19: 482–496, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636215622143.Search in Google Scholar

Canakci, H., Alak, D., and Celik, F. (2016). Evaluation of shear strength properties of modified expanded polystyrene aggregate. Procedia Eng. 161: 606–610, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.708.Search in Google Scholar

Carlsson, L.A., Sendlein, L.S., and Merry, S.L. (1991). Characterization of face Sheet/core shear fracture of composite sandwich beams. J. Compos. Mater. 25: 101–116, https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839102500105.Search in Google Scholar

Castanié, B., Aminanda, Y., Bouvet, C., and Barrau, J.-J. (2008). Core crush criterion to determine the strength of sandwich composite structures subjected to compression after impact. Compos. Struct. 86: 243–250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.032.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, W., Hao, H., Hughes, D., Shi, Y., Cui, J., and Li, Z.-X. (2015). Static and dynamic mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene. Mater. Des. 69: 170–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.024.Search in Google Scholar

Crouvisier-Urion, K., Bellat, J.-P., Gougeon, R.D., and Karbowiak, T. (2018). Mechanical properties of agglomerated cork stoppers for sparkling wines: influence of adhesive and cork particle size. Compos. Struct. 203: 789–796, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.116.Search in Google Scholar

Díaz-Parralejo, A., Cuerda-Correa, E.M., Macías-García, A., Sánchez-González, J., and Díaz-Díez, M.Á. (2014). The excellent mechanical properties of cork: a novel approach through the analysis of contact stress. ISRN Mater. Sci. 2014: 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/898439.Search in Google Scholar

Doroudiani, S. and Kortschot, M.T. (2003). Polystyrene foams. III. Structure-tensile properties relationships. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 90: 1427–1434, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12806.Search in Google Scholar

Douville, M.-A. and Le Grognec, P. (2013). Exact analytical solutions for the local and global buckling of sandwich beam-columns under various loadings. Int. J. Solid Struct. 50: 2597–2609, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.04.013.Search in Google Scholar

Fernandes, F.A.O., Jardin, R.T., Pereira, A.B., and Alves de Sousa, R.J. (2015). Comparing the mechanical performance of synthetic and natural cellular materials. Mater. Des. 82: 335–341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, L.J., and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139878326Search in Google Scholar

Jardin, R.T., Fernandes, F.A.O., Pereira, A.B., and Alves de Sousa, R.J. (2015). Static and dynamic mechanical response of different cork agglomerates. Mater. Des. 68: 121–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.016.Search in Google Scholar

Ko, W.L. and Jackson, R.H. (1993). Compressive and shear buckling analysis of metal matrix composite sandwich panels under different thermal environments. Compos. Struct. 25: 227–239, https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(93)90169-Q.Search in Google Scholar

Lakreb, N., Bezzazi, B., and Pereira, H. (2015). Mechanical behavior of multilayered sandwich panels of wood veneer and a core of cork agglomerates. Mater. Des. 65: 627–636, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.059.Search in Google Scholar

Laura, P.A.A. and Rossit, C.A. (2001). The behavior of sandwich structures of isotropic and composite materials. Ocean Eng. 28: 1437–1438, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(01)00013-0.Search in Google Scholar

Le Duigou, A., Deux, J.-M., Davies, P., and Baley, C. (2011). PLLA/flax mat/balsa bio-sandwich manufacture and mechanical properties. Appl. Compos. Mater. 18: 421–438, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-010-9173-8.Search in Google Scholar

Ling, C., Ivens, J., Cardiff, P., and Gilchrist, M.D. (2018a). Deformation response of EPS foam under combined compression-shear loading. Part I: experimental design and quasi-static tests. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 144: 480–489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.014.Search in Google Scholar

Ling, C., Ivens, J., Cardiff, P., and Gilchrist, M.D. (2018b). Deformation response of EPS foam under combined compression-shear loading. Part II: high strain rate dynamic tests. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 145: 9–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.015.Search in Google Scholar

Najafi, M., Darvizeh, A., and Ansari, R. (2020). Characterization of moisture effects on novel agglomerated cork core sandwich composites with fiber metal laminate facesheets. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 22: 1709–1742, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218789613.Search in Google Scholar

Reis, L. and Silva, A. (2009). Mechanical behavior of sandwich structures using natural cork agglomerates as core materials. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 11: 487–500, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636209104523.Search in Google Scholar

Sadeghian, P., Hristozov, D., and Wroblewski, L. (2018). Experimental and analytical behavior of sandwich composite beams: comparison of natural and synthetic materials. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 20: 287–307, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636216649891.Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez-Saez, S., Barbero, E., Garcia-Castillo, S.K., Ivañez, I., and Cirne, J. (2015). Experimental response of agglomerated cork under multi-impact loads. Mater. Lett. 160: 327–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.08.012.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, S.P., Sabino, M.A., Fernandes, E.M., Correlo, V.M., Boesel, L.F., and Reis, R.L. (2005). Cork: properties, capabilities and applications. Int. Mater. Rev. 50: 345–365, https://doi.org/10.1179/174328005X41168.Search in Google Scholar

Triantafillou, T.C. and Gibson, L.J. (1987). Failure mode maps for foam core sandwich beams. Mater. Sci. Eng. 95: 37–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(87)90496-4.Search in Google Scholar

Wadsworth, D.J., Horrigan, D.P.W., Moltschaniwskyj, G., and Collins, I. (2009). Facesheet wrinkling of damaged honeycomb sandwich structures. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 11: 105–131, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636209103555.Search in Google Scholar

Zaini, E., Azaman, M., Jamali, M., and Ismail, K. (2020). Synthesis and characterization of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites as core for honeycomb core structure: a review. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 22: 525–550, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218758589.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2021-0004).


Received: 2021-01-08
Accepted: 2021-05-07
Published Online: 2021-06-04
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hf-2021-0004/html
Scroll to top button